http://www.steorn.com/
For general enquiries,
email: general@steorn.com
Telephone: +351-1-6871020
About Steorn
Since its foundation in 2000, Steorn has worked
on innovative technologies in a number of areas, including
e-commerce, anti-fraud, and energy for companies ranging from
start-ups to multi-nationals.
The Steorn team brings together a wealth of experience from
diverse industries including engineering, energy, research and
information technology. A highly-focused, integrated approach
to our work allows us to drive projects forward with clarity
and vision.
With a range of services from project management to prototype
development and testing, Steorn has brought its experience and
expertise to bear on complex projects and technologies,
creating and capturing Intellectual Property and turning
concepts into reality.
Orbo
The development of Orbo® follows on from
results of tests on a custom designed permanent magnet
generator carried out during mid 2004. Orbo technology is
based on electromagnetic interactions concerning domain
rotation within ferromagnetic materials, specifically the
phenomenon of delayed magnetic field propagation.
Delayed magnetic field propagation is a limited area of
exploration within the physics community, while there are a
number of papers that detail the test method and examination,
no papers to date have gone as far as the research conducted
by Steorn.
The development of this technology is continuous as work
progresses to the end goal of providing a safe, stable and
continuous electrical power output.
As core research and development continues a number of other
technologies have been developed as a direct result, these
technologies are either based on Orbo interactions or
spin-outs from implementations of Orbo.
These ancillary technologies include low frequency induction
heating operating on AC line frequency without the need for
intervening electronics, hybrid passive magnetic bearings and
a range of rotary torque measurement systems for magnetic
implementations.
http://steornwatch.com
--- Forum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steorn
Steorn
Products Magnetic testing & measurement
systems, passive magnetic bearings, research & development
Steorn Ltd is a small, private technology development company in
Dublin, Ireland. It announced in August 2006 it had developed a
technology which provides "free, clean, and constant energy" in
violation of the law of conservation of energy,[3] a fundamental
principle of physics.[4]
Steorn challenged the scientific community to investigate their
claim[5] and, in December 2006, said that it had chosen a jury
of scientists to do so.[6] In June 2009 the jury gave its
unanimous verdict that Steorn had not demonstrated the
production of energy.[7]
Steorn has also given two public demonstrations of their
technology. In the first demonstration, in July 2007 at the
Kinetica Museum in London, the device failed to work.[8] The
second demonstration, which ran from December 2009 to February
2010 at the Waterways Visitor Centre in Dublin, involved a motor
powered by a battery and provided no independent evidence that
excess energy was being generated.[9]
History
Steorn was founded in 2000[10] and, in October 2001, their
website stated that they were a "specialist service company
providing programme management and technical assessment advice
for European companies engaging in e-commerce projects". Steorn
is a Norse word meaning to guide or manage.
In May 2006, The Sunday Business Post reported that Steorn was a
former dot-com company which was developing a microgenerator
product based on the same principle as self-winding watches, as
well as creating e-commerce websites for customers. The company
had also recently raised about €2.5 million from investors and
was three years into a four year development plan for its
microgenerator technology.[2] Steorn has since stated that the
account given in this interview was intended to prevent a leak
regarding their free energy technology.[11]
The company's investment history shows several share allotments
for cash between August 2000 and October 2005,[12] the
investments totalling €3 million.[2] In 2006, Steorn secured
€8.1 million in loans from a range of investors in order to
continue their research, and these funds were also converted
into shares.[13] Steorn said that they would seek no further
funding while attempting to prove their free-energy claim in
order to demonstrate their genuine desire for validation.[13]
Free energy claim
In August 2006, Steorn placed an advertisement in The Economist
saying that they had developed a technology that produced "free,
clean and constant energy".[5] Called Orbo, the technology was
said to violate conservation of energy[3] but had been validated
by eight independent scientists.[14] None of these scientists
would talk to the media, and Steorn suggested that this was
because they did not want to become embroiled in a
controversy.[14]
Views on the technology
No specific details of the workings of the claimed technology
have been made public. Seán McCarthy stated in a 2006 RTÉ radio
interview, "What we have developed is a way to construct
magnetic fields so that when you travel round the magnetic
fields, starting and stopping at the same position, you have
gained energy".[15] In 2011, Steorn's website was updated to
suggest that the Orbo is based on magnetic fields which vary
over time.[16] Barry Williams of the Australian Skeptics has
pointed out that Steorn is "not the first company to claim they
have suddenly discovered the miraculous property of magnetism
that allows you to get free energy"[4] while Martin Fleischmann
says that it is not credible that positioning of magnetic fields
could create energy.[14]
Following a meeting between McCarthy and Professor Sir Eric Ash
in July 2007, Ash reported that "the Orbo is a mechanical device
which uses powerful magnets on the rim of a rotor and further
magnets on an outer shell".[17] During this meeting, McCarthy
referred to the law of conservation of energy as scientific
dogma.[17] However, conservation of energy is a fundamental
principle of physics[4] and Ash said that there was no
comparison with religious dogma since there is no flexibility in
choosing to accept that energy is always conserved.[17]
Rejecting conservation of energy would undermine all science and
technology.[17] Ash also formed the opinion that McCarthy was
truly convinced in the validity of his invention but that this
conviction was a case of "prolonged self-deception".[17]
Many people have accused Steorn of engaging in a publicity stunt
although Steorn deny such accusations.[18] Eric Berger, writing
on the Houston Chronicle website, commented: "Steorn is a former
e-business company that saw its market vanish during the dot.com
bust. It stands to reason that Steorn has retooled as a Web
marketing company and is using the "free energy" promotion as a
platform to show future clients how it can leverage print
advertising and a slick Web site to promote their products and
ideas".[19] Thomas Ricker at Engadget suggested that Steorn's
free-energy claim was a ruse to improve brand recognition and to
help them sell Hall probes[20] while Josh Catone, features
editor for Mashable, believes that it was merely an elaborate
hoax.[21]
Jury process
In its advertisement in The Economist, Steorn challenged
scientists to form an independent jury to test their technology
and publish the results.[22][23] Within 36 hours of the
advertisement being published, 420 scientists contacted
Steorn[24] and, on 1 December 2006, Steorn announced it had
selected a jury.[6] It was headed by Ian MacDonald, emeritus
professor of electrical engineering at the University of
Alberta, and the process began in February 2007.[7]
In June 2009 the jury announced its unanimous verdict that
"Steorn's attempts to demonstrate the claim have not shown the
production of energy. The jury is therefore ceasing work".[7]
Dick Ahlstrom, writing in the Irish Times, concluded from this
that Steorn's technology did not work.[7] Steorn responded by
saying that because of difficulties in implementing the
technology the focus of the process had been on providing the
jury with test data on magnetic effects for study.[25] Steorn
also said that these difficulties had been resolved and disputed
its jury's findings.[7][25]
Demonstrations
A notice at the Kinetica Museum announcing the cancellation of
the public demonstration
On 4 July 2007, the technology was to be displayed at the
Kinetica Museum, Spitalfields Market, London. A unit constructed
of clear plastic was prepared so that the arrangement of magnets
could be seen and to demonstrate that the device operated
without external power sources.[8][26] The public demonstration
was delayed and then cancelled because of technical
difficulties. Steorn initially said that the problems had been
caused by excessive heat from the lighting[8][27] but later
blamed the failure on damage done to bearings due to a
greenhouse effect within the box.[28]
A second demonstration ran between 15 December 2009 and February
2010[29] at the Waterways Visitor Centre in Dublin, and was
streamed via Steorn's website.[30][31] The demonstration was of
a device powered by a rechargeable battery. Steorn said that the
device produced more energy than it consumed and recharged the
battery.[9] No substantive details of the technology were
revealed and no independent evidence of Steorn's claim was
provided.[9]
On 1 April 2010 Steorn opened an online development community,
called the Steorn Knowledge Development Base (SKDB), which they
said would explain their technology.[32] Access is available
only under licence on payment of a fee.[32][33]
References
1. ^ a b "Steorn Investor Relations". Steorn Ltd.. 9 February
2006. http://www.steorn.com/about/investor/. Retrieved 11
September 2007.
2. ^ a b c Daly, Gavin (21 May 2006). "Firm strives to extend
mobile battery lifespans". ThePost.IE.
http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2006/05/21/story14326.asp.
Retrieved 25 October 2006.
3. ^ a b "Our Claim". Steorn Ltd. Archived from the original on
2 May 2007.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070502192300/http://www.steorn.com/orbo/claim/.
Retrieved 12 April 2007.
4. ^ a b c Weekes, Peter (20 August 2006). "Irish energy miracle
'a joke'". Melbourne: The Age.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/08/19/1155408071307.html.
Retrieved 20 August 2006.
5. ^ a b "Copy of Steorn advertisement featured in The
Economist, hosted by dispatchesfromthefuture.com" (JPEG).
http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/images/steorn_economist_ad.jpg.
Retrieved 21 January 2009.
6. ^ a b "Steorn finalises contracts for jury to test its free
energy technology". Steorn (archive copy from archive.org). 1
December 2006. Archived from the original on 2007-02-21.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070221052040/http://www.steorn.net/news/releases/?id=911.
Retrieved 5 March 2009.
7. ^ a b c d e Dick Ahlstrom (24 June 2009). "Irish "energy for
nothing" gizmo fails jury vetting". Irish Times.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/0624/1224249416758.html.
8. ^ a b c "Irish firm's display of 'free-energy' machine
delayed". Belfast Telegraph. 5 July 2007.
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/business/irish-firms-display-of-freeenergy-machine-delayed-13456059.html.
9. ^ a b c Rupert Goodwins (15 December 2009). "Steorn shows
revolving Orbo to the public". ZDNet.
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/emergingtech/0,1000000183,39938307-1,00.htm.
Retrieved 15 December 2009.
10. ^ "Wanted: scientists to test free energy technology". Irish
Examiner. 20 August 2006. Archived from the original on
2006-08-21.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060821193017/http://www.irishexaminer.com/irishexaminer/pages/story.aspx-qqqg=business-qqqm=business-qqqa=business-qqqid=11133-qqqx=1.asp.
Retrieved 20 August 2006.
11. ^ "Energy Issues". Steorn. 1 October 2006.
http://www.steorn.net/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17962&page=5&Comment_271002.
Retrieved 26 October 2006.
12. ^ "Steorn Company Submissions". Companies Registration
Office.
http://www.cro.ie/search/submissionse.asp?number=330508&BI=C.
Retrieved 16 October 2006. [dead link]
13. ^ a b Downes, John (10 August 2008). "'Free energy' firm
generated €8m in funding". Sunday Tribune.
http://www.tribune.ie/article/2008/aug/10/free-energy-firm-generated-8m-in-funding/.
Retrieved 5 November 2008.
14. ^ a b c Boggan, Steve (25 August 2006). "These men think
they're about to change the world". The Guardian (London).
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/energy/story/0,,1858172,00.html.
Retrieved 24 May 2010.
15. ^ "Irish company challenges scientists to test 'free energy'
technology". Yahoo! News. 18 August 2006. Archived from the
original on 3 September 2006.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060903183705/http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060818/bs_afp/irelandscienceenergy.
16. ^ "Orbo". Steorn Ltd. Archived from the original on 16 July
2011.
http://web.archive.org/web/20110716051552/http://www.steorn.com/orbo/.
Retrieved 18 November 2011.
17. ^ a b c d e "The perpetual myth of free energy". BBC News. 9
July 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6283374.stm.
Retrieved 9 July 2007.
18. ^ Chris Vallance (23 August 2006). "Caught in a Tale Spin".
Pods&Blogs. BBC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/podsandblogs/2006/08/caught_in_a_tale_spin.shtml.
Retrieved 25 June 2009.
19. ^ Berger, Eric (19 August 2006). "Steorn and free energy:
the plot thickens". SciGuy. Houston Chronicle blogs.
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2006/08/steorn_and_free_1.html.
Retrieved 21 August 2006.
20. ^ Thomas Ricker (25 June 2009). "Steorn gives up on
free-energy, starts charging for USB-powered divining rods".
Engadget.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/steorn-gives-up-on-free-energy-starts-charging-for-usb-powered/.
Retrieved 25 June 2009.
21. ^ Catone, Josh (15 July 2009). "Top 15 Web Hoaxes of All
Time". Mashable.
http://mashable.com/2009/07/15/internet-hoaxes/. Retrieved 21
July 2009.
22. ^ "Steorn develops free energy technology and issues
challenge to the global scientific community". Steorn Ltd.. 18
August 2006. http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=22.
Retrieved 29 June 2009.
23. ^ "Steorn announces plans for widespread deployment of its
free energy technology post-validation". Steorn. 11 January
2007. http://www.steorn.net/news/releases/?id=981. Retrieved 6
July 2007.
24. ^ Smith, David (20 August 2006). "Scientists flock to test
'free energy' discovery". London: Guardian Unlimited.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1854305,00.html.
Retrieved 20 August 2006.
25. ^ a b "Jury report". June 2009. Archived from the original
on 2010-12-30.
http://web.archive.org/web/20101230235310/http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=1151.
26. ^ "'Free' energy technology goes on display". The Irish
Times. 4 July 2007.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2007/0704/breaking46.htm.
Retrieved 5 July 2007.
27. ^ "Steorn announcement: Kinetica Demonstration". 6 July
2007. http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=1001. Retrieved 5
June 2007.
28. ^ Schirber, Michael (August 2007). "Harsh light shines on
free energy". Physics World 20 (8): 9.
29. ^ "Testing - Orbo Technology Update". Steorn. 11 February
2010. http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=1201. Retrieved 13
February 2010.
30. ^ Rupert Goodwins (14 December 2009). "Steorn sets up for
second bite at perpetual cherry". ZDNet.
http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,1000000567,10014626o-2000331777b,00.htm.
Retrieved 14 December 2009.
31. ^ "Steorn Announces Public Demonstration of Orbo
Technology". Steorn. 15 December 2009.
http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=1161. Retrieved 15
December 2009.
32. ^ a b "SKDB Launch". Steorn. 1 April 2010.
http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=1211. Retrieved 9 May
2010.
33. ^ Gavin Daly (6 June 2010). "'Free' energy firm to make over
€2m this year". ThePost.ie.
http://www.sbpost.ie/news/ireland/free-energy-firm-to-make-over-2m-this-year-49707.html.
Retrieved 8 June 2010.
YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=W4quwymQlEI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9xXqWBbfkU&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU-MRSk-brQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VhKqqHxEmE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak3rt6p_dyY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kM3rGz_KyDg
http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/steorn-peddles-orbo-development-kit-snake-oil-optional/
http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2007/07/first_glimpse_of_an_orbo.html
First glimpse of an Orbo
Amidst all the talk about Steorn's spectacularly failed
demonstration, it's easy to overlook the most interesting new
bit of information that did come out of all this -- Steorn
finally revealed what a working Orbo looks like. It appears
that their press package for what they seem to have
anticipated would be a successful media event included photos
of Sean holding an Orbo device, and the central "rotor" disc
does look to be spinning. The photo showed up in several
articles during the past week, including coverage by the BBC.
Whether the Orbo is capable of working as claimed is as yet
unknown, but that hasn't stopped people from analyzing how
it's put together and how it would work if it could. Steorn
forum member Axle posted several images showing an exploded
view of the Orbo based on the published photos:
The "stator" is shown in green and blue, and contains a
circular arrangement of eight magnets fitted into slots around
the periphery of a central cavity. In that cavity spins the
"rotor", with four magnets around its circumference. The
stator and rotor are connected by two bearings, seen in orange
-- the weak links that, according to Sean, put an end to the
demo.
Some of this detail is conjecture, given the quality of the
photos that the design is drawn from. The design resembles a
variation of a classic magnet motor, a recurring motif among
attempts to create perpetual motion machines. A magnet motor
cannot generate more energy than is put into it because, due
to the way magnetic fields work, there will either be a stable
state where the rotor is being pushed in one direction just as
strongly as it is being pushed in the other direction, or else
the operation of the motor will progressively weaken the
magnets themselves until the spinning stops. If Orbo does
work, then it's doing something very unusual with the
configuration of magnets, perhaps (according to Sean) somehow
taking advantage of the time variance involved in the effect
of magnetic viscosity. (Some members of the Overunity forum
are trying to figure out how this might work).
Until (and unless) Steorn reveals just how their Orbo is put
together, all we can do is make speculations based on what
little we have seen. But if Sean is holding a spinning Orbo
device in these published photos, I think we can narrow down
the possibilities of what it actually is to these four:
1) A fake -- hidden in there somewhere is a battery, strong
enough to keep the device running for a few days (or maybe, as
it turned out, just a few hours).
2) A type of "magnet motor" that will spin for a while,
during which time the magnets themselves are weakened,
eventually stopping the motion. This is in direct
contradiction with Steorn's statement that tests showed no
weakening of the magnets... but we've seen that Steorn's
engineers (like any, to be fair) are not infallible.
