rexresearch
Xie
Xian Ning, et al.
Energy-Storage Membrane
http://www.sciencedaily.com
Novel
Energy-Storage Membrane: Performance Surpasses Existing
Rechargeable Batteries and Supercapacitors
A team from the National University of Singapore's Nanoscience
and Nanotechnology Initiative (NUSNNI), led by principle
investigator Dr Xie Xian Ning, has developed a novel
energy-storage membrane.
Electrical energy storage and its management are becoming urgent
issues due to climate change and energy shortage. Existing
technologies such as rechargeable batteries and supercapacitors
are based on complicated configurations including liquid
electrolytes, and suffer from difficulties in scaling-up and
high fabrication costs. There is also growing public concern and
awareness of the impact of traditional energy sources on the
environment, spurring a continued search for alternative, green,
sustainable energy sources.
Cost-effective and
environmentally-friendly
Recognising the issue, Dr Xie and his team have developed a
membrane that not only promises greater cost-effectiveness in
delivering energy, but also an environmentally-friendly
solution. The researchers used a polystyrene-based polymer to
deposit the soft, foldable membrane that, when sandwiched
between and charged by two metal plates, could store charge at
0.2 farads per square centimeter. This is well above the typical
upper limit of 1 microfarad per square centimetre for a standard
capacitor.
The cost involved in energy storage is also drastically reduced.
With existing technologies based on liquid electrolytes, it
costs about US$7 to store each farad. With the advanced energy
storage membrane, the cost to store each farad falls to an
impressive US$0.62. This translates to an energy cost of 10-20
watt-hour per US dollar for the membrane, as compared to just
2.5 watt-hour per US dollar for lithium ion batteries.
Dr Xie said: "Compared to rechargeable batteries and
supercapacitors, the proprietary membrane allows for very simple
device configuration and low fabrication cost. Moreover, the
performance of the membrane surpasses those of rechargeable
batteries, such as lithium ion and lead-acid batteries, and
supercapacitors."
The research is supported by grants from the Singapore-MIT
Alliance for Research & Technology (SMART), and National
Research Foundation. Dr Xie and his team started work on the
membrane early last year and took about 1.5 years to reach their
current status, and have successfully filed a US patent for this
novel invention.
The discovery was featured in Energy & Environmental Science
and highlighted by the international journal Nature.
Potential applications: From hybrid vehicles to solar panels and
wind turbines
The membrane could be used in hybrid vehicles for instant power
storage and delivery, thus improving energy efficiency and
reducing carbon emission. Potentially, hybrid cars with the
membrane technology could be powered by the energy stored in the
membranes in conjunction with the energy provided by fuel
combustion, increasing the lifespan of car batteries and cutting
down on waste.
The membrane could also be integrated into solar panels and wind
turbines to store and manage the electricity generated. Energy
provided through these sources is prone to instability due to
their dependence on natural factors. By augmenting these energy
sources with the membrane, the issue of instability could
potentially be negated, as surplus energy generated can be
instantly stored in the membranes, and delivered for use at a
stable rate at times when natural factors are insufficient, such
as a lack of solar power during night-time.
Next Step
The research team has demonstrated the membrane's superior
performance in energy storage using prototype devices. The team
is currently exploring opportunities to work with venture
capitalists to commercialise the membrane. To date, several
venture capitalists have expressed strong interest in the
technology.
"With the advent of our novel membrane, energy storage
technology will be more accessible, affordable, and producible
on a large scale. It is also environmentally-friendly and could
change the current status of energy technology," Dr Xie said.
Journal References:
Xie Xian Ning. Energy technology: Supersizing a supercapacitor.
Nature, 477, 9; 01 September 2011 DOI: 10.1038/477009c
Xian Ning Xie, Kian Keat Lee, Junzhong Wang, Kian Ping Loh.
Polarizable energy-storage membrane based on ionic condensation
and decondensation. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011; 4
(10): 3960 DOI: 10.1039/C1EE01841H
http://www.nus.edu.sg/ilo/faculty/NRF_POC_Awardees_POC5.html
A
Supercapacitive Energy Storage Device Based On Proprietary
Nanomaterials
In the fight against environment pollution and global warming,
clean energy generation and storage is vital to the
sustainability of Singapore. Supercapacitors are the major
energy storage devices due to their extremely high capacity in
storing electric charges and energy. They are superior to
batteries because their power density is up to 100 times that of
batteries. As clean energy sources, supercapacitors have
important applications in electric vehicles and consumer
electronic devices including iPods and iPhones. The increasing
concerns on energy and environment call for new generation
supercapacitors with improved performances and reduced costs.
