Charles
LEAVELL
Vibrationless &
Soundless Tools ( VAST )
The
National
Exchange ( Vol. 1 , No. 1 ), pp. 11-12 ( 1976 )
VASTS
Means Vibrationless and Soundless Tools
by Tom Valentine
If any one thing symbolizes crass materialism heaping wanton
destruction of the environment, that one thing is a jackhammer
loudly bashing cement or stone, sending chips flying in clouds
of dust to proclaim, "This is the price of progress".
That raucus imagery may soon vanish from the American scene. No,
the vital tooll will not become extinct -- merely improved.
Charles Haynes leavell died last year at the age of 69, but his
life's work lives on and epitomizes the great American dream of
successful invention.
The genius of Charles Leavell brought forth a vibrationless and
soundless jackhammer that actually does a more efficient job
without wear and tear on the ooperator, other equipment or the
environment.
The Leavell principle, conceived in 1935, patented in 1966 and
finally made into a production model last year, opens tremendous
new vistas in pneumatic technology. it may even lead to
super-efficient engines.
The need for such improved equipment is obvious to people in the
industry. The new genus of jackhammers will provide the
following:
Energy conservation -- The VAST ( vibrationless and soundless
tools) jackhammers, rock breakers and drill stopers will deliver
more impact with far less energy consumption.
Durability, low maintenance -- Standard airhammer machinery
vibrates itself and all attached equipment so violently that
costly serrious maintenance problems arise almost immediately.
VAST equipment puts less stress on metals and moving parts.
Lower costs -- VAST equipment has half as many parts, thus
manufacture and assembly are far less expensive.
Evironmental consideration -- VAST equipment emits very little
sound in constrast with today's jackhammers which are
environmental villains of the first order.
It all started back in 1935 when mailman Charley leavell stopped
to watch some laborers wrestling with their jackhammers. His
fertile mind mused about a more humane way to break cement.
He thought he could find an easier way and began to ask
questions. "What you have in mind is against the laws of
science", he was told by an engineer.
Charley was the kind of guy that grew more interested if someone
said that something "couldn't be done". For the rest of his life
he developed a reputation as a quality, if not peculiar,
inventor who took on "improbable" assignments.
In 1941 he organized Mechanical Research Corporation and sold
stock in order to finance his ventures. During WW2 he worked
with Sir Hubert Wilkins on a highly secret project. They were
developing a huge undersea "tanker" submarine, which would sneak
supplies across the oceans. The war ended before the project was
comleted and Charley went back to jackhammers.
By 1955 he had mad a few rough models and was trying to approach
the various equipment manufacturers, but he was afraid of
disclosure without protection so serious talks were impossible.
In 1966 he obtained his first patents, then in 1874 his
"ultimate model" was finished and patented.
The VAST corporation was formed and today it is headed by Floyd
R. Anderson of Bella Vista AK. Anderson is an expert in
metallurgy adn formerly an executive with Gardner-Denver, a firm
that manufactures pneumatic equipment.
Hal Thompson of West Chicago IL is the corporate vice-president
and he supplied Exchange with comparison table showing the
advantages of the VAST jackhamer with a standard, heavy-duty
tool.
"Our tool is lighter by several pounds, but the weight of the
gad (point for breaking rock) is more than twice as heavy",
Thompson explained.
The VAST model D has 24 parts, the standard machines have 42 or
44 parts.
It takes 100 pounds of air pressure per square inch to drive the
standard airhammer. The VAST tool is propelled by exactly that
amount. It requires 84 cubic feet of air per minute to drive the
standard tools, but only 21 cubic feet per minute for the VAST.
One of the key differences is that Charley's system utilized
heat and didn't exhaust it with a loud bang. The air input
temperature in the VAST system is 210 degrees farenheit, while
standard equipment uses a cool 80 degrees.
It takes a 25 horsepower plant or motor to power standard
hammers; the model D can do more work at higher speed with a
little 5-hp compressor.
Engineering firms have worked diligently to make these
comparisons accurate and the projected fuel savings in one year
if 100,000 airhammers were converted to the VAST model would be
about 375 million barrels of fuel.
"Sound engineers measured the noise output of our system
compared to the standard system and the relative noise in
absolute terms shows that an unmuffled jackhammer would be
ranked 100; a muffled jackhammer would then rank at 17, which is
still loud. Ours ranks 3.13", Thompson said.
Exchange witnessed a demonstration where the receptionist,
wearing a white skirt, was asked to perform a task that
heretofore required strong men. She had no difficulty
breaking through a 16" slab of concrete.
"Normally a jackhammer takes about 50 pounds of push from the
operator, ours takes a maximum of 35 pounds", Thompson stressed.
The problems of exhaust freeze, exhaust fog, and excess dust
cannot occur with VAST equipment.
The vibrationless operation is based upon two key points in
Charley's system. Anderson explained it this way:
"There is a constant air pressure between the piston hammer and
the housing throughout the stroke; powering the down stroke of
the piston but resulting in no variable forces being imparted to
the tool or the operator holding the tool.
"The system then allows a variable air pressure, powering the
upstroke of the piston which works simultaneously on equal areas
of the lower face of the piston and the upper face of the
breaker point.
"Because of the equal areas, the forces are confined to the
hammer being urged in an upward direction thus preparing for
another downstroke and the breaker point being urged downward
against the rock or concrete.
"This concept utilizes all of the compression forces and
compression heat invested in the equipment."
What Charley Leavell did was design a system that works a
reversal of the standard compression cycle. He utilized the heat
factor and thereby eliminated the noisy exhaust.
The impact of the leavell principle on industry will be immense.
VAST engineers have already computed applications to all sorts
of industrial tools with variable levels of pneumatic energy and
frequency.
"We already have programmed the design for a 2000 foot pound
boulder breaker which delivers eight times the impact of our
model D, but weighs only one-fourth what a standard tool of the
same output would weigh", Thompson said.
With all of the advantages it has, one would think industry
would be climbing all over itself to put the VAST system into
production. Such is not the case.
Naturally the manufacturers of the standard pneumatic equipment
equipment don't want to put themselves out of business or
totally retool, so they are resisting the change.
"The industry has not been receptive, but we are negotiating
with several firms and Charley's system will be going to work
whether those already making tools join or not", Thompson added.
"Charley really did have a better idea", Thompson remarked. "Do
you know that with vibration problems solved it's possible to
develop an automobile engine that is 68.2% efficient rather than
the present 18 to 23 % efficiency?"
Charley Leavell's vibrationless technology is coming of age at a
time when the world seems to be shaking in its boots with energy
and pollution problems begging for solutions.
His tool offers all the advantages, does the work faster and
more efficently than the loud, violent equipment but conserves
energy adn considers the environment. Says something for the
strong, silent types, doesn't it?
USP #
4,290,489
Vibrationless Pneumatic Tools
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
1981-09-22
Abstract -- A pneumatic
system includes a pneumatic motor, which may take the form of a
vibrationless paving breaker utilizing a blow-striking member or
hammer that is propelled to and from its force-transmitting or
blow-striking position by a compressed gas. A valving
arrangement provides for relatively large-ratio expansion of the
compressed gas in the space under the hammer between its infeed
thereinto and its exhaustion therefrom, in order to
significantly utilize heat energy in the compressed gas to
assist in energizing the propulsion of the hammer. Such heat
energy is usually invested in the compressed gas by and during
substantially adiabatic compression thereof at a gas-volume
transformer, or compressor, included in the pneumatic system. It
may be noted that the process of substantially adiabatic
compression in the compressor is to a significant degree
reversely duplicated in energizing the propulsion of the hammer.
