rexresearch.com
Raymond SEDWICK, et al
RING ( Resonant Induction
Near-Field Generator )
http://www.eng.umd.edu/html/media/release.php?id=208
August 13, 2013
UMD Propulsion Technology Offers New
Possibilities for Satellite Positioning, Space Exploration
by Jennifer Rooks
jfrooks@umd.edu
Electromagnetic propulsion could exponentially expand satellite
capabilities by providing a propellant-less formation flight
technology.
COLLEGE PARK, Md. -- New electromagnetic propulsion technology
being tested by the University of Maryland's Space Power and
Propulsion Laboratory (SPPL) on the International Space Station
could revolutionize the capabilities of satellites and future
spacecraft by reducing reliance on propellants and extending the
lifecycle of satellites through the use of a renewable power
source.
Because a finite propellant payload is often the limiting factor
on the number of times a satellite can be moved or repositioned in
space, a new propulsion method that uses a renewable, onboard
electromagnetic power source and does not rely on propellants
could exponentially extend a satellite's useful life span and
provide greater scientific return on investment.
Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering Ray Sedwick and his
research team have been developing technology that could enable
electromagnetic formation flight (EMFF), which uses locally
generated electromagnetic forces to position satellites or
spacecraft without relying on propellants. Their research project
is titled Resonant Inductive Near-field Generation System, or
RINGS.
RINGS was sent to the International Space Station on August 3 as
part of a payload launched on Japan’s HTV-4 Cargo Ship from the
Tanegashima Space Center. The project is scheduled for four test
sessions on the research station. Astronauts will unpack the
equipment, integrate it into the test environment and run
diagnostics. From there, RINGS will undergo three science research
sessions where data will be collected and transmitted back to the
ground for analysis.
RINGS is composed of two units, each of which contains a specially
fabricated coil of aluminum wire that supports an oscillating
current of up to 18 amps and is housed within a protective
polycarbonate shell. Microcontrollers ensure that the currents
oscillate either in-phase or out-of-phase to produce attracting,
repelling and even shearing forces. While aluminum wire was chosen
for its low density in this research prototype, eventual systems
would employ superconducting wires to significantly increase range
and performance.
In the spring of 2013, RINGS was tested for the first time in a
microgravity environment on NASA's reduced gravity aircraft. UMD
graduate students Allison Porter and Dustin Alinger were on hand
to oversee the testing. RINGS achieved the first and only
successful demonstration of EMFF in full six degrees of freedom to
date.
"While reduced gravity flights can only provide short, 15-20
second tests at a time, the cumulative test time over the four-day
campaign provided extremely valuable data that will allow us to
really get the most from the test sessions that we’ll have on the
International Space Station," said Sedwick.
In addition to EMFF, the RINGS project is also being used to test
a second technology demonstrating wireless power transfer (WPT).
WPT may offer a means to wirelessly transfer power between
spacecraft and in turn power a fleet of smaller vessels or
satellites. Having the power to support multiple satellites, and
using EMFF as a propellant-less means to reposition those same
satellites, provides the flexibility to perform formation control
maneuvers such as on-orbit assembly or creating synthetic aperture
arrays. A synthetic aperture array uses a network of smaller
antennas to function collectively as one large antenna. Larger
antennas are capable of producing higher resolution images and
better quality data.
The RINGS project has been a collaborative effort between UMD SPPL
and partners from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
and Aurora Flight Sciences (AFS). MIT's SPHERES (Synchronized
Position Hold Engage Re-orient Experimental Satellites) program
provided SPPL an existing test bed of miniature satellites and
control algorithms that will be used to integrate and test the
RINGS technology. AFS has provided hardware development and
support for the integration of RINGS onto the SPHERES platform.
SPPL began work on RINGS in 2011, and the project is funded under
a joint DARPA/NASA program that aims to demonstrate and develop
new technologies that could enable future space missions by using
a network of smaller spacecraft.
Dr. Ray Sedwick
sedwick@umd.edu
301-405-4388
Lab Location:
3247 Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building
Building #225
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
http://www.sppl.umd.edu/projects/03-resonant-inductive.html
Project: Resonant Inductive Near-field
Generation System (RINGS)
Sponsors: Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Collaborators: David Miller (Co-I), Peter Fisher, Alex Buck, Greg
Eslinger (MIT)
John Merk (Co-I), Roedolph Opperman (Aurora Flight Sciences)
Elisenda Bou (UPC Barcelona Tech)
RINGS (Resonant Inductive Near-field Generation System) is a
demonstration of combined technology for electromagnetic formation
flight (EMFF) and wireless power transfer (WPT) that will launch
to the International Space Station (ISS) in July 2013. Currently,
multi-satellite constellations use traditional thrusters to
maneuver into a desired position and orientation relative to each
other which shortens the operational lifetime of the constellation
due the limited onboard propellant. Electromagnetic formation
flight is a propellant-less propulsion technology that aims to
mitigate this operational lifetime constraint. Magnetic forces and
torques are generated by circulating electrical current through a
coil attached to each vehicle which can be used to reorient the
satellites relative to one another.
fig 4This approach uses electrical energy which is readily
available through the use of solar panels rather than expending
propellant. Inside the ISS, two RINGS vehicles will be used to
develop and test EMFF control algorithms in a full six
degree-of-freedom microgravity environment. The two RINGS are each
attached to a SPHERES vehicle (launched to the ISS in April 2006)
that will provide metrology information, commanding, and data
storage for the RINGS. Additionally, RINGS will demonstrate
another technology – wireless power transfer using the same coils
as highly coupled resonators for magnetic induction. One RINGS
unit will act as the primary by actively driving current in the
coil while the other unit will act as the secondary by passively
receiving power from the current induced by the primary unit’s
magnetic field. Expected power transmission is about 50 Watts over
an axial distance of 1 meter.
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LONG RANGE WIRELESS
POWER TRANSFER
US2012010079
[ PDF ]
2012-01-12
A wireless energy transfer system includes a primary and one (or
more) secondary oscillators for transferring energy therebetween
when resonating at the same frequency. The long range (up to and
beyond 100 m) efficient (as high as and above 50%) energy transfer
is achieved due to minimizing (or eliminating) losses in the
system. Superconducting materials are used for all current
carrying elements, dielectrics are either avoided altogether, or
those are used with a low dissipation factor, and the system is
operated at reduced frequencies (below 1 MHz). The oscillators are
contoured as a compact flat coil formed from a superconducting
wire material. The energy wavelengths exceed the coils diameter by
several orders of magnitude. The reduction in radiative losses is
enhanced by adding external dielectric-less electrical capacitance
to each oscillator coil to reduce the operating frequency. The
dielectric strength of the capacitor is increased by applying a
magnetic cross-field to the capacitor to impede the electrons
motion across an air gap defined between coaxial cylindrical
electrodes.
REFERENCE TO THE RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This utility patent application is based on the Provisional
Patent Application No. 61/350,229 filed 1 Jun. 2010.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention is directed to power transfer
systems, and more in particular to a system for wireless energy
transfer between electromagnetic resonant objects.