This project aims to use the research team’s patent-pending
nanomaterial to develop novel supercapacitors for energy storage
and management. In contrast to commercial supercapacitors
containing liquid electrolyte, our recently invented
superhydrophilic nanomaterial allows for a different mechanism
of energy storage, and thus create the possibility of a new type
of solid-state supercapacitor. According to our background IP,
the preliminary performance of the proposed supercapacitor is
comparable to that of commercial carbon-based devices. Moreover,
it has a lot of space for further improvement by optimizing the
chemical compositions of the active nanomaterials. To convert
the background IP into a commercial reality, further R&D
work is proposed in this project to deliver a new generation
supercapacitor which has market viability owing to its simpler
configuration, lower cost, and higher performances. image
Dr. Xie Xian Ning, PI, Lab Manager,
NUS Nanoscience & Nanotechnology Initiative – NanoCore,
NUS
Dr. Xie received his PhD degree in Chemistry from National
University of Singapore. He is currently Lab Manager/Principle
Investigator with NUSNNI-NanoCore. Dr. Xie has more than ten
years’ experience in nanoscience and nanotechnology. His
research interest is in advanced nanomaterials for energy and
environment sustainability. As principle author, Dr. Xie has
published more than 40 scientific papers since 2000. He also
served as reviewer for premier journals including Adv. Mater.,
Adv. Funct. Mater. and Small, etc. His current research effort
is focused on the development and commercialization of his
patent-pending nanomaterial in the water and energy market.
http://ilo.technologypublisher.com/technology/7793
8/29/2011
Polarizable
Ion-Conducting Membrane for Energy Storage
Technology Overview
A highly polarizable ion-conducting energy-storage membrane
capacitor demonstrates simplicity, easy device scaling up and
low fabrication cost for electrical energy storage. This
material system also presents a high cycle life at maintained
performance.
The membrane-based capacitor can have an average
capacitance of ~0.2 F/cm2, energy of 0.33 J/cm2 and charge of
0.39 C/cm2 across various constant resistances from 1.2 to 8.0
k?.
It can be seen that a linear increase of membrane area
corresponds to a scaling factor of 0.2 F/cm2 in capacitance.
This demonstrates that simple massive device scalability is
readily achieved due to the linear relationship as established
in Fig 1.
Figure 1:
Capacitance of membrane pieces with different area A.
Inset: Variation of capacitance
as a function of charge-discharge cycles.
Technology Features
The material system exhibits large open voltage (3.0V) as shown
in Fig. 2.

Figure 2: Comparison of
cost per Farad between membrane-based and double-layer
capacitor
High polarization current at 105 times higher than that of
typical dielectric polarization. Fig. 1 shows a polarization
current of ~250 mA/cm2 at 10 V.
Membrane-based capacitor incurs lower cost in storing energy at
$0.62/F than that of double-layer capacitors at a rate of
~$7.0/F as seen in Fig. 3.
Figure 3:
Discharge voltage V(t) of the device under constant current
Durable, negligible
capacity fading after 1000 cycles at room temperature.
Advantages
Simplicity in massive scale-up
Good cycle life, high ion conductivity and polarizability
Low cost of energy storage
Applications
Energy-storage; Supercapacitor; Battery; Fuel Cell; Data storage
http://www.materialsviews.com/details/news/1291123/Water-loving_electrodes_store_more_charge_Ionic_conductivity_in_supercapacitors.html
Water-loving
electrodes store more charge: Ionic conductivity in
supercapacitors
by
Jenny Mahoney
2011-07-19
image: Water-loving electrodes
store more charge: Ionic conductivity in supercapacitors
A new type of electrode material for supercapacitors that, for
the first time, predominantly exploits ionic conductivity is
reported online in the Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer
Physics. Compared to conventional electrode materials, which
require large surface areas and high porosities, lead researcher
Xian Ning Xie explains that the new hydrophilized polymer
network uses ion-conducting channels for fast ion transport and
charge storage.
Supercapacitors have an extremely high energy density compared
to regular capacitors and can be charged and discharged
repeatedly without degrading like batteries do. Their high
capacitance and stability in electrolyte solutions could make
them ideal for applications like uninterruptable power supplies
and hybrid cars.
The polymer network that Xie and his colleagues use includes
PSSH (poly(styrene sulfonic acid)). PSSH has a high density of
sulfonic SO3- groups, which attract a large amount of water,
creating hydrated paths with increased ionic conductivity.
According to the authors, previous publications emphasized only
the importance of electronic conductivity and surface area in
high capacitance charge storage. For supercapacitor electrode
material, “both electronic and ionic conductivity of the
material are important in terms of high capacitance charge
storage. It is this work that, for the first time, points out
the significance of ionic conductivity in supercapacitive energy
storage,” says Xie.
In their experiments, the researchers prepared PEDT:PSSH films
on a graphite substrate and tested both their capacitive
behavior as well as their stability in electrolyte solutions.
