rexresearch.com
Darren SUN
Multi-Use Titanium Oxide Nanofibers
Simultaneous production of HHO &
pure water by desalination with an anti-fouling &
anti-microbial flexible forward-osmosis filtration membrane;
& solar panels; & 2x battery life extension.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320094856.htm
Multi-Purpose Wonder Can Generate
Hydrogen, Produce Clean Water & Even Provide Energy
Assoc Prof Darren Sun holding the patented Titanium dioxide
nanofibre in a test tube and the hydrogen reactor in the
background. (Credit: Image courtesy of Nanyang Technological
University)
Mar. 23, 2013 — A new wonder material can generate hydrogen,
produce clean water and even create energy.
Science fiction? Hardly, and there's more -- It can also
desalinate water, be used as flexible water filtration membranes,
help recover energy from desalination waste brine, be made into
flexible solar cells and can also double the lifespan of lithium
ion batteries. With its superior bacteria-killing capabilities, it
can also be used to develop a new type of antibacterial bandage.
Scientists at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore,
led by Associate Professor Darren Sun have succeeded in developing
a single, revolutionary nanomaterial that can do all the above and
at very low cost compared to existing technology.
This breakthrough which has taken Prof Sun five years to develop
is dubbed the Multi-use Titanium Dioxide (TiO2). It is formed by
turning titanium dioxide crystals into patented nanofibres, which
can then be easily fabricated into patented flexible filter
membranes which include a combination of carbon, copper, zinc or
tin, depending on the specific end product needed.
Titanium dioxide is a cheap and abundant material, which has been
scientifically proven to have the ability to accelerate a chemical
reaction (photocatalytic) and is also able to bond easily with
water (hydrophilic).
More than 70 scientific papers on Prof Sun's work in titanium
dioxide has been published in the last five years, the latest
being papers published in Water Research, Energy and Environmental
Science, and Journal of Materials Chemistry.
Prof Sun, 52, from NTU's School of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, said such a low-cost and easily produced
nanomaterialis expected to have immense potential to help tackle
ongoing global challenges in energy and environmental issues.
With the world's population expected to hit 8.3 billion by 2030,
there will be a massive increase in the global demand for energy
and food by 50 per cent and 30 per cent for drinking water
(Population Institute report, titled 2030: The "Perfect Storm"
Scenario).
"While there is no single silver bullet to solving two of the
world's biggest challenges: cheap renewable energy and an abundant
supply of clean water; our single multi-use membrane comes close,
with its titanium dioxide nanoparticles being a key catalyst in
discovering such solutions," Prof Sun said. "With our unique
nanomaterial, we hope to be able to help convert today's waste
into tomorrow's resources, such as clean water and energy."
Prof Sun's multi-use titanium dioxide can:
concurrently produce both hydrogen and clean
water when exposed to sunlight
be made into a low-cost flexible filtration
membrane that is anti-fouling
desalinate water as a high flux forward osmosis
membrane
recover energy from waste desalination brine
and wastewater
be made into a low-cost flexible solar cell to
generate electricity
doubles battery life when used as anode in
lithium ion battery
kill harmful microbial, leading to new
antibacterial bandages
How the wonder material was found
Prof Sun had initially used titanium dioxide with iron oxide to
make anti-bacterial water filtration membranes to solve biofouling
-- bacterial growth which clogs up the pores of membranes,
obstructing water flow.
While developing the membrane, Prof Sun's team also discovered
that it could act as a photocatalyst, turning wastewater into
hydrogen and oxygen under sunlight while still producing clean
water. Such a water-splitting effect is usually caused by
Platinum, a precious metal that is both expensive and rare.
"With such a discovery, it is possible to concurrently treat
wastewater and yet have a much cheaper option of storing solar
energy in the form of hydrogen so that it can be available any
time, day or night, regardless of whether the sun is shining or
not, which makes it truly a source of clean fuel," said Prof Sun.
"As of now, we are achieving a very high efficiency of about three
times more than if we had used platinum, but at a much lower cost,
allowing for cheap hydrogen production. In addition, we can
concurrently produce clean water for close-to-zero energy cost,
which may change our current water reclamation system over the
world for future liveable cities."
Hydrogen is a clean fuel which can be used for automotive
fuel-cells or in power plants to generate electricity.
Producing hydrogen and clean water
This discovery, which was published recently in the academic
journal, Water Research, showed that a small amount of
nanomaterial (0.5 grams of titanium dioxide nanofibres treated
with copper oxide), can generate 1.53 millilitre of hydrogen in an
hour when immersed in one litre of wastewater. This amount of
hydrogen produced is three times more than when Platinum is used
in the same situation.
Depending on the type of wastewater, the amount of hydrogen
generated can be as much as 200 millilitres in an hour. Also to
increase hydrogen production, more nanomaterial can be used in
larger amounts of wastewater.
Producing low-cost flexible forward osmosis membranes
Not only can titanium dioxide particles help split water, it can
also make water filter membranes hydrophilic -- allowing water to
flow through it easily, while rejecting foreign contaminants,
including those of salt, making it perfect for desalinating water
using forward osmosis. Thus a new super high flux (flow rate)
forward osmosis membrane is developed.
This discovery was published recently in last month's journal of
Energy and Environmental Science. This is the first such report of
TiO2 nanofibres and particles used in forward osmosis membrane
system for clean water production and energy generation.
Producing new antibacterial bandages
With its anti-microbial properties and low cost, the membrane can
also be used to make breathable anti-bacterial bandages, which
would not only prevent infections and tackle infection at open
wounds, but also promote healing by allowing oxygen to permeate
through the plaster.
The membrane's material properties are also similar to polymers
used to make plastic bandages currently sold on the market.
Producing low-cost flexible solar cells
Prof Sun's research projects have shown out that when treated with
other materials or made into another form such as crystals,
titanium dioxide can have other uses, such as in solar cells.
By making a black titanium dioxide polycrystalline sheet, Prof
Sun's team was able to make a flexible solar-cell which can
generate electricity from the sun's rays.
Producing longer lasting lithium ion batteries
Concurrently, Prof Sun has another team working on developing the
black titanium dioxide nanomaterial to be used in Lithium ion
batteries commonly used in electronic devices.
Preliminary results from thin coin-like lithium ion batteries,
have shown that when titanium dioxide sphere-like nanoparticles
modified with carbon are used as the anode (negative pole), it can
double the capacity of the battery. This gives such batteries a
much longer lifespan before it is fully drained. The results were
featured in the Journal of Materials Chemistry on its cover page
last year.
Next step -- commercialisation
Prof Sun and his team of 20, which includes 6 undergraduates, 10
PhD students and 4 researchers, are now working to further develop
the material while concurrently spinning off a start-up company to
commercialise the product.
They are also looking to collaborate with commercial partners to
speed up the commercialisation process.
Journal References:
Lei Liu, Zhaoyang Liu, Hongwei Bai, Darren Delai Sun. Concurrent
filtration and solar photocatalytic disinfection/degradation using
high-performance Ag/TiO2 nanofiber membrane. Water Research, 2012;
46 (4): 1101 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.009
Jia Hong Pan, Xiwang Zhang, Alan J. Du, Hongwei Bai, Jiawei Ng,
Darren Sun. A hierarchically assembled mesoporous ZnO hemisphere
array and hollow microspheres for photocatalytic membrane water
filtration. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012; 14 (20):
7481 DOI: 10.1039/C2CP40997F
Nanyang Technological University (2013, March 23). Multi-purpose
wonder can generate hydrogen, produce clean water and even provide
energy. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 23, 2013, from
http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2013/03/130320094856.htm
Patents
US2010264097
MICROSPHERIC TiO2 PHOTOCATALYST
Inventor(s): SUN DARREN DELAI [SG]; LEE PEI
FUNG [SG]; LECKIE JAMES O [US] +
Applicant(s): UNIV NANYANG [SG]; UNIV LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR [US] +
Also published as: WO2008076082 (A1)
WO2008076082 (A8)
Abstract -- The present invention refers to titanium
oxide microspheres having photocatalytic properties which can, for
example, be used in a method for cleaning wastewater which uses a
submerged membrane reactor.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention refers to titanium oxide microspheres
having photocatalyst property which can be used in a process of
cleaning wastewater which uses a submerged membrane reactor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Contaminants present in raw water (e.g. natural organic
matter (NOM) and bacteria) are detrimental to the water quality.
There is a growing trend in the use of membrane technology for
removal of such contaminants from raw water for the production of
good quality potable water.
[0004] The "membrane" in a membrane reactor works as a filter
which is based on the separation of substances depending on their
size. With their micropores the membrane separates particles from
the wastewater.
[0005] In recent years, membrane processes have become
increasingly popular in water treatment for a variety of reasons
which include prospectively more stringent water quality
regulations, small footprint and reduced operation and maintenance
costs due to advancements in membrane technology. One of the
serious problems when utilizing filtration membrane in water
treatment process is the decline of permeate flux due to membrane
fouling and gel formation as learned from U.S. Pat. No. 5,505,841.
In general, the membrane fouling can be defined as the
accumulation of contaminated compounds on the surface of a
membrane which form a solid layer. The solid layer on the surface
of membrane comprises bacteria, organic and inorganic species,
non-biodegradable compounds. Especially, the natural organic
matter is suspected to be one of the major constituents in the
solid layer causing the fouling problem in the membrane process
(Sun, D. D., Li, J., et al., 2000, Civil Engineering Research
Bulletin, NTU, Singapore, No. 13). Thus, the term membrane fouling
comprehensively refers to a series of phenomenon which comprise of
pore adsorption, pore blocking or clogging, gel formation or cake
formation.
[0006] Gel formation or cake formation specifically refer to the
layer formed on the surface due to concentration polarization. The
layer is formed at the membrane liquid interface where larger
solute molecules excluded from the permeate form a coating. The
fouling caused by solids or colloids deposited on the membrane
surface, or gel formation or solid layer formation, is reversible
and can be overcome by periodic membrane cleaning. However, the
pore adsorption or pore blocking caused by colloids trapped within
the pores is usually irreversible and requires membrane
replacement.
[0007] To date, significant effort has been dedicated to control
membrane fouling. Several physical membrane cleaning methods such
as backwashing, aeration, ultrasonic cleaning (U.S. Pat. No.
7,008,540) have been suggested to minimize membrane fouling. In
backwashing, permeation through the membranes is stopped
momentarily. Air or water will flow through the membranes in a
reverse direction to physically push solids off of the membranes.
In aeration, bubbles are produced in the tank below the membranes.
The bubbles will agitate or scrub the membranes and thereby remove
some solids while creating an air lift effect and circulation of
the tank water to carry the solids away from the membranes. In
ultrasonic cleaning, ultrasonic energy is emitted by the
ultrasonic transducer in the direction of the filtration membrane.
Dislodged particles cleaned by the ultrasonic energy from the
filtration membrane are carried away in a cross-flow stream.
[0008] These methods or combination of these methods are effective
in removing the reversible membrane fouling like gel layer or
solid layer.