[0003] More in particular, the present invention is directed to
the power transfer between resonators (also referred to herein
intermittently as oscillators) in highly efficient and low loss
manner, thereby permitting long range wireless power transfer.
[0004] The present invention is further directed to a system for
wireless power transfer with diminished resistive, dielectric, and
radiative losses, where such is operated at reduced frequencies to
produce higher efficiencies at long range distances.
[0005] The present invention also is directed to a system for
wireless power transfer between electromagnetic oscillators spaced
apart at a desired distance from each other where the system
components are manufactured from superconductive materials for
diminishing resistive losses. Use of dielectric materials is
minimized or avoided to decrease the dielectric losses, and the
operating resonant frequency is maintained below a predetermined
level to attain a desired amount of power transfer at an increased
efficiency level.
[0006] In addition, the present invention is directed to a system
for wireless power transfer, where the oscillators are formed as
superconductive dielectric-less compact (flat) coils coupled to
dielectric-less (and preferably superconductive) capacitors
contoured in a shape permitting the application of a magnetic
field for increasing the effective dielectric strength of air or
other medium between the capacitor electrodes thereby permitting a
dielectric-less capacitive element with satisfactory dielectric
properties.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0007] Wireless energy (or power) transfer is a promising approach
for environmentally friendly, convenient and reliable powering of
electrical and electronic devices, such as computers, electric
vehicles, cell phones, etc.
[0008] Resonant Inductive Coupling pioneered by Nikola Tesla in
the early 20thcentury has later found applications in power
transfer systems.
[0009] Recent developments in the field of power transfer have
demonstrated the ability to transfer 60 W power with 40%
efficiency covering 2 m distance. This medium-range wireless
energy transfer system (called "WiTricity") has been developed by
a group of MIT scientists based on strong coupling between
electromagnetic resonant objects, i.e., transmitters and receivers
that contain magnetic loop antennas critically attuned to the same
frequency. As presented in A. Karalis, et al., "Efficient Wireless
Non-Radiative Mid-Range Energy Transfer", Ann. Phys., 10.1016
(2007), and U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,741,734 and 7,825,543, the system for
wireless energy transfer includes a first resonator structure
configured to transfer energy non-radiatively to a second
resonator structure over medium range distances. These distances
are characterized as being large in comparison to transmit-receive
antennas, but small in comparison to the wavelength of the
transmitted power.
[0010] The resonators in these energy transfer systems are formed
as self-resonant conducting coils from a conductive wire which is
wound into a helical coil of a predetermined radius r and height h
surrounded by air, as shown in FIG. 1. The non-radiative energy
transfer in this system is mediated by a coupling of a resonant
field evanescent tail of the first resonator structure and a
resonant field evanescent tail of the second resonator structure.
[0011] The ability to effectively transfer power over desired
distances, depends on losses in the resonance system which may be
attributed to ohmic (material absorption) loss inside the wire,
radiative loss in the free space, as well as dielectric losses in
dielectric materials used in the system.
[0012] In "WiTricity," the maximum power coupling efficiency of
coils fabricated from standard conductors occurs at the 10 MHz
range, where the combination of resistive and radiative losses are
at a minimum. The effective range of these systems, i.e., a few
meters at non-negligible efficiencies, has significant application
within everyday life to provide power to personal electronics
(laptops, cell phones) or other equipment within the confines of
room. However, this type of system is incapable of efficient power
transfer with respect to relatively long range applications.
[0013] It would be highly desirable to extend the reach of the
resonant inductive power transfer for applications in space, for
example, for the on-orbit power transfer between the elements of a
satellite cluster or on the surface of the moon between a
centralized power station and a rover. In order to attain greater
distances in wireless power transfer, higher efficiencies of power
transfer are necessary. Therefore, it is highly desirable to
provide a long range power transfer system where the loss paths
existing in the mid-range system are minimized or eliminated.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0014] It is therefore an object of the present invention to
provide a long range wireless power transfer system where high
efficiencies of power transfer are attained due to a reduction in
or elimination of parasitic loss mechanisms attributed to the
internal material dissipation (resistive, or ohmic, losses) as
well as radiative losses.
[0015] It is a further object of the present invention to provide
a long range inductive power transfer system in which the
oscillators are manufactured, based on superconducting principles
(superconducting materials, as well as compactness for
cryo-cooling) to reduce the ohmic losses.
[0016] It is another object of the present invention to provide an
efficient long range wireless power transfer system in which the
system components are free of dielectric losses.
[0017] It is also an object of the present invention to provide a
long range inductive wireless power transfer system in which
external capacitances are coupled to the superconductive
oscillators to lower the operating frequency, thereby attaining
higher efficiencies and thus permitting power transfer over
greater distances. Preferably, the capacitors are manufactured
from superconductive materials and are dielectric-less.
[0018] It is still a further object of the present invention to
provide a power transfer system using superconducting
dielectric-less system components while operating the system at a
reduced operating frequency to attain effective power transfer
over extended distances.
[0019] In one aspect, the present invention is envisioned as a
system for long range wireless power transfer which comprises a
primary oscillator and one (or a plurality of) secondary
oscillator(s) displaced from the primary oscillator at a distance
D (which may fall in any desired power transfer range, including
both mid-range, as well as long-range over 100 m, for instance) to
receive energy from the primary oscillator. The oscillators are
configured into flat compact coils formed from a superconducting
material and resonating substantially at the same frequency. The
frequency is maintained below a predetermined frequency level
(below 1 MHz, and preferably, at or below ~200 KHz) which provides
a significant reduction in radiative losses in both the primary
and secondary oscillators. It is important that the system is
operated at wavelengths that exceed the diameter of the coils by
several orders of magnitude.
[0020] The system includes a source of energy coupled up-stream of
said primary oscillator and one or a plurality of power consuming
unit(s) each coupled down-stream of the respective secondary
oscillator.
[0021] A uni-turn drive coil is coupled between the source of
energy and the primary coil. A drain coil is coupled between the
secondary oscillator and the respective power consuming unit.
[0022] A plurality of capacitors may be employed in the instant
system. Each capacitor is coupled to a respective oscillator. The
capacitor includes a pair (or more) of coaxially disposed
cylindrical electrodes including an inner cylindrical electrode
and one (or more) outer cylindrical electrode(s) disposed in a
co-axial surrounding relationship with the inner cylindrical
electrode. An air gap is defined between cylindrical walls of the
inner and outer cylindrical electrodes.
[0023] Preferably, the capacitor, similar to the oscillators, is
formed from a superconducting material. The superconducting
material for the oscillators and the capacitors may be any
superconductor, including for example, Type I superconductors,
High Temperature Superconductors, such as BSCCO, or YBCO, as well
as room temperature superconductors.
[0024] Although, the air gap in the capacitor, and spaces between
windings in coils may be filled with a dielectric material having
a low dissipation factor, it is preferred that dielectric-less
components are used in the system. In order to provide
dielectric-less capacitor, having a satisfactory dielectric
strength, a magnetic field is applied axially to the capacitor to
increase a breakdown voltage threshold in its air gap, thereby
increasing the effective dielectric strength of air in the air gap
of the dielectric-less capacitor.