Since electrode materials for supercapacitors are often soaked
in liquid electrolyte, good stability is needed. The authors
explain that the network exhibits excellent stability due to the
cross-linking of sulfonic groups in PSSH, which stops it from
dissolving. From a practical standpoint, Xie says “This is an
added advantage in device fabrication and operation, as in
current supercapacitors, insulating binders have to be added to
ensure the adhesion of electrode materials on the collector
surfaces.”
In this work, Xie and coworkers demonstrate that
hydrophilizer-based ionic conductivity can greatly improve
supercapacitor performance. In the future, they plan to “combine
the ionic-conduction network to other electronic-conduction
materials, and thus to develop composite materials for better
device performance”.
Macromolecular Chemistry and
Physics
Volume 211, Issue 20, pages
2187–2192, October 15, 201
A
Nanosegregant Approach to Superwettable and
Water-Attracting Surfaces
1. Xian Ning Xie1,*,
2. Sharon Xiaodai Lim2,
3. Yuzhan Wang2,
4. Xingyu Gao2,
5. Kian Keat Lee1,
6. Chorng Haur Sow2,
7. Xiaohong Chen3,
8. Kian Ping Loh1,3,
9. Andrew Thye Shen Wee1,2
Abstract
A simple and economical approach to the preparation of
superhydrophilic and water-capturing surfaces is reported. In
this method, a common polymer aqueous blend is drop-cast onto a
substrate, and the natural drying of the aqueous drop allows for
the formation of phase-segregated nanosegregants between the
bulk film and substrate surface. The nanosegregant is then
exposed by dissolving the bulk film using water. The
nanosegregant is stable, water-insoluble and optically
transparent, and exhibits superhydrophilicity with a minimum
contact angle below 10°. It also displays strong
water-attracting ability. The mechanism of superwettability and
water-capturing behavior is discussed in terms of the
self-organization and functional group of the nanosegregant.
WO
2011087458
SUPERHYDROPHILIC AND
WATER-CAPTURING SURFACES
2011-07-21
Inventor(s): XIE XIAN NING [SG]; LOH KIAN
PING [SG] + (XIE, XIAN NING, ; LOH, KIAN PING)
Applicant(s): UNIV SINGAPORE [SG]; XIE XIAN
NING [SG]; LOH KIAN PING [SG] + (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF
SINGAPORE, ; XIE, XIAN NING, ; LOH, KIAN PING)
Classification: - international:
C09K3/00; C09K3/18; H01G4/14
Abstract
A coated substrate includes a substrate and a coating containing
a water insoluble polymer and a water soluble polymer, the two
polymers, due to different water affinity, forming a
nanosegregant on the substrate. Also disclosed are a method of
preparing the above-described coated substrate and the use of
this coated substrate in a solid-state supercapacitor.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Typically, superhydrophilic surfaces have a water contact angle
of less than 25[deg.] and water-capturing surfaces retain water
as a uniform film having a thickness of millimeters.
Many techniques have been developed to prepare superhydrophilic
surfaces. See I.P. Parkin et. al., J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15,
1689. For example, superhydrophilic surfaces are obtained by
UV-irradiation of oxide semiconductor films such as Ti02 and
ZnO. In this method, the superhydrophilicity, induced by
photon-generated short-lived charges, gradually disappears
without continuous UV illumination. See, e.g., X.M. Li et. al.,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1350, A. Lafuma et. al., Nat. Mater.
2003, 2, 457.
A method has been devised for producing water-capturing surfaces
that mimic the water harvesting wing surfaces of the Namib
Desert beetle. See L. Zhai, Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 1213. This
method is not suitable for large-scale production as it involves
layer- by-layer multi-step patterning and deposition of both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic components.
Of note, superhydrophilic surfaces do not necessarily possess
water-capturing capacity.
Surfaces that are superhydrophilic and/or water-capturing have
many industrial applications. Superhydrophilicity prevents fog
formation, as condensed water spreads across a superhydrophilic
surface. On the other hand, water-capturing surfaces can be used
to draw water from dew in arid areas. A surface that possesses
both superhydrophilicity and water-capturing capacity is ideal
for use in a solid-state supercapacitor.
There is a need for cost-efficient methods of preparing enduring
superhydrophilic and/or water-capturing surfaces.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One aspect of this invention relates to a coated substrate
having a surface that possesses both superhydrophilicity and
water-capturing capacity. The coated substrate includes (i) a
coating having a water insoluble polymer and a water soluble
polymer, and (ii) a substrate covered by the coating.
The two polymers, due to their different water affinity, form a
nanosegregant having a thickness of 1-10 nm (e.g., 1-5 ran).
