Keelynet

The Bedini Patent
From: William Alek
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001

I've been looking over Mr. Bedini's patent, WO 01/52390 A1

No where in the patent am I seeing claims of over-unity? What I am seeing is the "possibility of over-unity" suggested there in (page 5, line 13), but
NOT actual or real over-unity produced by his device! Now, Mr. Bedini does mention (page 12, line 4), "... the motor to produce an energy level of COP = 0.98, more or less, depending upon configuration, circuitry, switching elements and the number and size of stators, rotors and coils that comprise the motor." includes ONLY the electrical and electronic components, however, does NOT mention or include the efficiency, or inefficiency of charging the battery. Battery charge inefficiencies would most certainly lower his overall COP value!

I would think that his systems (including motor, rotor, and batteries) would have an overall efficiency of around 85%, or COP = 0.85. This isn't too bad
for modern systems, however, this is a long way from being a "self-runner", which of course is the ultimate goal.

William S. Alek
INTALEK, INC.
3506-43rd. Place
Highland, IN  46322-3129  USA     HOME PAGE: <http://www.intalek.com
FAX: 219.924.2793
OFFICE PHONE: 219.924.2742

---

Advanced Bedini Motor/Energizer

From: DMBoss1021
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:13:39

This is a prelim report that another Bedini deive has been replicated by two of us, and not only works, but after we built it to his specs, and gained a
basic understanding of why/how it may work, could then predict changes to the design which improved it's functioning.

It is, in my opinion, imperative to follow his construction details closely, for first replication.  This is necessary, as I believe he has an intuitive,
or objective grasp of some advanced concepts, or properties of the interaction of magnetic fields, and oscillating ones, and how they interact
with reality, and or  - space-time; the ZPE; or the aether depending on what you call it.

And yes, at times his details are difficult to comprehend.  But it is not his task to give a basic course in electronics, or static/dynamic magnetics.
Also some concepts of correct functioning of certain devices may run counter to what we have been led to believe by conventional theory - so even if
something he specifies doesn't make sense - try it first, then after it works, figure out why.

That said, the device / effect we have replicated is found here:

http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/bedini.txt

I built it exactly as shown, as i have these size magnets (RS does not sell these large ones anymore, but they are available elsewhere)

I had a suspicion, from the comments about this pencil thin "scalar beam" or effect, that this may be the same or similar to what is described on my site
as the "Primary Energy".

Once built, and the motor turned on, there is indeed a "beam" of energy emitted from the sides where the magnet faces oppose each other (bucking).
This beam was exactly the same as the Primary Energy (PE) beams that can be made with a container of inert gas, and a magnetic field.

In the case of just the running device, in open air, emitting a beam, I surmised that this field arrangement and modulation was exciting the argon
atoms in the air (Ar is 1% of air) - so to see if this is the case, I placed a  tube of another inert gas, at this location (the place where the "beam"
comes out of the magnet interface) - and a VERY powerful PE beam was created --- much more powerful than if the tube is simply placed against the magnets, without the modulation.

And in addition, with the addition of a 25 ohm, wire wound rheostat in the circuit, to vary the motor's speed, (and hence the FREQ of the pulse signal,
thru the coil), the PE beam strength, varies as the FREQ is varied, and there are several resonant "nodes" where a small FREQ range, makes a much large beam effect, as this FREQ range is passed, while changing the speed.  There are several of these resonant points.

This has been replicated many times, by myself, now, and by another, using a different magnet size/shape, with similar results.

Both of us independently have found that our current crude, "measurement" of an anomalous quality which seems to be related to this energy (and not
thermal, or EM sources) is affected in the same way, by these "scalar" beams, augmented with a xenon flashtube. (not flashed) (this objective measurement, is separate from the subtle sensing of "feeling" of the PE, and will be detailed later, as we get a better handle on it)

I am working on a write up for a post to my web site - in next few days, with all the details.

