rexresearch
rexresearch1
Richard STEENBLIK
Fresnel Spiral
Reflector
Popular Science,
1981
Masonite and aluminum foil – that’s all Rick Steenblik, a
research engineer at the Georgia Institute of Technology, needs
to bring the sun into focus. Conventional point-focusing solar
concentrators are paraboloid dish types. Made of metal, these
complex-shape reflectors must be prcisely molded and machines –
therefore they’re expensive.
Steenblik’s simple design begins with a computer program that
prints a spiral pattern. This pattern is transferred onto a flat
material already covered with a reflective medium, then cut out
on a band saw. By lining up mounting points (also printed by the
program) along a straight frame member, the proper twist is
given to each segment of the spiral to concentrate sunlight at
the selected focal point. The computer program can vary the
focal length of the spiral or even alter the design to focus
light behind the reflector.
Nine Georgia Tech Spiral Concentrators have been built thus far.
For such simple applications as solar cookers Steenblik has used
as materials aluminum foil and hardboard. Other models have been
made with sheet aluminum. Steenblik believes his reflector can
replace parabolic concentrators in some present applications at
much lower cost.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311475268_Numerical_modeling_of_the_conformational_transition_of_a_spiral_focusing_surface
April 1990ACM SIGSIM Simulation Digest
20(4):127-134
Numerical modeling of the conformational transition of a
spiral focusing surface
Authors: Richard Steenblik, Dar-Veig Ho
Abstract
A new class of focusing reflectors was created by modeling
the conformational transitions between a wound spiral focusing
surface and its planar, non-focusing, unwound spiral state. Two
solutions to the problem were found; one by modeling the process
of unwinding the focusing spiral surface, the other by modeling
the winding of the planar spiral surface. Both the mathematical
derivations and the resulting equations relating the two states
of the spiral surface proved markedly different for the two
approaches. Implementation of each solution was accomplished by
specifying the locations of marker points and tracking them
through the conformational transitions. Although the mathematics
and the algorithms employed are completely different between the
two solutions, both result in identical sets of marker points
for a given spiral. However, the solution based on the winding
conformational transition is completely general, while the
solution based on unwinding is limited to a narrow set of
focusing geometrie
https://omnivorenz.wordpress.com/tag/steenblik/
Spiral Fresnel Reflector (a simple solar
concentrator)
Tobin Fricke has posted a PostScript program for computing the
spiral:
http://nibot-lab.livejournal.com/13319.html
Tobin Fricke's Lab Notebook
spiral fresnel reflector [Apr. 9th,
2004|10:14 am]
%!
% Postscript program to draw a planar spiral that may be
developed into a
% spiral fresnel lens, as described in U.S. Patent
4,350,412.
% Tobin Fricke <tobin@splorg.org> April 2004
72 72
scale
% coordinate system is inches,
8.5 2 div 11 2 div translate % with the
origin in the center of the page
1 setlinecap
0.001 setlinewidth
/pi 3.14159 def
/radians{180 mul pi div}def %
convert to degrees
/degrees{pi mul 180 div}def %
convert to radians
/x 0.75
def
% these parameters define the spiral
/f 42.75 def
/max_theta 20 2 pi mul mul def
newpath
0 0 moveto
0 0.1 max_theta
{
% this loop does polar plotting
/theta exch def
/r
% equation 1 from the patent, expressed
x theta
mul
% in postfix notation
x theta mul
2 pi f mul mul
atan degrees
0.5 mul
cos
2 pi mul mul
div
def
r theta radians cos mul
r theta radians sin mul lineto
} for
stroke
showpage
% that's all, folks!
Now one possibility is to print this on a transparancy and then
project it onto a big piece of cardboard, tracing out the
projection with a sharpie. Another possibility is to print out a
grid of 8"x11" sheets that can be reassembled into a giant
spiral. (I could do this easily in postscript by having a loop
go over each of the pages, using 'translate' to put each page at
the appropriate coordinates in the plane). ..
US4350412
Fresnel Spiral
Reflector
[ PDF ]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to Fresnel reflectors and more
specifically to spiral Fresnel reflectors.
2. Description of the Prior Art
There is a great need, particularly in the poor third world
countries, for an inexpensive solar cooker which can cook food
without the necessity of using valuable fuel. Traditionally,
solar cookers have been in the form of paraboloids or
hemispheres. However, such shapes are difficult to manufacture
and in order to keep their shape they must be formed from metal,
fiberglass or hard plastic. All of these materials are expensive
and the forming processes for these materials are expensive. As
a result, the finished cooker is also expensive. Further, such
shapes are bulky and require a disproportionate amount of space
when shipped. Since shipping volume is expensive, the cost is
again increased.
