Charles LEAVELL
Vibrationless &
Soundless Tools ( VAST )
The
National
Exchange ( Vol. 1 , No. 1 ), pp. 11-12 ( 1976 )
VASTS Means Vibrationless and Soundless Tools
by Tom Valentine
If any one thing symbolizes crass materialism heaping wanton
destruction of the environment, that one thing is a jackhammer
loudly bashing cement or stone, sending chips flying in clouds of
dust to proclaim, "This is the price of progress".
That raucus imagery may soon vanish from the American scene. No,
the vital tooll will not become extinct -- merely improved.
Charles Haynes leavell died last year at the age of 69, but his
life's work lives on and epitomizes the great American dream of
successful invention.
The genius of Charles Leavell brought forth a vibrationless and
soundless jackhammer that actually does a more efficient job
without wear and tear on the ooperator, other equipment or the
environment.
The Leavell principle, conceived in 1935, patented in 1966 and
finally made into a production model last year, opens tremendous
new vistas in pneumatic technology. it may even lead to
super-efficient engines.
The need for such improved equipment is obvious to people in the
industry. The new genus of jackhammers will provide the following:
Energy conservation -- The VAST ( vibrationless and soundless
tools) jackhammers, rock breakers and drill stopers will deliver
more impact with far less energy consumption.
Durability, low maintenance -- Standard airhammer machinery
vibrates itself and all attached equipment so violently that
costly serrious maintenance problems arise almost immediately.
VAST equipment puts less stress on metals and moving parts.
Lower costs -- VAST equipment has half as many parts, thus
manufacture and assembly are far less expensive.
Evironmental consideration -- VAST equipment emits very little
sound in constrast with today's jackhammers which are
environmental villains of the first order.
It all started back in 1935 when mailman Charley leavell stopped
to watch some laborers wrestling with their jackhammers. His
fertile mind mused about a more humane way to break cement.
He thought he could find an easier way and began to ask questions.
"What you have in mind is against the laws of science", he was
told by an engineer.
Charley was the kind of guy that grew more interested if someone
said that something "couldn't be done". For the rest of his life
he developed a reputation as a quality, if not peculiar, inventor
who took on "improbable" assignments.
In 1941 he organized Mechanical Research Corporation and sold
stock in order to finance his ventures. During WW2 he worked with
Sir Hubert Wilkins on a highly secret project. They were
developing a huge undersea "tanker" submarine, which would sneak
supplies across the oceans. The war ended before the project was
comleted and Charley went back to jackhammers.
By 1955 he had mad a few rough models and was trying to approach
the various equipment manufacturers, but he was afraid of
disclosure without protection so serious talks were impossible.
In 1966 he obtained his first patents, then in 1874 his "ultimate
model" was finished and patented.
The VAST corporation was formed and today it is headed by Floyd R.
Anderson of Bella Vista AK. Anderson is an expert in metallurgy
adn formerly an executive with Gardner-Denver, a firm that
manufactures pneumatic equipment.
Hal Thompson of West Chicago IL is the corporate vice-president
and he supplied Exchange with comparison table showing the
advantages of the VAST jackhamer with a standard, heavy-duty tool.
"Our tool is lighter by several pounds, but the weight of the gad
(point for breaking rock) is more than twice as heavy", Thompson
explained.
The VAST model D has 24 parts, the standard machines have 42 or 44
parts.
It takes 100 pounds of air pressure per square inch to drive the
standard airhammer. The VAST tool is propelled by exactly that
amount. It requires 84 cubic feet of air per minute to drive the
standard tools, but only 21 cubic feet per minute for the VAST.
One of the key differences is that Charley's system utilized heat
and didn't exhaust it with a loud bang. The air input temperature
in the VAST system is 210 degrees farenheit, while standard
equipment uses a cool 80 degrees.
It takes a 25 horsepower plant or motor to power standard hammers;
the model D can do more work at higher speed with a little 5-hp
compressor.
Engineering firms have worked diligently to make these comparisons
accurate and the projected fuel savings in one year if 100,000
airhammers were converted to the VAST model would be about 375
million barrels of fuel.
"Sound engineers measured the noise output of our system compared
to the standard system and the relative noise in absolute terms
shows that an unmuffled jackhammer would be ranked 100; a muffled
jackhammer would then rank at 17, which is still loud. Ours ranks
3.13", Thompson said.
Exchange witnessed a demonstration where the receptionist, wearing
a white skirt, was asked to perform a task that heretofore
required strong men. She had no difficulty breaking through
a 16" slab of concrete.
"Normally a jackhammer takes about 50 pounds of push from the
operator, ours takes a maximum of 35 pounds", Thompson stressed.
The problems of exhaust freeze, exhaust fog, and excess dust
cannot occur with VAST equipment.
The vibrationless operation is based upon two key points in
Charley's system. Anderson explained it this way:
"There is a constant air pressure between the piston hammer and
the housing throughout the stroke; powering the down stroke of the
piston but resulting in no variable forces being imparted to the
tool or the operator holding the tool.
"The system then allows a variable air pressure, powering the
upstroke of the piston which works simultaneously on equal areas
of the lower face of the piston and the upper face of the breaker
point.
"Because of the equal areas, the forces are confined to the hammer
being urged in an upward direction thus preparing for another
downstroke and the breaker point being urged downward against the
rock or concrete.
"This concept utilizes all of the compression forces and
compression heat invested in the equipment."
What Charley Leavell did was design a system that works a reversal
of the standard compression cycle. He utilized the heat factor and
thereby eliminated the noisy exhaust.
The impact of the leavell principle on industry will be immense.
VAST engineers have already computed applications to all sorts of
industrial tools with variable levels of pneumatic energy and
frequency.
"We already have programmed the design for a 2000 foot pound
boulder breaker which delivers eight times the impact of our model
D, but weighs only one-fourth what a standard tool of the same
output would weigh", Thompson said.
With all of the advantages it has, one would think industry would
be climbing all over itself to put the VAST system into
production. Such is not the case.
Naturally the manufacturers of the standard pneumatic equipment
equipment don't want to put themselves out of business or totally
retool, so they are resisting the change.
"The industry has not been receptive, but we are negotiating with
several firms and Charley's system will be going to work whether
those already making tools join or not", Thompson added.
"Charley really did have a better idea", Thompson remarked. "Do
you know that with vibration problems solved it's possible to
develop an automobile engine that is 68.2% efficient rather than
the present 18 to 23 % efficiency?"
Charley Leavell's vibrationless technology is coming of age at a
time when the world seems to be shaking in its boots with energy
and pollution problems begging for solutions.
His tool offers all the advantages, does the work faster and more
efficently than the loud, violent equipment but conserves energy
adn considers the environment. Says something for the strong,
silent types, doesn't it?
USP # 4,290,489
Vibrationless Pneumatic
Tools
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
1981-09-22
Abstract -- A pneumatic
system includes a pneumatic motor, which may take the form of a
vibrationless paving breaker utilizing a blow-striking member or
hammer that is propelled to and from its force-transmitting or
blow-striking position by a compressed gas. A valving arrangement
provides for relatively large-ratio expansion of the compressed
gas in the space under the hammer between its infeed thereinto and
its exhaustion therefrom, in order to significantly utilize heat
energy in the compressed gas to assist in energizing the
propulsion of the hammer. Such heat energy is usually invested in
the compressed gas by and during substantially adiabatic
compression thereof at a gas-volume transformer, or compressor,
included in the pneumatic system. It may be noted that the process
of substantially adiabatic compression in the compressor is to a
significant degree reversely duplicated in energizing the
propulsion of the hammer.
Current U.S. Class: 173/17 ; 173/133;
173/162.1; 173/204; 60/370; 60/412; 91/224; 91/234
Current International Class: B25D 9/14
(20060101); B25D 9/00 (20060101); F04B 39/12 (20060101); F04B
39/00 (20060101); F01L 21/02 (20060101); F01L 21/00 (20060101);
F01B 11/04 (20060101); F01B 11/00 (20060101); B25D 009/06 ()
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a pneumatic motor
actuationally utilizing the compressionally induced heat energy of
a gas substantially adiabatically compressed by a compressor
specialized so that compression of gas therein will approximate
ideal adiabatic compression, and more specifically, this invention
relates to such a motor and compressor combination wherein the
motor has the form of a percussive tool, which may be a
vibrationless paving breaker.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Over the preceding years, the present applicant has devoted much
time and effort and has made many important inventions, some of
which can be truly classified as "breakthrough" inventions,
relating to the production of vibrationless pneumatic tools, such
as paving breakers. (The term "vibrationless" as employed herein
refers to the complete elimination of both sensible and
theoretical casing vibration in a tool effectively utilizing a
blow-striking element therein.) A number of these inventions have
been patented, and reference may be made to the following U.S.