Current U.S. Class: 173/17 ; 173/133;
173/162.1; 173/204; 60/370; 60/412; 91/224; 91/234
Current International Class: B25D 9/14
(20060101); B25D 9/00 (20060101); F04B 39/12 (20060101); F04B
39/00 (20060101); F01L 21/02 (20060101); F01L 21/00 (20060101);
F01B 11/04 (20060101); F01B 11/00 (20060101); B25D 009/06 ()
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a pneumatic motor
actuationally utilizing the compressionally induced heat energy
of a gas substantially adiabatically compressed by a compressor
specialized so that compression of gas therein will approximate
ideal adiabatic compression, and more specifically, this
invention relates to such a motor and compressor combination
wherein the motor has the form of a percussive tool, which may
be a vibrationless paving breaker.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Over the preceding years, the present applicant has devoted much
time and effort and has made many important inventions, some of
which can be truly classified as "breakthrough" inventions,
relating to the production of vibrationless pneumatic tools,
such as paving breakers. (The term "vibrationless" as employed
herein refers to the complete elimination of both sensible and
theoretical casing vibration in a tool effectively utilizing a
blow-striking element therein.) A number of these inventions
have been patented, and reference may be made to the following
U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,400,650,
issued May 21, 1946; 2,679,826,
issued June 1, 1954; 2,730,073,
issued Jan. 10, 1956; 2,752,889,
issued July 3, 1956; 2,985,078,
issued May 23, 1961; 3,028,840,
issued Apr. 10, 1962; 3,028,841,
issued Apr. 10, 1962; 3,200,893,
issued Aug. 17, 1965; 3,214,155,
issued Oct. 26, 1965; 3,255,832,
issued June 14, 1966; 3,266,581,
issued Aug. 16, 1966; 3,291,425,
issued Dec. 13, 1966; and 3,295,614,
issued Jan. 3, 1967. Of particular interest is U.S. Pat. No. 3,200,893, in which an
exhaustive discussion of the principles involved in applicant's
production of vibrationless pneumatic tools is presented.
Apart from applicant's own efforts, as exemplified to some
degree by the patents identified above, the vibration referenced
emphasis in the field of pneumatic percussive tools has been
upon reduction of vibration, in contradiction to the complete
elimination of vibration sponsored by applicant in his basic
approach. Accordingly, while applicant's approach results in
completely vibrationless operation, the other prior art
approaches have, at best, merely reduced the degree of
practically occurrent vibration, which still remains at a very
undesirable high level.
In prior art percussive tools, both vibrating and vibrationless,
the actuating compressed gas (normally compressed air) is
delivered to and utilized in the tool at a temperature in the
vicinity of the ambient temperature. Therefore, there has been a
very costly loss of potentially available actuating energy, due
to the technologically traditional discarding of the heat energy
produced in and during compression of the gas, by design
deliberately directed to avoiding expansion of the compressed
gas in the tool, thus rendering the system inherently
inefficient.
As an informing quantitative illustration of this fact,
attention is directed to the long-existing extreme contrast
between the usefully transmitted mechanical-power results of
actuative investments, respectively, of 100 mechanical
horsepower, in an electrical generator for reclamation by and
after copper wire delivery to electric motors, and in an air
compressor for reclamation by and after conduit or hose delivery
to pneumatic motors, the electric-motor-reclaimed mechanical
power approximating 90 horsepower as against
pneumatic-motor-reclaimed mechanical-power values usually in,
and sometimes falling below, the range between 10 and 20
horsepower. An, because of the illustrative emphasis given
herein to pneumatic motors in the particular form of hand-held
pneumatic paving breakers, it is of interest to note that, in
prior art pneumatic mechanical-power transmission systems
consisting of compressor and hose components supplying
compressed air to motor components of this particular form, the
pneumatically transmitted mechanical power output resulting from
such a 100-horsepower input normally does not exceed this
astonishingly low 10-horsepower value, and not infrequently, in
cases of field work with old and worn compressor, hose, and tool
components, may decline to 8 or even to 6 horsepower.
It is not too much to say that this order-of-10 disparity
between the corresponding overall efficiencies of such electric
and pneumatic mechanical-power transmission systems, thus
respectively approximating 90% and 10%, is the principal reason
for the prior and contemporary failure of such pneumatic systems
(notwithstanding their great special advantages in completely
eliminating the fire and shock-hazard factors normally attending
the use of the electric systems, and also in affording motor
components that are uniquely superior in the respects of
work-output/weight, work-output/size, and work-output/cost
ratios) to generally replace such electric systems in the shop
and factory market therefor which, contemporaneously and on a
world sales basis, is approaching one-and-a-half billion dollars
per year.
As a variant and purely qualitative expression of this very
suggestive information, it is expected that the elimination of
this existing order-of-10 inferiority of pneumatic
mechanical-power transmission system efficiencies to electric
mechanical-power transmission system efficiencies resulting from
the practical equating of such pneumatic system efficiencies to
such electric system efficiencies by the breakthrough
achievements herein disclosed will result (inevitably, in view
of the great special advantages of such pneumatic over such
electric systems parenthetically recited in the preceding
paragraph) in the commencement of so great an enlargement of
world use of such pneumatic systems in shop and factory and in
various other and actually much more extensive spheres of
practical application therefor as to fully justify description
of such very great enlargement of pneumatic power transmission
use as constituting the innovation of a long overdue Pneumatic
Age.
The foregoing remarks relevant to the employment of compressors
to produce gaseous pressures for, and therefore adequate for,
the practically useful actuation of pneumatic motors,
illustratively and particularly in the form of pneumatic
percussive tools, yet more particularly represented by
vibrationless hand-held-pneumatic paving breakers, and
especially relevant to and emphasizing the very low overall
pneumatic efficiency of a typical system, made up of a
compressor, a practically useful form of pneumatic motor, and a
hose delivering actuating gas thereto at a pressure raised above
ambient value by the compressor component of the system, and
purposefully and successfully designed in accordance with the
traditional technical ideal of avoiding expansion of the
actuating gas in such motor component of the system, quite
strongly suggest the desirability, at this point in explaining
the background of the invention, of more particularly explaining
how this traditional but mistaken ideal, principally responsible
for delaying innovation of such Pneumatic Age throughout the
first century of the history of the compressor and pneumatic
tool industry, could ever have come to be adopted by it as its
ruling principle of thermodynamic design.
In this connection it will be readily understood that, because
early compressor types were heavy and only inconveniently
portable between different particular working sites on any
extensive project area, the use of relatively long hoses to
connect easily hand-portable pneumatic tools to such
inconveniently movable compressors, being the obvious
alternative to frequently undergoing the inconvenience of moving
the compressors, very early and widely became customary practice
in project areas where compressor, hose, and pneumatic tool
systems were being practically applied.
It was then found that the rate of heat transfer, through the
walls of such long hoses and between compressed air flowing
therein and ambient air, was generally sufficient to cause
delivery of such compressed air, to the tool to be actuated
thereby and regardless of its temperature of entrance into the
remote other end of the hose connected to the compressor, at a
temperature only unimportantly different from the temperature of
the casing and interior of the tool being maintained by contact
with ambient air approximately at ambient temperature. And under
these conditions it was readily determined that the horsepower
requirement for operating the compressor to deliver compressed
air to the tool at any chosen actuating pressure and thus
unavoidably at approximately ambient temperature, and at any
specific pounds-per-minute rate in order to obtain a desired
work-rate from the tool, could be significantly reduced by
purposeful design of the compressor to reduce the disparity
between the actual compression process and ideal isothermal
compression at the ambient temperature.
A corollary to the general acceptance of this objective of
design was a passive and continuing general acceptance of the
described condition of delivery of the actuating compressed air
to the tool at approximately ambient temperature, which in turn
imposed the still generally accepted prohibition on design that
it not permit substantial expansion of the actuating compressed
air in the tool which would so reduce the temperature of such
air in passing through the tool as to produce highly
objectionable degrees of refrigeration therein. In recent years,
one of the leading compressor and pneumatic tool manufacturers
published a list of 14 impairments of tool operation which such
refrigeration in the tool would usually or could sometimes
produce. As examples, a not very extreme degree of refrigeration
would result in liquefaction of the moisture content of the
compressed air into water streaking and breaking the oil film on
the internal cylinder surface of the tool, leading to rapid wear
and impaired hammer-piston seal on cylinder surface areas thus
deprived of effective oil lubrication, while more extreme
degrees of such refrigeration could destroy all lubricative
action, and therefore prevent free sliding hammer-piston motion,
by solidifying the oil film, and, under certain atmospheric
conditions, would stop operation of the tool entirely by
converting moisture content of the compressed air into an ice
plug completely blocking the exhaust port of the tool.
And this generally accepted prohibition against expansion, of
the compressed air in the tool, by preventing reclamation by it
of the major investment of mechanical energy in compressing air
to a smaller volume in the compressor (called the energy of
compression), limits the mechanical energy obtained by the tool
from compressed air passing through it to the minor investment
of mechanical energy made by the compressor piston (called the
pumping energy) in pumping compressed air out of the compressor
cylinder, without further reduction of the volume thereof, into
and against the compressed air pressure effective through the
receiver and/or hose.
In brief, then, the century-old commitment of the compressor and
pneumatic tool industry to not reclaiming the much larger energy
of compression in the tool, but instead actuatively employing in
it only the much lesser pumping energy, is the principal reason
for the continued survival of the hereinbefore specified,
astonishingly low, overall pneumatic mechanical-power
transmission efficiencies of the order of 10%.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention improves upon applicant's prior art
vibrationless pneumatic tools and obviates the inherent
inefficiency of all prior art pneumatic systems. Although the
preferred embodiment disclosed herein is that of a vibrationless
pneumatic paving breaker, it should be recognized that reference
to the paving breaker or specific features thereof will be
generally applicable to all vibrationless percussive tools
covered hereby, as well as frequently applying to the field of
pneumatic motors generally.