A Fresnel Reflector is a reflector made from a flat sheet of
material and having concentric rings which have an identical
focal point. The use of a Fresnel reflector as a solar cooker
would be advantageous since all of the parts of the Fresnel
reflector could be cut from one sheet of material and there
would be no complex three dimensional shapes to manufacture; the
Fresnel reflector could be made out of inexpensive materials
such as aluminized cardboard or aluminized plastic; and the
assembled reflector would have a very low profile and would be
easy to transport and store. A concentric ring Fresnel reflector
is disclosed in "Compact Solar Energy Concentrator" by Robert W.
Hosken in Electro-Optical Systems Design, January 1975, pages
32-35. However, the Fresnel reflector described in this article
provides rings which are machined into a blank of solid
material. Therefore, a high degree of precision is necessary is
machining the rings into the blanks with a resulting relatively
high cost of manufacture.
A Fresnel reflector using separate concentric rings has been
proposed in the past (for example, "EVALUATION OF SOLAR COOKERS"
by Volunteers for International Technical Assistance for the
U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technical Services).
However, such a Fresnel reflector using concentric rings has
several disadvantages. Each ring of the Fresnel reflector must
be assembled and mounted separately, a time consuming task.
Further, each reflector is composed of many separate parts.
Since each ring is a separate part, there are many parts which
can be misplaced or damaged.
An inexpensive, easily transportable, Fresnel reflector would
also be advantageous in other areas of solar energy. For
example, it could be used for low to medium temperature steam
generation for producing power. It could also be used for the
production of electric power by use of a Brayton or Sterling
cycle generator located at the focus of the reflector. Further,
direct electric power production by photovoltaic conversion
would also be possible by the placement of solar cells at the
focal point of the reflector. Accordingly, an inexpensive,
easily transportable, Fresnel reflector would be advantageous in
all areas of solar energy production.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a
Fresnel spiral reflector.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a
method for making a Fresnel spiral reflector.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a
Fresnel spiral reflector having a negative focal length.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a
Fresnel spiral reflector which may be assembled in one simple
and fast operation.
It is a final object of the present invention to provide a
Fresnel spiral reflector whose reflector is composed of a single
piece of material.
If a mathematically defined spiral is developed on a piece of
flat material and the spiral is cut along its spiral line and
"wound up" the arms of the spiral will have an angle of
inclination with respect to the plane of the original sheet. The
angle of inclination is proportional to the distance of the arm
from the center of the spiral. It has been found that the angle
of inclination of this spiral would be continuously changing so
that the point on the spiral would have the proper angle of
inclination so as to reflect sunlight through a focal point. The
present invention therefore involves the calculation of a spiral
which can be formed on a sheet of flat reflecting material and
which, when "wound up" will have a predetermined focal point.
The spiral can be formed so that the resulting reflector will
have either a positive or a negative focal length.
Such a Fresnel spiral reflector will have all of the advantages
of a concentric circle Fresnel reflector and will have the
additional advantages of being quickly and simply assembled and
of being composed of a single piece.
The developed spiral can be formed by using a computer program
to calculate a spiral which, when wound up, will provide a
predetermined maximum diameter, focal length, concentration
ratio, estimated blockage, reflectivity and number of mounting
rods. The computer program can then be used to plot the
developed spiral which can be transferred to a sheet of
reflecting material, cut out, and wound up to result in the
desired reflector. The wound up arms of the reflector can be
held in place by radial mounting rods whose positions can be
determined by the computer program.
Alternatively, a cam can be used to plot a developed spiral on a
rotating sheet, this developed spiral then being transferred to
a sheet of reflecting material as with the spiral developed by
the computer program.
As a further alternative, the cam could be used to plot a
developed spiral on the sheet of reflecting material itself. In
further alternatives, the computer program could be used to
generate a tape which could be used to direct a numerically
controlled machine to cut out the spiral, or a stencil could be
made from the spiral pattern and the stencil could be used to
mass produce identical spiral patterns.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the
attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the
same becomes better understood by reference to the following
detailed description when considered in connection with the
accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of the spiral Fresnel reflector;
FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the spiral
reflector of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a schematic plan view of a positive focal length
developed spiral;
FIG. 4 is a detail of a portion of the reflector of FIG. 2;
FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a negative focal
length spiral Fresnel reflector;
FIG. 6 is a schematic plan view of a negative focal length
developed spiral;
FIG. 7 is a schematic elevational view of a spiral Fresnel
reflector reflecting coverging light rays from a plurality of
mirrors;
FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of an apparatus for
plotting a spiral on a sheet of material.