[0009] On the other hand, chemical cleaning is applied to reduce
or eliminate the irreversible membrane fouling. The permeation is
stopped and a chemical cleaner is backwashed through the
membranes. In some cases, the tank is emptied during or after the
cleaning event so that the amount of cleaner can be collected and
disposed of. In other cases, if the tank remains filled, the
amount of chemical cleaner is limited and subject to the tolerance
for the application. Chemical cleaning has to be limited to a
minimum frequency because repeated chemical cleaning may affect
membrane life, and disposal of spent chemical reagents poses
another problem. Thus the control of the irreversible membrane
fouling is of importance for more efficient use of membranes.
[0010] For example, large molecular size of NOM is retained on the
membrane surface while the small molecular size of NOM is trapped
within the membrane pore which leads to irreversible membrane
fouling that could not be cleaned by merely physical cleaning.
Irreversible membrane fouling will eventually lead to higher
long-term operating pressures, and thus, higher operating cost and
more energy consumption.
[0011] Besides chemical cleaning of the membrane, it has been
proposed to remove the contaminants from water prior to membrane
filtration process to prevent irreversible membrane fouling. U.S.
Pat. No 6,027,649 discloses a process capable of removing
contaminants from water utilizing a coagulant in combination with
a semi-permeable membrane. However this process is not effective
for controlling irreversible fouling because such process does not
remove trace organic matter or the smaller molecular size of NOM
which will trap the membrane pores.
[0012] Powdered activated carbon (PAC) is proposed to be used in
conjunction with membranes to remove organic contaminants by
adsorption and allow the membrane to separate the larger PAC
particles (U.S. Pat. No. 5,505,841; JP 2004 016 896). Several
problems are encountered for the regeneration of PAC. PAC must be
heated to high temperatures to burn off the NOM. The cost of
regenerating at such high temperatures has a negative impact on
the economics of the process using PAC. Further more, when PAC
particles are heated to such high temperatures, a certain portion
of PAC are consumed by combustion. At the end of PAC lifespan,
they must be disposed of, which results in additional disposal
costs. Moreover, the irregular shape of PAC may damage the surface
of filtration membrane.
[0013] It has been proposed that freshly precipitated iron or
aluminium oxides, common adsorbents, be used in conjunction with
membranes to reduce fouling of the membrane. However iron oxide or
aluminium oxide also requires heat treatment for regeneration. It
is reported that the freshly precipitated particles themselves
contribute to the fouling of the membrane. Heated iron oxide
particles have been proposed to remove contaminants and
concurrently reduce membrane fouling, the recondition process is
carried out in acidic or basic condition to restore its adsorption
capacity (U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,792). This method is not preferable
for a continuous system.
[0014] Titanium dioxide is proposed to be used as adsorbent for
the removal of contaminants due to its regenerative potential. The
spent titanium dioxide can be regenerated via photocatalytic
oxidation (PCO) process (Fang, H., Sun, D. D., et al., 2005, Water
Science & Technology, vol. 51, no. 6-7, p. 373-380).
Commercial titanium dioxide, P25 is the most commonly used
photocatalyst due to its high photocatalytic activity, chemical
resistance, and low costs. Irradiation with light of sufficient
energy creates the formation of electrons and holes on the surface
of the photoreactive catalyst. The PCO process has been reported
as a possible alternative for removing organic matters from
potable water. A redox environment will be created in a PCO
process to mineralize the NOM's and sterilize the bacteria
adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst into carbon dioxide
and water when the semiconductor photocatalyst is illuminated by
light source (usually UV light) in a PCO process. The theoretical
basis for photocatalysis in general is reviewed by Hoffmann, M.
R., Martin, S. T., et al. (1995, Chem. Rev., vol 95, 69-96) and by
Fox, M. A. and Dulay, M. T. (1993, Chem. Rev., vol. 93, p.
341-357).
[0015] Unfortunately, recycling and reuse of such P25 titanium
dioxide is an existing problem, particularly separation of P25
titanium dioxide from treated water. Moreover, P25 titanium
dioxide does not present individually in aqueous system, but
rather as physically unstable complex primary aggregates ranging
from 25 nm to 0.1 [mu]m. These physically unstable complex
aggregates would reduce the surface area/active sites and
subsequently affect its photocatalytic activity (Qiao, s., Sun, D.
D., et al., 2002, Water Science Technology, vol. 147, no. 1, p.
211-217).
[0016] With the ever increasing concern about the quality of
drinking water, there continues to be a need for improved systems
for effectively and economically removing contaminants such as
natural organic matter and bacteria from water.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0017] In a first aspect, the present invention refers to a
titanium oxide microsphere having photocatalytic property and
having a size of about 10 [mu]m to about 200 [mu]m and a
mesoporous structure with a pore size in a range of about 2 to
about 50 nm wherein the microspheres are obtained by the process
comprising:
preparing a sol by mixing an organometallic titanium precursor
with an alcohol without adding H2O;
aging the sol;
mixing the aged sol with titanium oxide powder;
spraying the mixture to form the titanium oxide photocatalyst
microspheres;
calcining the microspheres.
[0023] In another aspect, the present invention refers to a
process of cleaning wastewater in a membrane filtration reactor,
wherein the process comprises:
mixing the titanium oxide microsphere of the present invention
with wastewater;
feeding the mixture into a membrane filtration reactor;
sucking the mixture treated in the membrane filtration reactor
through the membrane, wherein the diameter of the microspheres in
the mixture is greater than the diameter of the pores of the
membrane, to form a cake layer of catalyst on the surface of the
membrane; and
continuing feeding the membrane filtration reactor with wastewater
until the wastewater is cleaned.
[0028] In still another aspect, the present invention refers to a
submerged membrane reactor in which the titanium oxide microsphere
of the present invention is mixed with wastewater cleaned in the
reactor or which utilizes the process for cleaning waste water in
a membrane filtration reactor of the present invention.
[0029] In a further aspect, the present invention is directed to
the use of titanium oxide microspheres having photocatalytic
property for operation of a submerged membrane reactor.
[0030] In another aspect the present invention is directed to a
method of manufacturing a titanium oxide microsphere having
photocatalytic property and having a size of about 10 [mu]m to
about 200 [mu]m and a mesoporous structure with a pore size in a
range of about 2 to about 50 nm wherein the method comprises:
preparing a sol by mixing an organometallic titanium precursor
with an alcohol without adding H2O;
aging the sol;
mixing the aged sol with titanium oxide powder;
spraying the mixture to form the titanium oxide photocatalyst
microspheres;
calcining the microspheres.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0036] The invention will be better understood with reference to
the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the
non-limiting examples and the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0037] FIGS. 1 and 2 show flow charts illustrating the separate
steps for manufacturing the TiO2 microspheres of the present
invention. FIG. 2 illustrates a specific example which was
carried out for manufacturing the TiO2 microspheres of the
present invention.
[0038] FIG. 3 shows SEM micrographs of a TiO2 microsphere
of the present invention at different magnifications. While the
left picture shows a single microsphere the picture on the right
side shows the surface of the TiO2 microsphere of the present
invention. The picture showing the surface demonstrates that the
nano-size TiO2 particles are uniformly distributed over the
surface of the microsphere.
[0039] FIG. 4 shows the composition of the products used
for preparing the TiO2 microspheres of the present invention as
well as the composition of the calcined TiO2 microspheres. The
composition products have been characterized by means of powder
X-ray diffraction by using a Shimadzu XRD-6000 diffractometer
with CuKR radiation. The top curve shows the XRD pattern for the
calcined TiO2 microspheres of the present invention while the
middle and the lower curve show the XRD pattern for component A
and B, respectively. The different peaks indicate crystalline
phase of each product. TiO2 crystallizes in three major
structures: rutile, anatase and brookite. However only rutile
and anatase play the role in the TiO2 photocatalysis. Anatase
phase, a stable phase of TiO2 at low temperature (400-600[deg.]
C.), is an important crystalline phase of TiO2 Rutile is a
stable phase of TiO2 at high temperature (600-1000[deg.] C.).
Hence the product has been calcined at 450[deg.] C. to obtain
TiO2 with anatase phase. The peak indicating the rutile phase in
the manufactured microspheres shows the rutile phase TiO2
contributed by the TiO2 powder. The raw TiO2 powder has in
general a mixture of anatase and rutile at ratio of 70:30.
[0040] FIG. 5 shows a comparison of photocatalytic
activity of TiO2 microspheres of the present invention and
commercial TiO2 using phenol as targeted compound for cleaning
(phenol concentration: 100 mg/l; photocatalyst mass
concentration: 1 g/l, pH 7). FIG. 5 shows the degradation of
phenol as a function of the irradiation time at pH 7. It can be
observed that the degradation of phenol followed an exponential
decay form. About 40% of phenol is degraded after 60 min of UV
light irradiation with the absence of the TiO2 microsphere of
the present invention. The removal efficiency is greatly
enhanced when the TiO2 microsphere of the present invention is
added into the solutions. The removal efficiency after 60 min UV
light irradiation is 60% and 70% for P25 TiO2 and
nano-structured TiO2 microsphere, respectively. It can be seen
from FIG. 5 that the TiO2 microsphere of the present invention
possessed a better photocatalytic activity than P25 TiO2. C/C0
is the ratio of the concentration of microspheres in the samples
to the initial concentration of those microspheres.
[0041] FIG. 6 shows an exemplary set up of a reactor
system using the TiO2 microspheres of the present invention. Raw
water is introduced into the membrane reactor tank through a
valve. Within the membrane reactor tank the raw water is mixed
with fresh TiO2 microspheres of the present invention and
recycled TiO2 microspheres from the PCO reactor. Within the
reactor tank the raw water and the TiO2 microspheres are mixed
by the turbulence flow created by coarse diffuser located at the
bottom of the membrane reactor. As can be seen in FIG. 6 the
coarse diffusers are connected to an air supply which is also
connected to the PCO reactor. After cleaning the wastewater is
passed through the pores of the filtration membrane by suction
force generated by a pump located outside the membrane reactor.
The TiO2 microspheres settle to the bottom of the membrane
reactor once the coarse diffuser stops working. From the bottom
of the membrane reactor they are transferred via a pump into the
PCO reactor. The PCO reactor consists of a reaction chamber and
a UV lamp. The PCO chamber consists of a double glass-cooling
jacket (e.g., o.d. 70 mm for the outer wall, i.d. 50 mm for the
inner wall and height of 350 mm). The PCO reactor can be fitted
with a gas diffuser at the bottom of the PCO chamber for
diffusing the air. A medium-pressure mercury lamp (12 W) with
primary emission wavelength of 253.7 nm is installed vertically
in the middle of the reactor as the UV source (see also Fang,
H., Sun, D. D., et al., 2005, supra).