[0025] A booster resonator coil may be positioned between the
primary and the secondary oscillators to permit even larger
transfer distances. The booster resonator coil resonates in phase
with the primary oscillator structure to receive energy from it
and is in phase with the secondary oscillator to transfer power
thereto.
[0026] A thermo-control system is provided in the subject system,
which controls the cryo-equipment operatively coupled to the
oscillators and capacitors. The shape and dimensions of the coils
and capacitors must be compatible with dimensional abilities of
the cryo-equipment.
[0027] The present invention also is envisioned as a method for
long range wireless energy transfer, which includes the steps of:
fabricating primary and secondary oscillator structures as compact
flat coils formed from a superconducting material,
displacing the secondary oscillator from the primary oscillator a
desired distance which may fall in the range below as well as
exceeding 100 m,
generating an oscillating current of a resonant frequency in the
primary oscillator so that the oscillating current creates an
oscillating field, and
sensing the oscillating current of the primary coil by the second
oscillator, thereby causing oscillation of the secondary
oscillator structure at the same resonant frequency, thus
transferring energy from the primary to the secondary oscillator.
[0032] In the subject method, by maintaining the resonant
frequency below a predetermined frequency level (for example,
below 1 MHz, and preferably at or below ~200 KHz), a reduced
radiative loss in both the primary and secondary oscillators may
be attained.
[0033] The method further comprises the steps of:
coupling a capacitor element to each of the primary and secondary
coils where the capacitor is preformed to include an inner
cylindrical electrode and one (or more) outer cylindrical
electrode(s) co-axially disposed around the inner cylindrical
electrode. Specific care is taken to define an air gap between
cylindrical walls of the inner and outer cylindrical electrodes.
[0035] Finally, a magnetic field is applied axially to the
capacitor to increase the effective dielectric strength of air in
the air gap, thereby permitting formation of a dielectric-less
capacitor which, however, has a satisfactory dielectric strength.
The capacitor preferably is formed from a superconducting
material.
[0036] These and other objects and advantages will become apparent
from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with
the accompanying patent Drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0037] FIG. 1. is a schematic representation of a wireless
energy transfer scheme of the prior art;
[0038] FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a
wireless energy transfer system of the present invention;
[0039] FIG. 3 is an equivalent scheme of the system
presented in FIG. 2;
[0040] FIG. 4 is a diagram representing the power flow in
the present system;
[0041] FIG. 5 is a representation of the superconducting
compact oscillator of the present invention;
[0042] FIG. 6 is a representation of a section of the
superconductive oscillator of the present invention with the
"holding" mechanism;
[0043] FIG. 7 is a perspective view of one configuration of
the cylindrical capacitor used in the present system;
[0044] FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of the
connection of the capacitor to the superconducting coil;
[0045] FIG. 9 shows an alternative implementation of
the capacitor of the present invention;
[0046] FIG. 10 is a diagram representing the variation of
the Figure Of Merit (FOM) with dimensionless frequency for
different loss mode ratios in the wireless energy transfer
system;
[0047] FIG. 11 is a diagram representing a maximum
efficiency versus normalized frequency-distance product for the
case of zero ohmic dissipation;
[0048] FIG. 12 is a diagram representing efficiency versus
power mismatch;
[0049] FIG. 13 is a diagram showing the variation in charge
state of the inner (Qinner) and outer (Qouter) conductors over a
full cycle indicating the notional regions (regions 1, 2) where
significant electron release would typically occur as a result
of the electrical field at the conductor surface;
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0050] Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, the system 10 for a long range
inductive power transfer includes a source oscillator 12 (also
referred to herein as a transmitting oscillator, or a primary
oscillator) which is connected to a power source 14, and one or
several receiving (also referred to herein as secondary)
oscillator(s) 16 physically separated by a distance D from the
source oscillator 12.
[0051] As presented in FIG. 2, the system 10 may include a number
of receiving oscillators 16, each for powering a corresponding
power consuming device 18, such as, for example, cell phones, TVs,
computers, etc. It is to be understood by those skilled in the
art, that although any number of the secondary oscillators 16 is
envisioned in the present system, for the sake of simplicity
further disclosure will be presented based on a single secondary
oscillator design.
[0052] The energy provided by the power source 14 to the source
oscillator 12 is wirelessly transferred in the system 10 in a
non-radiative manner to the receiving oscillator(s) 16 over the
distance D using the electromagnetic field. The distance D may
fall in the range between meters to hundreds (or over) of meters,
depending on the application and the ability of the power transfer
system. As will be presented in further paragraphs, the present
system 10 is designed with the ability to effectively transfer
power over long distances, i.e., 100s of meters.
[0053] As shown in FIGS. 2-3, and 5-6, the source oscillator 12,
i.e., the primary oscillator, is formed as a multi-winding coil.
The receiving oscillator, i.e., the secondary oscillator 16 is
similarly formed as a multi-winding coil.
[0054] Mounted close to each of the resonant coils, i.e., the
primary coil 12 and the secondary coil 16 is a single turn coil.
The single turn coil 20 mounted between the power source 14 and
the primary coil 12 is the drive coil 20. The energy flows from
the drive coil 20 to the primary coil 12 as shown by the arrow 24.
The drive coil 20 is connected to the power supply 14 for being
driven at the natural frequency of the primary coil 12. At this
frequency, a large oscillating current is generated in the primary
coil 12. This oscillating current creates an oscillating magnetic
field that is then sensed by the secondary coil 16 which, as a
result, will start oscillating. As the current increases in the
secondary coil 16, more energy will be available for powering the
respective power consuming device 18.
[0055] A single turn coil 22, referred to herein as the drain
coil, couples to the secondary coil 16. The energy flows from the
secondary coil 16 to the drain coil 22 as shown by the arrow 26.
The load, i.e., the power consuming device 18, is connected to the
drain coil 22 to receive power.
[0056] The ends of each resonant coil, i.e., primary coil 12, and
secondary coil 16, may or may not be connected to capacitors. As
shown in FIG. 2, the ends 28, 30 of the primary coil 12, as well
as the ends 32, 34 of the secondary coil 16 are not connected.
[0057] In an alternative embodiment, in the equivalent circuit
diagram shown in FIG. 3, as well as in FIGS. 8-9, the primary and
secondary coil components are each shown connected to a capacitor,
i.e., the capacitor 36 is coupled to the primary coil 12, and the
capacitor 38 coupled to the secondary coil 16.
[0058] Even if the resonant coils 12 and 16 are not connected to
the capacitors 36 and 38, respectively, they have a
"self-capacitance", which in conjunction with their self
inductance causes them to resonate at a particular frequency. By
adding an additional external capacitance, this frequency may be
lowered, so that it becomes easier to match the frequencies of the
primary and secondary coils 12, 16, respectively. The operation of
this system 10 is based on the ability to cause resonation of the
primary and the secondary coils at the same frequency. By adding
additional capacitances 36, 38 to the primary and secondary coils
12, 16, respectively, in addition to matching of the frequency of
the coils 12 and 16, coils of different sizes may be used. The
resonant coils, when fabricated from a superconductive material,
as will be presented further herein, may be as small as 10 cm in
diameter or as large as several meters in diameter. The
superconductor material may be selected for example, from Type I
superconductors, High Temperature Superconductors, such as BSCCO,
and YBCO, as well as room temperature superconductors.