FIG. 9 is another embodiment of the apparatus of FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 is a plan view of a connecting rod arrangement;
FIG. 11 is a detail of the connection between one of the
connecting rods and the spiral;
FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of the centerpiece for the
connecting rods of FIG. 10;
FIG. 13 is a plot of a developed spiral produced by a computer;
FIG. 14 illustrates a frame defining an equilateral triangle
grid;
FIG. 15 illustrates a frame defining a square grid;
FIG. 16 is a cross-sectional view of a type A-B conic reflector;
FIG. 17 is a cross-sectional view of a type A conic reflector;
FIG. 18 is an isometric view of the reflector of FIG. 17;
FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional view of a type P-B conic reflector;
and
FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional view of a type P-A conic reflector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 shows a plan view of a wound up Fresnel reflector. The
reflector has a projected arm width of x and the spiral is at a
distance d from the center of the polar coordinate system, d
varying with the angle .beta. of the spiral. The same reflector
is shown in cross-sectional elevation in FIG. 2. As can be seen,
the angle of inclination .phi. of each portion of the spiral
reflector arm varies with the distance d of that portion of the
arm from the center of the polar coordinate system. It can also
be seen that the focal length of a reflected light ray which is
reflected from the base of the arm portion, that base
corresponding to the plotted spiral, is equal to f.
FIG. 3 is a plan view of the spiral which is developed on a flat
sheet of reflecting material in such a manner that, when cut
along the spiral line and wound up, the Fresnel spiral reflector
of FIGS. 1 and 2 results. The developed spiral of FIG. 3 has a
distance D from the center of the polar coordinate system for
any angle .PSI. of the spiral. In order to develop a spiral on a
flat sheet of reflecting material having a desired projected arm
width x and diameter d, it is therefore necessary to calculate
what D and .PSI. corresond to a wound Fresnel spiral reflector
having a projected arm width x, and a diameter d at a wound
angle .beta.. ##EQU1##
The above equation (1) relates the distance D of the developed
spiral to the desired focal length and the desired arm width at
a wound up angle .beta.. ##EQU2##
In the above equations, (2) relates the angle .PSI. of the
developed spiral to the desired projected arm width and the
desired focal length for any wound up spiral angle .beta..
Therefore, a developed spiral can be plotted for any desired
resulting spiral Fresnel reflector having a predetermined
projected arm width, focal length and wound up maximum diameter.
The above equations, however, only relate to the inner most edge
of a portion of the spiral arm since it is that edge which is
defined by the spiral according to the above equations. However,
the maximum concentration ratio is not located at the focal
point of light striking the bottom of each portion of the arm
but at the focal point ff of the light striking the radial
center of each portion of the spiral arm. As can be seen in FIG.
2, it is at the focal length ff that the focal area is at a
minimum (mw) and it is at this minimum focal width that the
concentration of energy is greatest. Therefore, it is desirable
to relate a developed spiral to the concentration ratio within
the minimum focal width at the focal length ff. The relation
between f and ff is found from equation (3). ##EQU3##
The minimum width (mw) from equation 3 can be found according to
equation (4): ##EQU4## G is percentage of blockage .rho. is
reflectivity of the material
CR is concentration ratio
The percentage of blocking (G) from equation (4) is most easily
understood from FIG. 4. FIG. 4 shows a close up of the
cross-sections of two portions of a spiral arm. It can be seen
from FIG. 4 that the light rays 1 reflected from each portion of
the spiral arm 2 may be partially blocked by an adjacent portion
of the spiral arm. The percentage of the blocked area 4 is
represented by (G). The concentration ratio (CR) of equation 4
is simply the ratio, expressed in terms of "suns" by which the
energy of the sun is multiplied within the minimum focal width
(mw).
Further, the projected arm width is not a parameter which one
would normally be initially aware of in order to produce a
reflector having certain characteristics. The projected arm
width can be found from equation (5) once (mw) and (ff) are
found: ##EQU5##
Therefore, the above equations provide a complete description of
a developed spiral given an input of the maximum desired
diameter, the desired focal length, the desired concentration
ratio, the desired estimated blockage and the reflectivity of
the reflector. An appropriate computer program can then find the
minimum focal width (mw) for the outermost point of the spiral
from equation (4), the projected arm width x from equation (5)
and the focal length of the inner edge of each point in the
spiral f from equation (3). From these parameters, the developed
spiral can be plotted from equations (1) and (2).