The magnetic field analysis, using QuickField, shows that this arrangement of permanent magnets, with the modulator coil is making the same field shape, and relative flux density gradients, as that of the "Magnetic Beam Amplifier" shown on my site, and detailed in US patent # 5,929,732.

In this case, it is a "dual beamer" as opposed to the "quad beamer" shown on the patent, and the "hex beamer" shown on my site.  The two bucking or
opposing magnets, are like the radial "focusing" plane, described in the patent, and the modulating coil forms the field of the axial magnet - and
this axial field is pulsed, or alternated (if any back EMF's from the motor, cause complex AC harmonics in the modulation).

In the "beamer" field configuration - there is found a "null" zone where the bucking fields intersect, or "collide" as Bedini describes it.  And with the
modulation, this null zone then is caused to move front and back, along the same axis as the coil. And the overall beamer field shape is also caused to
move back and forth, and if AC is present, will flip or mirror on each oscillation.  (our theory is this a severe "aether stretch", and forms a
resonant cavity for the PE)

Now with reference to the "Hyper Light Speed Antenna" patent:
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8147.html

There is also similar reports of bio effects, which are reported from this device's "beam" or field, and by the PE.

And notice that this device also used a set of bucking magnetic fields, with a modulation injected.  And this patent's author describes the interface
between the bucking magnetic fields as like a "window" to a higher dimension.

One more note on the bedini "scalar field, or beam" device: --- I noticed in the field analysis that the field strengths of the coil, and magnets were
greatly mismatched - and surmised that if this "beamer field shape" was responsible for the effect, in some measure, that increasing the current to
the coil should then make it perform better. (better matching of magnetic field strengths)

So I did a test with applying a mechanical load to the motor shaft (and measured the current) - the current could be increased 5 fold this way, and
the resulting beam was greatly increased in intensity, and followed the current level in a proportional manner.

Also, I noticed that while applying this load to the motor, by hand, that a PE emanation was present at the motor housing, and shaft!  So I believe there
is some kind of subtle "current" at work here, and some feedback, and resonance within the electrical conductors may occur, (the PE can be
"carried" on a good conductor, as shown in other experiments).  So this crude modulation method, may in fact be a critical factor to achieving this!

An armature type permanent magnet motor, has pemanent magnets as the stators, and a rotating armature, of coils - that are sequntially energized by the action of the brushes on the armature.  This creates a sparking effect at the brush/armature connection (and in this case, a spark, was observed,
indicating a plasma present) - and air is also present.  So (possibly) another PE emanation is being created in the motor as well as it functioning
as the pulse generator!

And this may be indicative as to why some older methods to make certain effects work, while newer, "modern" methods do not.  (when you use the sparks gaps, and electro - magnetic - mechanical systems - the effect is not necessarily the same as a "solid state" method!

I believe Bearden commented on this - that many times a jury rigged device has stumbled upon a method, material, impurity, or configuration, which is
the key to an effect, but more modern, clean, or pure methods may not have the right elements to accomplish this.

A note of caution - any who are following the PE, and experimenting with it --- this beam method is VERY powerful, and may pose some dangers to body exposure.  This is evidenced by my feeling the strong tingling, in the sense hand, turning into a strong numbness in the hand and arm, which then lasted for over an hour after each exposure!  This numbness felt like the effect of using a "hammer drill" to drill many successive holes in concrete - the
strong mechanical vibrations making the arms/hands feel numb for a time after this work.

As stated, I am working on the drawings, a field analyses, and writing up this info, and will inform when this is done.

The Primary Energy site: http://hometown.aol.com/dmboss1021/NEWPH/Index.html

Sincerely,

DMBoss102

YOU WANT O.U. - HERE IT IS!!!
From: Jerry Decker - KN
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:53:31

Hola Folks!