In the preferred embodiment disclosed herein, the vibrationless
pneumatic paving breaker has a generally cylindrical outer
casing with an annular cross-section. A central round bar or rod
is located in and coaxial with the casing, and a generally
cylindrical blow-striking member or hammer having an annular
cross-section is positioned for reciprocable motion along the
round rod within the casing. A generally annular shoulder is
located on the inner surface of the casing intermediate the ends
thereof. The hammer or blow-striking member slides along the
shoulder during its reciprocable motion. One end of the
blow-striking member or hammer is adapted to engage a work
member (tool bit or work bit). Adjacent the end of the hammer
that contacts the tool bit, there is located an annular
projecting portion that engages the inner surface of the casing
with a sliding fit. A compressed gas (usually air) actuating
chamber is formed in the space between the projecting portion
and the shoulder. An appropriate conduit is utilized to insert
compressed gas into the actuating chamber.
A cavity is formed in the end of the round rod adjacent the work
bit. The round rod and this cavity both extend into the work bit
itself. A portion of this cavity in the work bit, and in the
part of the rod adjacent the work bit, is enlarged to accept a
valve assembly, the mounting arrangement and spring bias for
which are located in the work bit. This enlarged portion of the
cavity has a control opening at the bottom of the hammer and a
vent opening in the work bit. The valve assembly interacts with
the control opening to regulate passage of actuating compressed
air to and venting (in order to exhaust the actuating gas) of
the space under the hammer. A compressed air passageway is
located at the other end of the cavity. This compressed air
passageway opens into an annular chamber formed in the hammer,
which is connected to the actuating chamber by another
passageway, for a short length of the hammer.
Inasmuch as the work bit is free to move with respect to the
casing, it is necessary to provide for holding the work bit in
conjunction with the casing. To achieve this, a restraining
device, such as somewhat resilient restraining arms engaging the
work bit and passing over the other end of the tool, may be
utilized.
By appropriate actuation of the valve assembly, a short burst or
pulse of compressed air at a temperature above ambient
temperature is inserted under the hammer where it expands to
drive the hammer away from the work bit. Appropriate regulation
of the duration of this burst of compressed air results in the
hammer being driven to the end of the casing away from the work
bit, at which point the momentum of the hammer is offset by the
pressure of the compressed gas in the actuating chamber. The
heat energy in the gas provides the energy of expansion. The
hammer is then driven toward the work bit by the compressed air
in the actuating chamber, while the valve assembly is
appropriately positioned to vent the space under the hammer to
atmosphere in order to exhaust the expanded air.
In this fashion, a vibrationless pneumatic tool is provided in
which the hammer acts against a constant force produced by the
compressed gas in the actuating chamber in transmitting an
external force against the casing, and in which actuation of the
hammer during the motion away from the work bit (return stroke
or up-stroke), may be easily and accurately controlled. In
addition to vibrationless operation, this tool also virtually
eliminates exhaust noise, since the exhaust is achieved at
ambient temperature and pressure. In view of the very small
number of parts required to construct this device, a
vibrationless pneumatic tool has been provided which not only
operates in an effective and easily controlled fashion, but
which is also very practical for manufacturing purposes.
The vibrationless pneumatic tool described above works very
efficiently by utilizing the heat developed during compression
of the gas to aid in driving the tool, as opposed to
conventional discarding of this heat energy. In other words, by
a substantially adiabatic compression of the gas from ambient
temperature and pressure, with a substantially adiabatic
expansion and cooling of the gas in the tool, effective
utilization of the heat energy is achieved. To achieve these
desired results, it is desirable to insulate the tool to permit
the desired adiabatic expansion. Of course, with such an
arrangement the work output of the tool is increased, and hence
even if an adiabatic compressor is not available, it may be
desirable to utilize a heated compressed gas, such as by
utilizing an after heater with a conventional compressor.
In order to achieve the desired adiabatic compression, a very
significant step forward in the art has been achieved by the
development of the adiabatic compressor disclosed herein. While
primary emphasis shall be placed upon the utilization of this
device as an adiabatic compressor, it should be recognized that
the device will work equally well as an adiabatic expansion
arrangement or pneumatic motor, and, therefore, it has been
termed an adiabatic gas-volume transformer. As a matter of fact,
it should be noted that the pneumatic tool itself serves as an
adiabatic expansion device or pneumatic motor, and hence is a
particularized form of the adiabatic gas-volume transformer.
In the preferred embodiment of the adiabatic gas-volume
transformer disclosed herein, which is shown in its utilization
as a compressor, a movable member or piston is mounted for
reciprocable motion in a casing. A first portion of the piston
is arranged to move in a gas mass confining area or energy
conversion chamber to vary the volume of the gas therein. In the
preferred embodiment disclosed herein, the energy conversion
chamber has a generally cylindrical shape with a hemispherical
end, which matches the shape of the casing, but, of course,
various other shapes could also be utilized. Heat migration or
heat loss preventing steps are required to prevent heat loss
from the energy conversion chamber during operation of the
gas-volume transformer. Any appropriate type of heat migration
preventing approach may be utilized, such as a very high speed
of operation, but in this preferred embodiment, the heat
migration preventing structure involves insulating material
placed about the first portion of the piston and in the casing
about the energy conversion chamber.
An appropriate valving arrangement is required to control the
flow of gas to and from the energy conversion chamber. In this
particular example, two valves are utilized, one of such valves
providing a conduit to the atmosphere, with the other valve
providing a conduit to a reservoir or tank of heated compressed
gas. Any appropriate type of control for these valves may be
utilized, such as a cam arrangement, but in the case of
compressor operation, appropriate biasing springs may be
utilized to yield the desired control.
A second portion of the piston is arranged to have a sliding fit
with the inner surface of the casing. This second portion is
integrally connected to the first portion, and to a piston drive
shaft which extends in the opposite direction from the first
portion of the piston. The second portion of the piston provides
support for the piston and contains piston or retaining rings
for carrying lubricant during operation of the transformer. In
order to reduce the friction losses as much as possible, it is
desirable to eliminate the side thrust experienced by the second
portion of the piston. To achieve this, an appropriate guide
structure, such as a spider arrangement, positions the piston
drive shaft. The piston is then reciprocated through mechanical
energy applied to the drive shaft, such as by a double-throw
crank arm arrangement. The guide or spider structure also
permits the first portion of the piston to move in the energy
conversion chamber without contacting the surface thereabout,
although being in very close proximity thereto.
By utilization of the structure disclosed herein, a very small
portion of the heated gas in the energy conversion chamber is in
the vicinity of the piston rings at the point of maximum
temperature in the transformer (i.e., when the piston has
decreased the gas containing volume of the energy conversion
chamber to its greatest extent). This permits cooling of the gas
in the vicinity of the piston rings without affecting the
temperature of the gas in the highest temperature or active area
of the energy conversion chamber. This is achieved by a suitable
cooling means, such as a water bath located in the casing, which
also cools the piston rings during the entire extent of their
motion. This is very important, as the very high temperatures
that may be reached in the energy conversion chamber can
otherwise vaporize the lubricant, such as oil, utilized in
connection with the second portion of the piston.
Therefore, a very efficient pneumatic tool system is provided.
As part of the system, an extremely efficient adiabatic
gas-volume transformer has been introduced, so that the hitherto
unapproachable dream of 100% efficiency from initial mechanical
energy input to ultimate mechanical energy output is
substantially realized.
These and other objects, advantages and features of this
invention will hereinafter appear, and for purposes of
illustration, but not of limitation, an exemplary embodiment of
the present invention is shown in the appended drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is an elevational
view of a pneumatic tool system constructed in accordance with
the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a left side
elevational view of the pneumatic tool of FIG. 2.
FIG. 3 is an exploded view
of the pneumatic tool of FIGS. 1 and 2, partially in elevation
and partially in cross-section.
FIGS. 4-13 are a series of
views of the pneumatic tool of FIGS. 1 and 2, partially in
elevation and partially in cross-section, illustrating the
sequence of operation of the pneumatic tool.
FIG. 14 is a view, partially
in elevation and partially in cross-section, of an adiabatic gas
transformer system constructed in accordance with the present
invention.