An additional equation which may be useful in plotting the
developed spiral is the equation relating the change of the
diameter of the wound up spiral to the angle .beta.. Such a
relationship is expressed by equation (6): ##EQU6##
The above equations describe a spiral Fresnel reflector having a
positive focal length as seen in FIG. 2. FIG. 5 schematicaly
illustrates a spiral Fresnel reflector having a negative focal
length while FIG. 6 illustrates a developed negative focal
length spiral which may be plotted on a flat sheet of reflective
material. As can be seen from FIG. 5 which is a cross-sectional
view through a wound up spiral, the focal point of the reflected
light in a negative focal length spiral Fresnel reflector is on
the opposite side of the reflector from the incoming light.
Further, the angles that the spiral arms 2 make with the
horizontal plane are much greater than those of a positive focal
length reflector. Further, as can be seen from FIG. 6, a
negative focal length reflector must be wound in a direction
opposite to that of a positive focal length reflector so that
the outer coils of the developed spiral become the inner most
coils of the wound spiral reflector. The developed spiral for
the negative focal length Fresnel spiral reflector can be
developed in a method similar to that for the positive focal
length reflector except that equations 1, 2 and 6 are
respectively replaced by equations 7, 8 and 9 below: ##EQU7##
Although the spiral Fresnel reflector will typically be used to
concentrate the direct rays of the sun, and the above equations
provide a spiral reflector for so concentrating parallel rays,
the spiral Fresnel reflector can also be used as a secondary
reflector for concentrating converging rays, as for example the
rays reflected from a field of mirrors. FIG. 7 is a schematic
representation of a spiral Fresnel reflector 2 located between a
field of reflecting mirrors 6 and the apparent focal point F of
the field of mirrors. The Fresnel spiral reflector 2 is located
at a height H from the field of mirrors and the apparent focal
point F of the field of mirrors is at a height F from the field
of mirrors 6. A spiral Fresnel reflector which will concentrate
the converging rays at desired focal point DFP can be formed
from a developed spiral plotted from the above equation (2)
where f is found from the following equations (10) and (11):
##EQU8## Therefore, using equations (10) and (11), one need only
preselect the desired heights H and F as well as the other
desired parameters such as the maximum desired diameter, focal
length, concentration ratio, estimated blockage and the
reflectivity of the reflector in order to plot a developed
spiral which may be wound up to form a spiral Fresnel reflector
usable with converging light rays.
An alternative method of plotting the developed spiral for the
spiralFresnel reflector is by use of the apparatus shown in FIG.
8. FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic representation of a mechanical
device for plotting a developed spiral. A piece of flat
reflective material 10, or a stencil, is position for rotation
about axis 12. The axis 12 is supported for rotation on rigid
guide 14 and includes a pinion 16. The pinion 16 meshes with a
rack 18 connected to cam 20 which guides pin 22 against the
reaction force of spring 24. Therefore, when material 10 is
rotated in the direction 26, or when cam 20 is moved in the
direction 28, the rotation of the material and the movement of
the pin 22 due to the cam 20, cause the pin to describe the
spiral 30 on the material 10. The shape of the cam 20 can be
predetermined based upon the equations. This method for
developing the spiral is useful when a large number of identical
spirals are to be produced.
Once the developed spiral is plotted, the developed spiral may
be transferred to a sheet of flat reflective material such as
aluminized flexible plastic or aluminized mylar bonded to low
molecular weight polyethylene or any other reflective sheet
material. The developed spiral can also be plotted directly onto
the reflective material. Once the developed spiral is plotted on
the reflective material, the reflective sheet is cut along the
spiral line.
Other material which may be usable for the spiral Fresnel
reflector are masonite (such as 1/8" thick masonite) having
aluminum foil glued to one side, thin aluminum sheet and
cardboard having an aluminum foil reflective surface.
Once the developed spiral has been cut, it is necessary to wind
up the developed spiral in order to result in the spiral
reflector. In the case of a positive focal length Fresnel spiral
reflector, the outermost portion of the spiral arm of the
developed spiral is placed at a fixed distance from the center
of the spiral and the center of the spiral is wound up. In the
case of a negative focal length spiral Fresnel reflector, the
innermost end of the developed spiral is placed at a fixed
distance from the center of the spiral reflector and the
outermost end of the developed spiral, which is the innermost
end of the spiral Fresnel reflector, is wound up. The degree of
winding determines the angle of inclination of the arms of the
spiral, and therefore determines the focal length of the
resulting reflector. It is therefore possible to make minor
changes in the focal length by performing minor adjustments upon
the degree of winding up the arms of the spiral reflector.