Not exactly sure what happened, but Emmett sent the following which did not make it to the list or archive, so I'm reposting.
I think the problem was the photos he mentions since this list doesn't accept attachments as per the guidelines page at;

http://www.keelynet.com/discuss.htm

So Emmett, if you'll send me the photos, I'll put them up on a webpage with your comments and a link to your email for private correspondence;

Good Afternoon All,

TO START: I believe O.U. does indeed exist.

There are some different ways to do this, some simple, and a little energy - some abit, how shall I say more complex, but unbelievable amounts of energy, I know, been there and have done it.

HERE IS A SIMPLE WAY TO ACHIEVE THIS!!!

BUT FIRST; As I always give credit where credit is due, First and formost to John Bedini for his motor/energizers, Tom Bearden for the math and help in seeing what isn't always obvious, on his website, to my friend, Stan Mayer, for thoughts, encouragement and how to do things with what few electronic parts are available in my area, i.e. radio shack, and to all the greats before me, Maxwell, Faraday, Stubblefield and especially Tesla

NOW ON TO BUSINESS: I will provide a brief description and as  you all can see there are photos, and if any are in my area or want to come to my shop, I will be glad to let you see, tinkker and phootograph to your hearts desire, on this project anyway.

1). We will start with Johns school girl energizer(simplified) first. There are many of you out there that I know of that have achieved minor
o.u. in the .01-.1-.2 volt range for periods of time, there are those of you who have achieved a 1-1 unity, i.e., trading the same voltage back and forth between batteries over time and the voltage does not go up or down altho in practical situations(not this) it would normally go down over time due to resistance in the wires, resistance in the bearings, air resistance of the rotor rotating, and general quality of workmanship,

there are those of you who are close to 1-1 unity but are only losing .1-.3 volts over a 24 hr. period, that is good too, but not good enough but not to worry.

I have included in the pictures, photo1, of my sg energizer, "the black widow" so you can see all the wires and circuitry etc. nothing hidden, nothing magical.

Photo #2). rear view with a small coil with a screw thru the center attached to a copper/PVC pipe stand, the leads are attached to a home-made 4-diode, simple full wave bridge rectifier, (4)in4003 diodes, or a stand alone manufactured one will work also with a cap. connected across to smooth out the spikes.

I originally used a reed switch but they have a tendancy to burn shut and last only so long, so I asked my buddy, Stan Mayer, what I could substitute, thanks Stan.

Yes I know the pictures are dark, using an old polaroid instamatic, flash burnt out, but wanted pictures, NOW, you will notice that the leads from the fullwbrid.rec. are connected to a DVM and it reads 6.13 volts.

Now this little coil is made from a screw about an inch long and 3/16" in dia. wrapped with radio shack 28g wire about 200' worth. This is far in excess of those who are losing .1-.13 volts every 24 hrs or so O.U. IN MY BOOK...BUT IT GETS BETTER.

Photo # 3). is just a side view.

Photo #4). now some of you have found that you don't need your wheel to rotate at all, that by just stacking your magnets on top and a few adjustments it becomes a resonate circuit and some of you are finding that it is still charging your batteries, both input and output at the same time, this is more than possible. Stan explained how the electronics do indeed do this thru a little window in time(pun intended).

Picture #4 is mine doing just that BUT IT GETS EVEN BETTER!!!

NOT ONLY DO YOU NOT NEED A ROTOR ROTATING, YOU DON'T NEED MAGNETS TO MAKE IT RESONATE, JUST ANOTHER COIL,

photo #5, show my coil sitting on top, it is smaller than the main coil, so needed to get it closer, altho sidfe by side it will still provide a voltage, just not as big, now!!

1, if you make your coils larger, the same size and attach the circuit I described above, you not only achieve O.U. in charging the two batteries, but you can run extra voltage even above, the DVM reads 2.579 volts in case u can't see it.