3) A very low friction magnet motor that will keep spinning
if held and jostled a bit, but that without this small input
of energy will eventually slow to a halt. It's possible that
such a device could have fooled Steorn into believing they had
a perpetual motion machine. This is difficult to reconcile
with Sean's claim that a test Orbo has been run continuously
for several weeks, however -- unless it was being carefully
cradled by a hopeful and deluded energy source for part of
that time.
4) It just might, of course, be the real thing.
Prior to their recent failed demo, Steorn made a number of
preparations that would seem to indicate complete confidence
on their part that the demo would be a spectacular success.
They readied a stunning and provocative demonstration space,
called in the media, and were set to stream the event live
over the web. They also paid to fly in a knowledgeable
physicist and skeptical forum member known as DrMike,
offering him a chance to inspect the Orbo up close and
report his findings.
Steorn's demo fell apart before it began. DrMike had the
opportunity to talk with Sean, hear his apologies and
explanations, fiddle with magnets in the small workshop
Steorn had set up at the demo site, hear Steorn's story
about how Orbo defies conservation of energy, and chat
physics with other scientists who had shown up for the demo.
His opinion after seeing all of this? Orbo is nothing more
than a delusion inside the mind of Sean McCarthy.
Sean lives in a world of delusion. His greatest
strength is the ability [to] convince people of things, and
it is also his greatest weakness. I am certain that Sean has
seen a "start - stop" device operating. That it never
existed outside his mind doesn't matter.
-DrMike
DrMike's full report states the case a bit more tactfully,
but no less damningly:
I am certain Steorn really believed I would see
something that resembled their claim... Watching Sean and
listening to him talk (and boy can he talk!!) I am convinced
he has seen everything he describes. Unfortunately, the rest
of us have not... My conclusion after going through all this
is that Steorn is neither hoax nor scam. It is delusion. The
reason it seems surreal is because it is surreal - we are
the real part of someone else's imagination.
What's more, after reviewing Steorn's technical documents
describing how magnetic viscosity is employed to violate the
laws of thermodynamics, DrMike is convinced he sees the flaw
in their logic; unfortunately he can't share his idea with
us due to Steorn's NDA, so we have little to go by but his
confidence.
If it was a hoax, the whole upstairs [workshop]
would not exist, nor would Sean have taken the time to go
through all the details of how he thinks it all works. I can
not describe any of those details without breaking the NDA,
so it puts me in a fairly strange position. The flaws in the
thought process are clear to me, but Steorn considers these
details proprietary information.
There were only ever three classes of possible explanations
for Steorn's claim; either it was a purposeful deception, an
honest mistake, or a genuine method for generating free
energy. Given the actions taken by Sean McCarthy and Steorn
over the past year, as well as what we've found out about
Steorn's history and finances, I'm willing to bet against
the first option, purposeful deception (this would include
all forms of deception such as scam, hoax, fraud, marketing
tactic, alternate reality game, social experiment, film
subject, etc.). DrMike, after having met and spoken at
length with Sean and other Steorn employees, is also ready
to discard that possibility.
Of the two remaining options, DrMike is convinced that Orbo
is an honest mistake on the part of Steorn. But how can a
company with dozens of employees, including a number of
engineers and PhDs, maintain such a blatantly erroneous
belief over the course of several years? DrMike explains
this as the result of the force of will and the charismatic
persuasion of one deeply delusional man, Sean McCarthy.
This story sounds terribly unlikely at first glance. What
about all of Steorn's other engineers, who build and test
Orbo devices? Wouldn't they have realized along the way that
they had never actually witnessed proof of the basic
assumption underlying their work? What about all of Steorn's
other employees, hanging on for years as their company
abandons "serious" work and devotes itself full-bore to the
quixotic quest of defying the most basic laws of science?
How could a single man be so delusional as to believe
without a speck of evidence that he's accomplished the
impossible, and yet preserve a veneer of coherence that
allows him to maintain the confidence of his company and
investors, and gather an international group of optimistic
followers?
As unlikely as this may sound, a combination of delusion
and charisma has been used to create mass movements in
politics and religion throughout history. And the
unlikeliness of this possibility must be weighed against the
unlikeliness of its alternative: that despite the
conservation of energy being among the most solidly proven
and repeatedly demonstrated theories in all of science, and
despite hundreds of years of failed empirical effort toward
violating that theory, a simple arrangement of permanent
magnets has accidentally been shown to create energy from
nothing. And recall that no one who has made the pilgrimage
to Steorn and is capable of reporting back to the public has
yet seen a working Orbo. Not Crank, not Dr. David Timoney,
not DrMike.
What does Sean McCarthy have to say these days, in the
aftermath of his failed demo and as his mental health is
increasingly being questioned? His confidence is unshaken.
Recently he answered a series of questions on the Steorn
forum, presenting the failed demo as a disappointment, but
no more than a temporary obstacle:
Clearly no one involved in the company is happy
about the failed demo, but despite this we also need to keep
perspective - it's a failed demo[.] It has shaken to the
core any confidence that people not involved with the
company have, and this is understandable. But we know what
we have so things are not as dire as people would like to
make them. We will do the demo, and then move on.
About DrMike's allegations against Sean's grasp of reality,
he replies:
I guess that in a way I understand his comments,
its not true but in the circumstances I doubt that you will
believe me.
Sean also gave a post-demo interview on Irish radio
recently. He continues to seek media attention and his
confidence appears to be intact. In the interview he states
that a new public demonstration of Orbo "will not be too far
away."
We now have Sean McCarthy, convinced he can pull energy
from nowhere, and DrMike, confidant that Sean's claim is
impossible and that he knows just where Sean's logic went
wrong. Neither of these people are able to produce an ounce
of solid evidence. Once again we are left with little
information, weighing the odds between the impossible and
the impossibler.
Sean asserts that a new and successful demo will occur,
unannounced beforehand, in the near future. He also states
that the previous failure will lead to more openness on
Steorn's part, to public evidence of the reality of Orbo. If
DrMike is right, then none of this will happen -- we'll
never see a working Orbo, because Steorn can't make one and
they won't fake one. As for this author, I'll keep an open
mind to Steorn's claim until the end of the summer. If by
then we haven't seen a working Orbo, I'll agree with DrMike
that, for the good of his family and his employees, Sean
McCarthy had best retire and spend some quality time in the
care of a doctor.
"It's not the end of the Steorn story."
Far from disengaging from the media and quietly skulking away
into obscurity, Sean McCarthy gave a fairly in-depth interview
to the technology site Engadget that was published today. Much
of it is an elaboration of what we have heard already: the
reasons for the failure of the demo and Steorn's plans moving
forward. Sean directly addresses the notion that the Orbo
technology works only in the confines of his own mind, and
confidently asserts that a successful demo will occur in the
near future. Some excerpts follow:
So we will be doing a demo, again. Obviously people
will believe it when they see it and I can understand the
skepticism about that. It is a deferral, our guys are
currently in the process of rebuilding some more robust
systems and changing some parts to prevent the engineering
thing from happening again and we'll be back out in the near
future with it.
Regarding DrMike's opinion that Orbo is no more than a
delusion on the part of Sean:
How can I criticize. We invited the guy to come from
Canada to see something. He didn't see it. It's his opinion.
He has no other basis, he has nothing else to work on, other
than sitting and having a chat with us. I can't possibly
criticize, Doctor Mike for what he said. It's exactly what I
would have said, I probably would have been harsher if I had
been in his shoes.
Again, obviously if I'm delusional, whatever answer
I give is going to be based on my own delusions. The only
thing that I can say -- I can say a couple of things about it.
First thing is that the answer that anybody looking at us and
wants to know will ultimately be delivered contractually. It's
going to happen whenever it happens from a bunch of
scientists. So unless they're delusional as well, if they
agree with us then we deal with that at the time. If you stand
back from the failed demo and say ok, I don't think anybody
should believe this -- I wouldn't believe this in the
circumstances, demo or no demo -- there is a process that's in
place that's a real process where real scientists are going to
draw a conclusion and that conclusion will be made public.
The other side of it which I think is why people have taken
the delusional route is because an awful lot of people had
expected us to rig the demo. They expected us to have a
hidden battery or whatever it is. If we were in that
business, believe me, there would have been a spinning
wheel. But we're just not in that business, the business of
scamming people or rigging demos. It failed, it's prototype
technology. Huge disappointment to us. We'll redo it. But
the answers to the question -- the demo doesn't answer the
question, it provides some thoughts from supporting evidence
when it happens. But the answer to the question will be done
by professionals and then we're either be found to be
delusional or not.
On Steorn's plans going forward:
Obviously we are going to have to redo the demo.
There is no question that we are not going to do the demo. We
will, as I said before, not pre-announce it this time. We will
get it set up properly, but the ground rules will be
identical. The ground rules will be physical public access to
the device, online webcams so it will be as open as possible.
If anybody has seen the intended device and then realizes that
it's, well, not impossible obviously to hide a certain energy
source, it becomes quite a convoluted process. So we are going
to try and demonstrate the technology in it's simplest,
simplest format in a place with public access where people can
watch online and talk to people there.
That will be one thing we have -- and to invite skeptics
along. We have to do that. We have to embrace the
skepticism. But equally to understand, these are not
intended to be slam dunk results, because they won't be.
There will always be issues and rightfully so. A simple
demo, no matter how long it lasts, isn't proof of the claim.
Proof of the claim is scientific analysis. But we are going
to have to do other things as well. I won't go into details,
but the biggest mistake that we've made and obviously we
have to learn from our mistakes was to pre-announce the
London demo. We've paid the price for that, we won't do it
again. But we will be doing probably an awful lot more than
we had intended. Basically when it happens we'll be letting
people know. It will not be that far away.
A final word:
I've met an awful lot of disappointed people. People
who came, who believed, who wanted to see history made.
Disappointed skeptics, people like Doctor Mike who we dragged
half way around the world -- and all I can do is apologize to
them and say look it didn't work, but we are going to do it
again. It's not the end of the Steorn story. Unfortunately,
I'm sure that many people wish they've never heard of us again
but we'll be back and we'll be back in the not too distant
future.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/07/steorns-ceo-states-the-obvious-we-screwed-up
Steorn's CEO states the obvious: "we screwed up"
By
Thomas Ricker
Perhaps the only thing more impressive than claimed possession
of an "infinite free energy" machine is the refusal to give-in
under the weight of the world's skepticism-turned ire. "We
screwed up," admitted Steorn's CEO Sean McCarthy yesterday after
their failed demonstration, but "if we were here to rig a demo,
we'd all be here watching a wheel spin." As shyster-Sean
explains, Steorn brought three systems to London, one of which
they got working for "about 4-hours" on Tuesday night. As we all
know by now, it mysteriously ceased to function after it was
moved to the display room. At that point, there was a breakdown
of the watchmaker-quality bearings causing friction to "go to
hell." Sean no longer attributes the failings to the lamp heat,
lamenting only that his team doesn't know the cause. Moving
forward Sean alluded to a less "covert and cryptic" Steorn as
they attempt to regain the confidence (they had it?) of the
public and more importantly, their shareholders who are more
than likely discussing matters with legal counsel at this very
moment. Still, he promised to return. Next time, however, the
system will already be up and running before the demonstration
is announced. While we seriously doubt they've circumvented the
laws of our physical world, half the fun of any good scam (and
this is a good'n) is picking apart the components to reveal the
truth. Click-on through for the full Q&A caught on video.
Dead silence
It's now been over a month since CEO Sean McCarthy or any other
member of Steorn has spoken publicly, to either the press or the
forums. Whether they're hard at work or falling apart, they're
just not talking.
The situation in the developers' club (SPDC) isn't much
different. Apparently Steorn has given SPDC members a gag order,
asking them not discuss the current situation. A few bits of
information have slipped through anyway; enough to reveal that
the SPDC doesn't know anything more about what Steorn's up to
than do we. SPDC member my_pen_is_stuck wrote on July 31st,
"Steorn don't even speak with the SPDC1 nowdays. Not a peep.
Very weird." Later on August 5th he wrote, "I'm beginning to
think that Grimer was on to something when he said the SPDC was
a cult. Sean speaks, usual no evidence waffle, the SPDC bows
down to kiss his ring. It's really fuckin' weird in there." On
August 11th, GrantHodges wrote "There isn't any news on Steorn
for this month. I'm in the SPDC and well . . .there isn't any
news."
Given the silence from Steorn, some have wondered whether they'd
packed up and cleared out. Forum member Crank, who lives a few
miles from Steorn, dropped by their office on July 31st.
She reported back that the situation there was normal, and all
employees were still present.
One older item of interest that came out recently is the design
of the demonstration unit that Steorn intends to have
manufactured in a limited quantity (100,000), to be sold off as
part of the public introduction of the Orbo technology. The
device, shown below, looks like a horsehead or "nodding donkey"
style oil pump, sitting atop an oil barrel. A video of this
device in action was made available to the SPDC, however Sean
stated that the motion of the prototype unit seen in the video
was not actually generated by an Orbo. So, it proves nothing
except that Steorn is laying plans for the public introduction
of Orbo.
Steorn effect replicated?
Today the Free Energy Truth blog announced that coming Friday
will be an interview with someone who claims to have
independently replicated the effect behind Steorn's free energy
technology. If true, this would be the first time that anyone
outside of Steorn has been able to replicate the effect and talk
about it publicly. Of course, after the failed demo, repeated
delays, and now complete silence that we've gotten from Steorn,
it's reasonable to expect nothing less than full disclosure and
a video of a self powered device before this claim is considered
to be worth taking seriously. A successful demonstration,
however, would beat Steorn to the punch and be the first display
of a potentially revolutionary discovery. Further updates on
this will follow as more information becomes available.
Update 8/31:
The previously announced interview has been posted at the Free
Energy Truth blog; the interviewee is a man named "Blake".
Consensus on the Steorn forum is that this is Alton "Blake"
Walston, a member of the SPDC who has gone by the forum handle
ablaker2.
Blake claims to have followed schematics provided by Sean
McCarthy and built an Orbo device that ran continuously for at
least 8 hours. According to his account the precise
configuration of magnets in his device required a good deal of
trial and error experimentation to get right, and after its
initial 8 hour run he has thus far been unsuccessful at coaxing
self-sustained motion from the device a second time.
While Blake claims to be committed to getting his Orbo spinning
again, and says he'll be sure to have a video camera on hand
next time when it does, as it stands now Blake has only an
anecdotal account of a one-time event to offer, with no
objective record of any kind that it actually took place. It's
certainly interesting to have this story brought out from the
confines of the SPDC, but until Blake's Orbo is running
continuously, repeatedly, and on video, it remains nothing more
than that -- a story.
Established inventor validates
Orbo
This week a video emerged showing the successful engineer and
inventor, Thieu Knapen, discussing Steorn's technology, which he
has personally tested. His conclusion is unambiguous: Orbo
generates free energy.
"Then I saw things that... I didn't believe."
Knapen founded the Dutch company Kinetron in 1984, where he
invented the microgenerators used in watches that are powered by
the movement of the wearer and so do not require a battery.
Apparently Sean McCarthy has told the SPDC that Kinetron will be
manufacturing the Orbo motors to power the demo devices that are
set to be manufactured to coincide with the public release of
the Orbo technology.
In the video Knapen is shown commenting on an early
demonstration 'toy' designed to display higher energy output
than input, but not designed to cycle perpetually. This video
was made sometime before December 12th 2006, when it was
presented to a small group at the Kinetica museum; it was also
long ago shown to the SPDC. However, this is the first time that
the video is available to the public. The documentary style
editing and peppy background beat suggest that the video was put
together as a promotional piece. It was allegedly found during
an unrelated Google Video search by Steorn forum member
RunningBare.
Steorn breaks its silence
After 3 1/2 months of almost complete silence from Steorn, CEO
Sean McCarthy granted an interview last week which was published
today at the Free Energy Truth blog. The difficult questions
were left unasked, but the interview does give a feeling for
what Steorn's been up to lately. Here are some excerpts:
On what they've been doing for the past few months:
We continue to work on Orbo. Obviously we are looking at
different implementations of it, more reliable implementations
of it both mechanical and non mechanical. We’re also looking at
the material science behind these time variant magnetic
transactions as in what’s the real driver for them. What makes
one material have a different response from another material?
We’ve looked at a lot of third party research, fund some
research and obviously do our own research into this area, we
have managed to rule out most of the drivers to time based
domain response (eddy currents, heat and so on) but as to why
ferrite has a different response to Iron – well more work to be
done.
On where the second demo will be located:
It will most likely be in Dublin, Ireland.
On what their recently trademarked name SteornLab refers to:
An awful lot of what we have developed over
the years has been based on tests... SteornLab relates to the
productization of these testing technologies we’ve developed
over the years.
On whether Orbo creates or extracts energy:
It’s a question of views. I would say that,
in the same way as there is a mass/energy equivalent there is
also a form of time/energy equivalent and whether you consider
that energy creation or conversion is a matter of semantics.
On whether Steorn will license Orbo for military and weapons
applications:
It’s specifically precluded.