[0042] FIG. 7 shows the graphical illustration of the
effect of titanium dioxide microspheres on permeates flux
through a membrane. The initial permeate flux of humic acid
filtration is 3.3 l*min<-1>*m<-2 >and gradually
decreased to 2.3 l*min<-1>*m<-2>. There is a flux
decrease of 30% after 300 min of humic acid filtration. The
initial permeate flux is increased with the presence of TiO2
microsphere in solution. The initial permeate flux is enhanced
to about 5.0 l*min<-1>*m<-2 >with the presence of
0.5 g/L of TiO2 microsphere in humic acid solution. The permeate
flux dropped to 4.2 l*min<-1>*m<-2>, about 16% of
flux drop after 300 min of filtration. However when the
concentration of TiO2 microsphere increased to 1 g/L, the
initial permeate flux is reduced to 4.2
l*min<-1>*m<-2>. Hence, the increase of TiO2
concentration in solution affects the degree of flux
enhancement. In general the presence of TiO2 microsphere in
solution is still beneficial in enhancing the permeate flux.
[0043] FIG. 8 shows the graphical illustration of the
permeate quality during the membrane filtration process. The
permeate quality shows that the membrane filtration is able to
remove humic acid to about 75%. The removal rate of humic acid
can achieve 87% and 93% with the presence of 0.5 g/L and 1.0 g/L
of TiO2 microsphere, respectively. The increase of TiO2
concentration in solution will help to achieve a better removal
rate.
[0044] FIG. 9 shows the pore size distribution of TiO2
microsphere and P25 TiO2. Pore size distribution curve was
calculated from the adsorption branch using the BJH
(Barrett-Joyner-Halenda) method. In FIG. 9, Dv, cc/nm/g (Dv
stands for pore volume, and cc stands for cubic centimeters) has
been plotted against the pore diameter in nm. The total pore
volumes were estimated from the amounts adsorbed at a relative
pressure (P/P0) of 0.99. The first peak in FIGS. 9 of 2 to 3 nm
pore size is referred to intercrystalline porosity which is the
pore within the TiO2 microsphere or the P25 TiO2 agglomerates.
The pore sizes obtained with the method of the present invention
for manufacturing the TiO2 microspheres of the present invention
lies in the mesoporous range (2-50 nm) whereas, for example, the
microspheres manufactured according to Li, X. Z. and Liu, H.
(2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 37, p. 3989-3994) lies in
the mesoporous range as well as in the macroporous range (>50
nm). The second peak refers to the interagglomerate pore which
is the pore between the TiO2 microspheres or the agglomerated
P25 TiO2. A smaller pore size distribution, i.e. the smaller
mesoporous structure, of about 2 to 50 nm enhances the
adsorption of contaminants.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0045] Considering the continuous need for improved systems for
effectively and economically removing contaminants such as natural
organic matter and bacteria from water the inventors have
developed titanium oxide microspheres having photocatalytic
property or activity and having a size of about 10 [mu]m to about
200 [mu]m and a mesoporous structure with a pore size in a range
of about 2 to about 50 nm. This microspheres are obtained by a
process which comprises:
preparing a sol by mixing an organometallic titanium precursor
with an alcohol without adding or using H2O;
aging the sol;
mixing the aged sol with titanium oxide powder;
spraying the mixture to form the titanium oxide photocatalyst
microspheres;
calcining the microspheres.
[0051] The manufacture of those particles is based on the sol-gel
process. In general, the sol-gel process is based on the phase
transformation of a sol obtained from metallic alkoxides or
organometallic precursors. This sol, which is a solution
containing particles in suspension, is polymerized at low
temperature to form a wet gel. The wet gel is going to be
densified through a thermal annealing to give an inorganic product
like a glass, polycrystals or a dry gel. In general, the sol-gel
process consists of hydrolysis and condensation reactions, which
lead to the formation of the sol.
[0052] A "sol" is a dispersion of solid particles in a liquid
where only the Brownian motions suspend the particles. A "gel" is
a state where both liquid and solid are dispersed in each other,
which presents a solid network containing liquid components.
[0053] The terms "particle", "microparticle", "bead", "microbead",
"microsphere", and grammatical equivalents refer to small discrete
particles, substantially spherical in shape, having a diameter of
about 10 micrometers ([mu]m) to about 200 micrometers. The average
size of the titanium oxide microspheres referred to herein is
about 50 [mu]m.
[0054] The sol-gel process used in the present invention can be
performed according to any protocol. The titanium oxide
microspheres may be formed from an organometallic titanium
precursor, for example in situ during the reaction process.
[0055] In this process, at first the sol may for instance be
generated by hydrolysis of such a precursor. An exemplary
precursor can be a titanium alkoxide. The hydrolysis of a titanium
alkoxide is thought to induce the substitution of OR groups linked
to titanium by Ti-OH groups, which then lead to the formation of a
titanium network via condensation polymerisation. Examples of
titanium alkoxides can include, but are not limited to titanium
methoxide, titanium ethoxide, titanium isopropoxide, titanium
propoxide and titanium butoxide.
[0056] Typically, but not limited thereto, sol preparation by
hydrolysis and condensation of a titanium alkoxide can be
performed in an alcohol or an absolute alcohol. Any alcohol can be
used in the present method. Examples of alcohols which can be used
are ethanol, methanol, isopropanol, butanol or propanol.
[0057] In general the hydrolysis does not require the use of a
catalyst. However, using a catalyst can accelerate the proceeding.
Thus, in one aspect, the present invention further comprises
adding a catalyst to the sol for initiating the reaction between
the precursor and the alcohol. Any known acidic catalyst, such as
hydrochloric acid or nitric acid, can be used. In an
acid-catalyzed condensation, titanium is believed to be protonized
which makes the titanium more electrophilic and thus susceptible
to nucleophilic attack. In an acid-catalysed process, the pH value
may for instance be in the range of about 1 to about 4, such as
for example about pH 1 or 2 or 3 or 4.
[0058] The ratio of the organometallic titanium precursor to
alcohol can be about 1 to between about 4 to 100 mol. In one
example the ratio is about 1 to between about 40 to 60 mol.
[0059] Afterwards, the reaction mixture of titanium precursor and
alcohol and optionally the catalyst is aged. With "aging" it is
meant that the gel which starts to form from the sol shrinks in
size by expelling fluids from the pores of the aging sol. Aging
can take from 24 hours up to 2, 3 or 4 days. In the present
invention the sol is aged for about 24 hours before it is used for
mixing with a titanium oxide powder.
[0060] For the manufacture of the titanium microspheres of the
present invention no water (H2O) is used for sol preparation
because water would accelerate the gelation process and the
precipitation of Ti(OH)2 in sol. "Precipitation" means that the
sol already precipitates to solids. That means that the present
invention uses the "sol" condition during the synthesis process so
that the sol will serve like a "glue" function to give a strong
binding capacity to form the microspheres during the later
following spray drying process. Hence, without the use of water a
much more stable sol can be obtained having a shelf life of more
than 1 year. With longer "shelf life" is meant that the sol will
not undergo any changes during the period of storage and can be
later used for the next step in the process, namely mixing the sol
with titanium oxide powder and spray drying.
[0061] Another advantage of not using water is that the spray
drying process can be operated at lower temperatures when alcohol
is used instead of water. Another effect is that the microspheres
of the present invention show a mesoporous structure, i.e. a pore
size distribution of between about 2 nm to 50 nm (FIG. 9). In
general, a mesoporous pore size distribution enhances the
adsorption of contaminants (Lorenc-Grabowska, E. and Gryglewicz,
G., 2005, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 284, p.
416-423). The enhanced cleaning capacity for microspheres having
such a pore size distribution has also been demonstrated for the
microspheres of the present invention (see FIGS. 5 and 8).
[0062] In the process of obtaining the TiO2 microspheres of the
present invention illustrated in FIG. 3, the use of additive or
templates should also be avoided during the preparation of the
sol. In general, additives or templates will contribute to the
unstability of the sol which means that the shelf life of the
particles will be limited. Additives, like polyethylenglycol
(PEG), polyvinyl acolhol (PVA) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)
are normally used to create the pore structure of a product, like
for example a microsphere. Higher molecular weight of an additive
will lead to larger pore sizes once the additive is decomposed
(Antonietti, M., 2001, Current Opinion in Colloid and interface
Science, vol. 6, issue 3, p. 244-248). Another problem that was
found is that those additives or templates are sometimes difficult
to remove during the calcination process. In this case, this would
affect the degree of crystallinity of the TiO2 microspheres which
is important for their cleaning capabilities. Different additives
or templates might have different decomposition temperatures and
therefore might not compromise with the optimum calcination
temperature for phase transformation of TiO2 into the anatase type
especially if the low temperature to form anatase phase (400[deg.]
C.) is used. In the process of obtaining the TiO2 particles,
amphipilic three-block copolymers, additives like for example
polyethyleneglycol (PEG), PVA and CMC are not added to the sol as
it is done for example in the method described in CN 1443601 A
which was used by Li, X. Z. and Liu, H. (2003, supra).
[0063] After aging, titanium oxide powder is mixed into the aged
sol. Any titanium oxide powder can be used. In one example
described herein, titanium oxide powder supplied by Degussa,
Germany, has been used. This powder is characterized by comprising
a surface area of about 50 m<-2>g<-1>, having a
crystal size of about 30 nm and about 70% of this TiO2 crystals
are of anatase type. Another TiO2 powder which could also be used
is supplied by Taixing Nano-Materials Company in China. Their
powder is characterized by comprising a surface area of about 56.7
m<-2>g<-1>, having a crystal size of about 9.6 nm and
about 89.4% of this TiO2 crystals are of anatase type.
[0064] Different weight ratios are possible for mixing titanium
oxide powder with the aged sol. The minimal ratio is about 1:3
whereas the maximal ratio is about 1:10. In one example, the
weight ratio for mixing aged sol with titanium oxide powder is
about 1:5. Mixing is carried out using any method for mixing known
in the art, for example, under stirring conditions using a
magnetic stirrer for obtaining mixed slurry.
[0065] The slurry obtained after mixing is then sprayed to form
the titanium microspheres. During spray drying the particles
aggregate to form semisolid microspheres.
[0066] After spraying the microspheres are calcined to form solid
TiO2 microspheres. Calcination reactions usually take place at or
above the thermal decomposition temperature (for decomposition and
volatilization reactions) or the transition temperature (for phase
transitions) of the metalloxide used. The calcination step has the
effect that the TiO2 particles obtained by spraying are
transformed from amorphous phase to crystallite phase of anatase
type. The different composition of crystal types of the different
components used for the manufacture of the TiO2 microspheres are
illustrated in FIG. 4.
[0067] In general, calcination is carried out at a temperature
between about 400[deg.] C. to about 600[deg.] C. Calcination can
be carried out at a temperature of about 400[deg.] C. as well as
at 500[deg.] C. In one example, the temperature was about
450[deg.] C. Calcination is carried out for several hours, for
example 3, 4, 5 or 6 hours. Calcination is normally carried out in
furnaces or reactors (sometimes referred to as kilns) of various
designs including shaft furnaces, rotary kilns, multiple hearth
furnaces, and fluidized bed reactors. The phase transformation
might also be induced using the hydrothermal method as described
by Hildago et al. (2007, Catalysis Today, vol. 129, p. 50-58).