Pat. Nos.
2,400,650,
issued May 21, 1946;
2,679,826,
issued June 1, 1954;
2,730,073,
issued Jan. 10, 1956;
2,752,889,
issued July 3, 1956;
2,985,078,
issued May 23, 1961;
3,028,840,
issued Apr. 10, 1962;
3,028,841,
issued Apr. 10, 1962;
3,200,893,
issued Aug. 17, 1965;
3,214,155,
issued Oct. 26, 1965;
3,255,832,
issued June 14, 1966;
3,266,581,
issued Aug. 16, 1966;
3,291,425,
issued Dec. 13, 1966; and
3,295,614,
issued Jan. 3, 1967. Of particular interest is U.S. Pat. No.
3,200,893, in which an
exhaustive discussion of the principles involved in applicant's
production of vibrationless pneumatic tools is presented.
Apart from applicant's own efforts, as exemplified to some degree
by the patents identified above, the vibration referenced emphasis
in the field of pneumatic percussive tools has been upon reduction
of vibration, in contradiction to the complete elimination of
vibration sponsored by applicant in his basic approach.
Accordingly, while applicant's approach results in completely
vibrationless operation, the other prior art approaches have, at
best, merely reduced the degree of practically occurrent
vibration, which still remains at a very undesirable high level.
In prior art percussive tools, both vibrating and vibrationless,
the actuating compressed gas (normally compressed air) is
delivered to and utilized in the tool at a temperature in the
vicinity of the ambient temperature. Therefore, there has been a
very costly loss of potentially available actuating energy, due to
the technologically traditional discarding of the heat energy
produced in and during compression of the gas, by design
deliberately directed to avoiding expansion of the compressed gas
in the tool, thus rendering the system inherently inefficient.
As an informing quantitative illustration of this fact, attention
is directed to the long-existing extreme contrast between the
usefully transmitted mechanical-power results of actuative
investments, respectively, of 100 mechanical horsepower, in an
electrical generator for reclamation by and after copper wire
delivery to electric motors, and in an air compressor for
reclamation by and after conduit or hose delivery to pneumatic
motors, the electric-motor-reclaimed mechanical power
approximating 90 horsepower as against pneumatic-motor-reclaimed
mechanical-power values usually in, and sometimes falling below,
the range between 10 and 20 horsepower. An, because of the
illustrative emphasis given herein to pneumatic motors in the
particular form of hand-held pneumatic paving breakers, it is of
interest to note that, in prior art pneumatic mechanical-power
transmission systems consisting of compressor and hose components
supplying compressed air to motor components of this particular
form, the pneumatically transmitted mechanical power output
resulting from such a 100-horsepower input normally does not
exceed this astonishingly low 10-horsepower value, and not
infrequently, in cases of field work with old and worn compressor,
hose, and tool components, may decline to 8 or even to 6
horsepower.
It is not too much to say that this order-of-10 disparity between
the corresponding overall efficiencies of such electric and
pneumatic mechanical-power transmission systems, thus respectively
approximating 90% and 10%, is the principal reason for the prior
and contemporary failure of such pneumatic systems
(notwithstanding their great special advantages in completely
eliminating the fire and shock-hazard factors normally attending
the use of the electric systems, and also in affording motor
components that are uniquely superior in the respects of
work-output/weight, work-output/size, and work-output/cost ratios)
to generally replace such electric systems in the shop and factory
market therefor which, contemporaneously and on a world sales
basis, is approaching one-and-a-half billion dollars per year.
As a variant and purely qualitative expression of this very
suggestive information, it is expected that the elimination of
this existing order-of-10 inferiority of pneumatic
mechanical-power transmission system efficiencies to electric
mechanical-power transmission system efficiencies resulting from
the practical equating of such pneumatic system efficiencies to
such electric system efficiencies by the breakthrough achievements
herein disclosed will result (inevitably, in view of the great
special advantages of such pneumatic over such electric systems
parenthetically recited in the preceding paragraph) in the
commencement of so great an enlargement of world use of such
pneumatic systems in shop and factory and in various other and
actually much more extensive spheres of practical application
therefor as to fully justify description of such very great
enlargement of pneumatic power transmission use as constituting
the innovation of a long overdue Pneumatic Age.
The foregoing remarks relevant to the employment of compressors to
produce gaseous pressures for, and therefore adequate for, the
practically useful actuation of pneumatic motors, illustratively
and particularly in the form of pneumatic percussive tools, yet
more particularly represented by vibrationless hand-held-pneumatic
paving breakers, and especially relevant to and emphasizing the
very low overall pneumatic efficiency of a typical system, made up
of a compressor, a practically useful form of pneumatic motor, and
a hose delivering actuating gas thereto at a pressure raised above
ambient value by the compressor component of the system, and
purposefully and successfully designed in accordance with the
traditional technical ideal of avoiding expansion of the actuating
gas in such motor component of the system, quite strongly suggest
the desirability, at this point in explaining the background of
the invention, of more particularly explaining how this
traditional but mistaken ideal, principally responsible for
delaying innovation of such Pneumatic Age throughout the first
century of the history of the compressor and pneumatic tool
industry, could ever have come to be adopted by it as its ruling
principle of thermodynamic design.
In this connection it will be readily understood that, because
early compressor types were heavy and only inconveniently portable
between different particular working sites on any extensive
project area, the use of relatively long hoses to connect easily
hand-portable pneumatic tools to such inconveniently movable
compressors, being the obvious alternative to frequently
undergoing the inconvenience of moving the compressors, very early
and widely became customary practice in project areas where
compressor, hose, and pneumatic tool systems were being
practically applied.
It was then found that the rate of heat transfer, through the
walls of such long hoses and between compressed air flowing
therein and ambient air, was generally sufficient to cause
delivery of such compressed air, to the tool to be actuated
thereby and regardless of its temperature of entrance into the
remote other end of the hose connected to the compressor, at a
temperature only unimportantly different from the temperature of
the casing and interior of the tool being maintained by contact
with ambient air approximately at ambient temperature. And under
these conditions it was readily determined that the horsepower
requirement for operating the compressor to deliver compressed air
to the tool at any chosen actuating pressure and thus unavoidably
at approximately ambient temperature, and at any specific
pounds-per-minute rate in order to obtain a desired work-rate from
the tool, could be significantly reduced by purposeful design of
the compressor to reduce the disparity between the actual
compression process and ideal isothermal compression at the
ambient temperature.
A corollary to the general acceptance of this objective of design
was a passive and continuing general acceptance of the described
condition of delivery of the actuating compressed air to the tool
at approximately ambient temperature, which in turn imposed the
still generally accepted prohibition on design that it not permit
substantial expansion of the actuating compressed air in the tool
which would so reduce the temperature of such air in passing
through the tool as to produce highly objectionable degrees of
refrigeration therein. In recent years, one of the leading
compressor and pneumatic tool manufacturers published a list of 14
impairments of tool operation which such refrigeration in the tool
would usually or could sometimes produce. As examples, a not very
extreme degree of refrigeration would result in liquefaction of
the moisture content of the compressed air into water streaking
and breaking the oil film on the internal cylinder surface of the
tool, leading to rapid wear and impaired hammer-piston seal on
cylinder surface areas thus deprived of effective oil lubrication,
while more extreme degrees of such refrigeration could destroy all
lubricative action, and therefore prevent free sliding
hammer-piston motion, by solidifying the oil film, and, under
certain atmospheric conditions, would stop operation of the tool
entirely by converting moisture content of the compressed air into
an ice plug completely blocking the exhaust port of the tool.
And this generally accepted prohibition against expansion, of the
compressed air in the tool, by preventing reclamation by it of the
major investment of mechanical energy in compressing air to a
smaller volume in the compressor (called the energy of
compression), limits the mechanical energy obtained by the tool
from compressed air passing through it to the minor investment of
mechanical energy made by the compressor piston (called the
pumping energy) in pumping compressed air out of the compressor
cylinder, without further reduction of the volume thereof, into
and against the compressed air pressure effective through the
receiver and/or hose.
In brief, then, the century-old commitment of the compressor and
pneumatic tool industry to not reclaiming the much larger energy
of compression in the tool, but instead actuatively employing in
it only the much lesser pumping energy, is the principal reason
for the continued survival of the hereinbefore specified,
astonishingly low, overall pneumatic mechanical-power transmission
efficiencies of the order of 10%.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention improves upon applicant's prior art
vibrationless pneumatic tools and obviates the inherent
inefficiency of all prior art pneumatic systems. Although the
preferred embodiment disclosed herein is that of a vibrationless
pneumatic paving breaker, it should be recognized that reference
to the paving breaker or specific features thereof will be
generally applicable to all vibrationless percussive tools covered
hereby, as well as frequently applying to the field of pneumatic
motors generally.