On the development of the mechanical, as well as a solid-state
version of Orbo:
We have some engineering issues that we are
currently resolving in terms of mechanical systems; we are
constantly looking at ways to capture and express the energy in
a real world environment that are simpler and simpler and there
is nothing simpler than a solid state device. So it’s in the
plan, but its not something that we [are] actively engaged in at
this time.
On whether anyone else has ever discovered the effect behind
Orbo:
I think lots of people have. I can look at
many of the other free energy claimants and understand exactly
how they could work. I could also see why many would be
difficult to replicate without understanding what was happening.
There are two main points that I take from this interview: 1)
Steorn is still humming along, and still believes in what they
have, and 2) Don't expect a second demo any time soon.
I add the second point because Sean thinks that the second demo
will "most likely" take place in Dublin. If it were to take
place further off than Dublin, a good deal of planning would be
involved; so the fact that it's still not certain whether it
will be in Dublin or elsewhere means that they haven't reached
the point yet of planning for an actual second event.
Another curiosity is that Steorn is already looking to
productize the testing technology they've acquired and developed
for the purpose of testing Orbo. For them to spare the energy to
develop a tangential line of business, does this mean they are
running short of cash, or doubting the future prospects of Orbo,
at least in the near term?
Steorn is still chugging away, and most signs are that they're
still confidant in the development of Orbo. Once again, there's
nothing new here – the message from Steorn is, as usual: just
you wait.
http://hackaday.com/2010/02/21/steorn-orbo-motor-replica/
Reader [Hjhndr] ran across an interesting set of tests and
wanted to know if they’re brilliant or just a load of bull.
We’re not making the call on that, but the tests on a Steorn Orb
motor replica are worth looking at.Keep in mind, people used to
think the earth was flat and scientists of the time would have
sworn up and down that’s the way things were.
The Steorn Orbo is a motor that generates more power than is put
into it. At least according to Steorn Limited that’s what it
does. An independent panel of scientists said otherwise a few
years back but that didn’t stop the company from showing off the
concept a few more times, most recently a showing in Dublin
ended this month.
So anyway, [Jean-Louis Naudin] took what he saw from those
demonstrations and built a replica. He’s made several papers
about the principle as well as his testing available online.
There’s a lot of math, a little bit of smoke and mirrors, and
several videos. Take a look and let us know what you think in
the comments.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/html/orboeffecten.htm
Understanding the Orbo Principle
by
JL Naudin
December 27, 2009
Updated on February 13, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3RLp3ezs1Q&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTMQFvWkS9s&feature=player_embedded
All informations and diagrams are published freely (freeware)
and are intended for a private use and a non commercial use.
You will find below 3 very simple experiments which can help you
to understand the hidden principles of the Orbo motor from
Steorn. The experiments proposed here and their explanations are
only based on my personnal interpretation only of the Orbo
working principle presented to the public through videos and
photos by Sean McCarthy in Dublin and may be differ from the
official Steorn explanations. These experiments presented here
are the tests results of all my researches about the Orbo device
from Steorn.
These experiments are very simple to do and you can check these
facts by yourself with few equipement. So, these key experiments
are intend to demonstrate the main effect in the Orbo device
which can produce free energy from moving magnets.
To conduct these experiments, you need these parts:
* 2 plastic boxes (the size of mines is
62x82x32mm),
* 2 strong neodymium magnets (I have used
NdFeB 27 MGoe magnets, 22 mm diam, 10 mm thick),
* 1 toroidal coil, with a ferromagnetic core
(grade 3E25) specific inductance Al=3820 (23x14x7 mm) (µ=6000)
wound CW with 7.5 m of 4/10 mm copper wire,
The 1st plastic box is used to install the moving magnets which
will be used to simulate the rotor magnet. The neodymium magnets
are installed as shown in the photo below :
A 3 mm foam spacer has been added so as to set an air gap
between the boxes.
The 2nd plastic box is used to simulate the toroïdal stator coil
of the Orbo. The coil has been installed in the box as shown
below :
Two sheets of carbon have been fixed on the sides of the box to
maintain the alignement with the moving magnet box.
The final setup is shown below :
The coil MUST BE PERFECTLY ALIGNED BETWEEN THE TWO MAGNETS. This
is very important !!!
There is a 8 mm air gap between the magnets and the toroïdal
coil.
The measured coil Rdc is 1.1O ohms.
1 - First key experiment :
Demonstrating the inductance changing effect
One of the key point of the Orbo principle is the change of the
inductance of the toroïdal stator coil while the magnets
approach it. To conduct this experiment, you need only to
connect an inductance meter to the output of the coil.
Without the magnets the measured inductance is 236 mH. This will
be named the REF position.
When the magnets box is placed on the side of the stator box,
the measured inductance drops to 179 mH.
This will be named the TDC position (Top Dead Center).
This very simple experiment demonstrates that there is an
inductance change effect when the magnets box is at the TDC
position. It is very important to recall that the toroïdal
stator coil must be very precisely aligned between the two
magnets, if this is not the case the following experiments won't
work correctly.
The first Orbo effect has been demonstrated with this 1st
experiment.
2 - Second key experiment :
Demonstrating that the magnetic attration force is canceled by
the pulse.
This experiment is very simple, you need to hold the stator box
vertically while the magnets box hangs magnetically under the
stator box. You may notice that the magnets box is attracted by
the ferromagnetic material of the toroïdal coil due to the
magnetic energy. This is here a FREE ENERGY MAGNETIC FORCE, you
don't need to power the coil to attract the magnets.
Now, if you power the coil at about 6 Volts DC, the magnetic
force attraction vanishes and the magnets box drops to the
ground...
This is an important key experiment here to understand the Orbo
working principle: Contrary to a common motor, in the case of
the Orbo motor, when you apply current to the stator coil, it is
only to release the magnet AFTER it has produced FREE MECHANICAL
WORK !!! Think about this...
The second Orbo effect has been demonstrated with this
experiment.
3 - Third key experiment : NO
EXTRA POWER is needed to release the magnet from the TDC
position to the REF position
Here, a bit more complicated experiment, but this is one of the
most important experiment about the Orbo principle.
A function generator is connected on the optocoupler input of my
Steorn Orbo v4.1 driver. The function generator has been
programmed so as to send the same shape of pulse sent by the
motor at full speed. Below you will find the diagram.
Look at the video of the test below, you will notice that the
alignment of the stator coil with the middle line of the magnets
is very critical at the "TDC position".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3RLp3ezs1Q&feature=player_embedded
The voltage and the current have been measured across the coil
with a digital oscilloscope at the REF position (no magnets) and
at the TDC position (with the magnets).
Below you will find the results.
Below, the current curve at the REF position (white curve) has
been memorised and superposed to the current curve (yellow
curve) at the TDC position. You may notice that the two current
curves are identical...
The Power (V*I) has been computed for the two positions ( TDC
and REF ) and you may notice that the power curves are also
identical...
You may also notice the fast rise of the current and then its
horizontal shape.
The third Orbo effect has been demonstrated with this
experiment.
A precisely machined device and a very fine alignement of the
toroïdal coils is the key of the success...
To summarize
It is very important that the toroïdal stator coils must be
perfectly aligned with the middle point between the two magnets
:
The magnets must have the equal strength,
the rotor must be perfectly balanced and must not have a wobble,
the rotation axis of the rotor must be frictionless.
These KEY EXPERIMENTS about the Orbo motor principle presented
here demonstrate fully that :
KEY 1 : The coil inductance decreases when the magnet goes from
the REF position (far from the stator coil) to the TDC position
(close to the stator coil).
KEY 2 : The mechanical power is produced only by the attraction
of the magnet by the ferrite of the stator, this is a FREE WORK
produced by the conversion of the magnetic potential energy into
kinetic energy. The current used to power the stator coil is
used only to release the magnet AFTER it has produced a free
mechanical work.
KEY 3 : The electrical power (Current * Voltage ) needed to
energize the toroïdal stator coil at the TDC position is EQUAL
to the electrical power for the REF position and this is fully
independant of the position of the magnet of the rotor Vs the
toroïdal stator coil. The electrical input power is fully
decoupled from the output mechanical power.
KEY 4 : When the magnet leaves the TDC, there is a magnetic
energy gain in the stator coil because the current remains
constant during the increase of the inductance.
Importants tips for the best tuning :
Use two strong neodymium magnets oriented N-S towards the
toroïdal coil.
The plane of the toroïdal coil must be perfectly aligned with
the middle point of two magnets.
The gap between the coil and the magnets must be tuned with a
scope so as to find the point where there is no change in the
shape of the current curve between the TDC and the REF position,
this tuning is very critical.
Use high permeability ferromagnetic material ( high permeability
ferrite core or better Nanoperm core ).
Don't forget that the free mechanical power produced by the
magnetic attraction of the magnets towards the ferromagnetic
core has no link with the electrical power spent to release the
magnets.
You will find below, the full video of these KEY EXPERIMENTS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTMQFvWkS9s&feature=player_embedded
Interesting document to read:
Comments from Jean-Louis Naudin: Why this patent, below, is
interesting for the Orbo motor ?
The patent below is very interesting because it says that in a
common toroidal coil, each layer is equal to a "one turn coil"
whose axis is parallel to the axis of the toroid. So, one layer
of toroidal coil is equal to a flat coil of one turn and thus it
can tap or produce EMF outside the torus. So, to counter this
interference effect, the only thing to do is , for each layer of
the toroidal coil, to wound a one turn flat coil along the
circumference of the toroid so as to produce a magnetic field
which nullify the virtual one turn coil created by each layer of
the toroidal coil... This is very simple and a very important
thing to do for canceling the weak CEMF induced in the toroid by
the motion of the magnet and this is one of the most important
key of the Orbo motor...
Patent number: US5565835
SUBSTANTIAL NULLIFICATION OF
EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELDS AND LORENTZ FORCES REGARDING TOROIDAL
INDUCTORS
Inventor: Lawrence R. Groehl
Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the
Secretary of the Army, Washington, D.C.
Appl. No.: 260,151
Filed: Jun. 13,1994
Main and supplemental windings are combined in a toroidal
inductor to subntially nullify Lorentz Forces on the main
winding and the magnetic field thereof which passes externally
from the inductor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Use of inductors or coils is well know as for storing electrical
energy. As the electromagnetic parameters of inductors increase
however, severe problems are encountered therewith, for example
in power distribution systems of electric utilities. Because of
Lorentz Forces which result from the interaction of currents
with magnetic fields, structural integrity becomes a primary
consideration. Magnetic fields which radiate externally from
many inductors are also an important consideration because
energy losses result therefrom, and a hazard to life and
equipment.
Steorn Patents
ELECTROMAGNETIC
SYSTEM WITH NO MUTUAL INDUCTANCE AND AN INDUCTIVE GAIN
WO2011110951
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is in the field of electromagnetic systems
and induction.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Inductance in an electric circuit occurs where a change in the
current flowing through the circuit induces an electromotive force
(EMF) which opposes the change in current.
Mutual inductance is well known in the art, most commonly found in
transformers. It is typically defined as a measure of the relation
between the change of current flow in one circuit to the electric
potential generated in another by mutual induction.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention disclosed herein relates to an electromagnetic
system and more particularly an electromagnetic system with no
mutual inductance and an inductance gain.
The electromagnetic system disclosed herein has four defined
states of magnetic interaction which are switched in a defined
sequence.
The system consists of a minimum of two solenoids, wired in
series, one mounted either side of a toroid.
The first of the defined magnetic interactions, called step one,
takes place when there is a voltage applied across the toroid.
The second of the defined magnetic interactions, called step two,
takes place when there is a voltage applied across the solenoids.
The third of the defined magnetic interactions, called step three,
takes place when there is no voltage applied across the toroid.
The fourth of the defined magnetic interaction sequences, called
step four, takes place when there is no voltage applied across the
solenoids.
For step one, a voltage is applied across the toroid.
For step two, after the completion of the current rise in the
toroid, a voltage is applied across the solenoids.
For step three, after the completion of the current rise in the
solenoids, the voltage across the toroid is switched off.
For step four, after the completion of the current fall in the
toroids, the voltage across the solenoids is switched off.
Following this sequence of four steps, there is an inductance gain
on the solenoids which is due to the saturation of the toroidal
core material caused by the current flowing through the toroid.
There is also an inductance gain on the toroid due to domain
rotation of the toroidal core material caused by the current
flowing in the solenoids. Another by-product of this sequence is
that there is no mutual inductance between the toroid and the two
solenoids.
By changing the permeability of the coil's cores the inductive
energy between the toroid and the solenoids is changed which leads
to an inductive energy gain.
From Figure 2 it can be seen that at step two there is an
inductance gain on the solenoids. The presence of the
current-carrying toroid results in a faster rise time for the
solenoids than would otherwise be the case.
The curves entitled Voltage Control and Current Control show
respectively the voltage across the solenoids and the current
flowing through the solenoids without current flowing through the
toroid.
The curves entitled Voltage Active and Current Active show
respectively the voltage across the solenoids and the current
flowing through the solenoids with current flowing through the
toroid.
In Figure 3, it can be seen that at step three, when the voltage
is switched off in the toroid, there is an inductance gain in the
toroid as a result of domain rotation in the toroid core material
due to current flowing through the solenoids.
The curves entitled Voltage Control and Current Control show
respectively the voltage across the toroid and the current flowing
through the toroid without current flowing through the solenoids.
The curves entitled Voltage Active and Current Active show
respectively the voltage across the toroid and the current flowing
through the toroid with current flowing through the solenoids.
It can be seen that the fall time is longer when there is current
flowing through the solenoids therefore showing the inductance
gain at step 3.
The overall sequence of these steps is illustrated in Figure 4.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a view of the system
comprising two solenoids, a toroid in the centre and associated
control circuitry;
Figure 2 is a graph showing
solenoid rise time;
Figure 3 is a graph showing
toroid fall time;
Figure 4 is a graph showing
voltage and current across the solenoids and the toroid;
Figure 5 is a graph showing no
mutual inductance when the toroid is switched off; and
Figure 6 is a graph showing no
mutual inductance when the solenoids are switched on.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
illustrated in Figs. 1-3, two solenoids 2 are mounted proximate to
a toroid 1. The solenoid coils each have 380 turns of 0.425 mm
diameter copper wire. The core diameter is 10 mm, length is 10mm
and the core is a 9.7* 10mm ferrite rod. The toroid coil has 380
turns of 0.375 mm copper wire. Its core is a NANOPERM ring, model
no. M-059, available from Magnetec GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany.
Associated control circuitry 3 used to power the circuit and
analyze the output is as follows: Power Supply: Laboratory DC
Power Supply ISO-TECH IPS-
2303
Solid State Relay: Crydom D06D100
Frequency generator: National Instruments Data Acquisition System
with a National Instruments Labview Environment.
Diode: Fairchild 1N914A
Current probe: Tektronix TCP0030 Current probe Voltage probe:
Tektronix P61139A
Solid state relay inputs are connected to the frequency generator.
Solid State relay outputs are connected in series to the power
supply/coils circuit. Data capture is performed using a Tektronix
DPO7104 oscilloscope.
While the invention has been described with reference to
illustrative embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled
in the art that various other changes, omissions, and/or additions
may be made and substantial equivalents may be substituted for
elements thereof with departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a
particular situation or material to the teaching of the invention
with departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended
that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment
disclosed for carrying out this invention, but that the invention
will include all embodiments, falling within the scope of the
appended claims.
ELECTRIC
MOTOR WITH NO COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE
WO2011073799
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is in the field of electric motors.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Electric motors are well known in the art and are utilized in a
wide range of applications ranging from home appliances to large
scale industrial use to transport.
The electric motor has changed little since its inception in the
sense that its operation is based upon magnetic interactions,
namely the repulsive and attractive nature of magnetic
interactions between magnetic bodies. It is the controlled
interaction of these magnetic interactions which allows an
electric motor to create a rotational motion which can in turn be
translated into an increase in kinetic energy of the system's
rotor.
What has changed is the materials science of the components of an
electric motor. Known in the art are permanent magnets which
exhibit ever increasing inherent magnetization levels. Insulation
techniques for copper wire and other conductive materials allow
for the function of an electric motor over a wide operational
range. The development of soft ferromagnetic materials enables the
use of materials which have a high permeability but low remanence
values coupled with low coercivity characteristics and such
materials exhibit a narrow and square hysteresis curve or loop.
The hysteresis loop shows the history dependent nature of a
magnetization effect on a magnetic material. For example, if a
suitable material, which has no magnetization levels, is saturated
for the first time it will retain most or all of its magnetization
once the external magnetic field used to achieve this saturation
is removed. This is the fundamental difference between a permanent
magnetic material and a soft ferromagnetic material in that once a
soft ferromagnetic material is removed from its influencing
magnetization field its magnetization will drop back to zero.
In the field of electromagnetic systems and research, advances
have been made in component and equipment functionality, such as
in power supplies, current measurement and differential probes,
and materials choice for rotors and optical encoders or similar
switching controllers. An important advance is the availability of
low friction bearings, typically passive magnetic bearings, which
provide for restraint of the spindle and allow its attached rotor
to rotate about a defined axis at the lowest possible friction
cost.