Using the hydrothermal method, the sample is placed in a Teflon
recipient inside of a stainless steel autoclave. Hydrothermal
treatment is performed at a low temperature, for example
120-150[deg.] C. for several hours up to 24 hours and at high
working pressures, for example 198.48 to 475.72 kPa.
[0068] As an optional step, the TiO2 particles obtained after
spraying can be dried before calcination to allow further
condensation and passing off of remaining liquids (water, alcohol)
from the gel. Depending on the liquid content in the wet-gel, the
drying step can be carried out for about one night up to several
days. In one example, of the present invention, the TiO2 particles
have been dried overnight. The particles can either be dried at
room temperature or at a temperature between about 50 to about
150[deg.] C. FIGS. 1 and 2 show a general overview of the process
of obtaining the TiO2 particles of the present invention.
[0069] Table 1 illustrates the physical characteristics of TiO2
microspheres of the present invention and a pure TiO2 powder,
namely P25 from Degussa, Germany.
[0000]
TABLE 1
BET Surface Area Total pore volume
Sample (m<2>/g) (cm<3>/g)
P25 TiO2 Component B 43.74 +- 5.02 0.952 +- 0.245
particle size 25 nm to 0.1 [mu]m
TiO2 microspheres 41.89 +- 3.98 0.472 +- 0.092
particle size 10-200 [mu]m
[0070] Even though the TiO2 microspheres of the present invention
are much larger than commonly used TiO2 particles, like P25, the
BET surface is retained due to its mesoporous structure. According
to the definition of the International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry (IUPAC) the term "mesopore/mesoporous" refers to pore
size in the range of 2 to 50 nm and this range enhances the
adsorption of contaminants (see FIG. 8) (Lorenc-Grabowska, E. and
Gryglewicz, G., 2005, supra). According to IUPAC, a pore size
below 2 nm is termed a micropore range and >50 nm is termed
macropore range.
[0071] Thus, the pore size of the microspheres of the present
invention falls into the mesoporous range only. For example, the
pore size of the microspheres mentioned by Li, X. Z. and Liu, H.
(2003, supra) ranges between the mesoporous and macroporous range
and depends on the additives used. Li, X. Z. and Liu, H. (2003,
supra) uses another mechanism for forming the porous structure of
their microspheres. Li, X. Z. and Liu, H. (2003, supra) use the
additives (i.e. PEG) to create the porous structure. In the
present invention, the nanosized TiO2 powder (from the sol) is
embedded within the microsphere in order to create the
interconnected pore structure of the microspheres. This has the
effect that the pore size distribution of 2 to 3 nm which is the
intercrystalline pore within the TiO2 microspheres, is 0.3 whereas
the pore size distribution of Li, X. Z. and Liu, H. (2003, supra)
is 0.7.
[0072] The photocatalytic activity of the microspheres of the
present invention is improved due to the quantum size effect which
is triggered by the embedded nano-sized anatase crystallites as
illustrated in FIG. 5. Quantum size effect is a phenomenon which
occurs for semiconductor particles on the order of 1-10 nm in
size. Particles which fall within this range will have increased
photoefficiencies as described by Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G. and
Yates, J. T. Jr (1995, Chem. Rev., vol. 95, pp. 735-758).
[0073] As can be seen from FIG. 3 the particles of the present
invention have a very regular spherical shape and thus 'surface
damage of filtration membranes in a reactor is avoided. Those TiO2
microspheres can also be used to avoid irreversible membrane
fouling because they inhibit, for example, that small particles
dissolved in wastewater clog the pores of the filtration
membranes.
[0074] Therefore, the present invention is also directed to a
process of cleaning waste water in a membrane filtration reactor,
wherein the process comprises:
mixing the titanium oxide microsphere of the present invention
with wastewater which is to be treated in a membrane reactor;
filtering the mixture treated in the membrane filtration reactor
through the filtration membrane of the membrane filtration reactor
by applying a suction force at the filtration membrane of the
membrane reactor, wherein the diameter of the microspheres in the
mixture is greater than the diameter of the pores of the membrane,
to form a cake layer of microspheres on the surface of the
filtration membrane; and continuing feeding the membrane
filtration reactor with wastewater until the wastewater is
cleaned.
[0078] In one example the process further comprises adding more
titanium oxide microspheres into the membrane reactor when further
wastewater is fed into the membrane filtration reactor.
[0079] "Wastewater" "raw water" or "sewage" includes municipal,
agricultural, industrial and other kinds of wastewater. In
general, any kind of wastewater can be treated using the process
of the present invention. In one example, the wastewater has a
total organic carbon content (TOC) of about 20 mg/l. In one
example, the wastewater used in the method of the present
invention has already been treated to remove trace organics or
soluble organics from the wastewater.
[0080] If necessary, this process can comprise further mixing of
the mixture of TiO2 microspheres and wastewater to achieve a
uniform distribution of the microspheres in the wastewater. FIG. 6
illustrates the possible setup of a membrane reactor which uses
the microspheres of the present invention. A good mixture of
microspheres with wastewater can be achieved in membrane reactor
tank by turbulence flow created, for example, by coarse diffuser
located at the bottom of the membrane reactor.
[0081] In general, the microspheres are used for removal of NOM
and bacteria from water. The nano-structured microspheric titanium
dioxide photocatalysts are combined with the incoming raw water to
form a suspension. Combination of wastewater and microspheres can
take place before entering the membrane reactor shown in FIG. 6 or
only upon entering the membrane reactor.
[0082] After mixing, the nano-structured microspheric titanium
dioxide photocatalysts remove NOM and bacteria from water by
adsorption (Fang, H., Sun, D. D., et al., 2005, supra). An
immersed filtration membrane is used for separating the potable
water from the nano-structured microspheric titanium dioxide
photocatalyst suspension. Wastewater treated with the microspheres
is passed or filtered through the membrane as permeate when
suction force is applied to the filtration membrane.
[0083] The composition of the membrane and the size of the pores
of the membrane may vary over a wide range, depending on the
particular contaminants that are to be removed from the
wastewater. Such membranes are usually submerged membranes. Such
membranes can include those known in the art and which are used in
microfiltration, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration systems. The
pore size of such membranes is can be in the range of 0.001 to 0.1
[mu]m. Such membranes can be made of ceramics or polymers.
[0084] Examples of polymers which are used for filtration
membranes are cellulose acetate, polyamide, polysulphone,
polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Examples of
ceramics which are used for such filtration membranes are diatom
earth, aluminium oxide, titanium oxide, titanium dioxide or zinc
oxide. In one non-limiting example of the present invention, the
membrane is made of ceramics, namely diatom earth of the MF type
(Doulton, USA).
[0085] The TiO2 microspheres can adsorb the contaminants from
wastewater due to its mesoporous structure. The particle size of
the nano-structured microspheric titanium dioxide photocatalyst is
preferred to be larger than the membrane pore to prevent clogging
or irreversible fouling. Thus, a dynamic layer of photocatalyst is
formed on the membrane surface due to suction force at the
membrane which prevents the remaining portion of contaminants from
water to trap within the pores of the filtration membrane. Water
to be treated is continuously introduced into the tank and
continued until predetermined hydraulic retention time to reach
the adsorption equilibrium or the reduction in the degree of NOM
removal or reduction in permeate flow is observed.
[0086] At this point, the permeation can be stopped and the
membrane can be backwashed to remove the layer of spent
microspheres that formed on the surface of the filtration membrane
in the membrane reactor. During and/or after the backwashing step,
a tangential flushing can be carried out in order to flush out the
inner surface of the filtration membrane and recover the
microspheres.
[0087] The spent titanium dioxide microspheres can be regenerated
via PCO process (Fang, H., Sun, D. D., et al., 2005, supra).
Therefore, the spent adsorbent is directed to a PCO reactor as
indicated in FIG. 6. The photocatalyst is activated by UV light at
254 nm, electron and hole charge carrier pairs are produced within
the photocatalyst microspheres. These charge carriers then perform
oxidation/reduction (redox) reactions with the adsorbed species on
the surface of photocatalyst. NOM is oxidized and bacteria are
sterilized by the PCO process. A hydraulic retention time is
provided for the regeneration to restore the adsorption capacity
of the microspheric TiO2 photocatalyst. The regenerated
microspheric TiO2 photocatalyst can than be recirculated back to
the membrane reactor as shown in FIG. 6.
[0088] The integrated system of membrane filtration and PCO is a
very efficient and cost-effective technology for the removal of
NOM and bacteria from water. An important factor that determines
the economics of this process is the increase of permeate flux in
both quality and quantity, and the extended membrane lifespan that
could be achieved due to the use of the TiO2 microspheres which
avoid membrane fouling. The permeate flux is enhanced by factors
of 1.5 when the microspheric titanium dioxide photocatalyst is
added to the wastewater as can be seen from FIG. 7. The permeate
quality is improved as well as is illustrated by FIG. 8.
[0089] In another aspect, the present invention is also directed
to a method of manufacturing a titanium oxide microsphere having
photocatalytic property, having a size of about 10 [mu]m to about
200 [mu]m and a mesoporous structure with a pore size in a range
of about 2 to about 50 nm. This method comprises:
preparing a sol by mixing an organometallic titanium precursor
with an alcohol without adding H2O;
aging the sol;
mixing the aged sol with titanium oxide powder;
spraying the mixture to form the titanium oxide photocatalyst
microspheres;
calcining the microspheres.
[0095] By "consisting of is meant including, and limited to,
whatever follows the phrase "consisting of". Thus, the phrase
"consisting of" indicates that the listed elements are required or
mandatory, and that no other elements may be present.
[0096] In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a
submerged membrane reactor in which the titanium oxide
microspheres of the present invention are mixed with the
wastewater cleaned in the reactor or which utilizes the process of
the present invention.
[0097] In another aspect, the present invention refers to the use
of titanium oxide photocatalyst microspheres of the present
invention for operation of a submerged membrane reactor.
[0098] By "comprising" it is meant including, but not limited to,
whatever follows the word "comprising". Thus, use of the term
"comprising" indicates that the listed elements are required or
mandatory, but that other elements are optional and may or may not
be present.
[0099] The inventions illustratively described herein may suitably
be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation
or limitations, not specifically disclosed herein. Thus, for
example, the terms "comprising", "including", "containing", etc.
shall be read expansively and without limitation. Additionally,
the terms and expressions employed herein have been used as terms
of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in
the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents
of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is
recognized that various modifications are possible within the
scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that
although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by
preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and
variation of the inventions embodied therein herein disclosed may
be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such
modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope
of this invention.
[0100] The invention has been described broadly and generically
herein. Each of the narrower species and subgeneric groupings
falling within the generic disclosure also form part of the
invention. This includes the generic description of the invention
with a proviso or negative limitation removing any subject matter
from the genus, regardless of whether or not the excised material
is specifically recited herein.