In the preferred embodiment disclosed herein, the vibrationless
pneumatic paving breaker has a generally cylindrical outer casing
with an annular cross-section. A central round bar or rod is
located in and coaxial with the casing, and a generally
cylindrical blow-striking member or hammer having an annular
cross-section is positioned for reciprocable motion along the
round rod within the casing. A generally annular shoulder is
located on the inner surface of the casing intermediate the ends
thereof. The hammer or blow-striking member slides along the
shoulder during its reciprocable motion. One end of the
blow-striking member or hammer is adapted to engage a work member
(tool bit or work bit). Adjacent the end of the hammer that
contacts the tool bit, there is located an annular projecting
portion that engages the inner surface of the casing with a
sliding fit. A compressed gas (usually air) actuating chamber is
formed in the space between the projecting portion and the
shoulder. An appropriate conduit is utilized to insert compressed
gas into the actuating chamber.
A cavity is formed in the end of the round rod adjacent the work
bit. The round rod and this cavity both extend into the work bit
itself. A portion of this cavity in the work bit, and in the part
of the rod adjacent the work bit, is enlarged to accept a valve
assembly, the mounting arrangement and spring bias for which are
located in the work bit. This enlarged portion of the cavity has a
control opening at the bottom of the hammer and a vent opening in
the work bit. The valve assembly interacts with the control
opening to regulate passage of actuating compressed air to and
venting (in order to exhaust the actuating gas) of the space under
the hammer. A compressed air passageway is located at the other
end of the cavity. This compressed air passageway opens into an
annular chamber formed in the hammer, which is connected to the
actuating chamber by another passageway, for a short length of the
hammer.
Inasmuch as the work bit is free to move with respect to the
casing, it is necessary to provide for holding the work bit in
conjunction with the casing. To achieve this, a restraining
device, such as somewhat resilient restraining arms engaging the
work bit and passing over the other end of the tool, may be
utilized.
By appropriate actuation of the valve assembly, a short burst or
pulse of compressed air at a temperature above ambient temperature
is inserted under the hammer where it expands to drive the hammer
away from the work bit. Appropriate regulation of the duration of
this burst of compressed air results in the hammer being driven to
the end of the casing away from the work bit, at which point the
momentum of the hammer is offset by the pressure of the compressed
gas in the actuating chamber. The heat energy in the gas provides
the energy of expansion. The hammer is then driven toward the work
bit by the compressed air in the actuating chamber, while the
valve assembly is appropriately positioned to vent the space under
the hammer to atmosphere in order to exhaust the expanded air.
In this fashion, a vibrationless pneumatic tool is provided in
which the hammer acts against a constant force produced by the
compressed gas in the actuating chamber in transmitting an
external force against the casing, and in which actuation of the
hammer during the motion away from the work bit (return stroke or
up-stroke), may be easily and accurately controlled. In addition
to vibrationless operation, this tool also virtually eliminates
exhaust noise, since the exhaust is achieved at ambient
temperature and pressure. In view of the very small number of
parts required to construct this device, a vibrationless pneumatic
tool has been provided which not only operates in an effective and
easily controlled fashion, but which is also very practical for
manufacturing purposes.
The vibrationless pneumatic tool described above works very
efficiently by utilizing the heat developed during compression of
the gas to aid in driving the tool, as opposed to conventional
discarding of this heat energy. In other words, by a substantially
adiabatic compression of the gas from ambient temperature and
pressure, with a substantially adiabatic expansion and cooling of
the gas in the tool, effective utilization of the heat energy is
achieved. To achieve these desired results, it is desirable to
insulate the tool to permit the desired adiabatic expansion. Of
course, with such an arrangement the work output of the tool is
increased, and hence even if an adiabatic compressor is not
available, it may be desirable to utilize a heated compressed gas,
such as by utilizing an after heater with a conventional
compressor.
In order to achieve the desired adiabatic compression, a very
significant step forward in the art has been achieved by the
development of the adiabatic compressor disclosed herein. While
primary emphasis shall be placed upon the utilization of this
device as an adiabatic compressor, it should be recognized that
the device will work equally well as an adiabatic expansion
arrangement or pneumatic motor, and, therefore, it has been termed
an adiabatic gas-volume transformer. As a matter of fact, it
should be noted that the pneumatic tool itself serves as an
adiabatic expansion device or pneumatic motor, and hence is a
particularized form of the adiabatic gas-volume transformer.
In the preferred embodiment of the adiabatic gas-volume
transformer disclosed herein, which is shown in its utilization as
a compressor, a movable member or piston is mounted for
reciprocable motion in a casing. A first portion of the piston is
arranged to move in a gas mass confining area or energy conversion
chamber to vary the volume of the gas therein. In the preferred
embodiment disclosed herein, the energy conversion chamber has a
generally cylindrical shape with a hemispherical end, which
matches the shape of the casing, but, of course, various other
shapes could also be utilized. Heat migration or heat loss
preventing steps are required to prevent heat loss from the energy
conversion chamber during operation of the gas-volume transformer.
Any appropriate type of heat migration preventing approach may be
utilized, such as a very high speed of operation, but in this
preferred embodiment, the heat migration preventing structure
involves insulating material placed about the first portion of the
piston and in the casing about the energy conversion chamber.
An appropriate valving arrangement is required to control the flow
of gas to and from the energy conversion chamber. In this
particular example, two valves are utilized, one of such valves
providing a conduit to the atmosphere, with the other valve
providing a conduit to a reservoir or tank of heated compressed
gas. Any appropriate type of control for these valves may be
utilized, such as a cam arrangement, but in the case of compressor
operation, appropriate biasing springs may be utilized to yield
the desired control.
A second portion of the piston is arranged to have a sliding fit
with the inner surface of the casing. This second portion is
integrally connected to the first portion, and to a piston drive
shaft which extends in the opposite direction from the first
portion of the piston. The second portion of the piston provides
support for the piston and contains piston or retaining rings for
carrying lubricant during operation of the transformer. In order
to reduce the friction losses as much as possible, it is desirable
to eliminate the side thrust experienced by the second portion of
the piston. To achieve this, an appropriate guide structure, such
as a spider arrangement, positions the piston drive shaft. The
piston is then reciprocated through mechanical energy applied to
the drive shaft, such as by a double-throw crank arm arrangement.
The guide or spider structure also permits the first portion of
the piston to move in the energy conversion chamber without
contacting the surface thereabout, although being in very close
proximity thereto.
By utilization of the structure disclosed herein, a very small
portion of the heated gas in the energy conversion chamber is in
the vicinity of the piston rings at the point of maximum
temperature in the transformer (i.e., when the piston has
decreased the gas containing volume of the energy conversion
chamber to its greatest extent). This permits cooling of the gas
in the vicinity of the piston rings without affecting the
temperature of the gas in the highest temperature or active area
of the energy conversion chamber. This is achieved by a suitable
cooling means, such as a water bath located in the casing, which
also cools the piston rings during the entire extent of their
motion. This is very important, as the very high temperatures that
may be reached in the energy conversion chamber can otherwise
vaporize the lubricant, such as oil, utilized in connection with
the second portion of the piston.
Therefore, a very efficient pneumatic tool system is provided. As
part of the system, an extremely efficient adiabatic gas-volume
transformer has been introduced, so that the hitherto
unapproachable dream of 100% efficiency from initial mechanical
energy input to ultimate mechanical energy output is substantially
realized.
These and other objects, advantages and features of this invention
will hereinafter appear, and for purposes of illustration, but not
of limitation, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is
shown in the appended drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is an elevational
view of a pneumatic tool system constructed in accordance with the
present invention.
FIG. 2 is a left side
elevational view of the pneumatic tool of FIG. 2.
FIG. 3 is an exploded view
of the pneumatic tool of FIGS. 1 and 2, partially in elevation and
partially in cross-section.
FIGS. 4-13 are a series of
views of the pneumatic tool of FIGS. 1 and 2, partially in
elevation and partially in cross-section, illustrating the
sequence of operation of the pneumatic tool.
FIG. 14 is a view,
partially in elevation and partially in cross-section, of an
adiabatic gas transformer system constructed in accordance with
the present invention.
FIG. 15 is an enlarged
cross-sectional view of a portion of the transformer of FIG. 14 in
its particular form of an adiabatic compressor.