More specifically, in the nanosegregant, the water insoluble
polymer adheres onto the substrate and the water soluble polymer
adheres onto the adhered water insoluble polymer. The
nanosegregant has a water contact angle of 0-25[deg.] (e.g.,
5-20[deg.]) and a capability to capture a water film having a
thickness of 0.1-10 mm (e.g., 0.5-3.0 mm).
The coating can further include, on top of the nanosegregant, a
conductive non- nanosegregant film containing the same water
soluble polymer and the same water insoluble polymer. Unlike the
nanosegregant, this film, having a thickness of
0.4-500 [mu][pi][iota], does not exhibit either
superhydrophilicity or water-capturing capacity.
The water soluble polymer contains identical or different
hydrophilic and hygroscopic groups, e.g., carboxylic groups or
sulfonic groups. An example of such a water soluble polymer is
poly(styrene sulfonic acid) ("PSSH"). The water insoluble
polymer, on the other hand, contains identical or different
electrically conductive groups, e.g., aniline groups or
thiophene groups. An example of such a water insoluble polymer
is poly(3,4-ethelynedioxythiophene ("PEDT"). In one embodiment
of the above- described coated substrate, PSSH and PEDT are used
as a water soluble polymer and a water insoluble polymer,
respectively, at a ratio of 2.5 : 1 to 20: 1 by weight (e.g.,
6:1 by weight).
Another aspect of this invention relates to a method of
preparing the coated substrate depicted above. The method
includes at least three steps: (i) providing an aqueous
dispersion containing a water soluble polymer and a water
insoluble polymer, (ii) applying the aqueous dispersion onto a
surface of a substrate, and (iii) allowing the applied aqueous
dispersion to dry to form on the surface of the substrate a
nanosegregant, due to different water affinity of the two
polymers. The excess applied polymers form a non-nanosegregant
film, which is mentioned above. The method can further include,
after step (iii), a step of removing the excess applied polymers
to expose the nanosegregant.
The coated substrate of this invention can be a positive
electrode having a coating that includes both a nanosegregant
and a non-nanosegregant film. This coated positive electrode can
be used to make a solid-state supercapacitor. Such a solid-state
supercapacitor includes (i) a positive electrode, (ii) a
negative electrode, (iii) a nanosegregant, as described above,
formed from an aqueous dispersion that contains an ionizable
water soluble polymer and a water insoluble polymer due to their
different water affinity of the two polymers, and (iv) a
conductive film, as described above, containing the water
soluble polymer and the water insoluble polymer. The
nanosegregant is disposed between the positive electrode and the
film, and the film is disposed between the negative electrode
and the nanosegregant.
The details of one or more examples of the invention are set
forth in the description below. Other features, objects, and
advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed
description of the examples and also from the drawings and the
appending claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The drawings are first described.
Fig. 1 is a schematic
diagram illustrating a process of preparing a superhydrophilic
and water-capturing surface.
Fig. 2 is a schematic
diagram illustrating a process of preparing a solid-state
supercapacitor.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
INVENTION
Within the scope of this invention is a substrate having a
coating made of a water soluble polymer and a water insoluble
polymer. The coating includes a nanosegregant (with a thickness
of 1-10 nm) containing the two polymers and, optionally a
conductive non-nanosegregant film (with a thickness of 0.4-500
[mu][iota][eta]) also containing the two polymers. The
nanosegregant unexpectedly exhibits both superior
superhydrophilicity and superior water-capturing capacity. The
substrate can be a metal, an insulator, a semiconductor, a
polymer, or a combination thereof. Examples of a metal include
gold, silver, copper, iron, aluminum, lead and alloy (i.e.,
stainless steel). Examples of an insulator include Si02, wood,
porcelain, clay, alumina, silicon, and paper. Examples of a
semiconductor include silicon, silicon carbide, gallium
arsenide, silicon nitride, indium sulfide, zinc oxide, and
diamond. Examples of a polymer include P VC, Teflon,
polycarbonate, polyester, nitrocellulose, polyethersulfone, and
polypropylene.
To prepare a coated substrate of this invention, one applies
onto the surface of a substrate an aqueous dispersion including
a water soluble polymer and a water insoluble polymer. An
artisan can mix the two polymers in water to obtain this
dispersion, or purchase it from a commercial supplier.
The term "water soluble polymer" refers to a polymer that
contains identical or different hydrophilic and hygroscopic
groups (e.g., carboxylic groups and sulfonic groups), which make
the polymer soluble or dispersible in water. Each of the groups
can exist in the form of an acid (e.g., carboxylic acid and
sulfonic acid), or in the form of a salt (e.g., carboxylate and
sulfonate). Note that when the water soluble polymer is used to
prepare a supercapacitor as discussed below, such a polymer must
also be ionizable.
