Imagine a day when a submarine could blast a
target to smithereens using nothing more than acoustic energy.
That’s the idea behind a recently granted U.S. Navy patent for a
cavitation weapon. The powerful weapon would use sonar to
generate "acoustic remote cavitation," i.e. a big pressure
bubble, that would destroy everything from torpedoes to mines.
As the patent describes:
A method is disclosed of generating a predetermined field of
cavitation around a remote target in an underwater environment.
The method includes the steps of identifying a remote target
location, generating at least two acoustic beams, each at a high
power output, from an underwater acoustic source, and
controlling the generated acoustic beams to intersect with each
other at the remote target location and thereby create a
destructive cavitation field at the intersection of the beams.
The acoustic source and target can be located in unconfined
underwater space and at a distance of at least 100 m apart.
Underwater cavitation is being looked at for a number of
applications — including superfast sub and missiles, but this is
different; it would actually use pure acoustic energy to destroy
things, i.e. no bombs or missiles involved. The potential
applications include "mine neutralization; torpedo self-defense,
melee close-in encounter; and any sources or communication
systems that must be left behind."
The underlying physics is based on the intense heat and
high-pressure pulse from the sonar sources 12, 14, and 16 as the
damage mechanisms by virtue of the intense acoustic power of the
sonar sources. An ensuing cavitation bubble formation and
collapse and shock propagation will also inflict damages on
underwater objects 18 targeted for removal. The technical
drivers are the cavitation lethality on the undesirable objects
18 and the acoustic power of the sonar sources versus range and
depth.
In an intriguing note on other uses, the patent says: "In view
of the above detailed description, it is anticipated that the
invention herein will have far reaching applications other than
those of underwater destruction of undesirable objects."
Any ideas what that could be?
A method is disclosed of generating a predetermined field of
cavitation around a remote target in an underwater environment.
The method includes the steps of identifying a remote target
location, generating at least two acoustic beams, each at a high
power output, from an underwater acoustic source, and
controlling the generated acoustic beams to intersect with each
other at the remote target location and thereby create a
destructive cavitation field at the intersection of the beams.
The acoustic source and target can be located in unconfined
underwater space and at a distance of at least 100 m apart.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to an environmentally clean
device to eliminate or destroy unwanted underwater objects
remotely without using explosive materials. More particularly,
the invention uses a general-purpose active sonar array to
remotely eliminate or destroy unwanted underwater objects.
(2) Description of the Prior Art
The current art for the underwater destruction of unwanted
objects is as varied as the devices to be destroyed.
The following patents, for example, disclose a generating a
cavitation area at a very close range and/or within an enclosed
space and at high frequencies, but do not disclose generating a
cavitation in an essentially free water space and at relatively
low frequencies in order to destroy a target within that free
space.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,244,749 to Sachs et al.;
U.S. Pat. No. 4,681,264 to Johnson, Jr.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,035,363 to Somoza;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,209,221 to Reidlinger;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,681,396 to Madanshetty; and
U.S. Pat. No. 5,827,204 to Grandia et al.
Specifically, Sachs et al. discloses removal of biofouling from
the external surfaces of spaced apart pipes of a heat exchanger
which are in contact with a liquid by positioning a plurality of
ultrasonic transducers between the pipes and operating the
transducers at sufficient power levels to cause cavitation
within the liquid to effect the desired cleaning action. The
transducers are arranged in a planar configuration to produce
bi-directional acoustic radiation. Various types of
instrumentation are provided for determining the extent of
biofouling and effectiveness of cleaning as well as for
monitoring transducer operation parameters.
The patent to Johnson, Jr. discloses a process and apparatus for
enhancing the erosive intensity of a high velocity liquid jet
when the jet is impacted against a surface for cutting,
cleaning, drilling or otherwise acting on the surface. A
preferred method comprises the steps of forming a high velocity
liquid jet, oscillating the velocity of the jet at a preferred
Strouhal number, and impinging the pulsed jet against a solid
surface to be eroded. Typically the liquid jet is pulsed by
oscillating the velocity of the jet mechanically or by
hydrodynamic and acoustic interactions. The invention may be
applied to enhance cavitation erosion in a cavitating liquid
jet, or to modulate the velocity of a liquid jet exiting in a
gas, causing it to form into discrete slugs, thereby producing
an intermittent percussive effect.