Another version of the apparatus for plotting the developed
spiral of FIG. 8 may be seen in FIG. 9. This device is useful
for forming large reflectors of varying diameters. The blank
sheet 10 is fixed for rotation on axis 32 which includes bevel
gear 34. Bevel gear 34 meshes with bevel gear 36 which is
mounted on splined shaft 38 for axial movement only. Bevel gear
40 is mounted on the other end of splined shaft 38 and meshes
with bevel gear 42 which is mounted on axis 44 together with
pinion 46. The axis 44 is fixed by guide pin 48. Pinion 46
meshes with rack 50 attached to cam 52. Cam follower 54 of
linkage 56 is guided by cam 52 against the reaction force of
spring 58 as the cam 52 is moved. This results in the movement
of pin 60 which describes spiral 62 in a manner similar to the
device of FIG. 8. The pinion gears 36 and 40 can move along
splined shaft 38 so as to accommodate spirals of different
sizes.
Once the developed spiral is wound into the resulting spiral
Fresnel reflector, it is necessary to stabilize the arms and
maintain them in their proper position with the desired amount
of winding. Preferably, this may be done by the use of radial
connecting arms which radiate from the center of the spiral and
attach to the arms of the spiral at radial points. Such radial
arms 70 may be seen in FIG. 10. The spiral arms 2 may be
attached to the connecting arms 70 at attachment points 72.
Although four connecting arms are shown in FIG. 10, any number
can be used.
According to a preferred method, the attachment points may be
plotted on the developed spiral and the Fresnel spiral reflector
may be wound up from the developed spiral simply by the
attachment of the attachment points 72 to their appropriate
connecting arms 70. The plotting of the appropriate attachment
points on the developed spiral may be done by determining the
number of connecting arms to be used, calculating the angle
.beta. between the connecting arms, and utilizing equation 2 or
8 to calculate the angle .psi. on the developed spiral for each
connecting point.
The connection of the spiral arms 2 to the connecting rods 70 at
the connecting points 72 must be done in such a way that the
spiral arms are not distorted at the connection points.
According to a preferred embodiment, this may be done by
creating two holes 74 in the innermost portion of the spiral
arms at each connecting point. A U shaped length of aluminum or
stainless steel wire may then be slid through the holes so that
the base of the U connects the two holes as shown in FIG. 11.
The arms of the U which extend past the bottom of the connecting
rod may then be bent inwards as shown at 76 in FIG. 11. This
provides a pivot for the spiral arm to pivot about its innermost
edge.
FIG. 10 shows the connecting rods as being formed of a single
piece of material. Alternatively, the connecting rods may be
fixedly attached to a separate center piece 80 at 82 as shown in
FIG. 12. The center piece may include a central bore 84 in which
may be positioned a dowel plug 86 and turning handle 88. The end
of the developed spiral may be placed in the dowel plug 86 and
the dowel plug 86 turned for winding up the developed spiral
into the spiral Fresnel reflector. Using such a technique, one
end of the developed spiral is fixed a predetermined diameter
from the dowel plug while the other end is inserted into the
dowel plug and wound until the fixing points 72 are aligned with
their appropriate connecting rods 70.
The center piece need not include a central bore and dowel. In
such a case, the spiral may be wound up by first attaching the
outermost point of the spiral to one of the connecting rods. The
spiral is then wound at its next innermost strip until its
fixing point falls into line with the connecting rod and this
fixing point is then fixed to the connecting rod. The winding is
continued and succeedingly inner arms of the spiral are attached
to the connecting rod along a radial line reaching the center of
the spiral, and then outwards to the opposite edge. Once a full
diameter of the spiral has been fixed to the connecting rods,
the other fixing points are mounted.
The frame for stabilizing the wound spiral need not be in the
form of radial connecting arms but, rather, may be in the form
of a frame defining a grid. Such a grid would be easier to
manufacture and have greater strength the the radial arm frame
arrangement.
One form of such a grid is shown in FIG. 14. This is a grid
compose of equilateral triangles. The arms of some of the
equilateral triangles form intersecting rods 90 which could be
the primary mounting points for the spiral. The spiral could
also be attached at other mounting points where it crosses the
grid.
A second form of grid is illustrated in FIG. 15. This is a grid
composed of a plurality of squares. The grid has a center point
100 from which radial rods 102, which are defined by the arms of
some of the squares, extend. The spiral could be mounted at
fixing points 104 to these radial arms, as well as to other
points on the grid where the edge of the spiral crosses the
grid. Other grid shapes are, of course, also possible.