The term "water insoluble polymer" refers to a conductive
polymer that does not contain ionizable or strong polar groups,
but contains identical or different electrically conducting
groups (e.g., aniline groups and thiophene groups). Each of the
groups can exist in the form of an unsubstituted group (e.g.,
aniline and thiophene), or in the form of a substituted group
(e.g. substituted aniline and substituted thiophene).
It is critical that the two polymers can be well dispersed in
water as nanoparticles (e.g., a diameter of 20-120 nm) so as to
form an aqueous dispersion.
The ratio between the water soluble polymer and the water
insoluble polymer varies. It affects the properties of the
nanosegregant and the film prepared from the two polymers, e.g.,
superhydrophilicity, conductivity, and water-capturing capacity.
One can apply the aqueous dispersion onto a substrate by
drop-casting. Other methods include, but are not limited to,
spin coating, spray coating, roller coating, flow coating,
roll-to-roll coating, and electrospinning. Once an aqueous
dispersion has been applied onto a substrate, it is left to dry.
During this process, the water soluble polymer and the water
insoluble polymer undergo phase segregation. As a result, a
nanosegregant forms on top of the substrate and a conductive
non-nanosegregant film forms on top of the nanosegregant. The
conductive film can be washed away to expose the nanosegregant.
Due to the intermolecular reorganization, the nanosegregant
adheres strongly to the substrate surface.
It has been found that nanosegregants formed on various
substrates remain on the substrates surfaces even after boiling
in water or other common solvents.
The phase segregation is driven by the different water affinity
of the water soluble polymer and the water insoluble polymer.
The two polymers segregate themselves on the substrate surface
to reach a thermodynamic equilibrium in order to minimize the
Gibbs free energy of the whole system.
The nanosegregant thus formed, not soluble in water, has a
thickness of 1-10 nm. Optionally, it also has a nanometer length
and a nanometer width, e.g., 20-150 nm. These dimensions can be
measured by an atomic force microscope (AFM). See X. N. Xie, et.
al., Macromol. Chem. Phys, 2010, 211, 2187. It exhibits two
unexpected superior features. First, it transforms various
substrate surfaces into superhydrophilic surfaces with water
contact angles of 0-25[deg.], regardless of the water
wettability of the substrate surfaces. Second, the nanosegregant
demonstrates a strong water-capturing capacity. With a thickness
of nanometers, it is capable of capturing a water film having a
thickness of 0.1-10 mm.
In one embodiment, the density of the hydrophilic and
hygroscopic groups contained in the water soluble polymer are in
the order of 10 groups/cm in the segregant and the density of
the electrically conducting groups contained in the water
insoluble polymer are also in the same order.
When PEDT is used as a water insoluble polymer and PSSH is used
as a water soluble polymer, the nanosegregant thus formed
contains both PEDT and PSSH. The sulfonic acid groups contained
in PSSH are distributed on the nanosegregant surface and provide
the strong hydration force for water-capturing after the
above-described phase segregation. Previous calculations have
shown that one sulfonic acid group can capture five water
molecules to form a [Eta]502<+> hydronium nanocluster. See
H. M. Li, et. al., Polymer International, 2001, 50, 421-428. The
hydronium nanocluster is much more stable than bulk water
because the hydrogen bond length of the nanocluster is
significantly shorter than that of bulk water. The
[Eta]502<+> nanocluster forms the first hydration shell
surrounding the sulfonic acid group and provides the base for
further water uptake through proton derealization and hydrogen
bonding. Thus, a nanometer- thick nanosegregant can transform
various substrate surfaces into superhydrophilic surfaces, and
it can also capture a water film having a thickness of
millimeters.
The conductive non-nanosegregant film contains the same water
soluble polymer and the same water insoluble polymer in the
nanosegregant. As the two polymers in the film do not undergo
phase segregation, the film, does not exhibit either
superhydrophilicity or water-capturing capacity. The thickness
of the film (0.4-500 [mu][pi][iota]) can be determined based on
measurement by an AFM or surface profiler.
When the above-described coated substrate is used as a positive
electrode having a coating that includes both the nanosegregant
and the conductive non-nanosegregant film, a negative electrode
is attached to the film to form a supercapacitor with an
electrode/film/electrode sandwich configuration.
Both the nanosegregant and the water absorbed in the film
contribute to the supercapacitive behavior, which can be
explained by a nanosegregant-mediated charge storage mechanism.
The nanosegregant is superhydrophilic as it is negatively
charged, attributable to the ionizable and hygroscopic groups
(e.g., S03<"> sulfonic groups) in the water soluble
polymer. The nanosegregant containing immobile hygroscopic
groups is surrounded by mobile H<+> ions (due to
electrostatic interactions), and also by hydration water (due to
its superhydrophilicity). When the positive electrode is
charged, H<+> cations are forced to move through the film
towards the negative electrode. At the same time, the absorbed
hydration water is dissociated into H<+> and OH<">
ions by the charging voltage, which move in opposite directions.