Somoza discloses reducing the particle size of energetic
explosive materials by slurrying the particulate explosive
materials in an inert liquid such as water or an aqueous
solution, and subjecting the slurry to intense acoustic
cavitation from an ultrasonic generator for a short time. The
particulate explosive materials are rapidly ground to a small
particle size while minimizing the danger of detonation.
Riedlinger discloses a device for generating sonic signal forms
for limiting, preventing or regressing the growth of
pathological tissue that comprises an ultrasonic transmission
system for transmitting sound waves, focused on the tissue to be
treated, by way of a coupling medium. An ultrasonic signal
produced at the focus of the system comprises brief pulses
having at least one rarefaction phase with a negative sonic
pressure amplitude with a value greater than 2*10<5 > Pa.
The ultrasonic signal is radiated with a carrier frequency
exceeding 20 kHz, a sonic pulse duration T of less than 100
[mu]s and a pulse recurrence rate of less than 0/(5T). The
device produces controlled cavitation in the tissue to be
treated.
The patent to Madanshetty discloses the surgical cleaning of a
semiconductor wafer through the inducement of cavitation on the
surface of the wafer at the location of an adherent particle.
Cavitation is induced by focusing two acoustic fields on the
surface of the wafer. The two acoustic fields include a
cavitation field having relatively low frequency focused on the
wafer surface from a direction perpendicular to the wafer and a
coaxing field of relatively high frequency focused on the wafer
surface from a direction between 0 and 25 degrees from the wafer
surface.
Grandia et al. discloses medical noninvasive operations using
focused modulated high power ultrasound that generally includes
a transmitter for exciting a multifrequency ultrasound wave for
causing vaporous cavitation bubbles in a small focal zone of a
medical target region. Focused ultrasound can be used for both
dissolving tissues as well as causing clots in order to destroy
cancerous growths. The multifrequency wave includes an
underlying low frequency signal for enabling optimal growth of
microbubbles and at least one high frequency signal for enabling
a narrow zone of focus of the ultrasound. A cavitation monitor
may be provided for sensing a level of cavitation as well as
providing feedback to the transmitter. In addition, an imaging
system is provided for enabling viewing of the medical target
area during the therapy.
It should be understood that the present invention would in fact
enhance the functionality of the above patents by providing an
array of intersecting acoustic beams in free water space, the
acoustic beams being generated at a frequency and range to
create a destructive cavitation field around an undesirable
remote target.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Therefore it is an object of this invention to provide a
self-defense weapon utilizing acoustic remote cavitation.
Another object of this invention is to provide an underwater
self-defense weapon mounted on an underwater support vessel.
Still another object of this invention is to provide an acoustic
remote cavitation weapon by generating an array of intersecting
acoustic beams.
A still further object of the invention is to provide an
acoustic remote cavitation weapon deriving power from an
underwater support vessel and generating an array of
intersecting acoustic beams at a long range.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide an acoustic
remote cavitation self-defense weapon for generating a
destructive cavitation in free water space.
In accordance with one aspect of this invention, there is
provided a method of generating a predetermined field of
cavitation around a remote target in an underwater environment.
The method includes the steps of identifying a remote target
location, generating at least two acoustic beams, each at a peak
power output, from an underwater energy source, and controlling
the generated acoustic beams to intersect with each other at the
remote target location and thereby create a destructive
cavitation field at the intersection of the beams.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The appended claims particularly point out and distinctly claim
the subject matter of this invention. The various objects,
advantages and novel features of this invention will be more
fully apparent from a reading of the following detailed
description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in
which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
FIG. 1 is perspective view of a self-defense weapon according
to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is graph showing linear and non-linear
absorption losses according to a preferred embodiment of the
present invention; and
FIG. 3 is a graph showing acoustic power requirement
versus range and depth according to a preferred embodiment of
the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In general, the present invention is directed to an
environmentally clean self-defense weapon, generally shown in
operation in FIG. 1. The weapon 10 includes an array of
selectively activated sonar devices 12, 14, 16, that will
eliminate or destroy unwanted underwater objects 18 remotely
without using explosive materials. It is a characteristic of the
present invention that the underwater environment is that of
free and open underwater space such as that found in lakes,
oceans and other large bodies of water.