FIG. 15 is an enlarged
cross-sectional view of a portion of the transformer of FIG. 14
in its particular form of an adiabatic compressor.
FIG. 16 is another view of
the compressor of FIG. 15, partially in cross-section and
partially in elevation.
FIGS. 17-19 illustrate,
partially in cross-section and partially in elevation, the
adiabatic gas-volume transformer in the form of a pneumatic
tool.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to FIGS. 1-3, a vibrationless pneumatic tool
21 constructed in accordance with the present invention is
disclosed. While this invention is in no way limited thereto,
the preferred embodiment of the pneumatic tool 21 disclosed
herein is that of a paving breaker. Hence, the pneumatic tool 21
shall also be interchangeably referred to herein as a pneumatic
paving breaker or paving breaker 21.
Paving breaker 21 has an outer casing 23, to which are attached
handles 25 and 27. Casing 23 is any suitable strong material,
usually a metal and usually steel, while handles 25 and 27 also
require a strong material, again frequently steel. Handles 25
and 27 are securely affixed to casing 23 to support the weight
of the operator bearing thereupon during operation. Handles 25
and 27 may be located at any appropriate place on casing 23, but
the location shown in FIG. 1 is particularly useful for this
type of tool. As a result of the elimination of vibrations, and
the location of handles 25 and 27, the operator may lean his
chest upon the top of the paving breaker 21 to exert a greater
force on casing 23 with less effort than in conventional
devices, where the handles are located near the top of the
paving breaker. It should also be noted that handles 25 and 27
have ball-like protruberances 29 at the outermost ends thereof,
as this type of structure has been found to be more easily
grasped by an operator than conventional handles.
A central round rod 31 extends along the central axis of casing
23 and is coaxial therewith. Round rod 31 includes a heat
portion 33 that closes one end of the casing 23. The head
portion 33, and hence the round rod 31, may be integrally formed
with casing 23 or integrated therewith by any suitable method,
such as by welding in a fashion that does not distort the casing
23. The other end 35 of round rod 31 extends beyond the other
end of casing 23.
A cavity 37 is formed in round rod 31 and extends a
predetermined distance inwardly from end 35 of the rod. The
cavity 37 includes a relatively small diameter portion 39 and a
somewhat larger diameter portion 41.
A valve assembly 43 is located in the enlarged portion 41 of
cavity 37. Valve assembly 43 includes a valve body 45 with a
valve stem 47. A bias spring 49 is connected to a base 51
attached to valve stem 47. A screw member 53 mounts the valve
assembly 43 in portion 41 of cavity 37, with bias spring 49
extending over a leg 54 of member 53. Threads 55 on screw member
53 mate with corresponding threads 57 on end 35 of round rod 31.
Therefore, during assembly of the tool, the valve assembly 43
may be inserted into portion 41 of cavity 37 for mounting
therein by the screw member 53.
The valve body 45 is moved with respect to a series of control
or adjusting openings 59, which selectively supply an actuating
compressed gas to a blow-striking member, or hammer, 61 and vent
the space under the hammer 61. The control or actuating openings
59 are spaced about the circumference of the round rod 31 in any
desired number, although in this preferred embodiment a total of
four actuating openings 59 have been found suitable. The bottoms
of actuating openings 59 are aligned with the top of a work
member (also referred to herein as a work bit or tool bit) 63,
when the tool 21 is in the operative position illustrated in
FIGS. 5-13. The tool bit 63 has a neck 65 which is inserted into
casing 23.
The end 35 of round rod 31 extends into the work bit 63. Vent
openings 67, generally corresponding to the actuating openings
59, extend from portion 41 of cavity 37 to a chamber 69 formed
in work bit 63. Passageways 71 connect chamber 69 to ambient
conditions, normally atmospheric. Grooves 73 formed in a
shoulder 75 of work bit 63 provide top portions of passageways
71. Another vent opening 77 connects cavity 37 with chamber 69
to provide venting of the space about stem 35 of rod 31 during
the at-rest or standby position of FIG. 4, since the upward
movement of casing 23 results in vent openings 67 being blocked
off from chamber 69 by work bit 63.
In the standby condition, valve body 45 is biased to the top of
portion 41 of cavity 37 by the spring 49. A frusto-conical
portion 79 of valve body 45 mates with a shoulder 81 at the top
of portion 41 to limit the extent of movement of valve body 45
in that direction. In this position, the space between the top
of neck 65 of work bit 63 and the bottom of hammer 61 is vented
through openings 59, along valve stem 47 to openings 67, through
chamber 69 and passageways 71 to atmosphere. When compressed air
is inserted into portion 39 of cavity 37, through openings or
passageways 83, valve body 45 is moved against the force of
spring 49 to permit the compressed air to pass through openings
59 and under hammer 61 to drive the hammer 61 away from work bit
63. At the same time, the vent path previously described is
blocked. In this fashion, the valve body 45 selectively permits
compressed air to be inserted into the space under hammer 61, or
causes that space to be vented or exhausted to ambient or
atmosphere.
The hammer 61 is a generally cylindrical body with an annular
cross-section and is formed of a suitably hard material to
deliver blows to the work bit 63. An actual blow-delivering face
85 strikes a blow-receiving surface 87 on the top of neck 65 of
work bit 63. Blow-delivering face 85 is the outermost extension
of an enlarged portion 89 of the hammer 61. In order to increase
the surface exposed to compressed air at the time that face 85
bears against surface 87, radial grooves 91 may be formed in
face 85. In addition, a frusto-conical surface 93 is formed at
the inner bottom of portion 89 to provide a surface for the
compressed air to bear against at the time that face 85 and
surface 87 are in contact, as well as during the return or
up-stroke of hammer 61.
A chamber 95 in the hammer 61 is connected to compressed gas
through openings or passageways 97. Seven such openings or
passageways 97 have been found preferable, although any suitable
number may be utilized. The compressed gas inserted through
openings or passageways 97 comes from an actuating chamber 99
that is formed between enlarged portion 89 on hammer 61 and a
projecting shoulder 101 formed on the inner surface of casing
23. The outer surface 103 of hammer 61 is adapted to pass
through shoulder 101 with a tight sliding fit. Similarly, the
outer surface 105 of enlarged portion 89 of hammer 61 is adapted
to ride along the inner surface 107 of casing 23 with a tight
sliding fit. Thus, the variable volume actuating chamber 99 is
provided. Appropriate seals (not shown) may be utilized to
insure that there is no gas leakage from actuating chamber 99.
Compressed gas is passed to actuating chamber 99 from a suitable
source 109 thereof through a line 111 to an opening 113 in
casing 23. In this preferred embodiment, compressed gas is
provided to the tool 21 at temperature somewhat in excess of
200.degree. Fahrenheit, so that the gas may be expanded and the
heat energy in the compressed gas utilized to drive the hammer
61, and thus greatly increase the efficiency of the pneumatic
system. The heat energy in the compressed gas from source 109
may be developed by means of an adiabatic compressor of the type
disclosed hereinafter, or by any other suitable means, such as a
conventional approximately isothermal compressor with an
after-heater.
At the end of the hammer away from enlarged portion 89, there is
located an opening 115 that has frusto-conical portions 117 and
119 and a connecting cylindrical portion 121. When the hammer 61
approaches the head portion 33 at the top of casing 23, the
surface about cylindrical portion 121 engages a shoulder 123 on
round rod 31, while the surface of portion 117 approaches a
shoulder 125, also on round rod 31. The engagement between the
surface of cylindrical portion 121 and shoulder 123 is a tight
sliding fit, so that a gas-tight space is formed between the
surface of portion 117 and shoulder 125. This provides a gas or
air cushion that prevents the hammer 61 from stroking against
the casing 23 with a metal to metal contact.
The space 126 above the hammer 61 is vented to atmosphere at all
times by openings 127, so that no pressure is developed above
hammer 61, except for the gas cushion between the surface of
frusto-conical portion 117 and shoulder 125. Again, any
appropriate number of openings 127 may be utilized, but it has
been found that forty such openings provide the desired amount
of venting in this embodiment. Although these forty openings are
not specifically disclosed in FIGS. 1-3, schematic
representations thereof are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
The work bit 63 has the neck 65 thereof positioned in casing 23
for reciprocable motion therein. When casing 23 is urged toward
work bit 63, the shoulder 75 of the work bit 63 bears against a
resilient member 129 connected to the bottom of casing 23.