[0059] As long as the two coils, i.e., the primary coil 12 and the
secondary coil 16, have the same resonant frequency, they may be,
but do not have to be of the same physical size. The larger
product of the two coil areas, e.g., of the primary coil 12 and
the secondary coil 16, leads to the larger amount of power which
can be transferred from the primary coil 12 to the secondary coil
16 as shown by the arrow 40. In some cases it may be advantageous
to increase the diameter of one coil and decrease the diameter of
another coil.
[0060] By lowering the losses in the primary coil 12, a higher
level of the oscillating current may be created, thereby resulting
in a larger magnetic field. Likewise, by lowering the losses in
the secondary coil 16, a higher level of the oscillating current
may be created, and more energy will be available to the load
device 18.
[0061] The power flow is shown schematically in FIG. 4 where the
power PIN comes into the primary (transmitting) coil 12 from the
power supply. Energy is stored in the primary coil 12 in the form
of an oscillating electric and magnetic field. This energy Pk may
be either transmitted to the secondary (receiving) coil 16 via the
channel 40, or lost as presented by P[Gamma]1.
[0062] The received power at the secondary (receiving) coil 16
also may be either transmitted (Pw) to the power consuming device,
or lost as shown by P[Gamma]2.
[0063] The mechanisms for power loss are attributed either to the
resistive losses in the coil wire, losses in the dielectric
material that may be used in the construction of the coils and/or
the capacitors, as well as to the losses due to radiated energy.
It is clear that by lowering the losses in the system, a higher
energy level may be available for the secondary coil 16, and a
higher overall efficiency of the system 10 is attained.
[0064] In order to reduce the losses in the present system,
multiple approaches have been considered and implemented,
including:
A. Use of superconducting material in the construction of the
components,
B. Minimizing or avoiding the use of dielectric materials in the
system components, and
C. Lowering the operating frequency (to below 1 MHz).
[0068] With respect to lowering the operating frequency, it is to
be taken in consideration that the operating frequency cannot be
lowered excessively since this approach will lower the amount of
power that may be transmitted. Therefore, a balance has to be
maintained between lowering the operating frequency for increasing
the efficiency with which the power may be transmitted and keeping
the satisfactory amount of transmitted power.
[0069] As presented in FIGS. 5 and 6, the transmitting and
receiving oscillator coils 12 and 16 are contoured as compact flat
multiturn coils. As opposed to the helical geometry of the
oscillators used in prior systems shown in FIG. 1 which was used
to reduce the self capacitance of the coil in order to target a
particular frequency (10 MHz) which was optimal with the regular
conductors being used, the present system uses lower frequencies
(below 1 MHz). Therefore a compact flat spiral contour is used
which is advantageous in occupying a lesser volume which is
important in the case of using a superconducting coil in the
present system since it facilitates enclosing the coil in the
cryogenic equipment 42, 43 schematically shown in FIGS. 2 and 3.
[0070] Shown in FIG. 6, the coil of the present invention is held
in close-up position by a structure 44 which holds each turn of
the coil spaced a predetermined fixed distance each from the other
without introducing a significant amount of dielectric material
between the windings. There are several structures 44 holding the
coil in close-up shape as shown in FIG. 5.
[0071] Although, it is possible to manufacture the coils 12, 16
with a thin layer of dielectric 45 between the windings as shown
in FIG. 8, it is preferable that there is no dielectric material
used between the turns of the coils in order to diminish or
eliminate dielectric losses in the coil.
[0072] The principle of the oscillator design, as well as the
detailed principle of the design of the capacitors 36, 38 will be
presented in following paragraphs.
[0073] Referring to FIGS. 7-9 an air-gap capacitor 36, 38 is
constructed from two coaxial cylinders 50 and 52 having different
radii (a<b). Shown in FIG. 8 is the connection of the ends of
the coil 12 or 16 to the cylindrical capacitor 36, 38 where one
end 28, 32 of the coil 12, 16, respectively, is connected to the
outer cylinder 52, while another end 30, 34 of the coil 12, 16,
respectively, is connected to the inner cylinder 50. The inner and
outer cylinders 50 and 52 of the capacitor 36 or 38 each
corresponds to a respective electrode of the capacitor.
[0074] In order that the system 10 be functional, the capacitor
36, 38 does not have to be superconducting or even
dielectric-less. However, current flowing in and out of the
capacitor will suffer from ohmic (resistive) losses if it is
fabricated from a regular conductor material, and likewise there
will be dielectric losses present if a dielectric is used. FIG. 9
shows a section of the air gap 62 filled with a dielectric 47.
[0075] The capacitor design shown with two cylindrical electrodes
is an exemplary embodiment. Any geometry may be used for the
capacitor in question. The advantage of the concentric cylinders,
however, is that such permits the use of a magnetic field to act
as a dielectric medium.
[0076] The purpose of the dielectric in a capacitor is to allow
electrodes of the capacitor to be placed closer together in order
to raise the capacitance. Without the dielectric, the electrons
penetrate the gap between the electrodes and cause shorting in the
capacitors. However, molecules of the dielectric material respond
to the changing electrical field by trying to align with it, thus
resulting in their oscillation. This effect causes an internal
friction that dissipates energy causing a dielectric loss. By
using a magnetic field, instead of the dielectric, the electrons
can be partially stopped or blocked from crossing the electrode
gap, thus allowing the electrodes to be closer together without
the risk of shorting. At the same time, since there is no material
present, the usual dielectric losses are not seen.
[0077] The superconducting capacitor may be made of the same
material as the wire of the primary and secondary coils in the
system, for instance, BCCO or YBCO, or of a Type I superconductor,
or a room temperature superconductor. However, as opposed to the
ribbon wire of the coils, the electrodes in the capacitor are
formed from solid pieces of the superconducting material.
[0078] Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 9, the capacitor also may
be constructed from several concentric electrodes. In the example
shown in FIG. 9, there are four concentric cylinders 52, 58, 60
and 63 in total connected alternately to the ends 28, 32, and 30,
34 of the oscillators 12, 16, respectively, thus increasing the
overall capacitance. The outer cylinder 52 encircles one of the
inner cylinder electrodes 58 which in turn encircles the electrode
60, etc. Any number of the concentrically disposed cylinders may
be used for the capacitor design.
[0079] The theoretical and design principles of the oscillating
structures as well as the capacitors in the subject system 10 will
be presented further herein.
[0080] The coupled-mode theory (CMT) presented in Haus, et al.,
"Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics", Prentice-Hall, N.J. (1984)
is a convenient framework to analyze performance of the subject
system 10. For small loss levels, the formalism provides for a
more physical understanding of the relevant processes.