FIG. 16 is another view of
the compressor of FIG. 15, partially in cross-section and
partially in elevation.
FIGS. 17-19 illustrate,
partially in cross-section and partially in elevation, the
adiabatic gas-volume transformer in the form of a pneumatic tool.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to FIGS. 1-3, a vibrationless pneumatic tool 21
constructed in accordance with the present invention is disclosed.
While this invention is in no way limited thereto, the preferred
embodiment of the pneumatic tool 21 disclosed herein is that of a
paving breaker. Hence, the pneumatic tool 21 shall also be
interchangeably referred to herein as a pneumatic paving breaker
or paving breaker 21.
Paving breaker 21 has an outer casing 23, to which are attached
handles 25 and 27. Casing 23 is any suitable strong material,
usually a metal and usually steel, while handles 25 and 27 also
require a strong material, again frequently steel. Handles 25 and
27 are securely affixed to casing 23 to support the weight of the
operator bearing thereupon during operation. Handles 25 and 27 may
be located at any appropriate place on casing 23, but the location
shown in FIG. 1 is particularly useful for this type of tool. As a
result of the elimination of vibrations, and the location of
handles 25 and 27, the operator may lean his chest upon the top of
the paving breaker 21 to exert a greater force on casing 23 with
less effort than in conventional devices, where the handles are
located near the top of the paving breaker. It should also be
noted that handles 25 and 27 have ball-like protruberances 29 at
the outermost ends thereof, as this type of structure has been
found to be more easily grasped by an operator than conventional
handles.
A central round rod 31 extends along the central axis of casing 23
and is coaxial therewith. Round rod 31 includes a heat portion 33
that closes one end of the casing 23. The head portion 33, and
hence the round rod 31, may be integrally formed with casing 23 or
integrated therewith by any suitable method, such as by welding in
a fashion that does not distort the casing 23. The other end 35 of
round rod 31 extends beyond the other end of casing 23.
A cavity 37 is formed in round rod 31 and extends a predetermined
distance inwardly from end 35 of the rod. The cavity 37 includes a
relatively small diameter portion 39 and a somewhat larger
diameter portion 41.
A valve assembly 43 is located in the enlarged portion 41 of
cavity 37. Valve assembly 43 includes a valve body 45 with a valve
stem 47. A bias spring 49 is connected to a base 51 attached to
valve stem 47. A screw member 53 mounts the valve assembly 43 in
portion 41 of cavity 37, with bias spring 49 extending over a leg
54 of member 53. Threads 55 on screw member 53 mate with
corresponding threads 57 on end 35 of round rod 31. Therefore,
during assembly of the tool, the valve assembly 43 may be inserted
into portion 41 of cavity 37 for mounting therein by the screw
member 53.
The valve body 45 is moved with respect to a series of control or
adjusting openings 59, which selectively supply an actuating
compressed gas to a blow-striking member, or hammer, 61 and vent
the space under the hammer 61. The control or actuating openings
59 are spaced about the circumference of the round rod 31 in any
desired number, although in this preferred embodiment a total of
four actuating openings 59 have been found suitable. The bottoms
of actuating openings 59 are aligned with the top of a work member
(also referred to herein as a work bit or tool bit) 63, when the
tool 21 is in the operative position illustrated in FIGS. 5-13.
The tool bit 63 has a neck 65 which is inserted into casing 23.
The end 35 of round rod 31 extends into the work bit 63. Vent
openings 67, generally corresponding to the actuating openings 59,
extend from portion 41 of cavity 37 to a chamber 69 formed in work
bit 63. Passageways 71 connect chamber 69 to ambient conditions,
normally atmospheric. Grooves 73 formed in a shoulder 75 of work
bit 63 provide top portions of passageways 71. Another vent
opening 77 connects cavity 37 with chamber 69 to provide venting
of the space about stem 35 of rod 31 during the at-rest or standby
position of FIG. 4, since the upward movement of casing 23 results
in vent openings 67 being blocked off from chamber 69 by work bit
63.
In the standby condition, valve body 45 is biased to the top of
portion 41 of cavity 37 by the spring 49. A frusto-conical portion
79 of valve body 45 mates with a shoulder 81 at the top of portion
41 to limit the extent of movement of valve body 45 in that
direction. In this position, the space between the top of neck 65
of work bit 63 and the bottom of hammer 61 is vented through
openings 59, along valve stem 47 to openings 67, through chamber
69 and passageways 71 to atmosphere. When compressed air is
inserted into portion 39 of cavity 37, through openings or
passageways 83, valve body 45 is moved against the force of spring
49 to permit the compressed air to pass through openings 59 and
under hammer 61 to drive the hammer 61 away from work bit 63. At
the same time, the vent path previously described is blocked. In
this fashion, the valve body 45 selectively permits compressed air
to be inserted into the space under hammer 61, or causes that
space to be vented or exhausted to ambient or atmosphere.
The hammer 61 is a generally cylindrical body with an annular
cross-section and is formed of a suitably hard material to deliver
blows to the work bit 63. An actual blow-delivering face 85
strikes a blow-receiving surface 87 on the top of neck 65 of work
bit 63. Blow-delivering face 85 is the outermost extension of an
enlarged portion 89 of the hammer 61. In order to increase the
surface exposed to compressed air at the time that face 85 bears
against surface 87, radial grooves 91 may be formed in face 85. In
addition, a frusto-conical surface 93 is formed at the inner
bottom of portion 89 to provide a surface for the compressed air
to bear against at the time that face 85 and surface 87 are in
contact, as well as during the return or up-stroke of hammer 61.
A chamber 95 in the hammer 61 is connected to compressed gas
through openings or passageways 97. Seven such openings or
passageways 97 have been found preferable, although any suitable
number may be utilized. The compressed gas inserted through
openings or passageways 97 comes from an actuating chamber 99 that
is formed between enlarged portion 89 on hammer 61 and a
projecting shoulder 101 formed on the inner surface of casing 23.
The outer surface 103 of hammer 61 is adapted to pass through
shoulder 101 with a tight sliding fit. Similarly, the outer
surface 105 of enlarged portion 89 of hammer 61 is adapted to ride
along the inner surface 107 of casing 23 with a tight sliding fit.
Thus, the variable volume actuating chamber 99 is provided.
Appropriate seals (not shown) may be utilized to insure that there
is no gas leakage from actuating chamber 99. Compressed gas is
passed to actuating chamber 99 from a suitable source 109 thereof
through a line 111 to an opening 113 in casing 23. In this
preferred embodiment, compressed gas is provided to the tool 21 at
temperature somewhat in excess of 200.degree. Fahrenheit, so that
the gas may be expanded and the heat energy in the compressed gas
utilized to drive the hammer 61, and thus greatly increase the
efficiency of the pneumatic system. The heat energy in the
compressed gas from source 109 may be developed by means of an
adiabatic compressor of the type disclosed hereinafter, or by any
other suitable means, such as a conventional approximately
isothermal compressor with an after-heater.
At the end of the hammer away from enlarged portion 89, there is
located an opening 115 that has frusto-conical portions 117 and
119 and a connecting cylindrical portion 121. When the hammer 61
approaches the head portion 33 at the top of casing 23, the
surface about cylindrical portion 121 engages a shoulder 123 on
round rod 31, while the surface of portion 117 approaches a
shoulder 125, also on round rod 31. The engagement between the
surface of cylindrical portion 121 and shoulder 123 is a tight
sliding fit, so that a gas-tight space is formed between the
surface of portion 117 and shoulder 125. This provides a gas or
air cushion that prevents the hammer 61 from stroking against the
casing 23 with a metal to metal contact.
The space 126 above the hammer 61 is vented to atmosphere at all
times by openings 127, so that no pressure is developed above
hammer 61, except for the gas cushion between the surface of
frusto-conical portion 117 and shoulder 125. Again, any
appropriate number of openings 127 may be utilized, but it has
been found that forty such openings provide the desired amount of
venting in this embodiment. Although these forty openings are not
specifically disclosed in FIGS. 1-3, schematic representations
thereof are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
The work bit 63 has the neck 65 thereof positioned in casing 23
for reciprocable motion therein. When casing 23 is urged toward
work bit 63, the shoulder 75 of the work bit 63 bears against a
resilient member 129 connected to the bottom of casing 23.
However, when work bit 63 is struck by the hammer 61, the work bit
63 may be driven away from casing 23 so that shoulder 75 no longer
bears against resilient member 129. In some cases, the separation
could become great enough that the work bit would become
completely separated from the casing 23, thus causing loss of
operating ability with, perhaps, attendant damage to the tool 21.