EXAMPLE
It was desired to construct a spiral Fresnel reflector having a
radius of 22.5", a focal length of 42.75", a maximum theoretical
concentration ratio of 1000 and 8 mounting arms. These
parameters were introduced into equations 1-6 which provided an
arm width of 1.078", a flat radius of 23.175" and a minimum
focal width of 1.21". A computer was used to plot the above
developed spiral as shown in FIG. 13. The spiral was cut along
its spiral line and holes for the mounting wire were cut into
the spiral. The connecting arms were then constructed which were
made from square tubing connected at a central point to a
plywood center piece by square nuts and washers. The spiral arms
were then connected to the connecting rods by the wires 76 as
described above. The resulting apparatus was tested at 5:00 in
the afternoon on a sunny day and a concentration ratio of 500
suns was measured.
The wound spiral need not be in the form of a flat plane. The
wound Fresnel reflector can also be in the form of a hollow cone
or a hollow truncated cone. This may be done by providing a
frame in the form of a hollow cone or the frustum of a cone. As
with the flat spiral Fresnel reflector, the spiral could be cut
from a single sheet of flat material and wound up onto the
conical frame. The angle of inclination of any point on the
wound conic spiral would be set so as to reflect light through a
chosen focal point f.
There are at least four different types of conical spiral
Fresnel reflectors possible. A first type of conical reflector
has an entirely conic support frame having a frame angle .tau.
which is greater than the angle of inclination of the spiral arm
at a given radial point. This is referred to as a type (A)
reflector. Such a type (A) reflector is shown in FIG. 17. As
seen in FIG. 17, which is a cross-sectional view through the
reflector, the angle of inclination of the arms at any point is
less than the angle of inclination .tau. of the frame up to the
transitional point T. Therefore, the arms are fixed to the frame
at their outermost radial point. If the reflector were to
continue radially outwards beyond the transitional point T, the
angle of inclination of the arms would be greater than the angle
.tau.. This portion of the reflector would be a type (B)
reflector.
FIG. 16 shows a conical spiral Fresnel reflector which is a
combined type (A) and type (B) reflector. As can be seen in FIG.
16, the reflector extends radially outward beyond the
transitional point T where the angle of inclination of the
spiral arms is greater than the angle .tau.. In such a type (B)
portion of the reflector, the arms are fixed to the frame at
their radially innermost edges.
It should be noted that in a pure type (A) conical reflector,
the transitional point T need never be reached. That is, the
reflector may terminate radially at a point short of the point
where the angle of inclination of the reflector arms equals the
angle .tau.. In the case where the outermost arm of the spiral
does have an angle of inclination which equals the angle .tau.,
so that the transitional point is reached, the outermost arm may
be fixed flat to the support arm. Such an arrangement is shown
in FIG. 18. In this Figure, the frame is in the form of a
plurality of radially extending rods 112 having a quadrilateral
cross section. The arms of the spiral are secured at fixing
points 114 located at the outermost edges of the spiral arms. As
can be seen at 116, the outermost arm of the spiral, which is at
the transition point, is secured at both its innermost and
outermost edges.
The type (A) reflector will have no blockage or shadowing of one
portion of the reflector arm by the radially inwardly adjacent
portion of the arm. However, since the effective focal length of
the strips decreases as the strips move out from the center and
up the conical support frame, the light reflected from the outer
strips impinges on the focal plane at shallower angles. This
increases the focal spot diameter, thereby reducing the
concentration ratio obtained.
Where a portion of a conical spiral Fresnel reflector is planar
(that is, in the truncated portion of a truncated cone), this
planar type is referred to as a type (P) reflector. FIG. 19
illustrates a combined type P-B reflector in which the radially
innermost portion of the frame is planar and the remainder of
the frame is conical but with an angle .tau. which is less than
the angle of inclination of the spiral arms at the radial
distance of the conical frame. In such a P-B reflector, the
support frame changes from the planar support to the conic
support at the transition point T. As seen in FIG. 19, the angle
.tau. is equal to the angle of inclination of the spiral arm at
the transition point T.
A fourth type of conical spiral Fresnel reflector is the type
"P-A" shown in FIG. 20. In this type of reflector, the angle T
is such that the transition point is not where the planar frame
changes to the conic frame, but at, or beyond, the outermost
radial point of the spiral arm. A second type of transition
point T1 occurs where the planar frame intersects with the conic
frame section. As can be seen from FIG. 20, in the (P) portion
of the reflector, the spiral arms are fixed to the frame at
their innermost edges. At the (A) portion of the reflector, the
spiral arms are fixed to the frame at their outermost edges.