However, when work bit 63 is struck by the hammer 61, the work
bit 63 may be driven away from casing 23 so that shoulder 75 no
longer bears against resilient member 129. In some cases, the
separation could become great enough that the work bit would
become completely separated from the casing 23, thus causing
loss of operating ability with, perhaps, attendant damage to the
tool 21. Also, the work bit 63 would become separated from tool
21 during the standby or at-rest condition. Therefore, a
restraining device 131 is utilized to prevent work bit 63 from
separating too far from casing 23. Restraining member 131 has a
pair of somewhat resilient arms 130 and 132, each of which has a
hook-type end members 133, which fit in corresponding slots 135
in the tool bit 63. As tool bit 63 is driven away from casing 23
by the impact of a blow, or by cessation of the force exerted by
the operator on casing 23, the end members 133 engage the
surface 137 at the tops of slots 135 to limit the amount of
separation between the work bit and the casing.
In order to prevent rotation of the work bit 63 during
operation, the restraining member passes through a structure 139
on the casing 23, which holds the restraining member arms 130
and 132 from twisting. Structure 139 includes a pair of holding
members or ears 138 and 140 on opposite sides of casing 23.
A suitable fastening device, such as a bolt-like portion 141,
may be utilized to secure the restraining member to the top of
casing 23. Threaded portion 141 is integrally connected to the
restraining member 131. Threads 143 on the bolt-like portion 141
mate with corresponding threads 145 in head portion 33 of round
rod 31. To attach or disattach restraining member 131 from tool
21, arms 130 and 132 are spread to the position illustrated in
FIG. 3 and the whole member 131 is rotated. With the resilient
arms 130 and 132 released to return to the position of FIG. 1 or
FIG. 2, the restraining member 131 is locked on tool 21 and held
by ears 138 and 140 and the sides of grooves 135.
While the structure of the tool 21 disclosed herein could be
utilized with an actuating compressed gas at ambient
temperature, the operation of the tool is premised upon the
expansion of the gas under hammer 61, and thus heat would have
to be provided to prevent a refrigerating effect. The most
efficient way to accomplish this, which also tremendously
increases systems efficiency, is to utilize the heat energy
produced during compression of the gas. Accordingly, in the
preferred embodiment, the source of gas 109 would be a
substantially adiabatic compressor. The heated compressed gas
would then be conveyed to tool 21, such as by a short hose or
conduit 111. Hose 111 is preferably formed to prevent heat
migration or loss, such as by use of an inner gas conveying tube
147 and an outer tube 146. The air space therebetween will
provide the desired insulation. Of course, with such an
insulated hose 111, the length thereof can be increased to any
desired length.
One of the major difficulties with a heated actuating gas is
that the lubricant in the tool may be vaporized. In the
preferred embodiment disclosed in FIGS. 1-3, the gas is used at
a low enough temperature to preclude vaporization of the oil or
other lubricant. Also, the tool 21 may be operated without
insulation, but in a desirable form rubber insulation 149 may be
utilized. Such a rubber coating on casing 23 prevents heat loss
and also permits use of a thinner-walled casing 23, due to the
greater resiliency provided by rubber coating 149.
By reference now to FIGS. 4-13, the operation of the pneumatic
tool disclosed herein may be followed in detail. With reference
to FIG. 4, the tool is shown in the at-rest or standby position.
It may be seen that work bit, 63 is spaced from the casing 23 by
a gap 148, which is the maximum amount of separation permitted
by the restraining member 131. As shown, the hooked end portions
133 of the restraining member 131 engages the top surfaces 137
of grooves 135 to limit the separation of tool bit 63 from
resilient member 129 of casing 23. (For purposes of the views of
FIGS. 4-13, the restraining member 131 is only illustrated in
fragmentary detail.) At this point, the chamber 95 is below the
passageway 83, so that no compressed gas bears against valve
body 45. Hence, the spring 49 maintains the valve body 45 at the
maximum distance away from the work bit 63 (with section 79
abutting shoulder 81).
In FIG. 5, the tool 21 is put into an operative state by an
operator putting force against casing 23 to bring the resilient
member 129 into contact with tool bit 63. In this position, the
chamber 95 in the hammer 61 is aligned with passageway 83, so
that compressed air from the actuating chamber 99 is conveyed to
cavity 37 and forces valve body 45 to the position shown,
against the force of bias spring 49. In this position, the valve
body 45 blocks the openings 59 from the atmosphere and permits
the compressed gas to enter under hammer 61. The initial effect
on the hammer 61 during the return or up-stroke is aided by the
grooves 91 and the frusto-conical surface 93. The openings 127
serve, of course, to vent the space 126 above hammer 61 to
ambient or atmosphere at all times, so that there is no
compression of the air in that space to impede the hammer on its
return stroke, other than the small air cushion at the end of
the return stroke.
FIG. 6 depicts the hammer 61 as being propelled upwardly so that
chamber 95 is no longer in association with passageway 83. Thus,
no more compressed gas is being conveyed to the cavity 37. The
length of chamber 95 is carefully determined, and based upon the
speed of the hammer 61 on the return stroke, so that the pulse
or slug of compressed air applied to the relatively large
surface 85 at the bottom of hammer 61 supplies just enough
energy to carry the hammer to the end of return stroke position,
against the force exerted by the compressed gas in chamber 99
against a surface 150 of enlarged portion 89 of hammer 61. As
the chamber 95 has just separated from passageway 83, the valve
body 45 is still in the position of FIG. 5.
In FIG. 7, the hammer 61 is approaching the end of the return
stroke (top-of-stroke) position and is slowing down pursuant to
an imminent change in the direction of momentum. The valve body
45 has now moved to the position that it completely closes
openings 59, so that the only gas or air under hammer 61 is the
initial pulse of compressed gas that was inserted at the
beginning of the return stroke. This pulse of gas is expanding
to propel the hammer 61, with the heat energy in the compressed
gas providing the energy of expansion in order to permit the gas
to be exhausted at ambient temperature and pressure, which
eliminates exhaust noise, as well as providing a very efficient
operation.
The view of FIG. 8 illustrates the hammer 61 at the end of
return stroke, or top-of-stroke, position. The pulse of
compressed air that was inserted under the hammer has now
expanded and cooled to approximately the value of these
parameters for the ambient (or atmospheric) conditions. In the
event that the pulse of compressed air provided too much energy,
the gas cushion between the surface of the frusto-conical area
117 and the shoulder 125 will preclude any direct contact
between the hammer 61 and the casing 23. At this point the
spring 49 has urged valve body 45 slightly above the openings
59, so that the space under hammer 61 is now vented to ambient
or atmospheric conditions by the path through openings 59, along
valve stem 47, through openings 67 to chamber 69, and thence to
atmosphere through passageways 71. Therefore, as the hammer
begins its blow striking or downward stroke under the force
exerted by the compressed air in actuating chamber 99, there
will be no compression of the gas under the hammer, as this
space is vented to atmosphere for exhausting the expanded gas to
atmosphere. The blow striking or down stroke of hammer 61 will
exhaust the space below it, but as the gas in the space is
expanded and cooled to atmospheric conditions, the gas being
exhausted will already be at or near atmospheric conditions.
During the initial states of the blow-striking stroke, the valve
body 45 continues to be urged away from work bit 63 by spring
49, until it reaches the farthest extent of this motion as shown
in FIG. 9. At this point, the openings 59 are completely opened
to provide the venting of the space under hammer 61, as
previously described. From the position shown in FIG. 8 to that
shown in FIG. 10, the hammer 61 is propelled on the
blow-striking stroke by the compressed gas in actuating chamber
99 and, in the case of a paving breaker, by the force of
gravity. At the position of FIG. 10, the passageways 97 have
come into gas conveying position with respect to actuating
chamber 99, but chamber 95 has not just come into conjunction
with openings 83, so that valve body 45 remains at the extreme
position under the force of spring 49.
Continued movement to the position of FIG. 11 results in chamber
95 beginning to come into confluence with openings 83 to pass
compressed gas to cavity 37. However, the relationship shown has
just been reached, so that the pressure in cavity 37 has not yet
been raised sufficiently to displace valve body 45 against the
force of spring 49. By the time that the position of FIG. 12 has
been reached, which is the point at which the hammer 61 comes
into blow-striking contact with work bit 63, the chamber 95 has
been brought into conjunction with the openings 83 to drive the
valve body 45 against the force of spring 49. However, as the
conveying of compressed air to cavity 37, and hence against
valve body 45, has not caused openings 59 to be closed, these
openings still serve to vent the area under hammer 61 to prevent
any lessening of the energy conveyed from hammer 61 to work bit
63. A short time later, though, as illustrated in FIG. 13, the
compressed air in cavity 37 has resulted in the valve body 45
being moved to close openings 59 as a vent and to open them for
the insertion of actuating compressed air. Since hammer 61 has
struck work bit 63 and is ready to repeat the cycle of operation
just described, it may be seen that a constant force has been
maintained against hammer 61 by the compressed gas in actuating
chamber 99, which transmits the force from casing 23 when that
casing has a force applied to it that is sufficiently great to
maintain the resilient member 129 on casing 23 in contact with
work bit 63. An energizing propulsion is achieved by applying
the same constant pressure compressed gas to a larger surface on
the bottom of the hammer 61 and permitting it to expand to drive
the hammer against the constant force produced by the gas in
actuating chamber 99. Therefore, a vibrationless pneumatically
actuated tool is provided which is highly efficient and
desirably simple in operation and construction.