Also, the work bit 63 would become separated from tool 21 during
the standby or at-rest condition. Therefore, a restraining device
131 is utilized to prevent work bit 63 from separating too far
from casing 23. Restraining member 131 has a pair of somewhat
resilient arms 130 and 132, each of which has a hook-type end
members 133, which fit in corresponding slots 135 in the tool bit
63. As tool bit 63 is driven away from casing 23 by the impact of
a blow, or by cessation of the force exerted by the operator on
casing 23, the end members 133 engage the surface 137 at the tops
of slots 135 to limit the amount of separation between the work
bit and the casing.
In order to prevent rotation of the work bit 63 during operation,
the restraining member passes through a structure 139 on the
casing 23, which holds the restraining member arms 130 and 132
from twisting. Structure 139 includes a pair of holding members or
ears 138 and 140 on opposite sides of casing 23.
A suitable fastening device, such as a bolt-like portion 141, may
be utilized to secure the restraining member to the top of casing
23. Threaded portion 141 is integrally connected to the
restraining member 131. Threads 143 on the bolt-like portion 141
mate with corresponding threads 145 in head portion 33 of round
rod 31. To attach or disattach restraining member 131 from tool
21, arms 130 and 132 are spread to the position illustrated in
FIG. 3 and the whole member 131 is rotated. With the resilient
arms 130 and 132 released to return to the position of FIG. 1 or
FIG. 2, the restraining member 131 is locked on tool 21 and held
by ears 138 and 140 and the sides of grooves 135.
While the structure of the tool 21 disclosed herein could be
utilized with an actuating compressed gas at ambient temperature,
the operation of the tool is premised upon the expansion of the
gas under hammer 61, and thus heat would have to be provided to
prevent a refrigerating effect. The most efficient way to
accomplish this, which also tremendously increases systems
efficiency, is to utilize the heat energy produced during
compression of the gas. Accordingly, in the preferred embodiment,
the source of gas 109 would be a substantially adiabatic
compressor. The heated compressed gas would then be conveyed to
tool 21, such as by a short hose or conduit 111. Hose 111 is
preferably formed to prevent heat migration or loss, such as by
use of an inner gas conveying tube 147 and an outer tube 146. The
air space therebetween will provide the desired insulation. Of
course, with such an insulated hose 111, the length thereof can be
increased to any desired length.
One of the major difficulties with a heated actuating gas is that
the lubricant in the tool may be vaporized. In the preferred
embodiment disclosed in FIGS. 1-3, the gas is used at a low enough
temperature to preclude vaporization of the oil or other
lubricant. Also, the tool 21 may be operated without insulation,
but in a desirable form rubber insulation 149 may be utilized.
Such a rubber coating on casing 23 prevents heat loss and also
permits use of a thinner-walled casing 23, due to the greater
resiliency provided by rubber coating 149.
By reference now to FIGS. 4-13, the operation of the pneumatic
tool disclosed herein may be followed in detail. With reference to
FIG. 4, the tool is shown in the at-rest or standby position. It
may be seen that work bit, 63 is spaced from the casing 23 by a
gap 148, which is the maximum amount of separation permitted by
the restraining member 131. As shown, the hooked end portions 133
of the restraining member 131 engages the top surfaces 137 of
grooves 135 to limit the separation of tool bit 63 from resilient
member 129 of casing 23. (For purposes of the views of FIGS. 4-13,
the restraining member 131 is only illustrated in fragmentary
detail.) At this point, the chamber 95 is below the passageway 83,
so that no compressed gas bears against valve body 45. Hence, the
spring 49 maintains the valve body 45 at the maximum distance away
from the work bit 63 (with section 79 abutting shoulder 81).
In FIG. 5, the tool 21 is put into an operative state by an
operator putting force against casing 23 to bring the resilient
member 129 into contact with tool bit 63. In this position, the
chamber 95 in the hammer 61 is aligned with passageway 83, so that
compressed air from the actuating chamber 99 is conveyed to cavity
37 and forces valve body 45 to the position shown, against the
force of bias spring 49. In this position, the valve body 45
blocks the openings 59 from the atmosphere and permits the
compressed gas to enter under hammer 61. The initial effect on the
hammer 61 during the return or up-stroke is aided by the grooves
91 and the frusto-conical surface 93. The openings 127 serve, of
course, to vent the space 126 above hammer 61 to ambient or
atmosphere at all times, so that there is no compression of the
air in that space to impede the hammer on its return stroke, other
than the small air cushion at the end of the return stroke.
FIG. 6 depicts the hammer 61 as being propelled upwardly so that
chamber 95 is no longer in association with passageway 83. Thus,
no more compressed gas is being conveyed to the cavity 37. The
length of chamber 95 is carefully determined, and based upon the
speed of the hammer 61 on the return stroke, so that the pulse or
slug of compressed air applied to the relatively large surface 85
at the bottom of hammer 61 supplies just enough energy to carry
the hammer to the end of return stroke position, against the force
exerted by the compressed gas in chamber 99 against a surface 150
of enlarged portion 89 of hammer 61. As the chamber 95 has just
separated from passageway 83, the valve body 45 is still in the
position of FIG. 5.
In FIG. 7, the hammer 61 is approaching the end of the return
stroke (top-of-stroke) position and is slowing down pursuant to an
imminent change in the direction of momentum. The valve body 45
has now moved to the position that it completely closes openings
59, so that the only gas or air under hammer 61 is the initial
pulse of compressed gas that was inserted at the beginning of the
return stroke. This pulse of gas is expanding to propel the hammer
61, with the heat energy in the compressed gas providing the
energy of expansion in order to permit the gas to be exhausted at
ambient temperature and pressure, which eliminates exhaust noise,
as well as providing a very efficient operation.
The view of FIG. 8 illustrates the hammer 61 at the end of return
stroke, or top-of-stroke, position. The pulse of compressed air
that was inserted under the hammer has now expanded and cooled to
approximately the value of these parameters for the ambient (or
atmospheric) conditions. In the event that the pulse of compressed
air provided too much energy, the gas cushion between the surface
of the frusto-conical area 117 and the shoulder 125 will preclude
any direct contact between the hammer 61 and the casing 23. At
this point the spring 49 has urged valve body 45 slightly above
the openings 59, so that the space under hammer 61 is now vented
to ambient or atmospheric conditions by the path through openings
59, along valve stem 47, through openings 67 to chamber 69, and
thence to atmosphere through passageways 71. Therefore, as the
hammer begins its blow striking or downward stroke under the force
exerted by the compressed air in actuating chamber 99, there will
be no compression of the gas under the hammer, as this space is
vented to atmosphere for exhausting the expanded gas to
atmosphere. The blow striking or down stroke of hammer 61 will
exhaust the space below it, but as the gas in the space is
expanded and cooled to atmospheric conditions, the gas being
exhausted will already be at or near atmospheric conditions.
During the initial states of the blow-striking stroke, the valve
body 45 continues to be urged away from work bit 63 by spring 49,
until it reaches the farthest extent of this motion as shown in
FIG. 9. At this point, the openings 59 are completely opened to
provide the venting of the space under hammer 61, as previously
described. From the position shown in FIG. 8 to that shown in FIG.
10, the hammer 61 is propelled on the blow-striking stroke by the
compressed gas in actuating chamber 99 and, in the case of a
paving breaker, by the force of gravity. At the position of FIG.
10, the passageways 97 have come into gas conveying position with
respect to actuating chamber 99, but chamber 95 has not just come
into conjunction with openings 83, so that valve body 45 remains
at the extreme position under the force of spring 49.
Continued movement to the position of FIG. 11 results in chamber
95 beginning to come into confluence with openings 83 to pass
compressed gas to cavity 37. However, the relationship shown has
just been reached, so that the pressure in cavity 37 has not yet
been raised sufficiently to displace valve body 45 against the
force of spring 49. By the time that the position of FIG. 12 has
been reached, which is the point at which the hammer 61 comes into
blow-striking contact with work bit 63, the chamber 95 has been
brought into conjunction with the openings 83 to drive the valve
body 45 against the force of spring 49. However, as the conveying
of compressed air to cavity 37, and hence against valve body 45,
has not caused openings 59 to be closed, these openings still
serve to vent the area under hammer 61 to prevent any lessening of
the energy conveyed from hammer 61 to work bit 63. A short time
later, though, as illustrated in FIG. 13, the compressed air in
cavity 37 has resulted in the valve body 45 being moved to close
openings 59 as a vent and to open them for the insertion of
actuating compressed air. Since hammer 61 has struck work bit 63
and is ready to repeat the cycle of operation just described, it
may be seen that a constant force has been maintained against
hammer 61 by the compressed gas in actuating chamber 99, which
transmits the force from casing 23 when that casing has a force
applied to it that is sufficiently great to maintain the resilient
member 129 on casing 23 in contact with work bit 63. An energizing
propulsion is achieved by applying the same constant pressure
compressed gas to a larger surface on the bottom of the hammer 61
and permitting it to expand to drive the hammer against the
constant force produced by the gas in actuating chamber 99.