When the supercapacitor is fully charged, H<+> cations
accumulate near the negative electrode, while OH<"> (and
S03<">) anions are located in the vicinity of the positive
electrode. This ionic relocation generates an internal field
that holds the positive charge near the negative electrode and
the negative charge near the positive electrode, thus achieving
charge storage in the supercapacitor. According to this
mechanism, the negatively charged nanosegregant (e.g.
OH<"> and SO3<">) on the positive electrode dictates
that the electrode is positively charged. This is in agreement
with the observation that the supercapacitive behavior only
takes place on the positive electrode and the influence that
small H<+> cations can move through the film due to their
high mobility in the film. In contrast, negatively charging the
electrode coated with a nanosegregant requires the movement of
OH<"> anions through a thick film, which is not favorable
due to the poor mobility of OH<"> anions in the film. The
film, which does not contain a nanosegregant, just acts as a
typical conducting media for its electronic and ionic
conductivity.
The high Cs (e.g., about 65 mF/cm<2> as shown in an
example below) of the supercapacitor is related to the large
surface area of the nanosegregant. The nominal surface area of
the nanosegregant is estimated to be at least >10 m /g. The
density of the hygroscopic groups on the nanosegregant surface
is also very high, which explains the strong hydration force for
the water-capturing behavior. The strong electrostatic field of
the nanosegregant generates a large counter-ion (H<+>)
zone and attracts thick shells of hydration water. Therefore,
the supercapacitive characteristic of the supercapacitor is
attributable to the formation of an electric double layer around
the nanosegregant under a charging voltage. The absorbed
hydration water provides mobile H<+> cations for charge
storage. Thus, the supercapacitive behavior disappears when the
absorbed water is removed.
A supercapacitor of the invention can further include in the
nanosegregant and the film, a carbon-based nanomaterial that has
a high surface area (e.g., 2000 m<2>/g) and a high
electric conductivity (e.g., 10<4> S/cm). Graphene is an
example of such a nanomaterial. Specifically, graphene powders
or flakes can be added into an aqueous dispersion of a water
soluble polymer and a water insoluble polymer. This aqueous
dispersion is then used to form a supercapacitor by the same
method described above. The supercapacitor thus prepared
exhibits even higher energy storage capacity.
The coated substrate provides numerous other industrial
applications, e.g., anti- fogging mirrors and traffic signs,
self-cleaning devices and water-harvesting devices.
Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in
the art can, based on the disclosure herein, utilize the present
invention to its fullest extent. The following specific examples
are, therefore, to be construed as merely descriptive, and not
limitative of the remainder of the disclosure in any way
whatsoever. All publications cited herein are incorporated by
reference.
Preparation of superhydrophilic and
water-capturing surfaces
A PEDT:PSSH polymer blend (CLEVIOS(TM) P, Heraeus Clevios Gmbh,
Germany, w/w 1:6), as an aqueous dispersion, was used to prepare
superhydrophilic and water-capturing surfaces. In the
dispersion, the two polymers form nanoparticles, each having a
diameter of 20-110 nm. It had a combined polymer concentration
of 1.0-3.0 % by weight.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, a PEDT:PSSH aqueous drop was first
cast onto the surface of a Si substrate and left to dry at
ambient temperature for about 3 hrs. During the drying process,
the two polymers formed a PEDT:PSSH nanosegregant on the
substrate and a PEDT:PSSH film on top of the nanosegregant. As
discussed below, AFM methodology confirmed the formation of both
the nanosegregant and the film. The film was then removed by
gently rinsing it with deionized water to expose the
nanosegregant.
The water contact angles of the Si surface, both bare and
nanosegregant-covered, were measured in a manner similar to that
described in S. H. Lu, et. al., Langmuir 2009, 25, 12806. The
water capturing capacity of the nanosegregant was estimated by
measuring the average thickness of the absorbed water film. The
average thickness was obtained by measuring both the weight of
the water captured film and the size of the water captured film.
The measurements show that the nanosegregant was
superhydrophilic (exhibiting a minimum water contact angle of
8[deg.]) and possessed a great water-capturing capacity
(retaining a water film as thick as 3.0 millimeters.
When the drying process was expedited, i.e., fast drying in
vacuum for several minutes, no nanosegregant could be observed
after the film was rinsed off. This indicated the importance of
the drying process during the nanosegregant formation. When the
PEDT:PSSH aqueous drop was left to dry at ambient temperature
for more than 3 hrs, e.g., 4.0 or 5.0 hrs, the
superhydrophilicity and water-capturing capacity of the
nanosegregant remained about the same. AFM images revealed that
the nanosegregant had a round or elongated shape. The average
width and height of the nanosegregant were -70.0 and -2.4 ran,
respectively. The maximum length of the elongated nanosegregant
was -165 nm. The thickness of the film was determined to be -1.2
[mu][pi][iota] based on measurement of the height difference
between the film-covered Si surface and the
nanosegregant-covered Si surface. The film had the same width
and the length as the segregant. See X. N. Xie, et. al.,
Macromol. Chem. Phys, 2010, 211, 2187.