There are several aspects of classical physics which are relevant
to this area of electric motors. Faraday's Law is one of the
fundamental laws of electromagnetism. In essence the Law states
that the electromotive force generated is proportional to the rate
of change of magnetic flux.
Following on from Faraday's Law is Lenz's Law, which states that
an induced current is always in such a direction as to oppose the
motion or change causing it. This Law links electromagnetism to
Newton's Third Law which states that for every action there is an
equal but opposite reaction.
The implications of these Laws for electric motors are as follows:
Counter electromotive force, or CEMF, is the electromotive force
or voltage that will push against the applied current and is only
caused by a changing magnetic field. Back electromotive force, or
BEMF, is a more specific term to electric motors, and is an
induced voltage that occurs where there is relative motion between
the armature or rotor of the motor and the system's external
magnetic field. CEMF or BEMF negatively affects the efficiency of
electric motors known in the art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The concept of the basic operation of an electric motor is very
well understood in that an input in the form of electrical energy
is converted into an output in the form of an increase in the
kinetic energy of the system's rotor. This invention sets out a
motor system that can achieve the same operation but without the
associated counter/back electromotive force due to the motion of
the rotor.
The invention disclosed herein relates to an electromagnetic motor
system and more particularly an electric motor with no
counter/back electromotive force (EMF) which is typically present
due to the rotation of the system's rotor.
The invention disclosed herein relates to a motor system which has
two defined states of a magnetic interaction which are switched in
a defined sequence.
The system consists of a minimum of two permanent magnets of a
high grade and magnetization level attached to the outer edge of
the motor's rotor. The permanent magnets are positioned adjacent
to each other such that their polarities are opposed i.e.
North-South and South-North. Fixed with respect to the rotation of
the rotor is an electromagnetic coil with a soft ferromagnetic
core. The permanent magnets are positioned on the rotor so that
they are symmetrically arranged with respect to the coil and soft
ferromagnetic core in the direction of the system's axis. Their
position is also such that as the system's rotor rotates they will
both always be at the same angular displacement from the fixed
coil and soft ferromagnetic core.
The soft ferromagnetic coil in this particular embodiment is of a
ferrite material with a composition of Manganese and Zinc, though
similar soft ferromagnetic materials such as those of a Nickel and
Zinc composition may be utilized.
The first of the defined magnetic interaction sequences, called
state one, takes place when there is no voltage applied across the
electromagnetic coil.
In the second of the two interactions, initiated through the use
of an optical disk and sensor set-up, a voltage of ample magnitude
is applied across the coil to produce a sufficiently strong
current to saturate the ferrite core of the electromagnetic coil.
This is called state two of the system.
Switching takes place when the permanent magnets on the rotor are
at their closest to the ferrite core.
During state one when there is no voltage applied across the coil
and the rotor is free to rotate towards the fixed coil and its
ferromagnetic core, a torque will act on the rotor to cause it to
move towards an angular position so that the permanent magnets and
soft ferromagnetic core reach their closest point.
Torque exists on the system's rotor due to the fact that the soft
ferromagnetic core will be polarized by the fields of the
permanent magnets on the rotor in a direction vertical to the
plane of the rotor. This polarization of the soft ferrite core
will cause a force of attraction to exist between the permanent
magnets on the system's rotor and the soft ferromagnetic core. The
polarization of the ferrite is such that a south pole is created
to oppose the presented north pole of one of the permanent
magnets, and the south pole of the other permanent magnet will
create a north pole. The areas of magnetization on the ferrite
will be substantially equal and opposite due to the symmetric
nature of the position of the ferrite core relative to the two
permanent magnets. This torque, combined with the angular
displacement that it causes will increase the kinetic energy of
the system's rotor.
When the permanent magnets are at their closest point to the soft
ferromagnetic core, stage two is initiated by a voltage being
applied across the coil of sufficient magnitude to cause the
ferromagnetic core to become magnetically saturated. Magnetic
saturation and hence the voltage applied to effect same, is a
function of the soft ferromagnetic core material , that is to say
that the current supplied is directly dictated by the current
required to saturate the ferrite core in this instance in a manner
that the ferrite core is polarized horizontally. The force of
attraction that existed between the soft ferromagnetic core and
the permanent magnets will now be substantially reduced due to the
fact that in its saturated state the ferromagnetic core will be
magnetically polarized horizontally.
There will be no net force (and hence torque) between the
stationary coil and the permanent magnets because the force that
exists between the coil and each permanent magnet will be of an
equal magnitude but opposite direction. The torque acting between
the soft ferromagnetic core and the permanent magnets on the
system's rotor, combined with the angular displacement will cause
the system's rotor to lose kinetic energy.
Due to the net magnetization vectors of the soft ferromagnetic
core in its saturated magnetization of state two being lower than
in state one, there is a lower net torque acting on the rotor.
However since angular displacement in both states is the same, the
overall result of the sequenced action of both states of the
interaction will be an increase in the kinetic energy of the
system's rotor.
Due to the symmetry of the permanent magnetic arrangement on the
system's rotor with respect to the fixed coil, there is no net
rate of change of flux through the coil during the motion of the
system's rotor, and hence no induced electromotive force to act
against the voltage applied across the coil (i.e. no counter or
back EMF).
During normal operation the system will change from state one to
state two when the permanent magnets are closest to the fixed soft
ferromagnetic core and back to state one when the rotor's
permanent magnets are furthest away from the fixed soft
ferromagnetic core.
The reversal of the current direction has no meaningful change on
the angular displacement direction of the rotor as it moves
through state one and state two. That is to say that changing the
current will not have any significant change to the kinetic energy
of the rotor as a positive torque component will continue to be
added to the system by the symmetric attractive forces between the
permanent magnets and the ferrite core. When the current is
reversed the ferrite will again be saturated and polarized
horizontally but with the polarity reversed. Again there is no net
rate of change of flux through the coil during the motion of the
system's rotor, and hence no induced electromotive force to act
against the voltage applied across the coil.
The current supply direction will dictate the angular displacement
direction of the systems rotor. When the current is reversed the
pulse motor will act like a magnetic brake.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 A is a side view of the
position of the magnetically reactive bodies with respect to
each other;
Figure IB is a top view of the
position of the magnetically reactive bodies with respect to
each other;
Figure 2 is a side view of the
polarity of the permanent magnets and the ferrite core at the
position of closest proximity before a current is applied across
the coil;
Figure 3 is a side view of the
polarity of the permanent magnets and the ferrite core at the
position of closest proximity when a current is applied across
the coil;
Figure 4 is a top view of the
switching point: 180 Degree, from State One to State Two;
Figure 5 is a complete system
component schematic; and
Figure 6 shows the direction of
the angular displacement of the rotor.
Figure 7 shows an exploded view
of an embodiment of the electric motor assembly.
Figure 8a shows a top view of an
embodiment of the electric motor.
Figure 8b shows a sectional view
through plane A-A of an embodiment of the electric motor.
Figure 8c shows a sectional view
through plane B-B of an embodiment of the electric motor.
Figure 8d shows a perspective
view of an embodiment of the electric motor.
Figure 9 shows a partial
perspective view of the spindle, rotor, magnets, coils, optical
disk and optical switch as in one embodiment of the invention.
Figure 10 shows a exploded view
of an embodiment of the invention with the spindle, rotor,
magnets, and selected accompanying components.
Figure 11 shows an assembly view
of an embodiment of the invention with the spindle and selected
accompanying components.
Figure 12 shows an assembly
schematic of an embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
INVENTION
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
illustrated in Figs. 1-6, two permanent magnets 3 are mounted on a
polycarbonate rotor 2. The polycarbonate disk has a diameter of
99.5mm and a height of 11.6mm with a cavity in the center of
diameter 12.1mm for an adapter bushing of a brass material, which
couples the rotor 2 to the spindle 1. The adaptor bushing has a
diameter of 12mm and is designed to restrain or couple the
polycarbonate disk 2 to the spindle 1.
The spindle is made of a stainless steel material and has a
diameter of 6.25mm and a total length of 200mm. It is restrained
in its rotational axis by a pair of passive magnetic bearings 7
which provide axial and radial rigidity while offering
exceptionally low friction characteristics. Each of the passive
magnetic bearings has two axially magnetized rings, which each
exhibit at least one pair of north and south poles. The magnetized
rings are positioned in a manner where the poles are in a
repulsive magnetic interaction such that the plane of symmetry
which separates the like poles lies perpendicular to the axis of
the rotation of a shaft and this radially constrains the movement
of the shaft. Axial rigidity is added to the system by the use of
ceramic bearings and related axial retaining mechanisms, as known
in the art, on one of the ring magnets thus maintaining the
magnetic bearing in an otherwise unstable axial plane.
The permanent magnets 3 are of a N35H grade and cylindrical in
shape with length and diameter of 10mm. The system consists of two
permanent magnets 3 attached to the rotor 2 of the motor with
opposite magnetic polarities as shown in Fig. 1. The permanent
magnets are positioned on the rotor 2 so that they are
symmetrically arranged with respect to the system's coil 5 and its
soft ferromagnetic core 4 in the direction of the system's axis.
That is, the permanent magnets exist on the x-plane with the shaft
being positioned in the y-plane, as per the x, y plane identifier
14 in Fig 5. A counterbalance 11 of brass material, of the same
weight (11.8g) as the two permanent magnets 3, is added to the
system's rotor approximately 180 degrees away from the permanent
magnets, again positioned in the symmetric manner as the permanent
magnets 3 with respect to the direction of the system's axis.
The soft ferromagnetic core 4 is a sintered ferrite with a
composition of Manganese and Zinc from Magnet Sales of Swindon,
United Kingdom, part number RDSF01556. It is of length 9.45mm and
it is cut down to 8.7mm to sit substantially within the
electromagnetic coil's 5 core. The electromagnetic coil 5 is wound
with insulated and bonded copper wire of 25 American Wire Gauge
(AWG), with a core diameter of 9.6mm and a total of 360 turns.
In Fig. 6 the direction of the angular displacement 12 is shown.
As the system's rotor 2 travels on this angular displacement it
will come into an angular range where the magnetic field of both
permanent magnets 3 can act on the ferrite core 4. The permanent
magnets are positioned on the rotor so that they are symmetrically
arranged with respect to the system's coil and soft ferromagnetic
core and as such they will act on the core in a manner that
results in an attractive force or torque acting on the rotor. In
turn the permanent magnets will magnetize the core in a manner
that the two forces acting on the bodies are substantially equal
but opposite.
Fig. 2 illustrates the magnetization effect the permanent magnets
3 will have when they have been allowed to rotate about an angular
path so that they are as close as possible to the ferrite core 4.
From Fig. 2 it can be seen that the ferrite will become magnetized
in a manner that there are two opposite polarity magnetized
regions vertically with respect to the rotor so that the presented
north pole of the permanent magnet will create an opposite south
pole on the ferrite and conversely the presented south pole of the
other permanent magnet will create a north pole on the ferrite
core.
In Fig. 4 the electromagnetic coil 6, with its ferrite core 4, has
a voltage applied to it such that the current across the coil is
approximately 4Amps and this is of sufficient magnitude to cause
the soft ferromagnetic core 4 to become magnetically saturated.
This firing angle, that is the angular position at which the
voltage is applied across the coil, is represented in Fig. 4 as
the 180 degree mark 13. The application of the voltage is switched
by an optical reader 9, in this instance a Sunx 4EPK, having being
activated by an optical disk 10 which has a diameter of 28mm and
is coupled to the spindle. The optical disk and its reader
presents a square wave signal to the system which results in an
open and closed signal being relayed to a solid state relay 8
depending on whether the reader is seeing the opaque or clear
section of the disk. The disk is configured so that the current is
only allowed to flow when the system is in State Two and no
current flows when the system is in State One. The solid state
relay is from Croydom, model SSC 1000-25-24 and is rated for a
maximum output of 25 Amps based on a 24 volt feed.
The voltage feed is supplied by an ISO Tech IPS-2303, Laboratory
DC Power Supply. As per Fig. 4 the electromagnetic coil 5 does not
have a voltage applied to it from 0 degrees to 179 degrees and the
electromagnetic coil 6 has a voltage applied to it from 180 degree
to 360 degrees. This is achieved by the optical disk having an
open circuit setting from 0 to 179 degrees and conversely
controlling a closed circuit, with the solid state relay and an
applied voltage from 180 degrees to 360 degrees.
In this embodiment Fig. 5 presents all of the system's components
and in turn the positional relationship to one another at a
particular angle, in this instance the 0 degree mark as set out in
Fig. 4.
Shown in Fig. 7, a further illustrative embodiment comprises a
polycarbonate base 14, 200x200mm in size, of height 30mm with
20x20mm bevelled corners. A number of cut outs and mounts are
provided to facilitate assembly, the most notable being a 39mm
diameter hole 15 provided in the centre of the base 14. Two
polycarbonate stands 16, 17, both 100mm tall, 60mm wide and 28mm
deep are mounted on the base 14 and another polycarbonate bracket
18 is mounted across the top of stands 16 and 17. Bracket 18 is
172mm long, 60mm wide and 30mm deep, with a 39mm diameter hole 19
in its centre, positioned such that it is aligned with the hole 15
in the main base 14.
The spindle 1 is mounted and positioned through the 39mm holes 15,
19 in the base 14 and the bracket 18, respectively, utilizing
similar low-friction magnetic bearings 7 as described earlier.
Additional components include a micrometer head 24 attached to the
spindle 1 , collars 25, nuts 26, ring magnets 27, bushings 28, and
clamp collar 29. In one embodiment the micrometer head 24 is made
of stainless steel; the collars 25, nuts 26, bushings 28, and
clamp collar 29 are acetal. A tungsten-carbide ball 30 rests atop
the spindle 1.
As shown in Figs. 8a-8d, four additional polycarbonate brackets 20
are mounted on the base 14. These brackets 20 are broadly
triangular in shape with squared-off edges, 70mm tall, 71mm wide
and 30mm deep. Each of these brackets 20 is provided with a
cut-out 21 at 41.5mm from its base, said cut-out being 15mm tall,
27mm wide and 27mm deep. The brackets 20 are each mounted on the
diagonals of the base 14 such that the cut-out 21 is facing
towards the centre of the base 14. Positioned within the cut-outs
21 of the polycarbonate brackets 20 are four toroidal coils 22.
These coils 22 are comprised of a Magnetec M-059 torus core, with
a 120-turn winding utilizing American Wire Gauge 27 copper wire.
As shown in Fig. 9, a spindle 1 has attached to it several
components of the embodiment. The spindle 1 is of a rigid epoxy
material and is 130mm in length, with a diameter of 12mm over the
central 100mm, and diameter of 8.1mm for 15mm at either end. Also
attached to the spindle is an optical disk 10. This optical disk
10, in conjunction with similar control equipment to that
described earlier including an optical switch 23, relay (not
shown), and power supply (not shown) provides for four instances
per revolution where the toroidal coils 22 are supplied with
current. Current is supplied to the coils 22 when each of the
pairs of magnets 3 mounted on the rotor 2 is exactly aligned with
one of the coils 22 and then switched off until the next instance
when the magnet pairs 3 and the coils 22 are aligned. The current
is supplied over 25 degrees of revolution for each alignment.
The rotor 2 is of polycarbonate and is 100mm diameter and 24mm
tall. At each of the four principal cardinal points it is provided
with a pair of cut-outs on its vertical exterior side, each of
these being 10.1mm in diameter, 10mm deep. These cut-outs hold
pairs of permanent magnets 3 for a total of 8 magnets. In this
embodiment the magnets 3 are 10x10mm cylindrically shaped, of type
NdFeb N38H. The magnets 3 are mounted one above the other. In this
illustrative embodiment the upper magnet 3 of each pair is mounted
with its North pole facing outwards and the lower magnet 3 of each
pair is mounted with its South pole facing outward. The air gap
between the magnet pairs 3 and the toroidal coils 22 is 10mm in
this embodiment, although that can be adjusted by moving the
brackets 20.
Figs. 10-12 show alternate views of an illustrative embodiment
with the above-mentioned components. As shown in Fig. 12, the base
14, bracket 18, and stands 16, 17 may be assembled using machine
screws 31 and machine nuts 32 as shown, or by using other
appropriate fasteners, an adhesive, or solvent welding.
While the invention has been described with reference to
illustrative embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled
in the art that various other changes, omissions, and/or additions
may be made and substantial equivalents may be substituted for
elements thereof with departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a
particular situation or material to the teaching of the invention
without departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is
intended that the invention not be limited to the particular
embodiment disclosed for carrying out this invention, but that the
invention will include all embodiments, falling within the scope
of the appended claims.
PASSIVE
MAGNETIC BEARING
US2011001379
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention is in the field of bearings systems,
and more particularly relates to passive magnetic bearings for
providing radial and axial restraint in rotary systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates to control of rotating mechanical
systems, specifically the requirement to restrain the relative
movement of two or more elements of such a system. A wide variety
of bearings exist which attempt to address this requirement,
ranging from simple ball bearings to complex electromagnetic
assemblies.