[0101] Other embodiments are within the following claims and
non-limiting examples. In addition, where features or aspects of
the invention are described in terms of Markush groups, those
skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is also
thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of
members of the Markush group.
Examples
[0102] Manufacture of TiO2 Microspheres
[0103] In a non-limiting example of the present invention, the
coating sol is prepared by dissolving 6.8 mL of
tetra-n-butylorthotitanate [Ti(OC4H9)4], obtained from Merck in
58.2 mL of absolute alcohol (CH3CH2OH), obtained from Fluka. A
uniform TiO2 sol is formed as component A under vigourous mixing.
During this process, pH is monitored and kept around 3 by the
addition of 0.5 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl). The
sol is aged for at least 24 hours by leaving it alone in a sealed
bottle before further use. Then the commercial TiO2 powder
(anatase=70%, surface area=50 m<-2>g<-1>, and crystal
size=30 nm) supplied by Degussa, Germany is used as component B
and mixed with component A at a powder:sol ratio of 5:1 by weight
to form a slurry. Then the slurry is put into a spray dryer
(capacity 1500 ml/h) with inlet air at 30[deg.] C. and outlet air
at 30[deg.] C. In the spray dryer, the TiO2 particles aggregate to
form semisolid microspheres. Finally the semisolid microspheres
are calcined at higher temperature of 450[deg.] C. for 3 h to form
solid TiO2 microspheres No water or any additive has been used in
the preparation of these TiO2 microspheres.
[0104] Characterization of TiO2 Microspheres
[0105] Humic acid (HA) used in this study is obtained from Fluka
Chemical. Humic acids in water are harmful compounds with a
complex nature composed of carboxylic, phenolic and carbonyl
functional groups. These substances cause a brown-yellow color in
water and are known to be the precursor of carcinogenic
halogenated compounds formed during the chlorination disinfection
of drinking water. A concentrated HA solution is first prepared by
mixing 4 grams of HA and 50 ml of 1 M NaOH in approximately 1.5
litres of pure water for at least 30 minutes with a magnetic
stirrer. When completely mixed, the solution was diluted to 2 l in
a volumetric flask. The solution was filtered through a 0.45 [mu]m
membrane filter. The HA concentrated solution was refrigerated and
used as needed. The concentrations of HA in this study were
obtained by diluting the concentrated solution. The pH of the
solution was adjusted by HCl and NaOH with a calibrated pH meter.
[0106] Different TiO2 dosages are used together with this solution
of humic acid, at fixed transmembrane pressures (0.3 Mpa). The
humic acid is prepared at 20 ppm concentration, with 50 ppm of
Ca<2+>, at a pH of 7. Polysulfone membrane with molecular
weight cut-off 50 k is used in the membrane filtration study. The
filtration study is carried out using a lab-scale membrane
filtration unit supplied by Nitto Denko with a maximum operating
pressure at 0.6 Mpa. The flowrate, flux (for the permeate) and pH
(the permeate and feed) is recorded every 15 mins for the first
hour, every 30 mins in the second hour and every one hour from the
third hour till the fifth hour. FIG. 7 shows the graphical
illustration of the effect of titanium dioxide particles on
permeates flux through a membrane. Samples of permeate are also
collected during the operation. The optical absorption spectrum on
the HA is determined by a Perkin Elmer (USA) Lambda Bio 20
spectrophotometer. The absorbance at 400 nm is selected for
quantitative analysis of color. FIG. 8 shows the graphical
illustration of the permeate quality during the membrane
filtration process.
[0107] A PCO test is carried out to compare the photocatalytic
activity of nano-structured TiO2 microspheres of the present
invention and commercial P25 TiO2 under the same conditions.
Phenol (analytical grade) with an initial concentration of 100 ppm
was chosen as the targeted compound. The choice of this compound
was motivated by the fact that phenol normally exhibits weak
adsorption on TiO2 particles. PCO study is carried out in a
cylindrical PCO reactor. The UV lamp used is a low pressure
mercury UV lamp. The major emission of the UV lamp is 253.7 nm. An
air pump is used to supply oxygen and create air bubbles for
suspensions. TiO2 microsphere is suspended in 1000 mL phenol
solution in dark for 0.5 hours to attain well mixed condition
before the PCO study set off. Samples are taken at different time
intervals after UV light has been turned on. All samples are
filtered through 0.45 [mu]m membrane filters prior to the
analysis.
[0108] FIG. 5 shows the results of this experiment. FIG. 5 shows
the degradation of phenol as a function of the irradiation time at
pH 7. It can be observed that the degradation of phenol followed
an exponential decay form. Blank study (absence of photocatalyst)
is carried out as a background check. About 40% of phenol is
degraded after 60 min of UV light irradiation with the absence of
the TiO2 microsphere of the present invention. The removal
efficiency is greatly enhanced when the TiO2 microsphere of the
present invention is added into the solutions. The removal
efficiency after 60 min UV light irradiation is 60% and 70% for
P25 TiO2 and TiO2 microsphere of the present invention,
respectively. It is obvious that the TiO2 microspheres possess a
better photocatalytic activity than P25 TiO2. C0 shows the initial
concentration in FIG. 5.
WO2011133114
METHOD OF PRODUCING PURIFIED WATER AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
Inventor(s): SUN DELAI DARREN; LIU ZHAOYANG
Applicant(s): UNIV NANYANG TECH
Abstract -- A method of producing purified water from a
water source which is suspected to contain impurities is
disclosed. The method comprises: (a) contacting the water source
with a draw solution, wherein the water source and the draw
solution are separated by a semipermeable membrane that is
permeable for water but essentially impermeable for solutes
contained in the water and wherein the draw solution contains a
chemically precipitable water-soluble salt in a concentration that
allows the draw solution to draw water from the water source by
osmosis; (b) allowing water from the water source to flow through
the semipermeable membrane to the draw solution, thereby diluting
the draw solution and concentrating the water source; (c)
producing purified water from the diluted draw solution by: (i)
adding a precipitant to the diluted draw solution to precipitate
the salt, wherein the precipitated salt thus formed comprises a
plurality of gel particles dispersed in water; (ii) adding a
coagulant to the plurality of gel particles to coagulate the
plurality of gel particles; and (iii) separating the coagulated
gel from the water.
Cross-Reference to Related Application
[0001] This application claims the benefit of priority of United
States Provisional Application No. 61/326,909, filed 22 April
2010, the contents of which being hereby incorporated by reference
it its entirety for all purposes.
Technical Field
[0002] The invention relates to a method of producing purified
water from a water source which is suspected to contain
impurities, and in particular, to a method of producing purified
water via a forward osmosis process. An apparatus for
carrying out the purification method is also provided.
Background
[0003] Water scarcity has now become one of the most pressing
challenges to human civilization in the earth. Growing population
and industrial activities, increasing living standard and changing
climate are placing extreme pressure on the already-scarce
drinking water and energy resources. Wastewater reuse and seawater
desalination are few options to increase drinking water
availability. However, current technologies for producing purified
drinking water from such resources require substantial energy
input, which at some extent worsen the vicious cycle of greenhouse
gas emissions and climate change. In order to address these
problems, tremendous effort has been taken to identify new
technologies for producing purified drinking water at lower energy
input capacity in an environmentally sustainable manner. [0004] In
the field of drinking water production, reverse osmosis (RO)
membrane process has been widely used globally. The process
employs high hydralic pressure and internal flow circulation to
force water through a semipermeable membrane from a high
concentration solution to a low concentration solution. This is
the 'reverse' of the water's natural osmosis tendency. Heavy
consumption of electrical energy for creating high hydralic
pressure, coupled with severe membrane fouling problem, has led to
the investigation and development of alternative approaches to the
RO process.
[0005] In contrast to the RO process, forward osmosis (FO) process
makes use of the natural osmosis phenomenon for the transport of
water from a feed solution with a low solute concentration to a
draw solution with high solute concentration across a
semipermeable membrane, with the osmotic pressure difference
between the feed and the draw solutions as the driving force.
After water naturally permeates into the draw solution, the
diluted draw solution can then be recycled for reuse while high
quality product water can be produced. Driven by an osmotic
pressure gradient, the FO process does not require significant
energy input, only stirring or pumping of the feed and draw
solutions are involved.' Meanwhile, the FO process offers the
advantages of less membrane fouling tendency and high rejection of
solutes. Recently, the FO process has attracted great attention in
seawater desalination, wastewater reclamation, food and
pharmaceutical processing, and power generation. However, the
major obstacle of adopting the FO process industrially and
globally in the application for producing purified drinking water
is a lack of low energy methods to separate draw solutes and the
purified water from the diluted draw solutions. Summary
[0006] Various embodiments provide for a method to separate draw
solutes and purified water from a draw solution without a need for
considerable amount of energy such as heat and pressure. The
method employs a forward osmosis process thereby using much less
energy than a reverse osmosis process.
[0007] Various embodiments provide for a method of producing
purified water from a water source which is suspected to contain
impurities. The method may include:
(a) contacting the water source with a draw solution, wherein the
water source and the draw solution are separated by a
semipermeable membrane that is permeable for water but essentially
impermeable for solutes contained in the water and wherein the
draw solution contains a chemically precipitable water-soluble
salt in a concentration that allows the draw solution to draw
water from the water source by osmosis;
(b) allowing water from the water source to flow through the
semipermeable membrane to the draw solution, thereby diluting the
draw solution and concentrating the water source;
(c) producing purified water from the diluted draw solution by:
(i) adding a precipitant to the diluted draw solution to
precipitate the salt, wherein the precipitated salt comprises a
plurality of gel particles dispersed in water;
(ii) adding a coagulant to the plurality of gel particles to
coagulate the plurality of gel particles; and
(iii) separating the coagulated gel from the water. [0008] Various
embodiments provide for an apparatus for producing purified water
from a water source which is suspected to contain impurities. The
apparatus may include:
(a) a first container configured to receive a semipermeable
membrane placed therein thereby forming a first portion for
containing the water source and a second portion for containing a
draw solution, wherein the semipermeable membrane is permeable for
water but essentially impermeable for solutes contained in the
water and wherein the draw solution contains a chemically
precipitable water-soluble salt in a concentration that allows the
draw solution to draw water from the water source by osmosis to
thereby form a diluted draw solution; and
(b) a second container for containing the diluted draw solution,
wherein the second container is fluidly connected to the second
portion of the first container, wherein the second container is
configured to:
(i) receive a precipitant feed wherein a precipitant is added to
the diluted draw solution to precipitate the salt, wherein the
precipitated salt thus formed comprises a plurality of gel
particles dispersed in water;
(ii) receive a coagulant feed wherein a coagulant is added to the
plurality of gel particles to coagulate the plurality of gel
particles; and
(iii) separate the coagulated gel from the water.
[0009] In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer
to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are
not necessarily drawn to scale, emphasis instead generally being
placed upon illustrating the principles of various embodiments. In
the following description, various embodiments of the invention
are described with reference to the following drawing.