SO NOW YOU NOT ONLY HAVE O.U., IN ONE SYSTEM BUT A SECOND SYSTEM AND THERE IS NO MOVEMENT, POSSIBLY A SIMPLIFIED MEG WITH SIMPLIFIED STUFF, BUT I CAN'T NOT SAY FOR SURE, EITHER WAY IT IS A NON-MOVING GENERATOR THAT YOU ALL CAN BUILD EASILY IN A COUPLE OF HOURS!!!

I ask only one or two things, PLEASE, tell and send this to all your family, friends, other energy sights, Rense .com , papers, radio, tv, or whatever as the momentum needs to raise sharply, like the spike on a scope of radiant energy as some have seen, or this will die a very quick death and my other peripheral devices along these lines are not worth  putting out and I shall go into quiet retirement.

ALSO.. any who want to  come to my office and shop to see, tinker, experiment, and photograph etc. are more than welcome, I have NOTHING TO HIDE. my address is

Westwood/'Westside Apts. Office,
1015 Oakcrest St., .Iowa City, Iowa
8-6 or so Mon.,-Fri. and about 9:30 1:00 or so on Sat.

Best Regards,
Emmett L. Butler

www.wondermagnet.com // www.otherpower.com ~ Forum
Initiated by finsawyer
Mar 23rd, 2004

When scanning this site I noticed some postings concerning Bedini motors but had no idea what they were like. When I finally found what they were I wasn't surprised by the basic idea, but I was by the claim that these things put out more power than is put in and by the controversy. It turns out that there may be a fairly easy way to determine the output power. This has to do with the energy storing properties of capacitors.  The Bedini motor has an output capacitor that is charged and then discharged into a battery pack.

For a capacitor of value C farads the energy E stored in it as a function of its voltage V is E = 1/2xCxV^2.  For instance, a capacitor of 1000 Microfarads with a voltage of 100 volts contains 5 joules of energy.  The voltage across a capacitor then gives an unambiguous measure of its energy.

A Bedini motor when tuned turns at a constant rpm.  This means that the pulses generated will be uniformly spaced in time.  An oscilloscope can be used to monitor the voltage across the output capacitor.  The drop in voltage when the capacitor is discharged then gives energy outputted: E = 1/2xCx(Vmax^2-Vmin^2).  Multiplying this by the number of pulses per second (determined from the oscilloscope sweep) gives the total output in joules/second (watts). This method can be used for any capacitor pulse charging system.

Input power can be measured by putting a small resistor in series with the battery and measuring its waveform using the oscilloscope.

You're overlooking two other system components, the source and receiving batteries.

There is a specific relationship between the source battery and the motor, and also between the motor and the receiving battery.

The only real way to determine what's going on is to measure the REAL POWER that you can draw from the receiving battery VS the charge state of the primary. Then continue charging and repeat, over and over. This is just like what was done by the TUV testing labs on Bedini's prototype.

That's the only set of measurements that really count, in the end.

Measuring the other items you've mentioned will mostly serve to confuse due to certain anomolous behavior in the source/motor/receiver process.

But, as always, feel free to slap on the meters.

The power going into the receiving battery has to go through the output capacitor. Determine that power and you've put a limit on the power into the receiving battery. There is no other route for energy to get into the receiving battery.  Otherwise get rid of the capacitor and the wires to the battery.  Let the energy flow through the ether or hyperspace or whatever. The device exists in our space and can be tested in our space.
GeoM

Most electrically "educated" people have a very rigid set of preconceived notions when it comes to understanding various circuit behaviors. I can charge any kind of battery that I want, with a simple capacitor discharge system, mechanical or electronic. Still, I have met with much resistance from many "learned" people along the way, most of them INSISTING that IT WON'T WORK, in one way or another. It really doesn't matter since I'm just sharing my observations from my hobby experiments.

 As for measuring the motor, I'm only telling you what I see happening, like it or not.

The relationship between the motor, the capacitor and the batteries is not as simple as you might, at first, assume.

Casting aspersions about dabbling with "hyperspace" won't answer your measurement questions.