The film was removed by water in seconds. The nanosegregant, on
the other hand, remained on the Si substrate after immersion in
water for half a year.
S 2p core level spectra were compiled from the film and
nanosegregant by using photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) in the
manner described in X. N. Xie, et. al., ACS NANO 2009, 3, 2722;
X. N. Xie, et. zX.Macromol. Chem. Phys, 2010, 211, 2187.
For the film, there were two peaks located at 163.5 and 167.8
eV. The peak at 163.5 eV arose from the thiophene ring of PEDT,
and the peak at 167.8 eV originated from the sulfonic group
(R-S(=0)2-OH) of PSSH. See G. Grecaynski, et. al., Thin Solid
Films, 1999, 354, 129-135.
The S 2p core level spectrum of the nanosegregant also consisted
of two peaks corresponding to the PEDT and PSSH. However, the
two peaks of the nanosegregant were systematically shifted
towards higher binding energy (by -1.4 eV). This was
attributable to the charging of the nanosegregant, as such a
shift was also observed in the PES measurement for other core
levels including C I s and Si 2p. The charging phenomenon
indicated that the nanosegregant was more insulating than the
film.
Other than Si, four additional substrates, i.e., Au, glass, mica
and plastic transparency, were also used to prepare a
nanosegregant on their surfaces by the same method described
above. The water contact angles of bare and
nanosegregant-covered substrate surfaces were measured and the
measurement results are listed in Table 1 below.
Table 1 below shows that, regardless of water wettability of the
surfaces of these substrates, the nanosegregant transformed all
of them into superhydrophilic surfaces with water contact angles
in the range of 7[deg.] to 20[deg.].
Table 1
Due to its superhydrophilicity, the nanosegregant showed an
anti-fogging effect. A glass substrate with a nanosegregant on
its surface was placed above a water boiler that generated water
steam. When the water steam condensed onto the glass substrate,
it formed a uniform water layer on the nanosegregant-covered
surface and droplets on the bare glass surface. In other words,
the nanosegregant-covered surface remained transparent and the
bare glass surface was foggy.
Other than the superhydrophilic feature, the water-capturing
capacity of the PEDT:PSSH nanosegregant was also tested. A Si
substrate with a nanosegregant on its surface was dipped into
water for a few seconds. A water film, having a thickness of
millimeters, was formed exactly where the nanosegregant was
located, indicating that the nanosegregant retained a great
amount of water. Similar water-capturing behavior was also
observed for a nanosegregant on a Au surface. The shape of the
nanosegregant was purposely made irregular. After being dipped
into water, the nanosegregant captured a water film that had
exactly the irregular shape. The other three coated substrates
listed in Table 1 also exhibited such water-capturing capacity.
Preparation of solid-state
supercapacitors
As shown in Fig. 2, an aqueous drop of PEDT:PSSH blend described
above was cast onto a Au substrate and left to dry at ambient
temperature. As a result, a PEDT:PSSH film and a PEDT:PSSH
nanosegregant were formed, with the nanosegregant disposed
between the Au substrate and the film. AFM images showed that
the nanosegregant had an elongated structure, packed densely on
the Au surface and having a length of 50-120 nm and a height of
1.5-3.8 ran. In contrast, surface profiling indicated that the
film was much thicker, i.e., having a height of about 100
[mu][iota][eta]. Finally, Ag glue was pasted on the film, thus
forming a Ag/PEDT:PSSH/Au supercapacitor.
Current-voltage (IV) curves were compiled from this
supercapacitor by scanning the Au electrode voltage in the form
of 0->8->0 V at different scan rates. The IV curves were
characterized by strong hysteresis between the forward (0->8
V) and reverse (8->0 V) currents. The hysteresis depended on
the voltage scan rate v; namely, the higher the v, the greater
the hysteresis. This behavior is indicative of charge storage in
the supercapacitor. By integrating the area Aj, (the active area
of Ag electrode was ~1.0 mm<2>) of the hysteresis and
employing the equation Q = ^<h>/v, the typical amount of
charges Q stored in the supercapacitor was estimated to be about
14.4 mC.