The underwater object 18 targeted for destruction is shown
generically in FIG. 1 and may include mines, incoming torpedoes,
marine fouling barnacles, and emergency rescue operations. It
will be understood that the position of the underwater object 18
is not necessarily specifically identifiable, yet is within a
range of about 100 meters to about 1 Km from a source vessel
such as a submarine 20.
The weapon 10, including the array of sonar devices 12, 14, 16,
is mounted to or formed in connection with the submarine 20 or
similar underwater vehicle capable of transporting and providing
power to the weapon array 10. In the subject of FIG. 1, the
weapon array 10, including three sonar devices 12, 14, 16, is
shown to be targeting the object 18 located a distance 22 from
the submarine 20. The sonar sources 12, 14, 16 of the weapon 10
are mounted on the submarine 20 at predetermined intervals. For
example, a first sonar source 12 may be mounted at the nose 30
of the submarine 20, a second sonar source 14 mounted at a
mid-section 32 of the submarine 20, and a third sonar source 16
mounted at a tail 34 of the submarine 20. This array spacing and
number of sonar sources is by way of example only and will be
modified to suit the particular underwater transport source.
Regardless of the spacing of the array 10 or number of sonar
sources used, the beams 12b, 14b, 16b from the sonar sources 12,
14, and 16, respectively, will be directed to intersect at a
cavitating focal point coinciding with the determined location
of the target 18. The intersecting beams at the cavitating focal
point of the sonar sources will create a destructive cavitation
field generally identified at 24 in FIG. 1.
The sonar sources 12, 14, and 16 of the weapon 10 are activated
to generate a focused beam at a frequency of 10 KHz to 15 KHz.
All calculations for target 18 location, output frequencies,
intersecting focal points of the sonar sources 12, 14, 16, and
required signals to control "firing" of the sonar sources is by
way of an on-board computer 26 connected to the sonar sources.
Any general-purpose active sonar source can be used to assemble
a weapon array 10 as in the present invention. The underlying
physics is based on the intense heat and high-pressure pulse
from the sonar sources 12, 14, and 16 as the damage mechanisms
by virtue of the intense acoustic power of the sonar sources. An
ensuing cavitation bubble formation and collapse and shock
propagation will also inflict damages on underwater objects 18
targeted for removal. The technical drivers are the cavitation
lethality on the undesirable objects 18 and the acoustic power
of the sonar sources versus range and depth.
Any sonar array can be used in this mode. The stand off distance
is the focal length of the array as defined by the intersection
of the separate sonar sources 12, 14, 16. A function of physical
dimension of the array is that the longer the span of the array
along the support member 20, the farther away the standoff or
target distance may be.
Historically, an acoustic array is always designed to avoid
cavitation. This invention seeks to operate the acoustic array
weapon 10 at its peak power output to maximize cavitation at the
focal point of the array. The key elements of the operation are:
computation of the focal point location and acoustic beamforming
to cover the object location.
There are several advantages to the present invention including
a lack of environmentally detrimental residues that will be
generated. Further, beamforming greatly reduces response time so
that more objects can be removed in a given time. Also, the
present invention reduces cost per object removed. This concept
also enables all sonar to be used as a device to remove
undesirable objects. Furthermore, without any explosives and the
increased standoff distance from the device, the operating
platform of the underwater vessel 20 with the sonar array 10
will not suffer any damage.
FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating linear and non-linear absorption
losses over a temperature range of 0 to 13 degrees Celsius and a
frequency of 1 to 30 KHz. FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating
acoustic power requirement versus range and depth at 30 KHz.
The potential applications are numerous, and include without
limitation thereto: mine neutralization; torpedo self-defense,
melee close-in encounter; and any sources or communication
systems that must be left behind.
In view of the above detailed description, it is anticipated
that the invention herein will have far reaching applications
other than those of underwater destruction of undesirable
objects.
This invention has been disclosed in terms of certain
embodiments. It will be apparent that many modifications can be
made to the disclosed apparatus without departing from the
invention. Therefore, it is the intent of the appended claims to
cover all such variations and modifications as come within the
true spirit and scope of this invention.