This second type of transitional point T1 occurs where both the
innermost edge and the outermost edge of the spiral arm contact
the frame adjacent the intersection of the planar and conic
sections thereof.
It is important to note that the outer arms of the type (P), or
planar, spiral Fresnel reflector experience the greatest
blockage and contribute the most to the total area of the
reflector. The type P-A reflector eliminates blocking entirely
for those spiral arm portions which are attached to the conic
frame portion, that is, the outermost arms. This will tend to
increase the concentration ratio obtained by the type P-A
reflector over that obtained by a type (P) reflector having the
same diameter, focal length and projected arm width. On the
other hand, the outermost strips of the P-A reflector will be at
a higher angle of inclination than those of similar type P
reflector. This will tend to enlarge the minimum focal width for
the type P-A reflector, reducing the concentration ratio
obtainable. Therefore, the type P-A conic Fresnel reflector
includes aspects which increase the obtainable concentration
ratio as well as other aspects which decrease the obtainable
concentration ratio. With the proper selection of design
parameters, it is possible for one skilled in the art to
optimize the type P-A reflector so that the obtainable
concentration ratio is maximized.
Related:
Light-guide solar energy concentrator -- US8885995B2/
[ PDF ]
Abstract
A light-guide solar concentrator that requires less
precision to assemble and manufacture than some other two-layer
solar concentrators has a light-condensing layer and an optical
waveguide layer. The light-condensing layer includes a plurality
of focusing elements for focusing incident sunlight and a
plurality of corresponding collimating elements for collimating
the light for output to the optical waveguide layer. The optical
waveguide layer receives the collimated light and has a
plurality of deflectors for redirecting the light for lateral
transmission through the optical waveguide layer toward an exit
surface. A secondary optic optically coupled to the exit surface
can also be provided to redirect the light toward a light
collection area where a solar energy collector can be placed to
harvest the concentrated sunlight.
https://history.gtri.gatech.edu/files/media/ees-report/EES_Report_1980_11.pdf
https://history.gtri.gatech.edu/innovations/adding-three-dimensions-innovation
Adding three dimensions to innovation
Former Engineering Experiment Station Research Engineer
Richard Steenblik developed a three-dimensional vision technique
in the late 1970s and early 1980s. This technique is used today
in the production of a popular commercial optical film product
used in certain 3D glasses.
ChromaDepth 3D uses pieces of microptic film to selectively
shift the points at which different colors of light are focused.
Known as chromostereoscopy, the technique makes objects of
different colors appear to be at varying distances from the
viewer.
Steenblik's discovery came after he noticed slight
three-dimensional effects produced by a video game. The effect
was caused by an imperfection called chromatic aberration in the
lenses of the eye. Also, Steenblik knew the brain expects that
red color often comes from objects close to the viewer, while
blue tends to come from objects far away.
He worked to enhance the effect and concluded that passing light
through two different liquids would provide the necessary
shifting or refraction. In his first prototype, he used two
liquids of Chinese cinnamon oil and glycerin. The liquids
provided the opposing refraction needed to produce right-eye and
left-eye views from the same two-dimensional image.
Steenblik patented the discovery in 1983. He soon thereafter
founded Atlanta-based Chromatek Inc. with New York businessman
Frederick Lauter. The company owners then developed 3D glasses
based on double prisms rather than liquids, but they did not
work as well as Steenblik hoped.
Collaboration with binary optics scientists at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) led to the inexpensive manufacture
of the complex prism patterns needed to produce the
three-dimensional effect. The new product debuted in 1992.