[0081] Using a resonant circuit shown in FIG. 3, a complex
amplitude corresponding to the instantaneous power is defined as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where C, L are the capacitance and inductance, Vmax, Imax
are the peak voltage and current, v, i are the instantaneous
voltage and current and W is the total energy contained within the
circuit. With this definition, losses that are small with respect
to the recirculated power can be introduced as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where [Gamma]1a1 relates to an unrecoverable drain of power
to the environment and [kappa]12a2 is an exchange of power with a
second resonant device with complex amplitude a2 .
[0082] It may be shown by energy conservation that under this
definition the coupling coefficients must be equal
([kappa]12=[kappa]21=[kappa]) and it will be assumed throughout
that the oscillators 12, 16 are identical
([Gamma]1=[Gamma]2=[Gamma]. The figure of merit (FOM) of such a
configuration is given by [kappa]/[Gamma] which may be seen as the
rate of power coupling divided by the rate of power dissipation.
The regime of interest where this quantity is much greater than
one is referred to as "strong coupling".
[0083] As stated earlier, in the system for power transfer, the
two sources of dissipative losses are ohmic and radiative. At
radio frequencies, the current travels on the outer surface of the
conductor (skin effect) and the characteristic skin depth is given
by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where [rho] is the resistivity, [omega] is the frequency,
and [mu] is the material permeability.
[0084] For small values of [delta] compared to wire radius, the
resistance is therefore
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where R, N and w are the coil radius, number of turns in
the coil and wire width respectively, and f=f/(10 MHz). The wire
of the oscillating coils 12, 16, although other implementations
are envisioned, as an example, is assumed to be a ribbon with a
width (w) much greater than its thickness. The radiative losses
are given in the quasi-static limit as-presented in [C. Balanis,
et al., "Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design", Wiley, N.J.,
(2005)]:
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0085] From Eqs. 1 and 2, the rate of energy dissipation is
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where the last equality is simply an identification of the
usual ohmic dissipation as a function of the RMS (Root Mean
Square) current, which is Imax/[square root of]{square root over
(2)}.
[0086] From this it may be seen that the loss coefficient can be
related to the inductance and dissipation of the coil by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0087] The coupling coefficient is defined in terms of the mutual
inductance by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where again the coils are assumed identical with inductance
L.
[0088] In the quasi-static limit and at large distances D>R the
magnetic flux density at the secondary coil 16 as a result of the
primary coil 12 has the form of a dipole
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where coaxial orientation of the coils has been assumed in
the last approximation. The mutual inductance is then found from
the flux through the N linkages of the secondary coil 16 as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0089] The ratio of coupled to dissipated power follows
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0090] and from the definition of crad, the FOM becomes
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where D is in meters.
[0091] It may be seen that the FOM goes to zero at low frequencies
as a result of slowly decreasing ohmic losses, as well as at high
frequencies as a result of rapidly increasing radiative losses.
The frequency dependence of the ohmic losses shown in Eq. 12 does
not actually hold at very low frequencies where it approaches a
constant value, however this does not change the result that
follows. The FOM therefore has a maximum, and its value and
corresponding frequency are easily found from differentiating Eq.
12
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0092] The loss mode ratio governing the optimal frequency is
related to the coil design parameters by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0093] For a copper coil used in the prior art system with
parameters R=30 cm, w=4 mm, N=1 is seen to have an optimal
frequency of 10.6 MHz ( f=1.06) and a corresponding coupling ratio
(FOM) equal to 117. Eqs. 13 and 14 provide a method of designing a
set of coils for a particular frequency in such a way as to
maximize the coupling with minimum loss.
[0094] An immediate consequence of the result of the analysis
presented supra is that a reduction in the resistivity of the
oscillator provides for an increase in the efficiency of the
coupling. By eliminating the resistive losses of the primary and
secondary coils 12, 16, there is freedom to drive the frequency to
lower values, reducing the radiative losses as well. FIG. 10 shows
the frequency dependent portion of the FOM (Eq. 12) for three
different loss mode ratios. As expected, the optimal value of the
frequency is tending toward lower frequencies in the limit that
the resistive losses are zero.
[0000] It is instructive to adopt the definition given in [A.
Kurs, et al., "Wireless Power Trans. Via Strongly Coupled Mag.
Resonances", Science, 317 (2007)] for the efficiency of the power
transfer, given as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where 2[Gamma]¦a1¦<2 >and 2[Gamma]¦a2¦<2 >are
the rates of power dissipation in each oscillator coil as
discussed in the previous paragraphs, and 2[Gamma]W¦a2¦<2
>is the rate of power transferred into a load coupled to the
secondary coil 16.
[0095] A similar loss may be attributed to the amplifier driving
the primary coil 12, but the efficiency will be defined as
relative to the output power of the amplifier. In steady-state,
the power that is coupled to the secondary coil 16 must equal the
total power consumed by both dissipation and the load draw. This
results in a relationship between the energy content of each
resonator
[0000]
[kappa]<2>¦a1¦<2>=([Gamma]+[Gamma]W)<2>¦a2¦<2>
(Eq. 16)
[0000] and allows the efficiency to be expressed solely in terms
of loss and coupling parameters
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0096] Differentiating this expression with respect to
[Gamma]W/[Gamma], the maximum efficiency occurs when
[0000]
[Gamma]W<2>-[Gamma]<2>=[kappa]<2> (Eq. 18)
[0000] and at this condition, the efficiency may be expressed as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0097] While efficiency is certainly a driver of the subject
system design, the actual power level that can be transferred to a
load 18 on the receiving end is of a great importance as well.
This power is related to the recirculating energy of the coil and
using Eq. 16 may be expressed as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0098] This expression may also be differentiated with respect to
[Gamma]W/[Gamma] to find the ratio of load to dissipation that
maximizes the power. This results in [Gamma]W/[Gamma]=1, and the
maximum power to the load is therefore
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] showing that for maximum power transfer, the dissipation
should be at a minimum and the energy content and coupling should
be at a maximum. Also shown is the resulting efficiency at the
condition of maximum power transfer, and it may be seen that the
efficiency approaches a maximum value of 50% as the FOM increases.
[0099] To estimate the power and efficiency at a nominal distance
of 100 meters, Eq. 12 is used in the superconducting limit
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] and at 200 kHz, f=0.02, so that [kappa]/[Gamma] 41 and
[eta]max 95%.
[0100] To estimate the power delivered, the product of [Gamma]L is
given by Eqs. 5 and 7 as [Gamma]L=[1/2]CRad f<4>, again with
no ohmic losses.
[0101] Assuming a coil design having 100 turns of wire and a
radius of 0.5 meters, cRad=237. At maximum efficiency
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] and if Imax=100 amps then the power delivered at 100 meters
is 7.8 Watts. However, if the maximum power coupling is desired,
[Gamma]W is matched to [Gamma], and from Eq. 21 the efficiency is
~50%. The power delivered at 100 meters in this case is 80 Watts.
From Eqs. 19 and 21, and from the performance numbers just
discussed, it is seen that there is a conflict between maximizing
efficiency and maximizing power delivered.