Slapping meters and resistors all over the thing might offer some insight into HOW it works and whether or not it's tuned properly. But, the BEST and MOST EFFECTIVE way to measure the input vs. output is to run the motor and do your final empirical testing by measuring real wattage available from the receiving battery vs charge dissipation in the primary battery. That's all I'm saying.

 By all means, measure everything. After all, there's no reason not to.

 While you're at it, make sure you also do some mechanical loading tests in parallel with the power in/out tests. Even more interesting stuff crops up.

How much power ends up in the battery?

 Just hook up a simple load (perhaps a 20 watt lamp), a precision resistor, measure the voltage drop, and time the whole thing until the battery is discharged.

Replace the battery on the motor, recharge, and repeat.

More on anomolous behaviour: http://www.amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html

It's mighty fun to play with - at any rate at the very least I now have a pretty efficient DC motor on my desk....

Having fun,

Ted.

That link is interesting. The concept of an EM absorption field in relation to the Bedini motor is even more interesting when you consider what's on this link...

http://www.stormwise.com/striking.htm
 

This is steady EM power transmission via nature's own processes. Seems like it's just beggin' to be "received".

Hi Charged,

Kinda what I was thinking. I made that comment the other day about holding a small neo magnet near the motor when it's running. It almost vibrates right out of your hand - up to a foot away. That's one illustration that there's a field built around it when it's running. It will be interesting to carry on with testing...

Ted.

I took a look at the site.  No violation of conservation of energy or charge or mass there. Also the author uses normal devices and their characteristics. Measurements are implied.

In my original posting I said nothing about the magneto-mechanical aspects. The "motor" may act as a "tuned" "circuit" for all I know. My concern was with the capacitor and the power output. Since form follows function, the role of the capacitor appears to be temporary storage of energy. There is no indication that it is involved in the energy conversion process. That is done by the magnetic components.  Hence the method I outlined should allow relatively straightforward determination of the output power. I noticed that at least one person building these things has an oscilloscope. It would be interesting to see what he finds.

Beyond this, if these Bedini Devices really are capturing energy, it behooves us to find out what the source is. If millions of these are built, it wouldn't be nice to find out that the earth's magnetic field is collapsing or its spin rate is slowing down or its orbit is decaying.  There are a lot of potential sources of energy out there. We don't want to mess up any critical balances. If it comes from the solar wind or the expansion of the universe then maybe "Who cares". If it comes from the 60 cycle power distribution system then Tesla's dream of broadcast power is realized and we get a whole new set of rules, but also possibilities.

 Just because something is anomalous doesn't mean it can't be studied or measured. The people who discovered that they could cause a spark in a coil at a distance certainly had an anomalous situation.  Look where it led. I reject the notion that something mysterious is happening between the output capacitor and the batteries.
GeoM

It's interesting stuff....

and lots of it's a bit over my head.
But to me, it seems very simple. If any of these systems (Bedini Motors etc) are actually "capturing" some mysterious outside form of energy... then why is it that we have yet to see a motor that "runs" by itself? I realize there are LOTS of folks who make the claim that this has been done.... I remain highly skeptical till I see it with my own eyes though.

On a different note...
Often when I see claims of overunity type motors and that "sort of thing" I jump to the pre-judgment that whoever is making the claims is either a con artist, or... doesn't know what they're talking about. I looked a bit into Bedini's webpages and career... and being a "vintage hi-fi" enthusiast, I was quite impressed by the really nice audio amplifiers he designed and manufactured. It appears they are possibly still manufacturing hi-end "vintage style" tube amplifiers!

According to Bearden, the electrical energy that's powering everything around you is ALREADY a 1:1 release of "vacuum energy" (zpe, radiant, etc...).

In other words, we're burning up fossil fuels to FORCE the capture of this energy in heating elements, lamps, batteries, etc...
This is what he means about allowing the captured energy (working power) to also destroy the dipole (generator charge separation). This then requires more physical input to drive the generator to produce more charge separation to keep the ZPE release going to power your load.