In the description of the pneumatic tool 21, it has been pointed
out that a greater work output can be achieved if heat energy in
the compressed gas is also utilized in driving the hammer. This
is particularly true when the operation of the pneumatic tool is
considered in conjunction with the operation of the system as a
whole, wherein the efficiency of the system is greatly decreased
as a result of discarding the heat of compression in the
attempted isothermal compression processes conventionally
utilized. Accordingly, a much more efficient system can be
realized if the heat of compression is conveyed to and utilized
in the pneumatic tool. To achieve this highly efficient
approach, applicant has produced a truly revolutionary adiabatic
compressor, the principles of which are equally applicable in a
reverse flow of energy, of which an adiabatic version of the
pneumatic tool disclosed herein is an example. Therefore, the
description of the adiabatic compressor disclosed herein is
generally applicable to the much broader concept of an adiabatic
gas-volume transformer (i.e., a device in which substantially
adiabatic energy transfer is achieved in either the form of a
compressor or a pneumatic motor).
With reference to FIGS. 14, 15 and 16, a preferred embodiment of
an adiabatic gas-volume transformer 201 may be seen. In FIGS. 15
and 16, the transformer 201 is depicted in its specialized use
as an adiabatic compressor, although the principles are equally
applicable to the generalized version of FIG. 14.
Adiabatic gas-volume transformer 201 has an outer casing or
shell 203. Casing 203 may be formed of any suitable material
having the requisite structural strength, such as steel. The
casing 203 has an annular cross-section, generally cylindrical
extending portion 205 and a generally hemispherical end portion
207 at one end thereof. It should be recognized that while the
preferred embodiment utilizes the shape described for the casing
203, this invention could also be practiced with casings having
modified, and even completely different, shapes.
An internal cavity 209 is formed in the casing 203. Cavity 209
has the same general configuration as the casing 203. A portion
211 of cavity 209 at the hemispherical end of the cavity
constitutes a gas mass containing space or energy conversion
chamber (which is the compression chamber in the specific
example of an adiabatic compressor). Energy conversion chamber
211 is encompassed by chamber insulating material 213.
Insulating material 213 may be any suitable type of insulation
that is capable of enduring the relatively high pressures and
temperatures to which it will be subjected in energy conversion
chamber 211. In this preferred embodiment, a ceramic type of
insulating material 213 has been utilized. Prevention of heat
migration or heat loss may also be achieved in any other
suitable fashion, such as by very rapid actuation of the
apparatus.
A movable element or piston 215 is located in cavity 209 and
arranged for longitudinal reciprocation therein. Piston 215 has
a first portion 217 insertable into the energy conversion
chamber 211, a second portion 219 from which the first portion
217 extends, and a piston shaft 221 extending from the other
side of portion 219. All of the portions of piston 215 are
integrally connected to form a unitary structure, which is
co-axial with casing 203.
Portion 217 of piston 215 is shaped to fit into the energy
conversion chamber 211 at the generally hemispherical end of
cavity 209. As a matter of fact, this portion 217 actually
defines the energy conversion chamber when it is at the bottom
of stroke position shown in FIG. 16. The energy conversion
chamber 211 may be defined as that portion of cavity 209 which
is between the hemispherical end of the cavity and the top of
portion 219 of piston 215, less the space displaced by portion
217 of the piston. This definition is made, of course, when the
piston 215 is at the bottom-of-stroke position (shown in FIG.
16). It may be seen that there is an additional space about the
circumference of part 217 between point 223 and portion 219 of
the piston, but as this space is very small and the gas therein
does not become an appreciable portion of the gas volume until
the top of stroke position is reached by piston 215, it could
easily be neglected when defining the energy conversion chamber
211. However, as the gas volume in this space becomes important
during the compression stroke at the top of stroke position, it
must be included as part of energy conversion chamber 211.
Portion 217 of piston 215 has a central core 225 of a high
strength material, such as steel. Core 225 of portion 217 of
piston 215 has a plug member 227 at the generally hemispherical
end thereof. Plug member 227 is provided with threads 229 to
engage corresponding threads in the body of core 225. The
purpose of plug 227 is to permit the removal of material from
the internal portion of core 225 to form an opening 231, which
extends into portion 219 as well. In this way, the piston can be
lightened without having to bore through the shaft 221, which
would tend to weaken that shaft. After the opening 231 has been
formed, plug member 227 is screwed back into the other portion
of core 225 to form an integral core for the portion 217.
Piston insulating material 233 is located about the outer
surface of core 225, to the same extent as the insulating
material 213, in order to prevent any heat loss from the energy
conversion chamber through piston 215. Insulating material 233
would be any appropriate type of insulation, such as a suitable
ceramic material. Insulation 233 may be more firmly affixed to
core 225 by the provision of projections 235, about which
insulating material 233 would be formed to provide a more secure
connection between this insulating material and core 225.
As may be seen, the external dimensions of portion 217 are made
slightly smaller than the dimensions of cavity 209, so that a
small gas volume will exist between piston portion 217 and the
internal wall of casing 203, even when piston 215 is at the top
of stroke position illustrated in FIG. 15. The spacing between
the external surface of piston portion 217 and the internal
surface of casing 203 is very small, on the order of a few
thousandths of an inch. This small spacing, combined with a
strict axial alignment of the piston as hereinafter described,
is sufficient to keep the insulating materials 213 and 233 from
bearing against each other, which could damage the insulating
qualities and cause insulating material to accumulate in the
energy conversion chamber as a result of abrasion.
Portion 219 of piston 215 is adapted to move in cavity 209 with
a tight sliding fit. Piston or sealing rings 237 are located
about the periphery of portion 219 to engage the inner surface
of casing 203 that forms the cavity 209. A suitable sealing and
lubricating medium or agent, such as oil, is in engagement
therewith to lubricate the sliding engagement between portion
219 of piston 215 and the inner surface of casing 203, as well
as sealing the energy conversion chamber 211 to prevent the
escape of gases therein. The sealing and lubricating medium
(oil) will be introduced into cavity 209 in any conventional
fashion and will be carried by piston ring 237. The pressure of
the gas in energy conversion chamber 211 will prevent the oil
from rising above the last piston ring 239.
Portions 217 and 219 of piston 215 would ordinarily be
integrally formed, although any suitable permanent connection of
these portions would be acceptable. Shaft 221 could also be
integrally formed with portion 219, but also may be connected in
any other fashion to provide a solid and permanent
interconnection.
Shaft 221 leads into a crank box 241, wherein mechanical energy
can either be transferred to piston 215 or extracted therefrom.
In this specific embodiment of a high efficiency adiabatic
compressor, an appropriate double-throw crank drive (not shown)
may be utilized to reciprocate the piston 215 upwardly to
compress the gas in the energy conversion or compression chamber
211. Energy is transferred from the double-throw crank drive by
linking rods 240 and 242, which are strong enough to permit high
speed operation, if desired. Rods 240 and 242 are connected to
shaft 221 through a linking member 244 by means of appropriate
bearings, such as needlepoint ball bearings. Member 244 is
attached to shaft 221 by any appropriate method, releasable
attachment such as a threaded interconnection being desirable
for assembly purposes.
In view of the close tolerances between portion 217 of piston
215 and the internal surface of the casing 203, it is necessary
that the piston be confined to an extremely accurate co-axial
motion between piston 215 and casing 203. Such an accurate
co-axial motion may be achieved by utilizing an appropriate
guide for the shaft 221, such as a spider structure 243
illustrated in FIG. 14. Spider 243 may be either a three or
four-legged spider, as desired. An internal ring 245 of spider
structure 243 provides a tight sliding fit with the shaft 221
and must be very accurately positioned to insure the co-axiality
of the motion of piston 215 with respect to casing 203.
A cooling jacket or bath 247 is located beyond the end of
insulating materials 215 and 233, and extends away from the
generally hemispherical end 207 of the casing.