[0102] Consider the case when maximizing the efficiency is the
goal. Eq. 19 shows that the efficiency is not appreciably affected
until [kappa]/[Gamma] drops below a value of around 3,
corresponding to a frequency-distance product ( fD) approaching
~5. At this point the maximum efficiency drops to 50% and at 200
kHz this corresponds to a distance of 250 meters. Reducing the
frequency by a factor of 10 will extend this 50% value of maximum
efficiency out to 2.5 km. The relationship between maximum
efficiency and fD in the limit of no ohmic dissipation is shown in
FIG. 11.
[0103] The results discussed above are for optimal efficiency,
where the power drawn by the load is related to the radiative
losses and coupling coefficient by Eq.
[0104] 18. This condition can be maintained by actively varying
the load to shunt excess power into onboard storage or extract it
from storage when needed. It is of interest to investigate how the
efficiency changes as a result of off-nominal operations to assess
how closely such a system would have to track power usage.
[0105] In the strong coupling regime, the maximum efficiency
occurs when [Gamma]W/[kappa] 1, but from Eq. 17, the efficiency
can be found that results over a continuum of load to coupling
ratios, spanning either side of the optimal value.
[0106] In FIG. 12, the variation of efficiency with
[Gamma]W/[kappa] for several values of [kappa]/[Gamma] is shown.
It may be seen that the sensitivity of the efficiency to a
mismatch in power goes down as the coupling strength increases. In
fact, the half-max value of the efficiency occurs where
[Gamma]w/[kappa]=([kappa]/[Gamma])<+-1>. The FOM may
therefore also be interpreted as the effective 'bandwidth' for
efficient power coupling. Thus, operating in the strong coupling
regime means that closely matching the load to an optimal value is
not critical, and in fact a considerably large mismatch may only
reduce the efficiency by an acceptably small amount.
Oscillator Design Considerations
[0107] In the previous paragraphs, a frequency of 200 kHz was
selected for use with a superconducting oscillator 12, 16 to
improve the efficiency over what can be achieved using
non-superconducting materials. As opposed to the design of
"WiTricity" where a regular conducting wire was used in order to
create a coil that has a natural resonance in the 10 MHz range to
provide maximum efficiency, helical coils having large torsion
were used as a way of reducing their self-capacitance. Since lower
frequencies (below 1 MHz, and, for example, preferably at or below
200 KHz) are of interest in the present system, more compact coils
are considered for the oscillators 12, 16.
[0108] The subject oscillators 12, 16 are formed from a
superconducting wire, for example, one that is commercially
available and is formed in the shape of ribbon that can be
conveniently wound into a flat spiral 12, 16. An example of such
wire is Bismuth Strontium Calcium Copper Oxide (BSCCO). BSCCO
("bisko") is a family of High Temperature Superconductors (HTS),
having a critical temperature of around 110 K. As such, they can
be easily cooled using liquid nitrogen (77 K at 1 atmosphere), or
by using a thermocontroller 42 for controlling a plurality of
cryo-coolers 43, as schematically shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. BSCCO is
a high temperature superconductor which does not contain a rare
earth element, and is formed into wires and offered commercially.
Also, Type I superconductor materials, as well as room temperature
superconductors, may be used as a material of the spirals 12, 16.
In one embodiment, a dielectric 45, such as 2 mil Kapton tape, may
be present between the windings of the coils 12, 16, as shown in
FIG. 8.
[0109] The inductance for such a winding is given by {E. Rosa,
"The Self and Mutual Induct. Of Linear Conductors", B. of the
Bureau of Standards, 4, 2 (1908)].
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where h (hereafter assumed negligible) is the difference
between the inner and outer radii of the windings and the other
parameters are as previously defined.
[0110] The issue of "self-capacitance" of the oscillators 12, 16
is more complicated. The flat spiral can be thought of as a long
parallel plate capacitor, wrapped around onto itself. The
capacitance per unit length around the spiral is a constant,
however the voltage distribution across the capacitor is not
constant from one end to the other, resulting in a variation in
the energy distribution. With the ends 38 of the spiral 30
unconnected, the fundamental frequency of the coil will correspond
to a half wavelength standing wave across the entire coil, such
that the current in the coil goes to zero at the ends. The
distribution of current, charge and potential around the spiral
can be given by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where the time phase of the current has been arbitrarily
chosen, and the resulting functional forms of charge and potential
satisfy charge conservation and Poisson's equation around the
spiral. Vmax has been defined as the potential across the entire
coil (end to end) and will be used to define the capacitance.
[0111] The energy per unit volume of insulator between the
windings of the coil at any given location around the spiral is
given by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where the voltage difference is taken between any point on
the spiral 12, 16 and the nearest point one turn farther along the
spiral, directly across the dielectric between the windings.
Multiplying by the cross-section of the dielectric (wd), and
integrating over the length of the spiral (1 2 [pi]RN), the
maximum total energy stored in the electric field is given as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where N>1 has been assumed. Combining the results of
Eqs. 23 and 26, the natural frequency of the flat spiral coil is
given by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0112] A coil radius of R=0.5 m may be assumed along with the
aforementioned 200 kHz target frequency. The HTS wire mentioned
above may be 4 mm wide, so using 2 mil Kapton with a dielectric
constant of 4.0 in this baseline design results in a natural
frequency of 96 kHz.
[0000] The required strength of the dielectric can be found by
equating the energy contained in the magnetic field at peak
current to the energy stored in the electric field at zero
current, given by Eq. 26. The peak current (Imax) is related to
the RMS current over [1/2] wavelength (denoted RMS/2) by a factor
of [1/2], resulting in the relation
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] and consequently
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0113] From Eq. 24, the maximum potential difference across the
dielectric will occur near the center of the coil length where the
gradient of the potential around the coil is the largest.
Multiplying the maximum gradient by the length of a single turn,
the largest potential seen across the dielectric is given by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0114] Using the baseline numbers, the maximum electric field seen
across the dielectric will be 262 V/mm, which is well below the
dielectric strength of Kapton (197 kV/mm).
[0115] A problem associated with this design results from
dissipative losses in the dielectric. The dissipation factor, also
known as the loss tangent under the relation DF=tan [delta],
represents the ratio of resistive power loss to reactive power in
the capacitor. Under the current formalism, the dissipation factor
is introduced in the same manner as the previous resistive loss
term
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where the matching of the reactance of the coil 12, 16 and
capacitor 36, 38 at resonance has been used. This result is
somewhat problematic for the efficiency, since the dissipation in
the dielectric scales identically to the power that can be
coupled. It is therefore of utmost importance either to eliminate
the dielectric whatsoever from the coils 12, 16 and the capacitors
36, 38, or to use dielectrics with the smallest possible
dissipation factor.
The effect of DF (dissipation factor) can be inserted directly
into Eq. 12, resulting in
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where elimination of the resistive losses in the coil has
still been assumed. The ratio of the loss coefficients is then
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] and the need for a low dissipation factor becomes quite
evident. At low frequencies, the dissipation in the dielectric
will dominate the radiative losses, just as was the case for the
ohmic losses previously.