Georgia Tech licensed the technique to Chromatek, while MIT
licensed the binary optics technology to the company.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?compact=true&page=0&AB=&ST=advanced&PR=&IN=Steenblik+Richard&rnd=1740011760292&locale=en_EP&AP=&PA=&PD=&TI=&CPC=&IC=&DB=EPODOC&PN=
44 results found in the Worldwide database for:
Steenblik Richard as the inventor
1. MICRO-OPTIC SECURITY AND IMAGE PRESENTATION
SYSTEM -- ES2946765 (T3)
2023-07-25
2. A TAMPER INDICATING OPTICAL SECURITY DEVICE
-- ZA201200509 (B) 2022-03-30
3. SINGLE LAYER IMAGE PROJECTION FILM --
ES2860910 (T3) 2021-10-05
4. IMAGE PRESENTATION AND MICRO-OPTIC SECURITY
SYSTEM -- ES2794076 (T3)
2020-11-17
5. MICRO-OPTICS FOR ARTICLE IDENTIFICATION
-- DK1476782 (T3)
2020-08-17
6. OPTICAL SYSTEM DEMONSTRATING IMPROVED RESISTANCE TO
OPTICALLY DEGRADING EXTERNAL EFFECTS --
ES2731671 (T3) 2019-11-18
7. Sistemas de imagenes opticas sinteticos, sistema de
presentacion de imagen y sistema micro-optico para formar
imagenes de elementos de icono de microestructuras. --
CL2007003350 (A1) 2009-07-03
8. MICRO-OPTIC SECURITY AND IMAGE PRESENTATION
SYSTEM -- BRPI0713906 (B1)
2018-06-05
9. sistema de apresentação de imagem e de segurança
microóptica ---= BRPI0520898 (B1)
2017-09-12
10. Micro-optic security and image presentation
system -- TW200643469 (A)
2006-12-16
11. SINGLE LAYER IMAGE PROJECTION FILM
-- US2016101643 (A1)
2016-04-14
12. Micro-optic security and image presentation
system -- AU2015207918 (A1)
2015-08-20
13. MICRO-OPTIC SECURITY AND IMAGE PRESENTATION
SYSTEM -- CA2812971 (A1)
2005-06-09
14. Micro-optic security and image presentation
system -- AU2013204903 (A1)
2013-05-16
15. Micro-optic security and image presentation
system -- AU2013204884 (A1)
2013-05-16
16. Image presentation and micro-optic security
system -- AU2013204845 (A1)
2013-05-16
17. Micro-optic security and image presentation
system -- AU2013204869 (A1)
2013-05-09
18. A tamper indicating optical security device
-- TW201206721 (A)
2012-02-16
19. Micro-optic security and image presentation
system -- TW200902339 (A)
2009-01-16
20. Image presentation and micro-optic security
system -- ZA200710725 (B)
2008-12-31
21. Merchandising Systems, Methods of Merchandising...
-- US2009173654 (A1) 2009-07-09
22. Merchandising Systems, Methods of
Merchandising... -- US2009173653 (A1)
2009-07-09
23. Merchandising Systems, Methods of
Merchandising... -- US2009172978 (A1)
2009-07-09
24. MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS, METHODS OF MERCHANDISING, AND
POINT-OF-SALE DEVICES COMPRISING MICRO-OPTICS TECHNOLOGY
-- WO2007081862 (A2)
2007-07-19
25. Lenses and uses, including microscopes
-- US2005063049 (A1)
2005-03-24
26. Apparatus for providing autostereoscopic and dynamic
images -- US5359454 (A)
1994-10-25
27. Microstructured Taggant Particles, Applications and
Methods of Making the Same --
US2008130018 (A1) 2008-06-05
28. Stereoscopic process and apparatus using diffractive
optical elements -- US4717239 (A)
1988-01-05
29. Method and apparatus for selectively controlling the
quantum state probability distribution of correlated quantum
objects -- US6057541 (A)
2000-05-02
30. PLANAR OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE --
US2008019652 (A1) 2008-01-24
31. Stereoscopic process and apparatus
-- US4597634 (A) 1986-07-01
32. Stereoscopic process and apparatus using different
deviations of different colors --
US5002364 (A) 1991-03-26
33. Microstructured taggant particles, applications and
methods of making the same --
US2004067360 (A1) 2004-04-08
34. Method and apparatus for selectively controlling the
quantum state probability distribution of entangled quantum
objects -- US6473719 (B1)
2002-10-29
35. Light control material -- US5503902 (A)
1996-04-02
36. Optical image encryption and decryption
processes -- US5715316 (A)
1998-02-03
37. Fresnel spiral reflector and method for making
same -- US4350412 (A)
1982-09-21
38. Apparatus for enhancing the brightness of an image and
method of making the same -- US5475533
(A) 1995-12-12
39. CONTROLLING CORRELATED QUANTUM STATE PROBABILITY
DISTRIBUTIONS -- WO9735388 (A1)
1997-09-25
40. LIGHT CONTROL MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR MAKING
SAME -- WO9523710 (A1)
1995-09-08
41. Device for attaching rain shields to motor vehicle
windows -- US4685718 (A)
1987-08-11
42. MEJORAS EN METODO PARA FORMAR UN REFLECTOR TIPO
FRESNEL -- MX154161 (A)
1987-05-15
43. DEVICE FOR ATTACHING RAIN SHIELDS TO MOTOR VEHICLE
WINDOWS -- CA1283146 (C)
1991-04-16
44. sistema de apresentação de imagem de segurança
micróptica -- BRPI0503224 (A)
2007-01-23