Therefore, a vibrationless pneumatically actuated tool is provided
which is highly efficient and desirably simple in operation and
construction.
In the description of the pneumatic tool 21, it has been pointed
out that a greater work output can be achieved if heat energy in
the compressed gas is also utilized in driving the hammer. This is
particularly true when the operation of the pneumatic tool is
considered in conjunction with the operation of the system as a
whole, wherein the efficiency of the system is greatly decreased
as a result of discarding the heat of compression in the attempted
isothermal compression processes conventionally utilized.
Accordingly, a much more efficient system can be realized if the
heat of compression is conveyed to and utilized in the pneumatic
tool. To achieve this highly efficient approach, applicant has
produced a truly revolutionary adiabatic compressor, the
principles of which are equally applicable in a reverse flow of
energy, of which an adiabatic version of the pneumatic tool
disclosed herein is an example. Therefore, the description of the
adiabatic compressor disclosed herein is generally applicable to
the much broader concept of an adiabatic gas-volume transformer
(i.e., a device in which substantially adiabatic energy transfer
is achieved in either the form of a compressor or a pneumatic
motor).
With reference to FIGS. 14, 15 and 16, a preferred embodiment of
an adiabatic gas-volume transformer 201 may be seen. In FIGS. 15
and 16, the transformer 201 is depicted in its specialized use as
an adiabatic compressor, although the principles are equally
applicable to the generalized version of FIG. 14.
Adiabatic gas-volume transformer 201 has an outer casing or shell
203. Casing 203 may be formed of any suitable material having the
requisite structural strength, such as steel. The casing 203 has
an annular cross-section, generally cylindrical extending portion
205 and a generally hemispherical end portion 207 at one end
thereof. It should be recognized that while the preferred
embodiment utilizes the shape described for the casing 203, this
invention could also be practiced with casings having modified,
and even completely different, shapes.
An internal cavity 209 is formed in the casing 203. Cavity 209 has
the same general configuration as the casing 203. A portion 211 of
cavity 209 at the hemispherical end of the cavity constitutes a
gas mass containing space or energy conversion chamber (which is
the compression chamber in the specific example of an adiabatic
compressor). Energy conversion chamber 211 is encompassed by
chamber insulating material 213. Insulating material 213 may be
any suitable type of insulation that is capable of enduring the
relatively high pressures and temperatures to which it will be
subjected in energy conversion chamber 211. In this preferred
embodiment, a ceramic type of insulating material 213 has been
utilized. Prevention of heat migration or heat loss may also be
achieved in any other suitable fashion, such as by very rapid
actuation of the apparatus.
A movable element or piston 215 is located in cavity 209 and
arranged for longitudinal reciprocation therein. Piston 215 has a
first portion 217 insertable into the energy conversion chamber
211, a second portion 219 from which the first portion 217
extends, and a piston shaft 221 extending from the other side of
portion 219. All of the portions of piston 215 are integrally
connected to form a unitary structure, which is co-axial with
casing 203.
Portion 217 of piston 215 is shaped to fit into the energy
conversion chamber 211 at the generally hemispherical end of
cavity 209. As a matter of fact, this portion 217 actually defines
the energy conversion chamber when it is at the bottom of stroke
position shown in FIG. 16. The energy conversion chamber 211 may
be defined as that portion of cavity 209 which is between the
hemispherical end of the cavity and the top of portion 219 of
piston 215, less the space displaced by portion 217 of the piston.
This definition is made, of course, when the piston 215 is at the
bottom-of-stroke position (shown in FIG. 16). It may be seen that
there is an additional space about the circumference of part 217
between point 223 and portion 219 of the piston, but as this space
is very small and the gas therein does not become an appreciable
portion of the gas volume until the top of stroke position is
reached by piston 215, it could easily be neglected when defining
the energy conversion chamber 211. However, as the gas volume in
this space becomes important during the compression stroke at the
top of stroke position, it must be included as part of energy
conversion chamber 211.
Portion 217 of piston 215 has a central core 225 of a high
strength material, such as steel. Core 225 of portion 217 of
piston 215 has a plug member 227 at the generally hemispherical
end thereof. Plug member 227 is provided with threads 229 to
engage corresponding threads in the body of core 225. The purpose
of plug 227 is to permit the removal of material from the internal
portion of core 225 to form an opening 231, which extends into
portion 219 as well. In this way, the piston can be lightened
without having to bore through the shaft 221, which would tend to
weaken that shaft. After the opening 231 has been formed, plug
member 227 is screwed back into the other portion of core 225 to
form an integral core for the portion 217.
Piston insulating material 233 is located about the outer surface
of core 225, to the same extent as the insulating material 213, in
order to prevent any heat loss from the energy conversion chamber
through piston 215. Insulating material 233 would be any
appropriate type of insulation, such as a suitable ceramic
material. Insulation 233 may be more firmly affixed to core 225 by
the provision of projections 235, about which insulating material
233 would be formed to provide a more secure connection between
this insulating material and core 225.
As may be seen, the external dimensions of portion 217 are made
slightly smaller than the dimensions of cavity 209, so that a
small gas volume will exist between piston portion 217 and the
internal wall of casing 203, even when piston 215 is at the top of
stroke position illustrated in FIG. 15. The spacing between the
external surface of piston portion 217 and the internal surface of
casing 203 is very small, on the order of a few thousandths of an
inch. This small spacing, combined with a strict axial alignment
of the piston as hereinafter described, is sufficient to keep the
insulating materials 213 and 233 from bearing against each other,
which could damage the insulating qualities and cause insulating
material to accumulate in the energy conversion chamber as a
result of abrasion.
Portion 219 of piston 215 is adapted to move in cavity 209 with a
tight sliding fit. Piston or sealing rings 237 are located about
the periphery of portion 219 to engage the inner surface of casing
203 that forms the cavity 209. A suitable sealing and lubricating
medium or agent, such as oil, is in engagement therewith to
lubricate the sliding engagement between portion 219 of piston 215
and the inner surface of casing 203, as well as sealing the energy
conversion chamber 211 to prevent the escape of gases therein. The
sealing and lubricating medium (oil) will be introduced into
cavity 209 in any conventional fashion and will be carried by
piston ring 237. The pressure of the gas in energy conversion
chamber 211 will prevent the oil from rising above the last piston
ring 239.
Portions 217 and 219 of piston 215 would ordinarily be integrally
formed, although any suitable permanent connection of these
portions would be acceptable. Shaft 221 could also be integrally
formed with portion 219, but also may be connected in any other
fashion to provide a solid and permanent interconnection.
Shaft 221 leads into a crank box 241, wherein mechanical energy
can either be transferred to piston 215 or extracted therefrom. In
this specific embodiment of a high efficiency adiabatic
compressor, an appropriate double-throw crank drive (not shown)
may be utilized to reciprocate the piston 215 upwardly to compress
the gas in the energy conversion or compression chamber 211.
Energy is transferred from the double-throw crank drive by linking
rods 240 and 242, which are strong enough to permit high speed
operation, if desired. Rods 240 and 242 are connected to shaft 221
through a linking member 244 by means of appropriate bearings,
such as needlepoint ball bearings. Member 244 is attached to shaft
221 by any appropriate method, releasable attachment such as a
threaded interconnection being desirable for assembly purposes.
In view of the close tolerances between portion 217 of piston 215
and the internal surface of the casing 203, it is necessary that
the piston be confined to an extremely accurate co-axial motion
between piston 215 and casing 203. Such an accurate co-axial
motion may be achieved by utilizing an appropriate guide for the
shaft 221, such as a spider structure 243 illustrated in FIG. 14.
Spider 243 may be either a three or four-legged spider, as
desired. An internal ring 245 of spider structure 243 provides a
tight sliding fit with the shaft 221 and must be very accurately
positioned to insure the co-axiality of the motion of piston 215
with respect to casing 203.
A cooling jacket or bath 247 is located beyond the end of
insulating materials 215 and 233, and extends away from the
generally hemispherical end 207 of the casing.