[0116] To get a feel for this limitation, consider the use of
fused quartz as a dielectric, which has a relatively low
dissipation factor (~10<-4>). For the baseline design of
R=0.5 m, the ratio in Eq. 33 is approximately equal to 0.33. The
dissipation due to the dielectric would then be comparable to the
radiation losses at a frequency of f= 0.69 or about 7 MHz.
Evidently, a comparable loss level to what existed before the
superconducting wire was introduced has returned.
[0117] To return to the efficiency offered by reducing the
frequency to below 1 MHz, for example to about or below ~200 kHz,
the ratio of dissipative loss to radiative loss given in Eq. 33
would have to be reduced by a factor of at least 10<-5>.
This does not appear to be a viable approach unless the dielectric
is removed altogether as shown in the presented embodiment of
FIGS. 5-6. Even the presence of a cryogen such as liquid nitrogen
to cool the superconducting wire will result in a loss tangent of
approximately 5(10<-5>), so designs apparently must avoid
the use of any dielectric in the inter-electrode space.
Superconducting Capacitor Design
[0118] Once the ohmic and dielectric losses are removed from the
coil 12, 16, the resulting natural frequency may not be at the
level desired for the system operation. Further reduction in
frequency may be made possible by adding more capacitance 36, 38
externally to the coil 30, as shown in FIGS. 2, 3 and 8. The use
of capacitors without dielectrics is desired in order to retain
the high Q-values of the superconducting oscillator 12, 16. The
limitation of the dielectric-free capacitor 36, 38 is the low
dielectric strength of the remnant gas in the gap. An approach
taken herein with the goal to increase the breakdown voltage of
the capacitor 36, 38 without introducing dielectric loss is to
inhibit the avalanche ionization of the gas medium by applying a
magnetic field.
[0119] As shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, an air-gap capacitor 36, 38 is
constructed from two coaxial cylinders 50, 52 of radii a and b
(with a<b), respectively. An axial magnetic flux density Bz is
applied, either by placing permanent magnets at the end of the
cylinders, or by inducing an azimuthal current in the outer
cylinder. In FIG. 7, IC is the circuit current between the
capacitor 36, 38 and the coil 12, 16, respectively, and IB
represents a steady current that could produce the desired
magnetic field.
[0120] The electric field in the capacitor 36, 38 is purely
radial, but its magnitude changes in time cyclically over a period
1/(10 f) [mu]sec. As the electric field at the surface of each
cylinder 50, 52 increases, electrons will leave the surface until
an avalanche occurs near the dielectric strength of the air gap.
In the presence of a uniform axial magnetic field, the motion of
electrons that leave the surface of either cylinder can be
idealized to three primary components-cyclotron, E*B drift and
polarization drift. These are given respectively as:
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where the first notion describes perpendicular motion
around the magnetic field lines, the second notion is azimuthal
motion around the inner electrode cylinder, and the third notion
corresponds to the radial motion across the air gap. In these
expressions, K is the kinetic energy of the electron, and [Omega]
is the electron gyro frequency.
[0121] If the cyclotron radius is small compared to the air gap
62, then the motion will be a superposition of these small
gyrations with a bulk spiral motion whose direction depends on the
changing electric field. By limiting the otherwise unimpeded
radial motion of free electrons to that of the polarization drift
velocity across the field lines, the expectation is that breakdown
in the air gap 62 can be suppressed.
[0000] From Gauss' law, the radial electric field is found as a
function of radial position and substituted into the polarization
drift expression to yield
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0122] Separating variables and integrating produces
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] giving the ratio of initial to final radial position of the
electron over a change in the inner conductor charge state. FIG.
13 shows the variation in charge state of the inner (Qinner) and
outer (Qouter) conductors over a full cycle, indicating the
notional regions (regions 1, 2) where significant electron release
would typically occur as a result of the electric field at the
conductor surface. Note that the electron emission from the inner
electrode 52 will have a lower threshold due to a smaller radius
of curvature and higher electric field. Also indicated by shading
are the regions where free electrons will drift outward (region A)
or inward (region B) across the magnetic field lines due to the
polarization drift.
[0123] While dielectric breakdown would normally initiate as the
charge magnitude on the inner conductor passes a critical negative
value (region 2), the polarization drift forces these electrons
back toward the inner electrode surface (region B).
[0124] It is not until the charge reaches its peak and the
polarization drift changes direction (region A-right) that the
charges may start to migrate outward. Migration continues until
the polarization drift again changes direction (region B) and the
charges begin to migrate back toward the inner electrode. By the
time the outer electrode 52 reaches its peak negative value, these
charges have been returned to the inner electrode 50 where they
started, and the cycle repeats. The same process occurs for
electrons emitted from the outer electrode over the other half of
the cycle.
[0125] The capacitor size and magnetic field strength are to be
chosen to ensure that the electrons are turned around prior to
reaching the opposite electrode. The full change in charge state
of the capacitor 36, 38 over the time it takes for the electrons
to cross the gap is 2qmax=2Imax/[omega]. The limiting ratio of
electrode radii is then found using Eq. 37
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where acm is the inner cylinder 50 radius in centimeters,
and the other terms are as previously defined. To find the
capacitor length, a set of concentric cylinders is assumed with an
impedance matched to that of the coil 12, 16 at resonance.
[0126] This assumes the capacitance of the coil 12, 16 is
negligible, but it could be included in the calculation at this
point. Ignoring the coil capacitance results in
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where lcm is the capacitor length in centimeters.
Substituting Eq. 38 into Eq. 39 then implies
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] showing that the volume of the cylindrical capacitor is
driven by the choice of maximum current, frequency and magnetic
field. The most compact geometry is when lcm 2bcm, and the
capacitor 36, 38 fits within a cube. For the baseline case and
assuming an applied magnetic flux density of 0.3 Tesla, the volume
given by Eq. 40 is 216 cm<3>. This results in a capacitor
length of 12 cm, an outer electrode radius of 6.0 cm and an inner
electrode radius of 4.6 cm.
[0127] Returning to FIG. 2, in order to boost the range of power
transfer, passive repeaters 70 are envisioned in the subject
system 10.
[0128] The passive repeaters 70 are the intermediate coils which
resonate in phase with the primary oscillator 12, to receive the
power therefrom, and in phase with the secondary resonator 16 to
further transfer power to the secondary oscillator 16.
Attenuation and Environmental Coupling
[0129] There are a variety of ways in which the transmitting 12
and receiving 16 coils can interact with the environment,
potentially resulting in a shift in the frequency, attenuation of
the delivered power or reduction of overall efficiency. The degree
to which each of these would occur is highly specific to the
properties and distribution of materials within the reach of the
magnetic field. A general overview of the effects and their
insertion into the current formalism may be discussed.