The supercapacitor was also charged by a constant current of 2.0
mA for 20 minutes with a charging voltage of 5.0 - 8.0 V applied
to the Au electrode. It was then discharged to measure the power
and the energy delivered by the supercapacitor. The fully
charged supercapacitor showed a typical open-circuit voltage Voc
of 1.85 - 2.2 V. Under a discharge current of 1.0 mA, the
voltage of the supercapacitor dropped from 2.0 V to 0.02 V
within 1.2 s. The discharge time increased to 1335 s when a much
smaller discharge current of 0.001 mA was used. The discharge
current was also detected with a constant resistance R connected
with the supercapacitor. When R was 5.0 I D, the initial current
was -0.4 mA and the discharge completed in 9.2 s. When R was
1000 i-[Omega], the initial current was in the order of several
[mu][Alpha] and the discharge took -2000 s.
A Ragone plot was constructed for the supercapacitor using data
obtained in the constant current and resistance methods
described above. The Ragone plot shows that the energy density
was quite stable (-3.5 W.h/g) during the entire discharge
period. The maximum power density was 1 1000 W/kg, comparable to
that reported for electrolyte solution-based supercapacitors.
See, e.g., B. E. Conway, Electrochemical
Supercapacitor s: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological
Applications, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York, 1999;
A. S. Arico, et. al, Nature Mater. 2005, 4, 366. Table 2 below
lists the capacitance C, output energy E, specific capacitance
Cm specific capacitance Cs, and energy density Em of the
supercapacitor using the data obtained by the above-described
constant current and resistance methods. The Cm, Cs, and Em were
obtained by normalizing the C and E to the PEDT:PSSH film mass
of the supercapacitor. The mass of the film was determined by
peeling off the film and weighing it with a microbalance. It was
about 0.1 mg for the film with an area of 1.0 mm . The m and Em
were about 6.5 F/g (or Cs was 65 mF/cm ) and 3.5 W.h/kg,
respectively.
In addition, the fully charged supercapacitor was used as an
energy source to power a digital thermometer (1.5 V, 0.06 mA)
for durations of up to 60 s. As listed in Table 2, the energy
delivered to the thermometer and the corresponding capacitances
were in agreement with those obtained in constant current and
constant resistance methods.
Table 2
This supercapacitive behavior was found to depend on presence of
water in the film. Some water remained in the film as the
supercapacitor was prepared and measurement were performed both
at ambient temperature. When the supercapacitor was placed in a
vacuum chamber to remove absorbed water, it was found to lose
the charge storage function; namely, the IV curve of the film
showed no hysteresis. Only a negligible open circuit voltage
(Voc) of 0.3 V and a short circuit current (7SC) of 0.2
[mu][Alpha] were observed after fully charging the
supercapacitor at 2.0 mA for 20 minutes. These results were in
sharp contrast to a V[infinity] of 1.89 - 2.2 V and a 7SC of 0.8
- 3.0 mA as observed with the film having absorbed water.
The supercapacitive behavior was found to also depend on
presence of a nanosegregant. In a control experiment, a thin
layer (~20 nm) of PEDT:PSSH was first formed on a Au surface by
fast drying the layer in vacuum for several minutes. No
nanosegregant was formed as the drying process was too short.
This was confirmed by lack of the superhydrophilicity of the
surface covered by the thin layer. An aqueous drop of PEDT:PSSH
blend was then cast on top of the thin layer to form a control
film. The control film also did not contain a nanosegregant. IV
curve compiled from the control film showed almost no hysteresis
due to absence of a nanosegregant. After charging the
supercapacitor at 2.0 mA for 20 minutes, a Voc of 0.30 - 0.40 V
and a Isc of 0.1 - 1.0 [mu][Alpha] were observed, indicating the
lack of the supercapacitive behavior in the device containing
the control layer and the control film.
In addition to Au, transparent fluorinated tin oxide (FTO)
conducting glass and graphite were also used as the positive
electrodes to prepare supercapacitors. Table 3 below lists the
capacitance C, output energy E, specific capacitance Cm, Cs and
energy density Em of these three supercapacitors having
different substrates.
Table 3
Table 3 shows that Cs was in a range of 65 - 68 mF/cm and Em was
about 3.5 W.h/kg for all three different supercapacitors,
indicating that they had consistent supercapacitor performance.
More supercapacitors were made by the following method. Graphene
powders or flakes were added into the PEDT:PSSH aqueous
dispersion, this aqueous dispersion was then used to form a
supercapacitor by the same method described above. This new
supercapacitor showed an increase of energy storage capacity by
5-15%.
OTHER EMBODIMENTS
All of the features disclosed in this specification may be
combined in any combination. Each feature disclosed in this
specification may be replaced by an alternative feature serving
the same, equivalent, or similar purpose. Thus, unless expressly
stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is only an example of a
generic series of equivalent or similar features.
From the above description, one skilled in the art can easily
ascertain the essential characteristics of the present
invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope
thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the
invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Thus,
other examples are also within the claims.