The temperature at which the sealing and lubricating medium that
engages piston rings 237 will vaporize is often considerably
lower than the relatively high temperatures reached in the
energy conversion chamber 211. For example, it would be likely
that the lubricant (oil) would have a temperature of
vaporization in the vicinity of 400.degree. F., while the
temperature in the energy conversion chamber 211 (at full
compression or top-of-stroke) could go as high as 6,000.degree.
F. Of course, the temperatures in the energy conversion chamber
211 could go considerably higher than this, but as a practical
example, the 6,000.degree. clearly illustrates the problem. The
cooling jacket 247 maintains a relatively low temperature in the
vicinity of the piston rings 237, as well as for a portion of
the gas in the energy conversion chamber 211 when the piston 215
is at top-of-stroke, as shown in FIGS. 14 and 15. A very
important feature of this invention, which cannot be
overemphasized, is the arrangement by which the piston rings 237
have been displaced from the vicinity of the extremely high
temperatures reached in the energy conversion chamber 211, as
well as by the arrangement for cooling the gas volume in the
energy conversion chamber that is adjacent to the piston rings
237.
The cooling jacket or bath 237 may be either located about
casing 203, or set in the casing, as shown in this preferred
embodiment. This cooling jacket or bath will normally utilize
water as the coolant, although other liquid or gaseous cooling
mediums could be used equally well.
While this description has been on rather generalized terms that
relate to an adiabatic gas-volume transformer, reference has
been made to the specific preferred embodiment disclosed herein
of an adiabatic compressor. Thus, the particular spring-biased
valve assemblies 251 and 253 may be employed, rather than the
more generalized arrangement of FIG. 14, which would be a cam
arrangement although such a cam arrangement could also be
utilized for the specific embodiment of an adiabatic compressor.
In valve assembly 251, a compression spring 255 is connected to
a valve stem 257. The other end of valve stem 257 is connected
to a valve head 259, which is forced against a valve seat 261 by
compression spring 255. Valve stem 257 passes through a valve
body 263, which is attached to an appropriately threaded flange
265 of casing 203. A valve chamber 267 is formed between the
valve body 263 and the valve head 259. An opening 269 brings
valve chamber 267 into communication with the atmosphere. When
valve head 259 is lifted off valve seat 261, the space between
valve head 259 and valve seat 261, the valve chamber 267 and
opening 269 form a conduit from energy conversion chamber 211 to
the atmosphere.
The valve assembly 253 has a tension spring 271 attached to a
valve stem 273, which has a valve head 275 at the other end
thereof. Valve head 275 engages a valve seat 277 to seal the
energy conversion chamber 211 from a valve chamber 279. A line
281 leads from valve chamber 279 to a tank 280 in which gas at a
relatively high pressure and temperature is stores. Tank 280 is
preferably insulated, such as by a layer of insulation 282.
Although shown in spherical form, tank 280 could, of course,
have any appropriate shown shape. Also, the line or conduit 281
is also preferably insulated to prevent loss of heat energy.
When valve head 275 is separated from valve seat 277, the space
between valve head 275 and valve seat 277, valve chamber 279 and
line 281 provide a flow path between the energy conversion
chamber 211 and the gas storage tank 280. As in the case of
valve assembly 251, valve assembly 253 has a valve body 283
through which the valve stem 273 passes. Valve body 283 is
connected to an appropriate threaded flange 284 on casing 203.
In the cases of both compression spring 255 and tension spring
271, the spring is fastened to the respective valve body. In the
case of tension spring 271, the spring is connected to valve
body 283 by clamps 285, while in the case of compression spring
255, the spring is connected to valve body 263 by clamps 287.
At the bottom-of-stroke position illustrated in FIG. 16, valve
head 275 firmly engages valve seat 277. Valve head 259 is forced
against valve seat 261 by the relatively weak compression spring
255. Although valve head 259 has been separated from valve seat
261 by the vacuum produced in energy conversion chamber during
the down-stroke, the relatively weak compression spring 255
suffices to move valve head 259 to the position shown in FIG. 16
at the bottom of the stroke. This is because at the
bottom-of-stroke position the pressure in energy conversion
chamber 211 has reached atmospheric level, due to the blow path
through opening 269, valve chamber 267 and the space between
valve head 259 and valve seat 261. On the other hand, valve head
275 is held in the closed position against valve seat 277 by the
pressure of the gas in valve chamber 279 that passes through
line 281, as well as by the vacuum created in energy conversion
chamber 211 during the down-stroke.
As piston 215 is moved upwardly, the gas in energy conversion
chamber 211 is compressed so that the pressure and temperature
thereof increase. The increased pressure against valve head 259
keeps valve assembly 251 in the closed condition, so that energy
conversion chamber 211 is sealed from the atmosphere. Valve
assembly 253 remains in the closed position, as the force due to
the pressure of the gas in chamber 211 against the inner surface
of valve head 275 is not sufficiently great to overcome the
combined force due to the pressure of the gas in valve chamber
279 against the surface of valve head 275 in that chamber and
that of the tension spring 271.
As piston 215 reaches the top of stroke position illustrated in
FIG. 15, the pressure and temperature of the gas in energy
conversion chamber 211 reach the levels that are desired for the
gas that is to be transmitted through line 281. At this point
the high pressure of the gas in chamber 211 that bears against
the inner surface of valve head 275 is sufficiently great to
open the valve as shown, to permit the gas in energy conversion
chamber 211 to pass through line 281 to the storage tank. As
soon as the gas in energy conversion chamber 211 has been
transferred through line 281 to the storage tank 280, valve head
275 will be moved to the closed position against valve seat 277.
At this point, the system is ready for the down-stroke of piston
215. During the down-stroke, valve head 259 will be moved to the
open position away from valve seat 261, as previously explained.
At the same time, valve head 275 will be held firmly against
valve seat 277 by the pressure of the gas in valve chamber 279
and the force of spring 271, with the strength of the seal being
further enhanced by the vacuum formed in energy conversion or
compression chamber 211. Therefore, the gas having a relatively
high temperature and pressure in the storage tank connected to
line 281 will not be permitted to escape into the energy
conversion chamber 211. At the bottom-of-stroke position, the
valve head 259 will move to the closed position and the sequence
of operation previously described will be reinitiated.
As previously explained, one of the significant features of this
invention that makes the system operative is the procedures
taken for insuring that the lubricating and sealing medium (oil)
engaging piston rings 237 is not vaporized by the heat generated
during the compression of the gas. This is achieved by two
steps: (1) increasing the physical separation between the piston
rings 237 and the area where the gas reaches its highest
temperature (i.e., adjacent to the hemispherical portion of the
cavity 209); and (2) cooling the gas that is closest to the
piston rings 237. This latter step is achieved by making the
insulation 213 in the casing 203 and the insulation 233 on
portion 217 of piston 215 terminate at point A, while the gas
extends to point B. Thus, the gas in the volume of energy
conversion chamber 211 between points A and B is subjected to
the cooling influence of the cooling jacket 247, both through
casing 203 and piston portion 219. Assuming that the temperature
at point A is the same as the temperature in the hemispherical
portion of the energy conversion chamber 211, a temperature
gradient between points A and B must be achieved that will
reduce the temperature of the gas at point B so that it is below
the temperature of vaporization of the sealing and lubricating
medium. Due to the very thin film of gas that is in this volume,
the cooling effect of the water jacket 247 is more than
sufficient to provide the desired temperature gradient. It
should be noted that, as a practical matter, the temperature at
point A will probably be somewhat less than the maximum
temperature in the energy conversion chamber 211, but as the
indicated method of protecting the sealing and lubricating
medium from high temperatures suffices even in the worst case,
the fact that actual conditions might result in less of a
temperature gradient between points A and B enhances the
significance of this approach.
While the preferred embodiment disclosed herein is that of an
adiabatic compressor, it should be recognized that the adiabatic
gas-volume transformer may be equally well utilized to provide
mechanical power in the fashion of a pneumatic motor. In such an
arrangement, the gas at a relatively high pressure and
temperature would be inserted into the energy converting chamber
211 through the valve assembly 253 to drive the piston on the
down-stroke. During this down-stroke of the piston, the valve
assembly 251 would be in the closed position. On the return
stroke of the piston, which would be the up-stroke, valve
assembly 251 would be open, while the valve assembly 253 would
be closed. Obviously, the spring arrangements shown in FIGS. 15
and 16 would not be suitable for such a purpose, and a cam
control of the type shown in generalized form in FIG. 14, or
some other appropriate type of control, would have to be
utilized.