The temperature at which the sealing and lubricating medium that
engages piston rings 237 will vaporize is often considerably lower
than the relatively high temperatures reached in the energy
conversion chamber 211. For example, it would be likely that the
lubricant (oil) would have a temperature of vaporization in the
vicinity of 400.degree. F., while the temperature in the energy
conversion chamber 211 (at full compression or top-of-stroke)
could go as high as 6,000.degree. F. Of course, the temperatures
in the energy conversion chamber 211 could go considerably higher
than this, but as a practical example, the 6,000.degree. clearly
illustrates the problem. The cooling jacket 247 maintains a
relatively low temperature in the vicinity of the piston rings
237, as well as for a portion of the gas in the energy conversion
chamber 211 when the piston 215 is at top-of-stroke, as shown in
FIGS. 14 and 15. A very important feature of this invention, which
cannot be overemphasized, is the arrangement by which the piston
rings 237 have been displaced from the vicinity of the extremely
high temperatures reached in the energy conversion chamber 211, as
well as by the arrangement for cooling the gas volume in the
energy conversion chamber that is adjacent to the piston rings
237.
The cooling jacket or bath 237 may be either located about casing
203, or set in the casing, as shown in this preferred embodiment.
This cooling jacket or bath will normally utilize water as the
coolant, although other liquid or gaseous cooling mediums could be
used equally well.
While this description has been on rather generalized terms that
relate to an adiabatic gas-volume transformer, reference has been
made to the specific preferred embodiment disclosed herein of an
adiabatic compressor. Thus, the particular spring-biased valve
assemblies 251 and 253 may be employed, rather than the more
generalized arrangement of FIG. 14, which would be a cam
arrangement although such a cam arrangement could also be utilized
for the specific embodiment of an adiabatic compressor. In valve
assembly 251, a compression spring 255 is connected to a valve
stem 257. The other end of valve stem 257 is connected to a valve
head 259, which is forced against a valve seat 261 by compression
spring 255. Valve stem 257 passes through a valve body 263, which
is attached to an appropriately threaded flange 265 of casing 203.
A valve chamber 267 is formed between the valve body 263 and the
valve head 259. An opening 269 brings valve chamber 267 into
communication with the atmosphere. When valve head 259 is lifted
off valve seat 261, the space between valve head 259 and valve
seat 261, the valve chamber 267 and opening 269 form a conduit
from energy conversion chamber 211 to the atmosphere.
The valve assembly 253 has a tension spring 271 attached to a
valve stem 273, which has a valve head 275 at the other end
thereof. Valve head 275 engages a valve seat 277 to seal the
energy conversion chamber 211 from a valve chamber 279. A line 281
leads from valve chamber 279 to a tank 280 in which gas at a
relatively high pressure and temperature is stores. Tank 280 is
preferably insulated, such as by a layer of insulation 282.
Although shown in spherical form, tank 280 could, of course, have
any appropriate shown shape. Also, the line or conduit 281 is also
preferably insulated to prevent loss of heat energy.
When valve head 275 is separated from valve seat 277, the space
between valve head 275 and valve seat 277, valve chamber 279 and
line 281 provide a flow path between the energy conversion chamber
211 and the gas storage tank 280. As in the case of valve assembly
251, valve assembly 253 has a valve body 283 through which the
valve stem 273 passes. Valve body 283 is connected to an
appropriate threaded flange 284 on casing 203. In the cases of
both compression spring 255 and tension spring 271, the spring is
fastened to the respective valve body. In the case of tension
spring 271, the spring is connected to valve body 283 by clamps
285, while in the case of compression spring 255, the spring is
connected to valve body 263 by clamps 287.
At the bottom-of-stroke position illustrated in FIG. 16, valve
head 275 firmly engages valve seat 277. Valve head 259 is forced
against valve seat 261 by the relatively weak compression spring
255. Although valve head 259 has been separated from valve seat
261 by the vacuum produced in energy conversion chamber during the
down-stroke, the relatively weak compression spring 255 suffices
to move valve head 259 to the position shown in FIG. 16 at the
bottom of the stroke. This is because at the bottom-of-stroke
position the pressure in energy conversion chamber 211 has reached
atmospheric level, due to the blow path through opening 269, valve
chamber 267 and the space between valve head 259 and valve seat
261. On the other hand, valve head 275 is held in the closed
position against valve seat 277 by the pressure of the gas in
valve chamber 279 that passes through line 281, as well as by the
vacuum created in energy conversion chamber 211 during the
down-stroke.
As piston 215 is moved upwardly, the gas in energy conversion
chamber 211 is compressed so that the pressure and temperature
thereof increase. The increased pressure against valve head 259
keeps valve assembly 251 in the closed condition, so that energy
conversion chamber 211 is sealed from the atmosphere. Valve
assembly 253 remains in the closed position, as the force due to
the pressure of the gas in chamber 211 against the inner surface
of valve head 275 is not sufficiently great to overcome the
combined force due to the pressure of the gas in valve chamber 279
against the surface of valve head 275 in that chamber and that of
the tension spring 271.
As piston 215 reaches the top of stroke position illustrated in
FIG. 15, the pressure and temperature of the gas in energy
conversion chamber 211 reach the levels that are desired for the
gas that is to be transmitted through line 281. At this point the
high pressure of the gas in chamber 211 that bears against the
inner surface of valve head 275 is sufficiently great to open the
valve as shown, to permit the gas in energy conversion chamber 211
to pass through line 281 to the storage tank. As soon as the gas
in energy conversion chamber 211 has been transferred through line
281 to the storage tank 280, valve head 275 will be moved to the
closed position against valve seat 277. At this point, the system
is ready for the down-stroke of piston 215. During the
down-stroke, valve head 259 will be moved to the open position
away from valve seat 261, as previously explained. At the same
time, valve head 275 will be held firmly against valve seat 277 by
the pressure of the gas in valve chamber 279 and the force of
spring 271, with the strength of the seal being further enhanced
by the vacuum formed in energy conversion or compression chamber
211. Therefore, the gas having a relatively high temperature and
pressure in the storage tank connected to line 281 will not be
permitted to escape into the energy conversion chamber 211. At the
bottom-of-stroke position, the valve head 259 will move to the
closed position and the sequence of operation previously described
will be reinitiated.
As previously explained, one of the significant features of this
invention that makes the system operative is the procedures taken
for insuring that the lubricating and sealing medium (oil)
engaging piston rings 237 is not vaporized by the heat generated
during the compression of the gas. This is achieved by two steps:
(1) increasing the physical separation between the piston rings
237 and the area where the gas reaches its highest temperature
(i.e., adjacent to the hemispherical portion of the cavity 209);
and (2) cooling the gas that is closest to the piston rings 237.
This latter step is achieved by making the insulation 213 in the
casing 203 and the insulation 233 on portion 217 of piston 215
terminate at point A, while the gas extends to point B. Thus, the
gas in the volume of energy conversion chamber 211 between points
A and B is subjected to the cooling influence of the cooling
jacket 247, both through casing 203 and piston portion 219.
Assuming that the temperature at point A is the same as the
temperature in the hemispherical portion of the energy conversion
chamber 211, a temperature gradient between points A and B must be
achieved that will reduce the temperature of the gas at point B so
that it is below the temperature of vaporization of the sealing
and lubricating medium. Due to the very thin film of gas that is
in this volume, the cooling effect of the water jacket 247 is more
than sufficient to provide the desired temperature gradient. It
should be noted that, as a practical matter, the temperature at
point A will probably be somewhat less than the maximum
temperature in the energy conversion chamber 211, but as the
indicated method of protecting the sealing and lubricating medium
from high temperatures suffices even in the worst case, the fact
that actual conditions might result in less of a temperature
gradient between points A and B enhances the significance of this
approach.
While the preferred embodiment disclosed herein is that of an
adiabatic compressor, it should be recognized that the adiabatic
gas-volume transformer may be equally well utilized to provide
mechanical power in the fashion of a pneumatic motor. In such an
arrangement, the gas at a relatively high pressure and temperature
would be inserted into the energy converting chamber 211 through
the valve assembly 253 to drive the piston on the down-stroke.
During this down-stroke of the piston, the valve assembly 251
would be in the closed position. On the return stroke of the
piston, which would be the up-stroke, valve assembly 251 would be
open, while the valve assembly 253 would be closed. Obviously, the
spring arrangements shown in FIGS. 15 and 16 would not be suitable
for such a purpose, and a cam control of the type shown in
generalized form in FIG. 14, or some other appropriate type of
control, would have to be utilized.