[0130] The frequency shift results from a change of the effective
inductance of either of the coils, resulting from the presence of
a material with magnetic permeability above unity, similar to
placing an iron core within a solenoid. The larger the volume of
material present, and the closer it is to the coil, the greater
the shift in frequency that will result. The effect of the
presence of the material on the inductance can be estimated as
follows. The reactive power within the coil is given by
PR=L[omega]Imax<2>, which can also be written as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0131] In a region with a material that has a permeability greater
than unity, the ratio of Bmax with the material present to that
without the material present is (1+[chi]), where [chi] is the
susceptibility. If the magnetic field is uniform within this
region, the increase in the effective inductance, normalized by
the original value is then
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where Bmax is evaluated locally, and [Delta]v is the volume
occupied by the material. A term such as this can be included for
each region where magnetic material is present. From Eq. 9, the
term Imax<2 >will divide out and only geometric dependencies
will remain. The amount of frequency shift that results is found
simply by taking the differential of expression for the resonant
frequency of the coil
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where it can be seen that a positive increase in the
inductance will result in a drop in the natural frequency of the
coil. Because the effect on each coil will be different, depending
on it location in the environment, the simplest solution is to
compensate for this shift at each coil independently by adjusting
the capacitance until the proper resonant frequency is achieved.
[0132] For any given placement of the coils in a static
environment, this may be done initially and should not need to be
altered. However, it would be straightforward to track the
frequency and dynamically update it to compensate for changes in
the environment or for the motion of either of the coils through
the environment. This effect is therefore not thought to be
problematic from an operational standpoint.
[0133] Likewise, attenuation of the signal by the environment is
of little concern. Unlike electromagnetic radiation, which can be
very effectively attenuated by the presence of conductors, the
magnetic field is much more difficult to shield. A particular
application resulting from this phenomenon is the ability to
penetrate the depths of the ocean, either for the delivery of
power, desirable for recharging Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
(AUVs), or for transferring information by modulating the signal.
When magnetic field attenuation is desired, it is typically
necessary to completely enshroud the item to be shielded in a high
permeability material. The attenuation results from the
'conduction' of the field lines around, rather than through the
device that is to be shielded. The amount of attenuation, given as
the ratio of un-attenuated to attenuated field strength is
approximately
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where [mu] is the permeability of the shielding, [Delta] is
the thickness of the shielding and R is the characteristic size of
the shielded region. Effective attenuation without excessive mass
therefore requires a high permeability material, and the smallest
possible enclosure volume. In most cases of interest, it is
unlikely that a situation will naturally exist to produce
appreciable levels of signal attenuation.
[0134] Of greater concern is the possibility of power lost to the
environment, resulting in a reduction of overall efficiency.
Sources of such power loss include dipole oscillations in
paramagnetic and diamagnetic materials, the dissipation associated
with eddy currents induced in conducting materials and the
hysteretic loss resulting from domain reconfiguration in
ferromagnetic materials. The first of these is treated in a
similar manner to the dielectric losses of Eq. 31. In fact, under
the proper definition of the loss tangent, the effect would be
introduced into the formalism in an identical manner. However, the
evaluation of this effective loss tangent will depend on the total
volume and distribution of this material within the dipole field,
just as with the effect on induction. If at the location of the
material the magnetic field is again assumed to be spatially
constant, the reactive power per unit volume at this location is
given by
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] which could also be found by performing the integration of
Eq. 41 over only the volume of magnetic material. Inserting Eq. 9
for the magnetic dipole field at the location of the material, and
dividing by Imax<2 >gives the effective reactance of the
material (per unit volume) referenced to the recirculating coil
current. This is then multiplied by the volume of material under
consideration and inserted into Eq. 31 in place of the product
L[omega], along with the appropriately defined loss tangent of the
material for magnetic dipole oscillations.
[0135] A similar situation exists for ferromagnetic materials,
however the dissipation resulting from domain hysteresis is given
per unit volume as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where HC is the coercivity of the material (where B=0) and
Brem is the remnant magnetization (where H=0). The product HCBrem
is referred to as the energy product and represents an
approximation to the area under the hysteresis loop, provided that
the material is being fully saturated. Unless the material is very
close to one of the coils, it is unlikely that this will be the
case. An approximation for the case when saturation has not been
reached can be made with
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where a linear scaling with magnetic field strength has
been assumed along the magnetic flux density axis of the
hysteresis diagram, as well as along the magnetic field strength
axis. This is now a function of Imax<2 >as before, and the
expression Phys/Imax<2 >is then substituted into Eq. 7 as a
resistance term.
[0136] Finally, we consider the case of induced eddy currents in
conductors that may be present. From a straightforward application
of Faraday's Law, the power dissipated per unit volume from
currents induced in a conductor with finite resistance scales
approximately as
[0000] [mathematical formula]
[0000] where [sigma] is the conductivity of the material, and d is
the characteristic size of the region perpendicular to the local
magnetic field direction. Because the loss per unit volume is seen
to scale with the size of the region, it is important to
distinguish between a single continuous region of conducting
material versus a region of comparable size where multiple
unconnected sub-domains of conducting material may exist. As
above, this loss can be converted into a resistance, referenced to
the recirculating current in the coil, and inserted into the
formalism via Eq. 7.
[0137] For all of the cases except for the attenuation (shift in
frequency, or the various dissipation mechanisms) the dependence
of the effect in question on the local magnetic field strength is
quadratic. For a constant volume of a given magnetic material, Eq.
9 shows that the impact this material will have on the system
performance scales with distance to the center of the coil as
D<-6>, and the impact of these effects rapidly diminishes
with distance.
[0138] For instance, if a volume of iron placed one meter from the
coil was able to shift the frequency by 10%, at two meters the
effect would be reduced to only 0.16%. Proper placement of the
coil within the environment can therefore significantly reduce the
effects that have been discussed. Alternatively, the coupling
between the coils has the same D<-6 >scaling. So, as a
fraction of the power coupled, the effect of these materials is
scale invariant. In other words, a material placed halfway between
two coils that dissipated 10% of the total coupled power, would
still dissipate 10% of the total coupled power if the separation
distance between the coils was increased by a factor of ten. Under
this increase in distance, both of these power values would be
decreased by 10<-6>.
[0139] Development of the low-loss antenna circuit is presented
herein to allow for inductive power coupling at high efficiency
over long distances (over 100 meters). To achieve low loss,
superconducting materials are used for all current carrying
elements, dielectrics are avoided and the system is operated at
low frequencies (below 200 KHz), and at wavelengths that exceed
the antenna diameter by several orders of magnitude. Maximum power
coupling and maximum efficiency cannot be achieved simultaneously,
however efficiencies as high as 50% have been achieved with the
present system at maximum power coupling.
[0140] Further reduction in the radiative losses may be achieved
by adding an external capacitance in which no dielectric is used.
To address this, electrical breakdown of a cylindrical capacitor
is suppressed by the application of a magnetic cross-field that
acts to impede the motion of electrons across the air gap. The
resulting capacitor size is very reasonable in comparison to the
baseline size of the coil. The interaction of the system with the
environment is quite weak, however mechanisms for power
dissipation, attenuation and modification of the natural frequency
are identified and examined parametrically.
[0141] Although this invention has been described in connection
with specific forms and embodiments thereof, it will be
appreciated that various modifications other than those discussed
above may be resorted to without departing from the spirit or
scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. For
example, functionally equivalent elements may be substituted for
those specifically shown and described, certain features may be
used independently of other features, and in certain cases,
particular locations of elements, steps, or processes may be
reversed or interposed, all without departing from the spirit or
scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.