[0010] Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the method of
producing purified water via a forward osmosis process.
Description
[0011] The following detailed description refers to the
accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific
details and embodiments in which the invention may be practised.
These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable
those skilled in the art to practise the invention. Other
embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and
electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of
the invention. The various embodiments are not necessarily
mutually exclusive, as some embodiments can be combined with one
or more other embodiments to form new embodiments.
[0012] Osmosis is defined as the net movement of water across a
selectively permeable membrane driven by a difference in osmotic
pressure across the membrane. A selectively permeable membrane (or
semipermeable membrane) allows passage of water molecules, but
rejects solute molecules or ions. The semipermeable membrane
filters the impurities from a water source (feed solution) which
is suspected to contain impurities, leaving purified water on the
other side (permeate side) of the membrane called permeate water.
The impurities left on the membrane may be washed away by a
portion of the feed solution that does not pass through the
membrane. The feed solution carrying the impurities washed away
from the membrane is also called "reject" or "brine".
[0013] Various embodiments of the invention make use of a forward
osmosis (FO) process developed as an alternative membrane
technology for wastewater treatment due to the low energy
requirement as a result of low or no hydraulic pressure applied,
high rejection of a wide range of contaminants, and low membrane
fouling propensity compared to pressure-driven membrane processes,
such as reverse osmosis (RO). FO process uses the osmotic pressure
differential across the membrane, rather than hydraulic pressure
differential (as in RO processes) as the driving force for
transport of water through the membrane. The FO process results in
concentration of the feed solution and dilution of a highly
concentrated stream (referred to as the draw solution). In other
words, the FO process utilizes the natural osmosis phenomenon,
which makes use of concentration differences between the two
solutions across a semipermeable membrane. The semipermeable
membrane acts as a selective barrier between the two solutions,
and dominates the efficiency of freshwater transportation in the
FO process. A concentrated draw solution on the permeate side of
the membrane is the source of the driving force in the FO process.
Different terms are used in the literature to name this solution
including draw solution, osmotic agent, or osmotic media to name
only a few. In a FO process the draw solution has a higher osmotic
pressure than the feed solution (or reject or brine).
[0014] The semipermeable membranes used may be polymer-based.
Further, the membranes may have a dense selective layer embedded
onto a support layer for providing rejection of dissolved
compounds and providing mechanical strength respectively.
[0015] Various embodiments provide for a method of producing
purified water from a water source which is suspected to contain
impurities, and an apparatus therefor. Fig. 1 illustrates a
schematic flow diagram in one embodiment. The water source shown
in this illustration is wastewater.
[0016] The apparatus may include a first container 10 configured
to receive a semipermeable membrane 12 placed therein thereby
forming a first portion 10a for containing the wastewater and a
second portion 10b for containing a draw solution. Wastewater may
be fed to the first portion 10a by any suitable means, such as a
pipe. The draw solution may be fed to the second portion 10b by
any suitable means, such as a pipe. Sufficient time is given to
allow water from the water source to flow through the
semipermeable membrane to the draw solution, thereby diluting the
draw solution and concentrating the water source.
[0017] The semipermeable membrane 12 is permeable for water but
essentially impermeable for solutes contained in the water of the
draw solution. The semipermeable membrane 12 may be of any
suitable type conventionally used in forward osmosis or reverse
osmosis process. The membrane materials for such semipermeable
membranes can be cellulose, polysulfone, polyethersulfone, and
polyamide.
[0018] The draw solution contains a chemically precipitable
water-soluble salt in a concentration that allows the draw
solution to draw water from the wastewater by osmosis to thereby
form a diluted draw solution. The diluted draw solution may be
withdrawn from the second portion 10b by any suitable means, such
as a pipe. The wastewater may be withdrawn from the first portion
10a by any suitable means, such as a pipe, and is now concentrated
with impurities that cannot pass through the semipermeable
membrane 12.
[0019] The salt is soluble in the water of the draw solution and
can be precipitated upon addition of a precipitant.
[0020] In various embodiments, the chemically precipitable
water-soluble salt may be selected from the group consisting of
aluminium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, manganese sulfate, iron
chloride, iron sulphate, and aluminium chloride.
[0021] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 1, the draw solution
contains (A12(S04)3) as the chemically precipitable water-soluble
salt, which is commercially available.
[0022] The apparatus may also include a second container (or
separator) 14 for containing the diluted draw solution. The second
container 14 may be fluidly connected via a pipe to the second
portion 10b of the first container 10 so that the diluted
A12(S04)3 draw solution (or A12(S04)3 recycle) withdrawn from the
second portion 10b is fed to the second container 14 for
separation. The second container 14 may be configured to receive a
precipitant feed whereby a precipitant is added to the diluted
draw solution to precipitate the salt, and whereby the
precipitated salt thus formed may include a plurality of gel
particles dispersed in water. The precipitant may be added to the
second container 14 via a separate pipe, for example.
Alternatively, the precipitant may be added to the A12(S04)3
recycle stream before entering the second container 14.
[0023] In various embodiments, the precipitant may be selected
from the group consisting of calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide,
sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, barium oxide, and barium
silicate.
[0024] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 1, the precipitant is
calcium oxide (CaO), which is commercially available.
[0025] The second container 14 may be further configured to
receive a coagulant feed wherein a coagulant is added to the
plurality of gel particles to coagulate the plurality of gel
particles. The coagulant may be fed to the second container 14 by
any suitable means, such as a pipe. The second container 14 may
also be configured separate the coagulated gel from the water,
thereby producing purified water separated from the diluted draw
solution.
[0026] In various embodiments, the coagulant may be negatively
charged.
[0027] In various embodiments, the coagulant may be in the form of
a particulate.
The size of the particulate coagulate may be from about 1 nm to
about 100 [mu][pi][iota].
[0028] In various embodiments, the coagulant may be selected from
the group consisting of activated silica, anionic polyelectrolyte,
iron (III) oxide, zeolite and silicate.
[0029] In one embodiment, the coagulant may be sodium silicate.
[0030] In another embodiment, the coagulant may be anionic
polyacrylamide.
[0031] In further embodiments, the coagulant may also be magnetic.
The coagulant may consist of a core/shell nanoparticle. In one
such embodiment, the coagulant may consist of an iron (III) oxide
core and an activated silica shell.
[0032] In various embodiments where the chemically precipitable
soluble salt is aluminium sulfate and the precipitant is calcium
oxide, each gel particle is a mixture of aluminium hydroxide and
calcium sulfate. When aluminium hydroxide is precipitated in water
as the solvent, the hydrated aluminium hydroxide forms gels which
are positively charged. Due to such electrical charges, each gel
particle repels one another and is dispersed in water as a
plurality of gel particles. A negatively charged sodium silicate
(Na2Si03) is added as a coagulant to coagulate the gel particles
of aluminium hydroxide and calcium sulfate. The coagulated gel
mixture of aluminium hydroxide, calcium sulfate, and sodium
silicate clump together and form a floe. The floe may be deposited
to the bottom of the diluted draw solution and is withdrawn while
the top liquid is removed as purified water from the second
container 14. [0033] The second container 14 may be further
configured (not shown) to receive an acid feed, wherein the acid
is added to the coagulated gel to recover the chemically
precipitable water-soluble salt.
[0034] In various embodiments, the acid may be selected from the
group consisting of sulfuric acid, chloric acid, and nitric acid.
[0035] In one embodiment where the chemically precipitable
water-soluble salt is aluminium sulfate, the acid is sulfuric
acid.
[0036] The recovered chemically precipitable water-soluble salt
aluminium sulfate may then be reused in the draw solution again.
[0037] Calcium sulfate present in the floe may be subsequently
precipitated as a useful by-product. Calcium sulfate has wide
applications in construction, fertilizer and biomedicine.
[0038] The coagulant may also be subsquently recovered from the
floe and reused in the purification process again.
[0039] The concentrated wastewater withdrawn from the first
portion 10a may be rich in organic matters and may be fed to an
anaerobic reactor 16 to generate a biogas (methane) as a useful
fuel.
[0040] In order that the invention may be readily understood and
put into practical effect, particular embodiments will now be
described by way of the following non- limiting examples.
Examples
[0041] The following illustrates examples of various negatively
charged coagulants used to coagulate positively charged gel
particles dispersed in water. The draw solution consists of
aluminium sulfate as the chemically precipitable soluble salt and
the precipitant is calcium oxide. The resultant gel particles are
mixtures of aluminium hydroxide and calcium sulfate, and are
positively charged.
[0042] Fe304@Si02 core/shell nanoparticles that are negatively
charged and magnetic are added to the diluted draw solution to
coagulate the gel particles. The floe is formed by ionic binding
between the positively charged gel particles and the negatively
charged Fe304@Si02 coagulant. The floe is then easily and fully
removed under application of an external magnetic field. When
placed near a permanent magnet, the draw solution becomes clear
within minutes and the floe is deposited near the magnetic field
due to the magnetic coagulant particles. The clear top liquid is
then taken out as the final water product. The roles of the
negatively charged and magnetic Fe304@Si02 core/shell
nanoparticles are to both coagulate the gel particles and to
increase the rate of separation via a magnetic field.
Example 2: Anionic Polyacrylamide (PAM) as Coagulant
[0043] Anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) is added to the diluted draw
solution to coagulate the gel particles. The floe is formed by
ionic binding between the positively charged gel particles and the
negatively charged PAM coagulant. The floe is then precipitated to
the bottom of the draw solution. The clear top liquid is then
taken out as the final water product.
Example 3: Sodium Silicate (NaiSiOV) as Coagulant
[0044] Sodium silicate (Na2Si03) is added to the diluted draw
solution to coagulate the gel particles. The floe is formed by
ionic binding between the positively charged gel particles and the
negatively charged Na2Si03 coagulant. The floe is then
precipitated to the bottom of the draw solution. The clear top
liquid is then taken out as the final water product.
[0045] While the invention has been particularly shown and
described with reference to specific embodiments, it should be
understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in
form and detail may be made therein without departing from the
spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended
claims. The scope of the invention is thus indicated by the
appended claims and all changes which come .within the meaning and
range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be
embraced.
WO2011133116
METHOD OF PREPARING A NANOCOMPOSITE MEMBRANE
Inventor(s): SUN DELAI DARREN [SG]; LIU
ZHAOYANG [SG] +
Applicant(s): UNIV NANYANG TECH [SG] +
Abstract -- The present invention relates to a method of
preparing a nanocomposite membrane, comprising: (a) providing a
nanocomposite solution comprising a polymer solution and
nanomaterials; (b) subjecting the nanocomposite solution to a cold
water bath to produce the nanocomposite membrane in a gel-like
form; and (c) subjecting the gel nanocomposite membrane to a heat
treatment to solidify the nanocomposite membrane, wherein the
nanomaterials are dispersed within the polymer matrix of the
nanocomposite membrane.