Another interesting and very important concept that is involved in
the dual nature of the adiabatic gas-volume transformer is that by
utilizing the transformer as a compressor to drive the transformer
utilized as a pneumatic motor, it is possible to produce
efficiencies in practice that are close enough to the theoretical
maximum efficiency of 100% to make such a pneumatic power
transmission system very desirable. In this regard, it should be
noted that the paving breaker tool described herein may be
regarded as a particularized form of the adiabatic gas-volume
transformer utilized as a pneumatic motor. Accordingly, use of the
adiabatic compressor disclosed herein with the pneumatic paving
breaker disclosed herein provides a highly efficient pneumatic
system, as well as the freedom from vibration and other desirable
characteristics of the paving breaker tool previously set forth.
With reference now to FIGS. 17-19, a somewhat schematicized form
of a pneumatic tool is illustrated in which the use of the
adiabatic gas-volume transformer for transferral of energy in a
direction opposite to that involved in compression (i.e., as a
pneumatic motor) is disclosed. In the embodiment of FIGS. 1-13, a
relatively low temperature is utilized for the heated compressed
gas. As the temperature is below the vaporization temperature of
the lubricant, there is no necessity of isolating the lubricant
from the actuating gas. However, in the embodiment of FIGS. 17-19,
much higher temperatures are involved, so that it is necessary to
protect the lubricant.
The tool 301 of FIGS. 17-19 has an outer casing 303, of a material
such as aluminum, which constitutes a back-up tank. Back-up tank
303 contains a gas at an elevated pressure, but essentially
ambient temperature. The utilization of such a back-up tank to
keep a constant pressure force applied is disclosed in detail in
U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,581--Cooley et al.
An inner casing 305, which is provided with an insulating layer
307, has a movable member or piston 309 therein. Piston 309 has a
part 311 thereof which serves as the blow-striking member or
hammer. The other portion 313 of piston 309 has piston or sealing
rings 315 which are adapted to contact the inner casing 305 with a
sliding fit. Piston rings 315 convey a lubricant, such as oil,
which forms a film from the top of casing 305 to the bottom of
portion 313 of piston 309 at the position shown in FIG. 17. The
hammer 311 has a diameter somewhat less than that of portion 313,
and thus does not contact the casing 305.
The hammer 311 strikes against an anvil 317, which can either be a
portion of the work bit or a separate member driven to strike the
work bit. A first conduit 319 provides for the insertion of heated
compressed gas (air), while a second conduit 321 provides for
venting or exhausting the space between hammer 311 and anvil 317.
Appropriate valve systems (not shown) would control the opening
and closing of these conduits. It should be noted that the
pressure of the gas inserted through conduit 319 is at a greater
pressure than the constant pressure of the gas applied to the top
surface of piston 309 from back-up tank 303, so that the piston
can be raised against the constant force.
For purposes of this discussion, it shall be assumed that the
compressed air inserted through conduit 319 has a pressure of 232
psia and a temperature of 542.degree. Fahrenheit. The ambient air
shall be assumed to be at 15 psia and 70.degree. F.
At the position shown in FIG. 17, a pulse of the compressed air is
inserted through conduit 319. This pulse will have a time duration
such that the energy contained therein has been calculated to
raise piston 309 to the position shown in FIG. 19, during
expansion thereof, against the constant force of the compressed
gas from back-up tank 303. As the heated compressed gas is
inserted into the casing 305, the temperature of hammer 311 will
be raised to 150.degree.. Since the oil film only comes to the
bottom of portion 313 of the piston 309, it is not exposed to the
542.degree. of the incoming compressed gas, but only to a
temperature of 155.degree..
As the gas expands and raised piston 309 to the position shown in
FIG. 18, the gas also cools. The decrease in temperature and
pressure is illustrated for the bottom of hammer 311 in FIG. 19.
In the position of FIG. 18, the bottom of hammer 311 is at the
level of the lowermost boundary of the oil film (i.e., at the
point of the bottom of portion 313 in FIG. 17). From the chart in
FIG. 19, it may be seen that the maximum temperature to which the
oil film would be exposed would be 294.degree. F., which would be
below the temperature of vaporization of the oil. At all other
points above this, the oil would be exposed to lesser
temperatures, so that no problem of vaporization would result.
Continued expansion and cooling of the pulse of gas that is
inserted through conduit 319 raises piston 309 to the position
shown in FIG. 19. At this point, conduit 321 is open to the
atmosphere to permit exhaustion of the space below the hammer
during its downward motion. Since the pulse of air is expanded and
cooled to ambient conditions, it will be exhausted at this
pressure and temperature level. Therefore, the reverse operation
of the adiabatic gas-volume transformer is readily recognized, and
it may be seen that all of the energy in the heated compressed gas
has been transferred to the piston 309, which is now prepared to
release that energy in delivering a blow to the work bit under the
constant force of the compressed gas from back-up tank 303.
Accordingly, a highly efficient adiabatic system has been
demonstrated in which the gas-volume transformer can be utilized
at both ends of the system. Of course, the device illustrated in
FIGS. 17-19 is rather schematic, but it may be readily recognized
that the principles disclosed therein can be readily adapted to
many areas.
It should be understood that various modifications, changes and
variations may be made in the arrangements, operations and details
of construction of the embodiment disclosed herein without
departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
Patents
[
Download from Espacenet Advanced Search :
http://ep.espacenet.com/advancedSearch?locale=en_EP ]
Vibration elimination
US3200893
1965-08-17
Excerpt from USP #
4,290,489 (
Vibrationless Pneumatic Tools, above ) -- Over the
preceding years, the present applicant has devoted much time and
effort and has made many important inventions, some of which can
be truly classified as "breakthrough" inventions, relating to the
production of vibrationless pneumatic tools, such as paving
breakers. (The term "vibrationless" as employed herein refers to
the complete elimination of both sensible and theoretical casing
vibration in a tool effectively utilizing a blow-striking element
therein.) A number of these inventions have been patented, and
reference may be made to the following U.S. Pat. Nos.
2,400,650, issued May 21,
1946;
2,679,826, issued
June 1, 1954;
2,730,073,
issued Jan. 10, 1956;
2,752,889,
issued July 3, 1956;
2,985,078,
issued May 23, 1961;
3,028,840,
issued Apr. 10, 1962;
3,028,841,
issued Apr. 10, 1962;
3,200,893,
issued Aug. 17, 1965;
3,214,155,
issued Oct. 26, 1965;
3,255,832,
issued June 14, 1966;
3,266,581,
issued Aug. 16, 1966;
3,291,425,
issued Dec. 13, 1966; and
3,295,614,
issued Jan. 3, 1967.
Of particular interest is U.S. Pat. No.
3,200,893, in which an exhaustive discussion of
the principles involved in applicant's production of vibrationless
pneumatic tools is presented...
Vibrationless percussive tools
US3295614
1967-01-03
Vibrationless power tool
US3266581
1966-08-16
Vibrationless percussive tool
US3255832
1966-06-14
Work member for a percussive tool
US3292976
1966-12-20
Pneumatic vibration eliminator
US3214155
1965-10-26
Pneumatic torque-transmitting
coupling for isolating angular vibration
US3136143
1964-06-09
System for eliminating vibration
US3291425
1966-12-13
Localized vibration elimination
in vibratory structural compositions
US2985078
1961-05-23
Percussion tool
US2752889
1956-07-03
Percussion tools
US2730073
1956-01-10
Vibrationless pneumatic
tools
US4290489
1981-09-22
Pneumatic tool
US2679826
1954-06-01
Vibration apparatus
US2400650
1946-05-21
Perfectionnement à l'amortissement des vibrations
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
BE616435
1962-07-31
VIBRATIONLESS POWER TOOL
Inventor: COOLEY GORDON A ;
LEAVELL CHARLES
CA841983
1970-05-19
ANTI-VIBRATION MEANS
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA794631
1968-09-17
WORK MEMBER FOR A PERCUSSIVE TOOL
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA779572
1968-03-05
PNEUMATIC TORQUE-TRANSMITTING
COUPLING FOR ISOLATING ANGULAR VIBRATION
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA750123
1967-01-10
VIBRATIONLESS PERCUSSIVE TOOL
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA708860
1965-05-04
COUNTERBALANCED VIBRATIONLESS
PERCUSSIVE TOOL
Inventor: LEAVELL CHARLES
CA708859
1965-05-04
PNEUMATIC TOOL
CA530678
1956-09-25
Vibrationless Percussive Tool
GB1154593
1969-06-11
OUTILS PNEUMATIQUES DEPOURVUS DE
VIBRATIONS
JP51087102
1976-07-30
Dispositif de transmission
de couple arrêtant les vibrations angulaires
FR1524973
1968-05-17
Vibration elimination
FR1334347
1963-08-09