[0003] Ball bearings are well known in the art and are utilized in
thousands of devices. Improvements in materials technology, such
as the use of ceramics, and enhanced raceway designs have
addressed many of the inherent issues with traditional bearings,
such as friction and lubrication.
[0004] At the other end of the spectrum, advances in magnetic
materials and magnetic levitation technology have given rise to
active magnetic bearings which overcome the issues associated with
direct contact between moving parts although they present a
different set of challenges related to their complex control
requirements.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The invention disclosed herein relates to a means of
providing radial and axial stability using passive magnetic
bearings in conjunction with ceramic ball bearings and associated
structures.
[0006] The passive magnetic bearings disclosed herein have an
exceptionally low friction couple whilst exhibiting radial and
axial rigidity.
[0007] In one illustrative embodiment, passive magnetic bearing is
made up of a large axially magnetized ring shaped magnet, and a
less large axially magnetized ring shaped magnet. Both magnets
have at least one pair of negative and positive poles with field
lines which emanate in an axial manner, that is, a magnetic field
shape which is perpendicular to an axial cross section of the
magnets.
[0008] When the less large magnetic ring is positioned inside the
open area of the large magnetic ring, the field of the less large
magnetic ring and the magnetic field of the large magnetic ring
will rapidly produce both a restorative and repulsive force such
that a levitation effect will be acting upon the less large
magnetic ring compared to the large magnetic ring.
[0009] The large magnetic ring is embedded in a non-magnetic
material and this housing is designed so that no displacement of
the housing or the large magnetic ring is allowed. The housing
also allows for the less large ring magnet to sit directly within
the internal open area of the larger ring magnet. The less large
ring magnet is restrained by the following mechanisms: two sets of
stainless steel axial thrust bearings and a number of ceramic ball
bearings, all of which are housed in two cages.
[0010] The resultant precise positioning of the less large ring
magnet is such that the two ring magnets have their positive and
negative poles aligned such that the net forces, or lines of
force, acting between the magnetic rings are close to or equal to
zero. Any displacement experienced by the less large ring magnet
is mechanically corrected by the ceramic bearings in conjunction
with a magnetic correction relating to the opposing fields of the
two ring magnets seeking their lowest energy or force state, thus
realigning the less large magnetic ring back to a predetermined
home position.
[0011] This system is of a magneto-mechanical nature and requires
no circuitry. It has a variety of applications which require a
friction minimizing bearing operation. The removal of friction
through the levitation effect exhibited by this magnetic bearing
system through the non-contact nature of the shaft and its
attached less large ring magnet, coupled with the passive nature
of this system, allows for non-contact rotation for both low and
high speed systems integration.
[0012] One of the known impediments to such a system is eddy
current losses and to counter these, materials within the system
are chosen for their lack of conductivity and/or are of a high
electrical resistivity value. Another issue typical of a magnetic
bearing system is losses due to hysteresis effects which in turn
are due to changing magnetic fields. Such hysteresis effects are
removed or minimized to such an extent that they are not a
significant loss due to reduced magnetic field changes directly
related to the fact that the large and less large ring magnets are
radially restrained in a stable repulsive magnetic field by said
magnetic field interaction and also that the axial movement of the
less large ring magnet is substantially reduced, such that the
overall magnetic bearing systems operates in a manner that allows
for a near zero force to be acting on the two ring magnets and as
such the system exhibits little or no magnetic field changes and
thus little or no hysteresis effects or losses.
[0013] Due to the rigid nature of this magnetic bearing system,
this system can be used as a single unit or in a plurality of
implementations and the related magnetic levitation of the shaft
allows for little or no contact on the shaft pivot points, thereby
vastly reducing or completely diminishing pivot point friction.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] FIG. 1 is a cross section
of the bearing system.
[0015] FIG. 2 is a cross section
of the large and less large ring magnets indicating their polar
orientation.
[0016] FIG. 3 shows a first, less
large inner magnet, its attached stainless steel sleeve and an
attached shaft.
[0017] FIG. 4 shows the less
large inner magnet, its attached stainless steel sleeve and an
attached shaft for a dual bearing arrangement.
[0018] FIG. 5 is a cross section
of the bearing system without its outer housing.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
a large axially magnetized ring magnet 1 and a less large axially
magnetized ring magnet 2 are positioned inside a housing 6. The
housing 6, manufactured from Acetal, is circular in shape with a
diameter of 43 mm and a depth of 9 mm comes in two
pre-manufactured parts, which are mirror images of each other.
Each housing piece exhibits three step-down cut outs. The largest
of these is found 8 mm from the outer diameter of the housing
piece. This first cut out has a diameter of 30 mm, the second
largest cut out has a diameter of 24.4 mm and the smallest has a
diameter of 11.5 mm. It is within these cut outs in this
illustrative embodiment that the various bearing components are
housed.
[0020] As shown in FIG. 2 the two ring magnets 1 and 2 exhibit at
least one pair of north and south poles. The two magnets 1 and 2
have the same width and are constrained within the housing such
that the both the outer and inner edges of the ring magnets are in
the same y plane symmetry. The magnets 1 and 2 are positioned in
such a manner that they exert a repulsive magnetic field on each
other. In this embodiment the outer diameter for the large magnet
1 is 30 mm, its inner diameter is 22 mm and its depth is 6 mm. For
the less large magnet 2, its outer diameter is 18.6 mm, its inner
diameter is 8.2 mm and its depth is 6 mm. Both the large ring
magnet 1 and the less large ring magnet 2 are made from NdFeB 35
material.
[0021] FIG. 2. and FIG. 3 illustrate the magnetic pole positions
of the two ring magnets, which is such that a restorative force is
acting between the two magnetic bodies 1 and 2 so that they are
magnetically and mechanically restrained in this predetermined
position. This effect allows for a shaft 8 (FIG. 3), which is
attached to the less large magnetic ring 2 by way of a stainless
steel sleeve 7. The stainless steel sleeve 7 is made of stainless
steel 316, and has an outer diameter of 8.2 mm, an inner diameter
of 6 mm and is 20 mm in length.
[0022] It follows that a levitation effect is experienced by the
shaft 8 which is radially constrained by both the levitation
effect and the restorative magnetic effect outlined in this
particular embodiment of this invention. That is to say that where
the radial displacement of the centre of the less large ring
magnet 2 is zero from the centre of the large ring magnet 1 then
the force acting on the less large ring magnet 2 is zero Newtons.
[0023] The radial stiffness of this system is inversely
proportional to the air gap between the large ring magnet 1 and
less large magnetic ring 2, and its associated stainless steel
sleeve 7 with its attached shaft 8. That is to say that the
smaller the air gap between the ring magnets 1 and 2, the lower
the propensity of the less large ring magnet 2 and its associated
stainless steel sleeve 7 with its attached shaft 8, to experience
radial displacement. Accordingly the spring constant is at its
most beneficial level at this air gap which is fixed consequently
in conjunction to achievement of an invariant total system
magnetic field whether the magnetic materials, with their inherent
magnetic fields, of the combined fields are in a stationary
position or rotational plane of movement. The spring constant
deals in this particular embodiment with the relationship between
the distance of the two ring magnets, 1 and 2, and the force
required to restore any radial displacement of said magnetic
rings.
[0024] Referring back to FIG. 1 the large ring magnet 1 is
constrained in the housing 6 by a thrust bearing race 3 with
non-magnetic ball bearings 5. The ball bearings are of a 3/32 in
diameter and are of an aluminum oxide material, whilst the thrust
bearing race is of a stainless steel material and has an outer
diameter of 18.5 mm, an inner diameter of 11.5 mm and a depth of
0.5 mm.
[0025] The ball bearings 5 are kept in place by two cages 4 of
Acetal material, each cage 4 having a total of 10 cavities of 2.6
mm diameter. Each cage 4 has an outer diameter of 21 mm and an
inner diameter of 15 mm, and each of the centre-points of the
cavities is exactly 8.5 mm from the centre-point of the cage. Each
of the cavities has one of the ball bearings 5 free to move about
it. The friction for such rolling or sliding of the ball bearings
5 is facilitated by the thrust bearing race 3.
[0026] The configuration of thrust bearing races 3, ball bearings
5, and cages 4 is such that the less large ring magnet 2 is kept
in a stable axial position with respect to maintaining an
invariant field between the large 1 and less large 2 axially
magnetized ring magnets.
[0027] There are a total of four thrust bearing races 3
incorporated into the passive magnetic bearing system. Each thrust
bearing race 3 has an outer diameter of 18.5 mm and an inner
diameter of 11.5 mm. These are permanently affixed by adhesive to
the two sections of housing 6. The thrust bearing races 3 provide
the minimum surface friction for the ceramic ball bearings to
operate to maintain the less large magnetic ring 2 and its
associated stainless steel sleeve in 7 a stable axial position.
[0028] For the correct operation of the ball bearings 5 there is a
requirement for a set of thrust bearing races 3 to be utilized on
both contact sides for the ball bearings 5. For this particular
arrangement, a total of twenty 3/32 in aluminum oxide ball
bearings are used.
[0029] The number of ball bearings, thrust bearing race diameter,
and holding cage size is directly dependent on the choice of ring
magnets, being reliant on the physical dimensions of the magnetic
materials, the grades, the resultant magnetic field shapes and the
required air gap to maintain the levitation effect in a radial
manner, as presented previously. The size of any proposed rotor or
shaft to be attached to the system is also a function of material
and specification choice.
[0030] The retaining mechanisms, the small magnetic ring 2 and
similar are attached using adhesive to the stainless steel sleeve
7 of an outer diameter of 8.2 mm and an inner diameter of 6 mm. A
shaft 8 would in turn be attached to the inner diameter of the
sleeve, typically by welding or an adhesive of sufficient strength
to maintain required operation.
[0031] Further magnetic bearing systems of the same specification
could be added to a shaft 8, as per FIG. 5, where the components
are set out in a dual system arrangement. Attaching more than one
magnetic bearing system gives radial and axial rigidity which is
such that the shaft 8 can achieve levitation and be stable in a
permanent manner such that there is no contact between the shaft 8
and the large ring magnet 1.
[0032] FIG. 6 shows the components of the axial retaining system
for the less large ring magnet 2 and in turn the positional
relationship of the less large ring magnet 2 with the large ring
magnet 1. The magnetization field directions illustrate the fact
that the two magnets are in repulsive mode and this setting has
both retentive and restorative magnetic and mechanical
characteristics.
[0033] While the invention has been described with reference to
illustrative embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled
in the art that various other changes, omissions, and/or additions
may be made and substantial equivalents may be substituted for
elements thereof with departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a
particular situation or material to the teaching of the invention
with departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended
that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment
disclosed for carrying out this invention, but that the invention
will include all embodiments, falling within the scope of the
appended claims.
TORQUE
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
WO2009087476
Field of the invention
The present invention is in the field of the measurement systems
and, more particularly, systems for measuring kinetic energy and
torque of a rotating body.
Background
Numerous commercial systems are available to measure the angular
displacement, angular velocity, kinetic energy, and torque acting
on a disk during rotation. However, most commercial systems that
are available to perform such measurements require test sensors to
be in physical contact with the rotating body being measured.
Therefore, such systems detrimentally affect the dynamics of the
system being measured.
Previously known optical encoders use reflected laser beams to
accurately measure the angular displacement of a body, but are not
generally used to measure angular velocity for a given
displacement. Such devices have been used to measure the average
angular velocity of a body over a large angular displacement,
typically over several revolutions, but are not generally used to
measure the instantaneous angular velocity for rotating bodies
during acceleration over small angular displacements or to
associate instantaneous velocity with a particular displacement.
Because optical angular velocity measurements have typically been
performed using average angular velocity over a relatively large
angular displacement, the use of such measurements to determine
other dynamic conditions of a rotating body, such as torque or
kinetic energy, provides average values over the large
displacement and do not provide accurate nearly instantaneous
information such as nearly the instantaneous torque or nearly
instantaneous kinetic energy of a rotating body for a given
displacement.
Previously known systems and methods for measuring nearly
instantaneous torque or kinetic energy of a rotating body during
less than one revolution of the body typically employ torque
sensors which make contact with the body, thus detrimentally
affecting the dynamics being measured. Summary of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention measure nearly instantaneous
angular velocity for each of a plurality of small angular
displacements of a rotating body using a laser measurement sensor.
A flat graduated disk, such as a paper disk, is applied to the
body being tested. The graduated disk is selected such that it
will not substantially change the moment of inertia of the body
being tested or its air resistance. A laser diode is aimed at the
disk and laser light reflected from the disk is received by a
photo-diode. As the disk rotates, the laser light alternatively
reflects from graduated portions and the spaces between graduated
portions. The different reflective properties between the
graduated portions and the space between graduations causes the
intensity of the reflected light to pulsate. The output from the
photo-diode provides a series of signal pulses which are each
associated with corresponding graduations of the disk. Each pulse
is time-stamped so that the angular velocity of the rotating disk
can be measured for each graduation. The kinetic energy and torque
acting on the rotating disk is then calculated for each graduation
of the disk. Because torque is calculated without using
conventional torque sensors, no part of the inventive measurement
system makes contact with the rotating object to detrimentally
affect the dynamics being measured.
The inventive measurement device has the capability to measure the
kinetic energy and torque of a rotating disc without making any
contact with the disc or anything connected to the disc during
measurement. It does this by accurately measuring speed changes
during angular displacement of a 360 degree rotation of a disc and
the speed at specific positions of the disc.
Existing non-contact Optical encoders use a reflective lasers that
measure position use a similar type of reflective laser concept,
from which the general speed of the disc can be calculated.
However, the output of such existing encoders is primarily focused
on position precision. Speed changes during a 360 degree rotation
are not a main consideration. In such existing systems speed
changes can only be crudely calculated on a number of revolutions
per minute basis. If speed changes during a 360 degree rotation
are required a torque sensor has generally been employed. Such
torque sensors must typically come in contact with the disk being
measured.
The present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art
by using a non-contact encoder concept, recording data for
graduation on for a disk within each 360 degree rotation. This
data is used to determine speed changes during a rotation to
calculate torque and kinetic energy variations which take place
during each rotation.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present
invention will be better understood from the following detailed
description of illustrative embodiments, taken in conjunction with
the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of
a measurement system according to an illustrative embodiment of
the invention;
Fig. 2 is an oscilloscope
measurement of the light monitoring device output signal
according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 3 is a plot of kinetic
energy and torque versus angular displacement as measured
according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention; and
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram
illustrating a method of measuring kinetic energy and torque
according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
An illustrative embodiment of the invention as shown in Fig. 1
provides a test system 10 having a light emitting device 12 such
as a laser diode, a light monitoring device 14 such as a
photodiode, and a graduated encoder disk 16 which is affixed to a
rotating body 18 being measured. A time-stamping device 20 such as
an oscilloscope is provided in communication with the light
monitoring device 14 and receives output signals therefrom. The
graduated disk has a radial array of graduations printed on a
contrasting background. In the illustrative embodiment, the
graduated disk is constructed of paper and has a white background
with black graduations printed in a radial fashion at assigned
intervals (typically one degree). A home position graduation 22
that has a greater width than the other printed graduations acts
as a reference or home position marker. The graduated disk is
securely attached to the disk that is being measured.
The light emitting device 12 emits a light beam that is directed
at the rotating graduated disk 16. The light emitting device 12
and light monitoring device 14 are aligned so that the light is
reflected from the graduated disk into the light monitoring device
14. The light emitting device 12 and light monitoring device 14
are securely fixed with respect to the rotation of the rotating
body 18.
In an illustrative embodiment, direct current is provided to power
the light emitting device and light monitoring device. An analog
output signal from the light monitoring device input to a time
stamping device such as a digital oscilloscope so that the signal
may be digitally sampled and analyzed. Illustratively, the
oscilloscope records a voltage produced by the light monitoring
device and the time at which the voltage was recorded, so that all
voltage measurements are time-stamped.
Operation of the inventive measurement system is described with
reference to Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Light from the light emitting
device 12 is reflected off the surface of the graduated disk
16. The intensity of the reflected light varies depending on the
reflective properties, (i.e. color) of the section of the
graduated disk 16 at which the light emitting device is pointing.
Illustratively, the light monitoring device 14 produces an output
voltage that is proportional to the intensity of the light
reflected by the graduated disk 16. Accordingly, if the light
emitting device is pointing at a section of the graduated disk 16
that is black, the light monitoring device 14 will produce a lower
voltage than if the light emitting device 12 is pointing at a
section of the graduated disk that is white. Hence, as the
graduated disk rotates, the light monitoring device 14 produces a
voltage that varies as the intensity of reflected light changes
due to the passing of the graduations under the light emitting
device 12. When recorded on an oscilloscope, the analog signals 24
from the light monitoring device 14 vary as the graduations pass
the light emitting device as shown in Fig. 2.