Cross-Reference to Related Application
[0001] This application claims the benefit of priority of United
States Provisional Application No. 61/326,896, filed 22 April
2010, the contents of which being hereby incorporated by reference
it its entirety for all purposes.
Technical Field
[0002] The invention relates to a method of preparing a
nanocomposite semipermeable membrane for forward osmosis
applications in wastewater treatment, seawater desalination, food
and pharmaceutical processing, and power generation.
Background
[0003] Forward osmosis (FO) process makes use of the natural
osmosis phenomenon for the transport of water from a low solute
concentration feed solution to a high solute concentration draw
solution across a semipermeable membrane, with the osmotic
pressure difference between the feed and the draw solution acting
as the driving force. After the water naturally permeates into the
draw solution without external energy input, the diluted draw
solution can then be recycled for reuse in the FO process while
high quality water product can be produced.
[0004] The FO process has recently shown great potential for
wastewater reuse and seawater desalination. It has various
advantages over current membrane technology, especially the
reverse osmosis (RO) process. These advantages include a lower
energy consumption needed for the osmosis process and a lower
fouling potential of the membrane. One of the most important
challenges in utilizing the FO process for practical applications
is the lack of such suitable membrane. Water permeate flux
obtained with current FO membrane is usually lower than expected.
The low permeate flux attributes to the severe internal
concentration polarization (ICP) effect occurring in the porous
support layer of the membrane.
[0005] Due to the limitations posed by the severe ICP effect on
water permeate flux for current forward osmosis membranes, new
forward osmosis membranes with superior water permeate flux and
high solute rejection rate are desired.
Summary
[0006] Various embodiments provide for methods of preparing
nanocomposite semipermeable membranes that contain dispersed
nanomaterials within the polymer matrix for forward osmosis
applications such as wastewater treatment, seawater desalination,
food and pharmaceutical processing, power generation, and the
like. With the addition of nanomaterials dispersed within the
polymer matrix of the porous support layer of the membranes,
significant increase of water permeate flux is achieved, while
high solute rejection rate is maintained, compared to membranes
having no added nanomaterials.
[0007] Various embodiments provide for a method of preparing a
nanocomposite membrane. The method may include:
(a) providing a nanocomposite solution comprising a polymer
solution and nanomaterials;
(b) subjecting the nanocomposite solution to a cold water bath to
produce the nanocomposite membrane in a gel-like form; and
(c) subjecting the gel nanocomposite membrane to a heat treatment
to -solidify the nanocomposite membrane, wherein the nanomaterials
are dispersed within the polymer matrix of the nanocomposite
membrane.
[0008] Various embodiments provide for a nanocomposite membrane
which may include:
- a dense selective layer, wherein the dense selective layer is
permeable to water but is impermeable to solutes; and
- a porous support layer, wherein the porous support layer
comprises nanomaterials dispersed within a polymer matrix.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0009] In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer
to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are
not necessarily drawn to scale, emphasis instead generally being
placed upon illustrating the principles of various embodiments. In
the following description, various embodiments of the invention
are described with reference to the following drawings.
[0010] Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the casting process
for preparing a flat sheet membrane.
[0011] Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of the spinning process
for preparing a hollow fiber membrane.
[0012] Fig. 3 shows the TEM of Ti02 nanotubes prepared in the
Examples.
[0013] Fig. 4 shows the cross-sectional view of a flat sheet
nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane.
[0014] Fig. 5 shows the cross-sectional view of a hollow fiber
nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane. [0015] Fig. 6 shows the
water permeate flux comparisons of different flat sheet forward
osmosis membranes. HTI(TM) denotes a commercial forward osmosis
membrane from Hydration Technologies Inc.; CA denotes a
cellulose acetate forward osmosis membrane prepared without
nanomaterials; Nanocomposite-Cellulose acetate denotes a
nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane prepared with Ti02
nanotubes.
[0016] Fig. 7 shows the water permeate flux comparisons of
different hollow fiber forward osmosis membranes.
Description
[0017] The following detailed description refers to the
accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific
details and embodiments in which the invention may be practised.
These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable
those skilled in the art to practise the invention. Other
embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and
electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of
the invention. The various embodiments are not necessarily
mutually exclusive, as some embodiments can be combined with one
or more other embodiments to form new embodiments.
[0018] Osmosis is defined as the net movement of water across a
selectively permeable membrane driven by a difference in osmotic
pressure across the membrane. A selectively permeable membrane (or
semipermeable membrane) allows passage of water molecules, but
rejects solute molecules or ions. The semipermeable membrane
filters the impurities from a water source (feed solution) which
is suspected to contain impurities, leaving purified water on the
other side (permeate side) of the membrane called permeate water.
The impurities left on the membrane may be washed away by a
portion of the feed solution that does not pass through the
membrane. The feed solution carrying the impurities washed away
from the membrane is also called "reject" or "brine".
[0019] Various embodiments of the invention make use of a forward
osmosis (FO) membrane developed as an alternative membrane
technology for wastewater treatment due to the low energy
requirement as a result of low or no hydraulic pressure applied,
high rejection of a wide range of contaminants, and low membrane
fouling propensity compared to pressure-driven membrane processes,
such as reverse osmosis (RO). FO process uses the osmotic pressure
differential across the membrane, rather than hydraulic pressure
differential (as in RO processes) as the driving force for
transport of water through the membrane. The FO process results in
concentration of the feed solution and dilution of a highly
concentrated stream (referred to as the draw solution). In other
words, the FO process utilizes the natural osmosis phenomenon,
which makes use of concentration differences between the two
solutions across a semipermeable membrane. The semipermeable
membrane acts as a selective barrier between the two solutions,
and dominates the efficiency of freshwater transportation in the
FO process. A concentrated draw solution on the permeate side of
the membrane is the source of the driving force in the FO process.
Different terms are used in the literature to name this solution
including draw solution, osmotic agent, or osmotic media to name
only a few. In a FO process the draw solution has a higher osmotic
pressure than the feed solution (or reject or brine).
[0020] Various embodiments provide for a method of preparing a
nanocomposite membrane. The method may be a phase inversion type
for preparing asymmetric nanocomposite membranes. The membranes
may be polymer-based. Further, the membranes may have a dense
selective layer disposed adjacent a porous support layer whereby
the dense selectively layer is used for rejecting solutes in the
wastewaste stream, for example, and the porous support layer is
used for providing mechanical strength to the membrane.
[0021] The method may include providing a nanocomposite solution
comprising a polymer solution and nanomaterials. The polymer
solution is first prepared in a suitable solvent or system of
solvents. Suitable solvent or system of solvents include solvents
that are miscible with the polymer so that a homogeneous solution
may be formed thereafter. In one embodiment, the system of
solvents may include N-methyl-2- pyrrolidone, Dimethylformamide,
acetone and water (see Examples below).
[0022] In various embodiments, the polymer of the polymer solution
is a natural polymer. Examples of the natural polymer include
cellulose-based polymers such as cellulose acetate, cellulose
triacetate, cellulose acetate proprianate, cellulose butyrate,
cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose diacetate, cellulose
dibutyrate, cellulose tributyrate, hydroxypropyl cellulose, and
nitrocellulose. In one embodiment, the polymer in the polymer
solution is cellulose acetate.
[0023] In various embodiments, the polymer of the polymer solution
is a synthetic polymer. Examples of the synthetic polymer include
polyamide, polybenzimidazole, polyethersulfone, polysulfone,
polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrole, polyvinyl pyrrolidone,
polyethylene glycol, saponified polyethylene-vinyl acetate
copolymer, triethylene glycol, and diethylene glycol.
[0024] In various embodiments, the nanomaterials may be
nanoparticles, nanofibers, nanowires, nanotubes, or nanospheres.
In one embodiment, the nanomaterials are nanotubes. In another
embodiment, the nanomaterials are nanoparticles.
[0025] In various embodiments, the nanomaterials are inorganic
materials. Examples of suitable inorganic materials include
titanium, silicon, aluminium, zirconium, indium, tin, magnesium,
calcium, including the respective oxide thereof and - alloy
thereof. In one embodiment, the nanomaterials may be titanium
oxide nanotubes or nanoparticles. In another embodiment, the
nanomaterials may be tetraethyl orthosilicate.
[0026] In various embodiments, the nanomaterials may be mesoporous
materials. Examples of suitable mesoporous materials include
aluminosilicate, aluminophopsphate, and zeolite.
[0027] In various embodiments, the nanomaterials may be organic
materials. Examples of suitable organic materials include
dendrimers, graphite, graphene, carbon nanotube, and fullerene.
[0028] In various embodiments, the nanomaterials are present in
the polymer matrix in the range of about 0.1 wt% to about 20 wt%
(based on total weight of the polymer matrix).
[0029] In various embodiments, the nanomaterials are in the size
from about 1 nm to about 1,000 nm.
[0030] The method may further include homogenizing the
nanocomposite solution. In various embodiments, the nanocomposite
solution may be stirred continuously until a homogenized
nanocomposite solution is obtained. The stirring may be carried
out via a mechanical stirrer or magnetic stirrer, for example. In
various embodiments, the stirring is continued for more than one
day. In one embodiment, the stirring is continued for about two
days.
[0031] In various embodiments, the obtained homogenized
nanocomposite solution may be subjected to an ultrasound bath to
remove air bubbles or partially evaporate volatile components of
the solvent. The volatile components may be vaporized at room
temperature.
[0032] The method may also include -subjecting the -homogenized
nanocomposite solution to a cold water bath to produce the
nanocomposite membrane in a gel-like form. The method may further
include subjecting the gel nanocomposite membrane to a heat
treatment to solidify the nanocomposite membrane, whereby the
nanomaterials are dispersed within the polymer matrix of the
nanocomposite membrane.
[0033] In various embodiments, after obtaining the homogenized
nanocomposite solution and prior to subjecting the homogenized
nanocomposite solution to a cold water bath, the homogenized
nanocomposite solution may be cast on a plate to form a cast film.
For example, Fig. 1 illustrates the general process used for
preparing nanocomposite membranes by solution casting. Phase
inversion is used for the preparation of flat sheet membranes. In
the polymer solution casting, a polymer solution, comprising
polymers and nanomaterials (0.1 to 20 wt%, based on total weight
of the polymer matrix) in solvents, is stirred continuously until
the solution become homogenous. The polymer solution is then
casted on a glass plate using a casting knife. The cast film was
then immersed into the cold water bath (or coagulation bath) to
complete the phase inversion. The membranes were then post-treated
in a hot water bath.