Another interesting and very important concept that is involved
in the dual nature of the adiabatic gas-volume transformer is
that by utilizing the transformer as a compressor to drive the
transformer utilized as a pneumatic motor, it is possible to
produce efficiencies in practice that are close enough to the
theoretical maximum efficiency of 100% to make such a pneumatic
power transmission system very desirable. In this regard, it
should be noted that the paving breaker tool described herein
may be regarded as a particularized form of the adiabatic
gas-volume transformer utilized as a pneumatic motor.
Accordingly, use of the adiabatic compressor disclosed herein
with the pneumatic paving breaker disclosed herein provides a
highly efficient pneumatic system, as well as the freedom from
vibration and other desirable characteristics of the paving
breaker tool previously set forth.
With reference now to FIGS. 17-19, a somewhat schematicized form
of a pneumatic tool is illustrated in which the use of the
adiabatic gas-volume transformer for transferral of energy in a
direction opposite to that involved in compression (i.e., as a
pneumatic motor) is disclosed. In the embodiment of FIGS. 1-13,
a relatively low temperature is utilized for the heated
compressed gas. As the temperature is below the vaporization
temperature of the lubricant, there is no necessity of isolating
the lubricant from the actuating gas. However, in the embodiment
of FIGS. 17-19, much higher temperatures are involved, so that
it is necessary to protect the lubricant.
The tool 301 of FIGS. 17-19 has an outer casing 303, of a
material such as aluminum, which constitutes a back-up tank.
Back-up tank 303 contains a gas at an elevated pressure, but
essentially ambient temperature. The utilization of such a
back-up tank to keep a constant pressure force applied is
disclosed in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,581--Cooley et al.
An inner casing 305, which is provided with an insulating layer
307, has a movable member or piston 309 therein. Piston 309 has
a part 311 thereof which serves as the blow-striking member or
hammer. The other portion 313 of piston 309 has piston or
sealing rings 315 which are adapted to contact the inner casing
305 with a sliding fit. Piston rings 315 convey a lubricant,
such as oil, which forms a film from the top of casing 305 to
the bottom of portion 313 of piston 309 at the position shown in
FIG. 17. The hammer 311 has a diameter somewhat less than that
of portion 313, and thus does not contact the casing 305.
The hammer 311 strikes against an anvil 317, which can either be
a portion of the work bit or a separate member driven to strike
the work bit. A first conduit 319 provides for the insertion of
heated compressed gas (air), while a second conduit 321 provides
for venting or exhausting the space between hammer 311 and anvil
317. Appropriate valve systems (not shown) would control the
opening and closing of these conduits. It should be noted that
the pressure of the gas inserted through conduit 319 is at a
greater pressure than the constant pressure of the gas applied
to the top surface of piston 309 from back-up tank 303, so that
the piston can be raised against the constant force.
For purposes of this discussion, it shall be assumed that the
compressed air inserted through conduit 319 has a pressure of
232 psia and a temperature of 542.degree. Fahrenheit. The
ambient air shall be assumed to be at 15 psia and 70.degree. F.
At the position shown in FIG. 17, a pulse of the compressed air
is inserted through conduit 319. This pulse will have a time
duration such that the energy contained therein has been
calculated to raise piston 309 to the position shown in FIG. 19,
during expansion thereof, against the constant force of the
compressed gas from back-up tank 303. As the heated compressed
gas is inserted into the casing 305, the temperature of hammer
311 will be raised to 150.degree.. Since the oil film only comes
to the bottom of portion 313 of the piston 309, it is not
exposed to the 542.degree. of the incoming compressed gas, but
only to a temperature of 155.degree..
As the gas expands and raised piston 309 to the position shown
in FIG. 18, the gas also cools. The decrease in temperature and
pressure is illustrated for the bottom of hammer 311 in FIG. 19.
In the position of FIG. 18, the bottom of hammer 311 is at the
level of the lowermost boundary of the oil film (i.e., at the
point of the bottom of portion 313 in FIG. 17). From the chart
in FIG. 19, it may be seen that the maximum temperature to which
the oil film would be exposed would be 294.degree. F., which
would be below the temperature of vaporization of the oil. At
all other points above this, the oil would be exposed to lesser
temperatures, so that no problem of vaporization would result.
Continued expansion and cooling of the pulse of gas that is
inserted through conduit 319 raises piston 309 to the position
shown in FIG. 19. At this point, conduit 321 is open to the
atmosphere to permit exhaustion of the space below the hammer
during its downward motion. Since the pulse of air is expanded
and cooled to ambient conditions, it will be exhausted at this
pressure and temperature level. Therefore, the reverse operation
of the adiabatic gas-volume transformer is readily recognized,
and it may be seen that all of the energy in the heated
compressed gas has been transferred to the piston 309, which is
now prepared to release that energy in delivering a blow to the
work bit under the constant force of the compressed gas from
back-up tank 303. Accordingly, a highly efficient adiabatic
system has been demonstrated in which the gas-volume transformer
can be utilized at both ends of the system. Of course, the
device illustrated in FIGS. 17-19 is rather schematic, but it
may be readily recognized that the principles disclosed therein
can be readily adapted to many areas.
It should be understood that various modifications, changes and
variations may be made in the arrangements, operations and
details of construction of the embodiment disclosed herein
without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
Patents
[ Download from
Espacenet Advanced Search :
http://ep.espacenet.com/advancedSearch?locale=en_EP ]
Vibration elimination
US3200893
1965-08-17
Excerpt from USP # 4,290,489 (
Vibrationless Pneumatic Tools, above ) -- Over the
preceding years, the present applicant has devoted much time and
effort and has made many important inventions, some of which can
be truly classified as "breakthrough" inventions, relating to
the production of vibrationless pneumatic tools, such as paving
breakers. (The term "vibrationless" as employed herein refers to
the complete elimination of both sensible and theoretical casing
vibration in a tool effectively utilizing a blow-striking
element therein.) A number of these inventions have been
patented, and reference may be made to the following U.S. Pat.
Nos. 2,400,650, issued
May 21, 1946; 2,679,826,
issued June 1, 1954; 2,730,073,
issued Jan. 10, 1956; 2,752,889,
issued July 3, 1956; 2,985,078,
issued May 23, 1961; 3,028,840,
issued Apr. 10, 1962; 3,028,841,
issued Apr. 10, 1962; 3,200,893,
issued Aug. 17, 1965; 3,214,155,
issued Oct. 26, 1965; 3,255,832,
issued June 14, 1966; 3,266,581,
issued Aug. 16, 1966; 3,291,425,
issued Dec. 13, 1966; and 3,295,614,
issued Jan. 3, 1967.
Of particular interest is U.S. Pat. No. 3,200,893, in which an
exhaustive discussion of the principles involved in applicant's
production of vibrationless pneumatic tools is presented...
Vibrationless percussive tools
US3295614
1967-01-03
Vibrationless power tool
US3266581
1966-08-16
Vibrationless percussive tool
US3255832
1966-06-14
Work member for a percussive tool
US3292976
1966-12-20
Pneumatic vibration eliminator
US3214155
1965-10-26
Pneumatic torque-transmitting
coupling for isolating angular vibration
US3136143
1964-06-09
System for eliminating vibration
US3291425
1966-12-13
Localized vibration elimination in
vibratory structural compositions
US2985078
1961-05-23
Percussion tool
US2752889
1956-07-03
Percussion tools
US2730073
1956-01-10
Vibrationless pneumatic
tools
US4290489
1981-09-22
Pneumatic tool
US2679826
1954-06-01
Vibration apparatus
US2400650
1946-05-21
Perfectionnement à l'amortissement des vibrations
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
BE616435
1962-07-31
VIBRATIONLESS POWER TOOL
Inventor: COOLEY GORDON A ;
LEAVELL CHARLES
CA841983
1970-05-19
ANTI-VIBRATION MEANS
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA794631
1968-09-17
WORK MEMBER FOR A PERCUSSIVE TOOL
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA779572
1968-03-05
PNEUMATIC TORQUE-TRANSMITTING
COUPLING FOR ISOLATING ANGULAR VIBRATION
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA750123
1967-01-10
VIBRATIONLESS PERCUSSIVE TOOL
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA708860
1965-05-04
COUNTERBALANCED VIBRATIONLESS
PERCUSSIVE TOOL
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA708859
1965-05-04
PNEUMATIC TOOL
CA530678
1956-09-25
Vibrationless Percussive Tool
GB1154593
1969-06-11
OUTILS PNEUMATIQUES DEPOURVUS DE
VIBRATIONS
JP51087102
1976-07-30
Dispositif de
transmission de couple arrêtant les vibrations angulaires
FR1524973
1968-05-17
Vibration elimination
FR1334347
1963-08-09