The angular velocity of the disk is determined by measuring the
time between leading edges of the analog signal 24. Illustratively
one graduation is printed on the disk per degree of angular
displacement. Since the angular displacement between the
graduations is known and the time taken to travel between these
graduations can be measured, the angular velocity can be
determined. A system can provide a measurement of any change in
the angular velocity during a single revolution.
The angular displacement of the disk at any point in time is
determined by counting the number of pulses from a known reference
position (the "home" position). In the illustrative embodiment,
the home position of the system is a graduation that is of greater
physical width than the other graduations on the disk. Hence, the
home pulse 26 recorded by the oscilloscope can be identified
because it is of greater width than the other pulses of the analog
signal 24.
According to illustrative embodiments of the invention, the moment
of inertia of the disk is accurately calculated. The moment of
inertia and angular velocity data are then used to calculate the
kinetic energy of the disk during rotation, using the standard
formula: Kinetic energy = <1>A I[omega]" where I=moment of
inertia of the disk (Kg/m<~>) and [omega] is angular
velocity (radians/second).
Since the kinetic energy is calculated at known positions (the
graduation markings) and the distance between these graduations is
also known, the torque acting on the disk is calculated by
differentiating the kinetic energy with respect to angular
displacement. Hence, from the angular displacement, and angular
velocity measurements, the kinetic energy and torque of the system
can be calculated during the system's revolution. An exemplary
plot of kinetic energy 28 and torque 30 versus angular
displacement measured according to the present invention is shown
in Fig. 3.
Measurement uncertainty in the test system may be caused by
several factors including the response time of the light
monitoring device, the accuracy of the placement of disk
graduations, the sampling frequency of the light monitoring device
output signal, the accuracy of the time stamping oscilloscope and
the accuracy of moment of inertia calculations.
For example, a time lag in the photo-diode between the change of
light intensity that enters the sensor and associated change in
the output voltage level; this will lead to measurement
uncertainty. Also, the lower the oscilloscope sampling frequency
the greater the measurement uncertainty. Further, for a fixed
sampling frequency, the measurement uncertainty will increase with
an increase in angular velocity because the number of samples
taken between the leading edges will determine the timing and
positioning accuracy of the system.
Since both the kinetic energy and torque values are calculated
based upon the moment of inertia of the disk being tested,
inaccuracies in calculating the moment of inertia of a rotating
body will increase the measurement uncertainty of the kinetic
energy and torque values.
The moment of inertia can be calculated through the use of
parametric mechanical design and modeling software. In an
illustrative embodiment, Solid Edge <rM> 3D CAD software by
Siemens PLM Software of Piano. Texas is used to calculate the
disk's moment of inertia based on information such as the disk's
material, dimensions, weight, density and point of rotation.
Fig. 4 illustrates a method of measuring kinetic energy and torque
according to the invention. In an application step 40, a
graduations are applied to the disk. While the disk is rotating, a
first sensing step 42 is performed in which a light source such as
a laser diode is directed to shine upon graduations. In a second
measurement step 44, light reflected from the graduations is
received by a sensor such as a photo-diode. The sensor converts
reflected light into a signal having pulses which correspond to
the passage of graduations beneath the light source. In time
stamping step 46, signal pulses output from the sensor are time
stamped, for example by recording the pulses on a digital
oscilloscope. In a correspondence step 48, each of the time
stamped signal pulse is associated with a corresponding angular
displacement according to the angular displacement between
graduations. In a velocity calculation step 50, the angular
displacement between graduations is divided by the time between
the time stamped signal pulses which correspond to the
graduations. In a kinetic energy calculation step, the measured
angular velocity and the disks moment of inertia are used to
calculate the disk's kinetic energy during a specified angular
displacement. In a torque calculation step 52, the measured
angular velocity and the disk's moment of inertia are used to
calculate the disk's torque during a specified angular
displacement.
Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been
described herein as using a digital oscilloscope as a time
stamping device, persons skilled in the art should recognize that
the use of an oscilloscope may be impractical for various desired
implementations of a torque measurement system. Furthermore, the
maximum sampling rate of a typical digital oscilloscope may not be
high enough to accurately measure the projected maximum rotational
speed of about 10,000 rotations per minute (RPM) for certain
embodiments of the invention. It should therefore be appreciated
that alternative embodiments of the present invention may be
implemented without using an oscilloscope. For example, in an
illustrative embodiment of the invention, time stamping circuitry
includes high speed electronics which overcome the disadvantages
of using an oscilloscope for time stamping. The high speed
electronics can generate and capture signals from a rotating body
capable of detecting kinetic energy and toque changes during disk
rotation at speeds up to 10,000 RPM.
In an illustrative embodiment, the high speed electronics for
times stamping include a quartz crystal which outputs an
oscillating signal having a frequency of about 2 gigahertz, for
example. This provides a time period between time stamps in the
output signal of about 5 x 10<"10> seconds which can be used
to time the pulses from the photodiode. The high speed electronics
detect the pulses from the photo diode when changes from black
graduation to white graduation produces a rising edge and changes
from white graduation to black graduation produces a falling edge.
For each graduation, a counter in the high speed electronics
counts the number of time stamps from the quartz crystal during
each graduation detected by the photo-diode. After each
graduation, the high speed electronics reads the number of pulses
from the counter, then resets the counter to start a new count for
the next graduation. The time stamps counted per graduation are
summed and multiplied by the period of the oscillator signal to
calculate the time for the measured graduation on the rotating
body to pass the photodiode. Since, in the illustrative
embodiment, one graduation is equal to one degree of angular
displacement of the rotating body, the measured time period per
pulse is readily converted to an angular velocity to provide a
nearly instantaneous measurement of the body's angular velocity at
any time.
In an illustrative embodiment the high speed pulse counting may be
performed by channelling the quartz crystal output signals and the
photodiode output signals through counting circuitry on a printed
circuit board (PCB) having a series of high speed gates and
providing a low speed output. The low speed output can then be
channelled to a low speed counter. One or more microcontrollers or
other custom hardware can perform counting of the time stamps per
pulse on the PCB board for output to a computer.
A Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) to Universal Serial Bus (USB)
converter can be used to receive data from the PCB board and
convert it into USB format for the computer.
Alternatively, the SPI to USB converter may be replaced by other
custom interface circuitry. The computer may be used to execute
software for converting the number of time stamps per pulse and
the number of pulses to a nearly instantaneous angular velocity,
kinetic energy and/or torque for the rotating body. Although the
invention is described with reference to a light source such as
laser diode, and a light monitoring device such as a photo-diode,
persons having ordinary skill in the art should appreciate that
various other types of light sources and light monitoring devices
can be used within the scope of the invention.
Although the invention is described with reference to an encoding
disk being affixed to the rotating body, it should be understood
that encoding graduations can be printed directly onto a rotating
body within the scope of the invention. While the invention has
been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it
should be understood by those skilled in the art that various
changes, omissions and/or additions may be made and equivalents
may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the
spirit and scope of the invention, In addition, many modifications
may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the
teachings of the invention without departing from the scope
thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be
limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode
contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the
invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of
the appended claims. Moreover, unless specifically stated any use
of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or
importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to
distinguish one element from another.
SYSTEM
AND METHOD FOR MEASURING ENERGY IN MAGNETIC INTERACTIONS
US2009009157
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 60/947,474 filed on Jul. 2, 2007.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to test systems, and more
particularly to test systems for measuring energy exchanges
involving the magnetic fields of magnetic materials.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] It may be desirable to measure the total energy exchanged
due to the interaction of magnetic fields. It may also be
desirable, in measuring such energy exchanges, to account for the
magnetic viscosity of materials involved in the exchanges.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] The present invention provides an apparatus and method for
measuring magnetic force response time due to the magnetic
viscosity of materials and for measuring total energy exchanged
due to relative motion of magnetic materials.
[0005] According to an embodiment of the invention, a test system
for measuring magnetic force response time comprises an
electromagnet mounted to a test stand and a material under test
(MUT) mounted to a force gauge such that a magnetic flux linkage
can be created between the electromagnet and the MUT. An
oscilloscope or other test instrument is used to measure and
record the voltage and current through a coil of the electromagnet
and a force reading from the force gauge or other test instrument
with respect to time. A step increase in magnetic flux through the
MUT is created by energizing the electromagnet. The magnetic force
exerted on the MUT as a result of the magnetic flux is observed on
the force gauge and observed as a function of time on the
oscilloscope.
[0006] The system is calibrated by accounting for the
characteristic response time of the force gauge and confirming
that the net effect of eddy currents in the MUT is negligible.
When the electromagnet is energized, the time elapsed before a
maximum magnetic force is reached is measured on the MUT. The
direction of the current applied to the electromagnet is reversed
to measure the effect on the MUT of a magnetic field in the
opposite direction.
[0007] In the illustrative embodiment, the MUT comprises a
partially de-magnetized permanent magnet. The magnetic viscosity
of the MUT is therefore much greater than the viscosity of the
ferromagnetic core of the electromagnet. Accordingly, this rise
time of measured force on the MUT is attributed almost exclusively
to the time needed to align magnetic domains in the MUT. A pulse
generator can be used in combination with a relay to repeatedly
energize the electromagnet. The method and apparatus of the
illustrative embodiment can be used to measure the rise time and
maximum force produced upon each cycle, or upon a sampling of
cycles of the pulse generator to demonstrate the effect of
repeated magnetic interactions on a MUT.
[0008] According to another embodiment of the invention, a test
system for measuring energy exchanged due to the relative motion
of magnetic materials comprises a permanent magnet mounted on a
disk. The disk is revolved about its axis of rotation to establish
a circular path of the permanent magnet. A passive electromagnet
is mounted proximate to the circular path of the permanent magnet.
Current that is induced in the electromagnet is measured and
recorded for corresponding angular displacements of the permanent
magnet around the circular path. Torque on the disk is also
measured for corresponding angular displacements of the permanent
magnet around the circular path. The magnetic flux density in the
electromagnet is calculated as a function of the current for
corresponding angular displacements of the permanent magnet. The
mechanical energy transferred to the disk is calculated as a
function of measured torque versus angular displacement of the
permanent magnet for a given angular velocity of the disk. The
electrical energy transferred to the electromagnet is calculated
as a function of the measured current in the electromagnet for a
given angular velocity of the disk. The absolute values of the
transferred mechanical energy and electrical energy are combined
to determine the total energy exchanged by interaction of the
permanent magnet and electromagnet.
[0009] The illustrative embodiments of the invention provide a
system and method for demonstrating that the absolute net energy
of a ferromagnetic interaction varies as a function of the
relative velocities of magnetic materials involved in the
interaction. The embodiments provide a system and method for
demonstrating that the variations of absolute net energy as a
function of speed are due to the magnetic viscosity of the
materials involved in the interaction. Accordingly, embodiments of
the present invention can be used to demonstrate that the absolute
energy of a magnetic transaction can be controlled by controlling
the speed of the interaction.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] The foregoing and other features and advantages of the
present invention will be better understood from the following
detailed description of illustrative embodiments, taken in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
[0011] FIG. 1 is a diagram of a
test apparatus for measuring magnetic force response time
according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0012] FIG. 2 is a process flow
diagram showing the steps of measuring magnetic force response
time according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0013] FIG. 3 is a graph of force
versus time illustrating the results of a ring test performed by
applying impulses of different amplitudes on a material under
test as measured according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0014] FIG. 4 is a graph of force
and current versus time illustrating a lag time in force
registration as measured according to an embodiment of the
invention;
[0015] FIG. 5 is a graph showing
a repulsive force applied to a material under test due to
magnetic flux generated by energizing a coil as measured
according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0016] FIG. 6 is a graph showing
an attractive force applied to a material under test in response
to magnetic flux generated by energizing the coil as measured
according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0017] FIG. 7 is an initial force
versus time graph showing the force lag time due to magnetic
viscosity in a material to be used in the repetition test and
measured according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0018] FIG. 8 is a force versus
time graph acquired after a repetition test performed and
measured according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0019] FIG. 9 is a diagram of a
test apparatus for measuring energy exchanged due to relative
motion of magnetic materials according to an embodiment of the
invention;
[0020] FIG. 10 is a process flow
diagram showing the steps of measuring energy exchanged due to
relative motion of magnetic materials according to an embodiment
of the invention;
[0021] FIG. 11 is a graph showing
torque versus angular displacement of the disk for different
relative speeds of magnetic members as measured according to an
embodiment of the invention.
[0022] FIG. 12 is a graph of the
magnetic flux within an electromagnet versus angular
displacement of a disk for different rotational speeds of the
disk as measured according to an embodiment of the invention;
[0023] FIG. 13 is a graph of
torque and magnetic flux versus angular position of a disk when
the rotational speed of the disk is 1 RPM as measured according
to an embodiment of the invention;
[0024] FIG. 14 is a graph of
torque and flux versus angular position of a disk when the
rotational speed of the disk is 10,000 RPM as measured according
to an embodiment of the invention;
[0025] FIG. 15. is a graph
showing a magnitude of the flux versus angular position of the
disk as measured according to an embodiment of the invention;
and
[0026] FIG. 16 is a graph showing
total absolute value of mechanical energy and induced electrical
energy exchanged during a revolution of a disk as a function of
the rotational speed of the disk as measured according to an
embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0027] A system for measuring magnetic force response time 100 as
illustrated in FIG. 1 is comprised of a number of components
including an electromagnet 102 illustratively consisting of a core
104 and a coil 106 having a number of turns disposed around the
core 104. The electromagnet is a fast acting air coil
electromagnet that can be used to generate a step change in
magnetic flux. In an illustrative embodiment, the coil 106 has an
external diameter of 7 mm and consists of eight turns of 1.5 mm
diameter wire insulated by polyurethane. The electromagnet 102 is
held rigidly in place relative to a material under test (MUT) 108
such as a permanent magnet. In an illustrative embodiment, the MUT
108 is a partially demagnetized neodymium magnet. The MUT 108 is
attached to a piezoelectric force sensor incorporated in a force
gauge 110 having an output suitable for connection to an
oscilloscope 112. The oscilloscope 112 measures and records the
force exerted upon the MUT 108 with respect to time.
[0028] In order to generate a step change in magnetic flux, the
electromagnet 102 is connected in series with a resister 114, a
direct current DC power source 116 and a first switch 118.
Illustratively, the resister is a 2.8 ohm resister and the DC
power source 116 is a 24 volt DC battery. A second switch 120 is
illustratively provided to enable a repeatable step change in
magnetic flux by connecting a pulse generator 122 and relay 124 to
the coil 102. A voltage (V1) 126 across the coil 102 and a voltage
(V2) 128 across the resistor 114 are measured with respect to time
by the oscilloscope 112.
[0029] An air gap 130 is provided between the coil 102 and the MUT
108. Illustratively, the air gap 130 is adjustable. A typical air
gap of 2 mm in the illustrative embodiment results in generation
of a magnetic flux of 1.6 mT.
[0030] A method of measuring magnetic force is described with
reference to the process flow diagram of FIG. 2 which starts at
step 200. A MUT such as a permanent magnet is mounted 202
proximate to an electromagnet so that magnetic flux created in the
electromagnet applies a force to the MUT. The MUT is connected 204
to a force gauge for measuring the force applied to the MUT. The
electromagnet is then energized 206. Force measurements are output
from the force gauge to an oscilloscope which records 208 and/or
displays the measured force versus time. Current through the
electromagnet is also measured and recorded 210 by an
oscilloscope. To measure the current through the coil, the
oscilloscope is illustratively connected to measure a voltage
(e.g., 128 of FIG. 1) across a resistor in series with the coil
(e.g., 114 of FIG. 1) which is divided by the value of the
resister to yield the current through the coil. The process is
completed at step 212.
[0031] A ring test can be performed in order to measure the
mechanical response time of the system shown in FIG. 1. The ring
test is performed by applying a mechanical impulse to the mounted
MUT and recording the force versus time output by the force gauge
or other test instrument in response to the impulse. FIG. 3 is a
graph 300 of force versus time illustrating the results of such a
ring test performed by applying impulses of different amplitudes.
It is observed that the measured force versus time curves 302 have
the same period of oscillation 304, about 2.45 ms, regardless of
the strength of impulse applied to the MUT.
[0032] A lag time in force registration is observed with reference
to the graph 400 shown in FIG. 4. Current 402 through the coil of
the electromagnet, voltage 404 across the coil of the
electromagnet, and force 406 measured by the force gauge in
response to the current is plotted as a function of time. A time
lag 408 of about 52 [mu]s is observed between registration of full
current 410 and registration of full force 412. Since the magnetic
field created by energizing a coil propagates at the speed of
light there is virtually no lag time associated with propagation
of the field. Accordingly, the time lag 408 represents the
response time of the force gauge.
[0033] FIG. 5 is a graph showing a repulsive force applied to the
MUT, a partially demagnetized neodymium magnet, in response to
magnetic flux generated by energizing a coil using the system
shown in FIG. 1. In this example, the second switch 120 is in
position 'A' to remove the pulse generator 122 and the 124 from
the energizing circuit. The first switch 118 is closed to energize
the coil 102. The graph 500 shows the force 502 measured when a
current 504 is applied to the coil. A rise time 506 of about 1.13
ms due to magnetic viscosity in the MUT is observed from the time
of peak current to the time of peak force.