[0034] In alternative embodiments, after obtaining the homogenized
nanocomposite solution and prior to subjecting the homogenized
nanocomposite solution to a cold water bath, the homogenized
nanocomposite solution may be extruded through a hollow fiber
spinneret. For example, Fig. 2 illustrates the general process
used for preparing nanocomposite membranes in the form of hollow
fiber by dry- wet spinning. In the dry- wet spinning process, the
polymer solution (same as that used for preparing the flat sheet
membranes) flows through the ring nozzle of the spinneret while a
bore fluid flowed through the inner tube of the spinneret. The
fiber passes through a controlled environment air gap before
entering -the cold water bath (or coagulation -bath). The hollow
fiber filament then passes through a series of rollers in the
coagulation bath. Following that, it is then passed through a
washing bath. The fully formed hollow fiber is then continuously
collected on a wind up drum. Prior to evaluation test, the
membranes are subjected to a pretreatment process to reduce pore
size of the membranes. In the pretreatment process, the membranes
are immersed in a water bath at room temperature and the water
bath with the membranes in it are gradually heated from ambient
temperature to about 60 to 100 [deg.]C range in about 20 to 30
minutes. The final temperature is kept constant for about 10
minutes. The water bath together with the membranes are then
cooled drastically to below 60 [deg.]C by pouring cold water
directly into the bath to freeze the membrane structure. The
membranes are then ready to undergo solvent exchange to prevent
fibers from collapsing during evaluation tests.
[0035] In various embodiments, the nanocomposite membrane prepared
thereof by the above-described method may be a porous support
layer for providing mechanical strength to subsequent layers
disposed thereon. In various embodiments, the nanocomposite
membrane may include a porous support layer and a dense selective
layer. The dense selective layer is disposed adjacent the porous
support layer. The dense selective layer is permeable to water but
is impermeable to solutes. The porous support layer comprises
nanomaterials dispersed within a polymer matrix. The porous
support layer may provide mechanical strength to the nanocomposite
membrane. Both the porous support layer and the dense selective
layer may be formed of the same polymer. Alternatively, the
polymer of the porous support layer and the dense selective layer
is different.
[0036] In various embodiments, the membrane may include a smooth
layer disposed adjacent the dense selective layer and away from
the porous support layer. The smooth layer may be used to prevent
or minimize membrane fouling. The materials for the smooth layer
can be polyvinyl acetate and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
[0037] In various embodiments, the membrane may also include an
intermediate layer between the dense selective layer and the
porous support layer. The intermediate layer may be a polymer
which is the same as the dense selective layer, the same as the
porous support layer, the same as both the dense selective layer
and the porous support layer, or different from any of the layer.
The mateials for the intermediate layer can be cellulose,
polysulfone, polyethersulfone and polyacrylonitrile.
[0038] In various embodiments where the membrane include a dense
selective layer and a porous support layer, the dense selective
layer may be formed and disposed on the porous support layer by a
method selected from the group consisting of phase inversion,
interfacial polymerization, spray coating, and dip coating. In
various embodiments, the dense selective layer may be formed
simultaneously with the porous support layer. In alternative
embodiments, the dense selective layer is subsequently formed on
the porous support layer.
[0039] In one embodiment, the nanocomposite membranes may be used
in forward osmosis processes. For example, the nanocomposite
membranes may be used in wastewater treatment, seawater
desalination, food and pharmaceutical processing, or power
generation via forward osmosis processes.
[0040] The water permeate flux of the nanocomposite membranes were
found to be dependent on the amount of nanomaterials used.
Compared with the forward osmosis membrane fabricated without
nanomaterials, a breakthrough in the water permeate flux of the
nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes was achieved, with almost
unchanged solute rejection performance.
[0041] In order that the invention may be readily understood and
put into<^>practical <~> effect, particular
embodiments will now be described by way of the following non-
limiting examples.
Examples
Forward Osmosis Tests of Nanocomposite Membranes
[0042] In the following Examples, membranes prepared according to
the invention were tested in forward osmosis mode without
hydraulic pressure. Each membrane was tested in a crossflow mode
with 1M A12(S04)3 as draw solution and DI water as feed solution.
The feed solution was directed against the dense selective layer
of the membranes and the draw solution was directed against the
support layer. Both the feed and draw solutions were maintained at
room temperature 25 [deg.]C.
[0043] Results of the solute rejection rate by the nanocomposite
membranes of the following Examples are shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Solute Rejection Rate of Nanocomposite Forward Osmosis
Membranes
Determination Of Water Permeate Flux And Solute Rejection
[0044] In the following Examples, water permeate flux is
determined by measuring the weight change of the draw solution
over a selected time period. As water transports across the
membrane from the feed water into the draw solution, the weight of
draw solution was increased. The solute concentration is
determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer
(ICP). Example 1: Flat Sheet Nanocomposite Membranes with TiO[3/4]
Nanotubes Dispersed in Cellulose Matrix
[0045] Ti02 nanotubes were fabricated as follows: Commercial Ti02
(P25, degussa) powders were mixed with a 1 OM NaOH aqueous
solution by magnetic stirring, then the mixture was added into a
Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was heated
to 160 [deg.]C from room temperature in 2 h, then maintained at
160 [deg.]C for 48 h and finally cooled to room temperature. The
obtained precipitates were firstly washed with distilled water,
then adjusted the pH to neutral with 0.1M HC1 solution, and
finally were washed repeatedly with distilled water and ethanol
until no CF was examined in the solution. After ultrasound
treatment for 10 min, the Ti02 nanotubes were obtained. The
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Ti02 nanotubes is shown
in Fig. 3.
[0046] Conventional phase inversion was used for the preparation
of flat sheet nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes. A solution
comprising cellulose acetate (MW 30,000 g/mol, 39.8 wt% acethyl
content) 22.0 wt%, acetone 66.7 wt%, water 10.0 wt%, magnesium
perchlorate 1.0 wt% and Ti02 nanotubes (Fig. 3) 0.3 wt% was
stirred continuously for two days. The solution was homogenized
and put into an ultrasound bath for 30 min to remove air bubbles
before casting. Then the casting solution was casted on a glass
plate using a casting knife. The cast film was then immersed in an
ice water bath to complete the phase separation. The membranes
were heat-treated at 80 [deg.]C in a hot water bath for 10 min.
Then the membranes were immersed in a 50 wt% glycerol water
solution for another 24 h and then were dried in air at room
temperature for evaluation tests.
[0047] Under the same forward osmosis experimental conditions, the
nanocomposite membrane had a notably higher water flux than
commercially available HTI(TM) membrane (Fig. 6).
Example 2: Flat-Sheet Nanocomposite Membranes With T1O2
Nanoparticles Dispersed In Cellulose Matrix
[0048] Conventional phase inversion was used for the preparation
of flat-sheet nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes. A solution
comprising cellulose acetate (MW 30,000 g/mol, 39.8 wt% acethyl
content) 22.0 wt%, acetone 66.7 wt%, water 10.0 wt%, magnesium
perchlorate 1.1 wt% and Ti02 nanoparticles (Degussa P25) 0.2 wt%
was stirred continuously for two days. The solution was
homogenized and put into an ultrasound bath for 30 min to remove
air bubbles before casting. Then the casting solution was casted
on a glass plate using a casting knife. The cast film was then
immersed in an ice water bath to complete the phase separation.
The membranes were heat-treated at 80 [deg.]C in a hot water bath
for 10 min. Then the membranes were immersed in a 50 wt% glycerol
solution for another 24 h and then were dried in air at room
temperature for evaluation tests.
Example 3: Flat-Sheet Nanocomposite Membranes With Silica
Nanoparticles Dispersed In Cellulose Matrix
[0049] Conventional phase inversion was used for the preparation
of flat-sheet nanocomposite membranes. An acetate solution
comprising cellulose acetate (MW 30,000 g/mol, 39.8 wt% acethyl
content) 22.0 wt%, acetone 66.0 wt%, water 10.0 parts, magnesium
perchlorate 1.1 wt% and Tetraethyl orthosilicate 0.9 wt% was
stirred continuously for two days. The solution was homogenized
and put into an ultrasound bath for 30 min to remove air bubbles
before casting. Then the casting solution was casted on a glass
plate using a casting knife. The cast film was then immersed in an
ice water bath to complete the phase separation. The membranes
were heat-treated at 80 [deg.]C in a hot water bath for 10 min.
Then the membranes were immersed in a 50 wt% glycerol solution for
another 24 h and then were dried in air at room temperature for -
evaluation tests.
Example 4: Nanocomposite Membranes In The Form Of Hollow Fiber
[0050] Spinning of the hollow-fiber membrane was based on the
dry-wet technique.
A homogenous spinning solution was prepared same as that for the
flat-sheet membrane. Afterward, the dope was extruded through a
hollow fiber spinneret. Both the core liquid and the external
coagulant were pure water, and the external coagulant temperature
was controlled at 80 [deg.]C. The air gap which is the distance
between the tip of spinneret and the surface of external coagulant
was kept 20 cm. After coagulation in iced water, the resulting
hollow fiber was wound up with a take-up roller and rinsed with
water to remove residual solvents. Then the fibers were annealed
in a hot water bath at 80 [deg.]C. Finally, the fibers were
immersed in a 50 wt% glycerol solution for another 24 h and then
were dried in air at room temperature for evaluation tests.
[0051] While the invention has been particularly shown and
described with reference to specific embodiments, it should be
understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in
form and detail may be made therein without departing from the
spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended
claims. The scope of the invention is thus indicated by the
appended claims and all changes which come within the meaning and
range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be
embraced.
WO2012102678
A FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANE
Inventor: SUN DARREN DELAI // LEE TZE SIONG JONATHAN
Applicant: NANO MEM PTE LTD // SUN DARREN DELAI [SG] (+2)
An apparatus for cleaning of wastewater comprising a submerged
membrane biological reactor system (MBR) and a submerged membrane
module (MBD) wherein the MBR is in fluid communication with the
MBD for feeding excess sludge from the MBR to the MBD and wherein
the MBR comprises an outlet which releases permeate passed through
the membrane of the MBR and the MBD is in fluid communication with
the MBR for feeding permeate passed throug the membrane of the MBD
back into the MBR and comprises an outlet for releasing gas.
WO2012102677
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECOVERING WATER FROM A
SOURCE WATER
Inventor: SUN DARREN DELAI // LEE TZE SIONG
JONATHAN
Applicant: NANO MEM PTE LTD // SUN DARREN DELAI
US2010233812
MEMBRANE MADE OF A NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIAL
Inventor:
SUN DARREN DELAI [SG]
ZHANG XIWANG [SG] (+2)
Applicant:
UNIV NANYANG
US2010133182
MICROSPHERIC TiO2 PHOTOCATALYST
US2010140167
WATER RECLAMATION WITHOUT BIOSLUDGE PRODUCTION
WO2012102678
A FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANE
Inventor: SUN DARREN DELAI // LEE TZE SIONG JONATHAN
Applicant: NANO MEM PTE LTD // SUN DARREN DELAI [SG] (+2)
An apparatus for cleaning of wastewater comprising a submerged
membrane biological reactor system (MBR) and a submerged membrane
module (MBD) wherein the MBR is in fluid communication with the
MBD for feeding excess sludge from the MBR to the MBD and wherein
the MBR comprises an outlet which releases permeate passed through
the membrane of the MBR and the MBD is in fluid communication with
the MBR