[0034] FIG. 6 is a graph showing an attractive force applied to
the MUT in response to magnetic flux generated by energizing the
coil using the system shown in FIG. 1. The polarity of the DC
power source (116, FIG. 1) energizing the coil is reversed to
reverse the direction of magnetic flux and thereby apply an
opposite magnetic force to the MUT. In this example, the second
switch 120 is still in position 'A' to remove the pulse generator
122 and the relay 124 from the energizing circuit. The first
switch 118 is again closed to energize the coil 102. The graph 600
shows the force 602 measured when a current 604 is applied to the
coil. A rise time 606 of about 1.13 ms is observed from the time
of peak current to the time of peak force. This demonstrates that
force lag time due to magnetic viscosity in the MUT is the same
regardless of whether the applied magnetic field is attractive or
repulsive.
[0035] A repetition test is performed using the system shown in
FIG. 1. FIG. 7 is an initial force versus time graph 700 showing
the force lag time 702 of about 0.737 [mu]s due to magnetic
viscosity in the MUT that will be used in the repetition test. The
force 704 generated by the magnetic interaction is about 0.115 N.
Once the initial lag time is measured, the system is configured
for the repetition test by placing the second switch 120 in
position 'B' to include the pulse generator 122 and relay 124 in
the coil energizing circuit and closing the first switch 118. The
pulse generator 122 provides a stream of pulses to repeatedly open
and close the relay 124 which, in turn, repeatedly energizes and
de-energizes the coil 102.
[0036] FIG. 8 is a force versus time graph 800 acquired after
840,000 cycles of energizing and de-energizing the coil. The graph
800 shows a force lag time 802 of about 721 [mu]s and a force 804
of about 0.115 N generated by magnetic interaction. A difference
in lag time of about 16 [mu]s, or about 2%, is observed between
the initial measurements (FIG. 7) and final measurements (FIG. 8)
after the repetition test. No difference in the force of magnetic
interaction is observed.
[0037] A system for measuring energy exchange due to the relative
motion of magnetic materials is described with reference to the
illustrative embodiment shown in FIG. 9. In the illustrative
embodiment, a permanent magnet 902 is mounted to disk 904 having
an axis of rotation 906. The disk 904 is revolved about its axis
of rotation 906 to establish a circular path of the permanent
magnet 902. A passive electromagnet 908 is mounted proximate to
the circular path of the permanent magnet 902. The passive
electromagnet consists of a number of turns 910 of wire wrapped
around a ferromagnetic core 912. A resistor 914 is connected
across the coil 901 and one terminal of the resistor 914 is
connected to ground 916.
[0038] Changing magnetic fields in the electromagnet 908 caused by
motion of the permanent magnet 902 about the circular path induce
current in the coil 908. The induced current versus time is
measured and recorded by an oscilloscope for corresponding angular
displacements 918 of the permanent magnet 902 around the circular
path. Torque on the disk 904 is also measured for corresponding
angular displacements of the permanent magnet around the circular
path.
[0039] A method of measuring energy exchange due to the relative
motion of magnetic materials is described with reference to the
process flow diagram of FIG. 10 which starts at step 1002.
According to the illustrative method, a permanent magnet is
mounted 1004 on a disk. The disk is revolved 1006 about its axis
of rotation at a constant speed. A passive electromagnet is
mounted 1008 proximate to the path of rotation of the permanent
magnet. Current induced in the electromagnet versus angular
displacement of the disk is measured 1010. Torque on the disk
versus angular displacement of the disk is measured 1012
simultaneously with the current measurement. In the illustrative
embodiment, the current measurement is recorded by an oscilloscope
and the torque measurement is measured by a torque transducer
connected to the oscilloscope.
[0040] The magnetic flux density in the electromagnet is
calculated as a function of the current for corresponding angular
displacements of the permanent magnet. The mechanical energy
transferred to the disk is calculated 1014 as a function of
measured torque versus angular displacement of the permanent
magnet for a given angular velocity of the disk. The electrical
energy transferred to the electromagnet is calculated 1016 as a
function of the measured current in the electromagnet for a given
angular velocity of the disk. The absolute values of the
transferred mechanical energy and electrical energy are combined
1018 to determine the total energy exchanged by interaction of the
permanent magnet and electromagnet. The process is completed at
step 1020.
[0041] As the disk is rotated at different fixed speeds, the
torque on the disk and the flux density of the iron core are
plotted as a function of the angular displacement of the disk.
Illustratively, the zero degree position is defined as the
position of the disk where the permanent magnet is furthest away
from the electromagnet, but directly in line with it. The 180
degree position is where the permanent magnet is closest to the
electromagnet. In FIG. 9, the disk is shown in the 90 degree
position.
[0042] The disk is rotated at speeds of 1, 10, 100, 1000, and
10,000 revolutions per minute (RPMs). For each rotational speed,
the torque on the disk and the flux density within the
electromagnet are calculated.
[0043] A graph of the measured torque versus angular displacement
of the disk for each rotational speed is shown in FIG. 11. The
graph 1100 shows the torque at rotational speeds of 1 RPM 1102, 10
RPM 1104, 100 RPM 1106, 1000 RPM 1108 and 10,000 RPM 1110. A graph
of the measured magnetic flux within the electromagnet versus
angular displacement of the disk for each rotational speed is
shown in FIG. 12. The graph 1200 shows the magnet flux at speeds
of 1 RPM 1202, 10 RPM 1204, 100 RPM 1206, 1000 RPM 1208 and 10,000
RPM. It is observed with reference to FIG. 11 and FIG. 12 that
when the constant rotational speed of the disk is stepped up from
1 RPM to 10,000 RPM, the torque acting on the disk is reduced from
about 0.22 Nm to about 0.10 Nm. This reduction in torque is
attributable to the finite alignment time of magnetic domains in
the ferromagnetic core of the electromagnet, i.e. its magnetic
viscosity. In FIG. 12, it is observed that as the constant
rotational speed of the disk is stepped up from 1 RPM to 10,000
RPM, the peak flux values move to the right from the 180 degree
position, where the permanent magnet is closest to the
electromagnet, to about the 210 degree position of the disk. Both
the reduction in torque and the shift of the peak flux values are
produced as a result of the magnetic viscosity of the
electromagnet.
[0044] FIG. 13 is a graph 1300 of torque 1302 and magnetic flux
1304 versus angular position of the disk when the rotational speed
of the disk is 1 RPM. A maximum torque of about 0.22 Nm and a
maximum flux of about 0.1 Wb is observed. It is also observed that
at about 1 RPM the peak flux value and cross over of the torque
curve occur at the 180 degree position of the disk. This indicates
that there is no noticeable shift of the peak flux value and no
noticeable effect of the electromagnet's magnetic viscosity when
the disk is rotated at a constant speed of 1 RPM.
[0045] FIG. 14 is a graph 1400 of torque 1402 and flux 1404 versus
angular position of the disk when the rotational speed of the disk
is 10,000 RPM. A maximum torque of about 0.10 Nm and a maximum
flux of about 0.0023 Wb is observed. FIG. 15. is a graph 1500
having a scale that more clearly shows the magnitude of the flux
1404 versus angular position of the disk. Again, it is observed
that, due to the magnetic viscosity of magnetic materials in the
system, the peak torque value of the magnetic transaction is much
smaller when the disk is rotated at a constant speed of 10,000 RPM
than it is when the disk is rotated at constant speed of 1 RPM. In
FIG. 15 it is observed that, due to the magnetic viscosity of the
magnetic materials in the system, when the disk is rotated at
10,000 RPM, the flux within the electromagnet peaks at a disk
position of about 210 degrees with a much lower peak flux value
than was observed at 1 RPM.
[0046] FIG. 16 is a graph 1600 showing the total absolute value of
mechanical energy and induced electrical energy exchanged during a
revolution of the disk as a function of the angular velocity of
the disk. A plot of the energy calculated by measuring induced
current in the electromagnet's coil for a corresponding disk speed
represents the electrical energy 1602 exchanged by magnetic
interaction during one rotation of the disk. A plot of the energy
calculated by measuring torque on the disk for a corresponding
disk speed represents the mechanical energy 1604 exchanged by
magnetic interactions during one rotation of the disk. The sum of
the electrical energy 1602 and mechanical energy 1604 represents
the total energy 1606 exchanged by magnetic interactions during a
revolution of the disk.
[0047] Although illustrative embodiment of the invention are
described as having the MUT mounted to a force gauge and an
electromagnet fixed in proximity thereto, persons having ordinary
skill in the art should appreciate that alternative embodiments of
the invention can be implemented by mounting the electromagnet to
the force gauge and fixing the MUT in proximity thereto within the
scope of the invention. Further, while an electromagnet is
described, it should be appreciate that other magnetic elements
can be alternatively implemented. And, while a force gauge and an
oscilloscope are used as part of the instrumentation of the
illustrative embodiments, other measurement techniques and
instrumentation can be alternatively implemented.
[0048] Although a material under test is described herein as a
partially demagnetized neodymium magnet, it should be appreciated
that any of various other magnetic materials could be
alternatively implemented.
[0049] While the invention has been described with reference to an
exemplary embodiment, it should be understood by those skilled in
the art that various changes, omissions and/or additions may be
made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof
without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In
addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular
situation or material to the teachings of the invention without
departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that
the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment
disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this
invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments
falling within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, unless
specifically stated any use of the terms first, second, etc. do
not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first,
second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another.
SYSTEM
AND METHOD FOR MEASURING INTERACTION OF LOADS
WO2008020424
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to test systems, and more
particularly to test systems for measuring characteristics of a
load.
Background of the Invention
It is often desirable to measure the forces associated with motion
of a load, such as the motion of a fly-wheel or the linear or
rotary motion of a rotary actuator. It is also desirable, in
measuring such forces, to eliminate extraneous forces that might
interfere with the true measurement of the force under
measurement.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides an apparatus and method for
measuring a rotary load and provides the ability to substantially
eliminate the affects of friction and system baseline
characteristics from the load measurement.
According to the invention, a test system for measuring a rotary
load comprises components mounted on an aluminum frame forming a
measurement arm. In one embodiment, a stepper motor drives a gear
box that is mounted at one end of the aluminum frame. Adjacent to
the output shaft of the gear box is a torque sensor which provides
contactless measurement signal transmission. The gear box's output
shaft is connected to one of the torque sensor's stubs by means of
a universal joint coupling. On the other side of the torque sensor
a second universal joint coupling connects the sensor to a
stainless steel shaft. A low friction flange bearing is used to
provide support for the shaft. An angle encoder is disposed on the
end of the shaft distal to the gear box. The gear box's output
shaft, the torque sensor's cylindrical shaft hubs and associated
couplings are arranged such that they are directly aligned with
the shaft. The test system has been designed to take automated
torque and angle readings from a shaft capable of rotary motion.
The measurement arm configuration with the stepper motor directly
connects the torque and angle sensors to a PC based data
acquisition card for acquisition and processing of data.
In one embodiment of a method according to the invention the user
of the system defines a travel path for the shaft or a wheel on
the shaft and an angular step for that travel path. The system
then automatically travels the path defined in a clockwise and
counter-clockwise direction. Since the system has a certain
settling time after movement a delay exists between the automated
movement of an arm and the acquisition of data. This settling time
has been configured to be 2 seconds. It should be appreciated that
other settling times may be appropriate. Once the system has been
allowed to settle, five torque measurements are taken with a 100ms
time period between them. The highest and lowest of these five
samples are discarded and the average of the remaining three is
taken and recorded as the torque at that angle. This
multi-sampling approach is taken so that spikes caused by signal
noise may be removed.
The system in the illustrative embodiment is used to make a true
torque measurement of a rotary actuated shaft or wheel in a
process where a first data set is acquired with the system
unloaded as the shaft or wheel is actuated through the defined
travel path. The actuation force applied by the stepper motor is
accurately controlled through a computer interface. Torque data is
measured at each angular step as the wheel is actuated in a first
direction (e.g. clockwise). Torque data is then measured at each
angular step as the wheel is actuated in the opposite direction
(e.g. counter-clockwise).
A load is then placed on the test system, for example, a magnetic
force applied by a fixed or electromagnet wherein it is desired to
determine the torque on the wheel resulting from the application
of the magnetic force or volume. With the load on the system,
torque data is acquired/measured at each angular step as the wheel
is actuated in a first direction (e.g. clockwise) through the
defined travel path. Torque data is then measured at each angular
step as the wheel is actuated in the opposite direction (e.g.
counter-clockwise) through the defined travel path.
Ultimately, the true torque, i.e. torque less the effects of
friction and the system baseline mechanical profile, is determined
by adjusting measurement data to virtually eliminate these two-
effects. This is done so that the adjusted data represents the
actual effects of the interaction of the load, e.g, magnetic
field, and not changes in friction or the effect of the test
system mechanical profile.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a perspective view of
a test system for measuring a rotary load according to the
invention;
Figure 2 is a close-up view of
one of the universal joint couplings used in the measurement arm
for connection of the torque sensor to the shaft on one side and
the gearbox or the other;
Figure 3 is a graph depicting
settling time of the stepper motor in the system if Figure 1;
Figure 4 is a block diagrammatic
overview of the operation of the test system of Figure 1;
Figure 5 is a block diagram of a
process of determination of friction and system baseline
mechanical profile, according to the invention;
Figure 6A and Figure 6B are two
graphs illustrating the clockwise and counterclockwise torque
readings for the test system measurement arm under different
friction loads;
Figure
7 is a graph showing an unadjusted torque, mechanical
baseline profile and a torque curve adjusted to remove the
mechanical baseline;
Figure 8 is a block diagram of a
process of determining true torque for load on a system,
according to the invention;
Figure 9 is a view of an
embodiment of a test system for measuring the interrelationship
of magnetic forces having two measurement arms according to the
invention; and
Figure 10 is a block diagram of
the operation of the test system embodiment of Figure 9
comprising two measurement arms.
Detailed Description
The system, as illustrated in Figure 1, is comprised of a number
of components which are mounted on an aluminum frame 10 to form a
measurement arm 11. A stepper motor 12, such as a MDrive model
MDIF1719, drives a gear box 13, for example a Muffett model
M3-50/1-C mounted at one end of the aluminum frame 10. Adjacent to
the output shaft of the gear box is a torque sensor 14 with
cylindrical shaft stubs. In this illustrative embodiment a HBM
T20WN unit which provides contactless measurement signal
transmission is implemented. The gear box's output shaft is
connected to one of the torque sensor's stubs by means of a
universal joint coupling 16. On the other side of the torque
sensor a second universal joint coupling 18 is employed to connect
the sensor to a stainless steel shaft 20. In this illustrative
embodiment the universal joint couplings 16 and IS are Yuil
SCJA-20C couplings and the shaft 20 is of diameter 10mm and length
255mm. A low friction flange bearing 22 is used at this juncture
to provide support for the shaft. An angle encoder 24 is disposed
on the end of the shaft distal to the motor 12. In this
embodiment, the angle encoder is a Wachendorff Encoder model
WDG58E with angular contact bearings which provide axial and
radial alignment with the shaft. The stepper motor's output shaft,
the torque sensor's cylindrical shaft hubs and associated
couplings are arranged such that they are directly aligned with
the shaft.
The universal joint couplings 16, 18 are used to prevent the
transmission of complex forces (such as bending forces) to the
torque sensor 14. However, while they are highly effective at
removing such forces, the universal joint couplings themselves
typically contain a degree of play, or slop, as they turn. This
characteristic of the couplings has the potential to cause
erroneous readings being taken by the torque sensor 14. In order
to substantially eliminate this, the universal joint couplings 16,
18 are kept under compression, thus removing the slop in flie
couplings. This is achieved by pressing the two sides of the
coupling together before they are tightened onto the shaft . A
consequence of this is that it increases the friction component of
the measurement arm, hence the importance of adjusting for
friction as described hereinafter. A more detailed depiction of
the universal joint couplings 18 and low friction flange bearing
22 is illustrated in Figure 2.
[iota]n the illustrative embodiment, the test system has been
designed to take automated torque and angle readings from the
shaft 20 or a wheel on the shaft (not shown) capable of rotary
motion. The system is essentially configured as a single
measurement arm 11 with the stepper motor 12 and direct connection
of the torque and angle sensors to a PC based data acquisition
card as known in the art (not shown in Figure 1). It should be
appreciated that more than one measurement arm can be configured
according to the invention, as described hereinafter with respect
to a two measurement arm implementation,
In operation, generally, the user of the system defines a travel
path for the shaft or wheel and an angular step for that travel
path. The travel path, is the same in each of a loaded and
unloaded state in the method as described. The system then
automatically travels the paths defined in a clockwise and
counter-clockwise direction, unloaded and loaded. Since the system
has a certain settling time after eaeh movement in a travel path,
a delay exists between the automated movement and the acquisition
of data. This settling time has been configured to be 2 seconds.
It should be appreciated that other settling times may be
appropriate. Figure 3 shows the settling time of the measurement
arm as captured using an oscilloscope. Once the system has been
allowed to settle, five torque measurements are taken with a 100ms
time period between them. It should be appreciated that fewer or
greater than 5 measurements could be taken and a time other than
100ms could be used. The highest and lowest of the five samples
are discarded and the average of the remaining three is taken and
recorded as the torque at that angle. This multi- sampling
approach is taken so that spikes caused by signal noise may be
removed.
As generally illustrated in Figure 4 (overview), a true torque
measurement of a rotary actuated shaft/wheel is determined in a
process where first a travel path of the wheel is defined 30, in
terms of a number of steps of the wheel through a defined angular
path. It is desirable in measuring the true torque to decouple any
axial or linear forces present from the rotary force in order to
eliminate error that is introduced by the non-torque force(s).
Thus, in application of the system described herein, an objective
is to determine torque associated virtually exclusively by the
load applied to the rotary actuated wheel while virtually
eliminating the error or effects of friction and/or any baseline
mechanical profile caused by characteristics of the system (e.g.
tilt, asymmetry, noise, etc).
An unloaded data set is then acquired 32 with the system unloaded
as the shaft/wheel is actuated through the defined travel path. As
described, in this illustrative embodiment the actuation force is
applied by the stepper motor 12 that is accurately controlled
through a computer interface as is well known in the art. Torque
data is measured at each angular step as the wheel is actuated in
a first direction (e.g. clockwise). Torque data is then measured
at each angular step as the wheel is actuated in the opposite
direction (e.g. counter-clockwise). Thereafter, the first data set
is adjusted 34, as described in more detail hereinafter, to
virtually eliminate the effects of friction and the baseline
mechanical profile of the system. A load is then placed on the
test system 36. The load may, for example, be a magnetic force,
applied by a fixed or electromagnet wherein it is desired to
determine the torque on the shaft/wheel resulting from the
application of the magnetic force or volume. With the load on the
system, torque data is measured/acquired at each angular step as
the wheel is actuated in a first direction (e.g. clockwise)
through the defined travel path. Torque data is then measured at
each angular step as the wheel is actuated in the opposite
direction (e.g. counter-clockwise) through the defined travel
path.
Ultimately, the true torque, Le. torque less the effects of
friction and the system baseline mechanical profile, is determined
38 as described in further detail hereinafter by adjusting
measurement date to virtually eliminate these two effects. This is
done so that the adjusted data represents the actual effects of
the interaction of the load, e.g. magnetic field, and not changes
in friction or the effect of the test system mechanical profile.
Two adjustments are made to the test system torque data. No
adjustments are made to the angle data since the angle encoders
are directly connected to the measurement wheels. The first
adjustment to the torque measurement data is to remove the effects
of friction. The friction will vary as a function of the load
applied to the measurement wheel.
Referring now to Figure 5 (Determine Friction and Mechanical
Baseline), in order to compensate for friction, a set of no-load
torque profile data is acquired. Clockwise 40 and
counter-clockwise 42 torque measurements are taken with no load on
the system. Due to the way that the torque sensor works, the
difference between these measurements represents two times the
friction component sensed (the torque sensor is always measuring
force in the same direction while the friction component will
change direction depending on the direction of rotation). The
no-load friction data set is then adjusted by subtracting 44 the
counter clockwise torque profile from the clockwise torque profile
and dividing by 2 to get a friction data set which provides a
measurement of friction, Le. a friction profile. The friction data
can be stored 46 for use if and as needed. Then, taking the
average of the clockwise and counter clockwise data sets 48
provides an average data set which is a friction compensated
torque data set which can be stored 50 for use in , performing
adjustment of a torque data set taken under load as described
hereinafter.
Figure 6A and Figure 6B are two graphs illustrating the clockwise
and counterclockwise torque readings for the test system
measurement arm under different friction loads. The first graph,
Figure 6A, shows the measurement wheel under a constant friction
load. The second graph, Figure 6B, shows the same measurement arm
under a varying friction load. The torque measurements of the
system net of friction are hence the average of the clockwise and
counter-clockwise torque measurements.
As with any mechanical system, the measurement system according to
the invention has a certain mechanical profile that is captured by
the torque sensor. Typically this is due to the fact that the
system components, e.g. measurement arm, can not ever be perfectly
aligned or balanced. As magnets or loads are added to the
measurement arms the wheels become even more unbalanced. The base
mechanical profile is hence typically a Sine curve, as illustrated
in Figure.7 which shows a graph of an unadjusted torque 60, a
mechanical baseline profile 62 and a torque curve adjusted to
remove the mechanical baseline 64.
Referring now to Figure 8 (Determine True Torque for Load on
System), in order to measure torque according to this embodiment
of the invention, it is necessary to place a load on the system
70. Via the stepper motor, a force is applied to rotate the shaft
in a first direction (e.g. clockwise), to a first angle 72, and
allowed to settle 74. A torque measurement is taken at that angle
76. This is repeated for all angles in the defined travel path 78,
in the first direction. Data is also gathered by performing the
foregoing in the opposite direction 80, e.g. counter clockwise.
The average of the clockwise and counter clockwise torque profile
data gathered gives the friction adjusted torque profile of the
system under load 82. The data set that was acquired in
determining the friction and baseline mechanical profile of the
system is used, Le. including both the clockwise and
counter-clockwise torque profile through the defined path. It is
subtracted 84 from the friction adjusted profile (i.e. the no-load
friction adjusted profile is subtracted from the loaded friction
adjusted profile). This provides a representation of the true
torque due to the load only. Accordingly, the torque is measured
having substantially eliminated the friction and baseline
mechanical profile of the system.
Referring now to Figure 9, in order to measure the interaction of
magnetic loads, it is necessary to construct a test system
comprising two measurement armslOO, 102. The second arm is
identical in components and construction to that already described
hereinbefore with respect to Fig. 1. The second arm's baseline
mechanical profile and friction profile are calculated using the
method already described herein. The second arm is mounted
adjacent to the first measurement arm, but at an angle of 90
degrees relative to the first measurement arm.
The position of the two measurement arms is such that with a load
on each arm, for example a magnetic load, the interaction of the
loads can be measured as follows: One load is positioned at a
user-defined point and remains stationary for the duration of the
test. A travel path and angular step are defined for the other
load and data is then collected as it travels that path and
interacts with, the other load. Data adjustment is the same as
already described herein, the result being the true torque profile
for the travelling load based on its interaction with the
stationary load. Any number of tests can be performed with either
of the two arms in the stationary position and the load on the
stationary arm in various user-defined positions.
It should be appreciated that the two measurement arms may be
canted relative to one another at an angle other than 90 degrees.
The distance between them may also vary.
Although a "wheel" is described in the embodiment herein, it
should be appreciated that the test system according to the
invention could be used to measure true load on other rotary
actuated structures such as cams, bearings or the like, or on
other geometrical forms of loaded structures. While a stepper
motor is shown and described as an actuator force, it should be
appreciated that the wheel or loaded structure could be actuated
by other forces such as manually or automatedly by other types of
motors.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect
to illustrative embodiments thereof, it should be appreciated that
the foregoing and various other changes, modifications, additions
and deletions in the form and detail thereof may be made without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set for in
the claims that follow.
LOW
ENERGY MAGNETIC ACTUATOR
WO2006035419
[0001] "Low Energy Magnetic Actuator"
[0002] FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0003] The present invention relates to a magnetic actuating
apparatus.
[0004] BACKGROUND OF THE
INVENTION
[0005] Electromagnets are commonly used where there is a
requirement for a magnetic field to be actuated (turned on/off).
[0006] An electromagnet achieves this effect by providing
(generating) a magnetic field while electrical current is applied
to it. To turn off the field the current is no longer applied to
the electromagnet.
[0007] The use of electromagnets to effectuate magnetic fields
suffers from one major drawback - the electromagnet requires a
relatively large amount of electrical energy to operate.
[0008] Many techniques are being used to reduce the amount of
external energy that an electromagnet requires. Primarily these
techniques relate to the efficiency of the electromagnet and its
components.
[0009] SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] A low energy magnet actuator allows magnetic fields to be
turned on and off using a small amount of energy. The magnetic
actuator according to the invention generally includes a base
suitable for the support of a plurality of magnets. An actuatable
shield is positioned in relation to the plurality of magnets so
that it effectively blocks the magnetic field when it is
positioned over at least one of the magnets. The magnetic fields
of the plurality of magnets interact in a manner that allows low
energy actuation of the shield. In one illustrative embodiment of
an actuator according to the invention, the base supports a first
magnet mounted to the base in a first position. A second magnet is
supported by the base in a second position relative to the first
magnet. A shield is positioned relative to the first and second
magnets in a configuration that enables the movement of the shield
between two known positions. In this illustrative embodiment, each
magnet is of similar field strength and the field that radiates
from the ends are of the same polarity. The shield is of a
thickness that effectively blocks the emitted magnetic field when
positioned over one or the other of the magnets. The magnetic
fields of the two magnets interact in a manner that allows for the
low- energy movement of the shield. The exposed magnetic field may
be used to perform work (e.g. interact with other magnetic fields
to move an object).
[0011] Advantages of the actuator according to the invention
include low energy actuation of the shield in a manner that yields
motion or actuation that is highly efficient. The highly efficient
actuation of the shield results in movement that can perform work
in a highly efficient manner.
[0012] BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE
DRAWINGS
The foregoing, and other features and advantages of the present
invention will become more apparent from a detailed description of
illustrative embodiments of the invention, taken in conjunction
with the following figures, in which:
[0013] Fig. 1 shows an
illustrative embodiment of an actuator according to the
invention, in a first or "closed" position;
[0014] Fig. 2 shows the actuator
of Fig. 1 in a second or "open" position;
[0015] Fig. 3 is a perspective
view of a shield of the embodiment of Figs 1 and 2; Fig. 4 shows
an alternative embodiment of the invention utilizing three
magnets in the actuator;
[0016] Fig. 5 shows the three
magnet actuator of Fig. 4 with the shield in a first
[0017] "closed" position ; and
[0018] Fig. 6 shows the three
magnet actuator of Fig. 4 with the shield in a second
[0019] "closed" position.
[0020] DETAILED DESCRIPTION QF
THE INVENTION
[0021] The present invention is an actuator configuration that
involves a plurality of magnetic fields working in conjunction to
effect motion in a highly efficient manner.
[0022] Referring now to Figs. 1-3, a first illustrative embodiment
of an actuator according to the invention comprises a first magnet
10 and a second magnet 12 disposed on a base 14. In this
embodiment the first and second magnets are fixed to the base. The
base 14 is disposed proximate to a linear bearing 16. The base 14
and linear bearing 16 are configured to move relative to each
other in this embodiment. A shield 18 is disposed in a manner to
move relative to the first magnet 10 and the second magnet 12. The
shield is driven to appropriate positions as described herein, by
mechanical means (not shown), such as a linear actuator (solenoid,
stepper motor, worm gear or the like), rotary actuator (cam,
rotary bearing or the like) or any of various other actuators.
[0023] In Fig. 1 the actuator is in a first "closed" position.,
i.e. with the field of the second magnet 12 effectively blocked by
the shielded magnet holding the shield 18 in place. Hence, when
the magnetic shield is in the 'closed' position, the magnetic
field from the actuating magnet (i.e. the second magnet 12) is
effectively blocked by the magnetic shield 18 (shown in detail in
Fig. 3). There is little or no field just in front of the shield.
Thus the second magnetic is effectively blocked and precluded from
doing any work.
[0024] As illustrated in Fig. 2, when the actuator is in the
'open' position (i.e. the second magnet is not shielded) the
magnetic field for the actuating magnet (i.e. the second magnet)
operates as normal i.e., the magnetic field is not blocked. Hence
this field is now 'active' in the position where it was previously
blocked by the shield 18 (Fig. 3), and the first magnet is
blocked.
[0025] In this manner the field from the second or actuating
magnet (1) is effectively turned on and off. It should be
appreciated that either of the first or second magnet can be used
and designated as the "actuating" magnet.
[0026] As illustrated in Figure 1 and 2, the first magnet 10 acts
as a "balancing magnet" and allows the movement of the shield 18
to happen for a relatively low amount of energy. Without this
balancing magnet 10 the force to move the shield 18 down is
relatively high and the system is highly inefficient. The
balancing magnet 10 substantially reduces the energy required to
move the shield 18 over the actuating magnetic field.
[0027] The positioning of the magnetic shield 18 relative to the
balancing and actuating magnets allows for minimal energy to
effect actuation. In the open position (Fig. 2) the bottom edge of
the magnetic shield should be close to the top edge of the
balancing magnet 10. In the closed position (Fig. 1) the top edge
of the shield should be close to the bottom of the actuating
magnet 12. Mechanical stops may be used to optimally position the
shield or otherwise limit the movement thereof.
[0028] Fig. 1 shows a first illustrative embodiment of a magnetic
actuator according to the invention, comprising the first magnet
10 fixed to the base 14 which is made of aluminum. The second
magnet 12 in this embodiment is of substantially equal strength as
the first magnet 10 and is fixed to the base in relative position
to the first magnet 10. In this embodiment the second magnet 12 is
the actuating magnet in that when it is "open" (i.e. not
shielded), it is used to perform work such as by interaction with
other entities (for example, other proximate magnetic fields). The
first magnet 10 is the balancing magnet in that its primary
function is to interact with the shield 18 providing the blocking
method for the magnetic fields.
[0029] The shield 18 in this embodiment is positioned in
particular relation to both magnets, and is made of a magnetic
shield material, such as NETIC S3.6 available from Magnetic Shield
Corporation of Bensenville, Illinois. In this illustrative
embodiment the bottom edge of the first magnet 10 is approximately
15mm from the top edge of the second magnet with the magnets being
approximately 25 mm in diameter. In this embodiment the shield is
approximately 30 mm in width and 50 mm in height. In this
embodiment the shield is configured such that an inner surface of
the shield is approximately 5 mm from a top (flat) surface of the
magnets). These dimensions are illustrative and are a function of
the size of the actuator and shield.
[0030] It should be appreciated that more than a first and second
magnet may be implemented in an actuator according to the
invention. Fig. 4 shows an additional embodiment of the invention
utilizing three magnets in the actuator. In this instance a third
magnet 20 is substantially identical to the other two magnets in
terms of size, strength and configuration. The third magnet 20 is
disposed on the base 14 in such a fashion that the shield can move
in front of it on a linear bearing as per the previous embodiment.
[0031] Fig. 5 shows the three magnet configuration of Fig. 4 with
the shield 18 now having reached the closed position in front of
the second magnet 12. The movement of the shield 18 along the
linear bearing 16 from the third magnet 20 towards the second
magnet 12 allows the magnetic field from the third magnet 20 (the
actuating magnet) to operate as a function of its magnetic field
being exposed.
[0032] Similarly, Fig. 6 shows the three magnet configuration of
the actuator with the shield 18 having reached the closed position
in front of the first magnet 10. The movement of the shield 18
along the linear bearing 16 from the second magnet 12 towards the
first magnet 10 allows the magnetic field from the second magnet
12 (which now becomes the actuating magnet) to operate as a
function of its magnetic field being exposed. It should be
appreciated that in the three magnet embodiment that two of the
magnets may be used as actuating magnets.
[0033] The present invention is not restricted to the above
embodiments. In relation to the magnets and shield, all magnets on
the base are fixed to the base, such as by an adhesive, and
arranged such that their end portions are of the same polarity and
the magnetic field radiates outward from the base. However, it is
possible that the polarities of the outward end portions of the
permanent magnets are alternately changed. The magnets may have
different magnitudes of magnetic force. In addition the shield may
be of varying dimensions and geometric configuration.
[0034] The system works by moving the magnetic shield in front of
one of the permanent magnets or any of various other means of
generating a magnetic field. Actuation of the shield in the
foregoing embodiments is effected on a low friction linear
bearing. The drive mechanism (not shown) for the shield is
provided by an external force such as a solenoid, linear motor or
the like. The addition of the balancing magnet allows actuation
operation to be done for relatively low amounts of energy. While a
balancing magnet, or magnets are currently viewed to be the best
method of achieving low energy actuation, it should be appreciated
that various other methods can produce the same or similar
results. Use of springs, pneumatics or the like can also provide
the balancing force. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that an
actuator according to the invention can be implemented in a wide
range of scales, from a miniature scale such as would be
implemented in a micromechanical or micro electro mechanical
structure to a large scale actuator such as implemented with large
permanent magnets and other mechanical structures.
[0035] It should be appreciate that in the foregoing description
that the use of the terms "open" and "closed" are nominal and are
used for illustration purposes only, as are the terms "top" and
"bottom."
[0036] Although the invention is shown and described hereinbefore
with respect to illustrative embodiments thereof, persons having
ordinary skill in the art should appreciated that the foregoing
and various other changes, omissions and additions in the form and
detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and
scope of the invention.