So if drawing ZPE is going to slow down the planet or something, it's already happening every time you make french toast. I'm more interested in finding ways not to have to choke on noxious fumes from expensive fuels.

Anyway, the Earth's magnetic field is almost zero at this point in time, so what would it matter? ;)

Bearden's idea sounds a little like the negative energy accelerating the expansion of the universe that astronomers have come up with. I prefer to stick with Beaty's ideas which show no contradiction with established knowledge.

It struck me that the Bedini Device has a basic similarity with an atom. The electrons in an atom are moving in circles around the atom. The magnetic poles are also moving in circles. In both cases time varying electromagnetic fields will exist around the structures.  These fields could interact with existing electromagnetic waves in the surrounding medium out to sizable distances. So the Bedini device could conceivably act as a collector of energy. But it's not then doing anything really mysterious. This leads to the further consideration: The most likely source of collected energy would be the 60 cycle energy that pervades our environment. This leads to some ideas for experimentation.

At 60 hz a wavelength is 3100 miles. For a Bedini device to be scaled at the same size as an atom it would have to have a wheel diameter of about 3000 feet. Okay, not too practical. One could instead build a power system running at 60,000 hz with a three foot wheel. This could be done on a small scale.

Another question involves interactions between Bedini devices.  If each unit has a magnetic footprint out to large distances will two close units interact, and how. How close is close?

Also, a Bedini device may have a best frequency (greatest output power). At what frequency does this occur? Adjust the rpms while monitoring the power output by the method that I suggested.

Finally, by this analysis it should be possible to have the device function without a battery on the input by looping the output back in some manner.

If Bedini wants to sell a large number of these devices all he has to do is start a rumor that they rob power from the power companies. They'd sell like hotcakes.
GeoM

Things are only mysterious until they are properly investigated. I suppose that curiousity is why I built one of these things.

From what I've seen so far there are two things going on here - one is the EMF energy collection thing, and the other is the charging of the second battery. There may be something there in pulse charging vs. regular 'brute force' as Tom W called it. There's posts in lots of locations on the board about that subject.

About the frequency of operation - you're right it does bear investigation. The main current consumer is the driving circuit. If a load is attached to the spinning wheel, the current consumption actually goes down substantially. My unit spins at about 2,900 rpm unloaded, and uses about 280 MA off the powering battery. I have tried a 5" diameter x 2" high squirrel cage blower wheel mounted directly to the Bedini rotor. That fan slows the motor down to about 1,000 RPM and the current draw for the driving circuit drops to around 90 MA.

I have the secondary stage of this unit set up with a 555 timer and rheostat pulsing circuit so the cap can be pulsed into the battery at lower voltage and faster pulses, or higher voltage (per pulse) and lower frequencies. There is a sort of sweet spot where you can adjust the pulse frequency and actually watch the voltage measured across the battery under charge rise.

So far I can tell you that the voltage measured across the battery under charge rises to about 15 volts after the motor has been running for 10 minutes or so. It doesn't seem to make much difference whether the fan is attached to the motor or not.

More investigation and trials are needed. I'd really encourage anybody who's the least bit interested to build one of these things and start observing and testing. It only took me about 4 hours to build mine, mostly out of parts in the electronic junk drawer.

Lots of fun in any case...

Ted.

---

BATTERY TEST SEQUENCE:

One lead acid gel-cell (12 volts, 450 milliamps) is being utilized as the primary source fully charged at 12.5 volts

Three (3) lead acid gel-cell batteries (12 volt, 450 milliamps) strapped in parallel are being used as the charge destination. The batteries are discharged to 10 volts for the test purposes.

Test #1 starts at 10:45 AM utilizing primary battery fully charged at 12.5 volts charging three (3) destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of 14 volts at 11:20 AM.

The destination batteries are then discharged to 10 volts under working load to prepare for Test #2.

Test #2 starts at 11:25 AM utilizing primary battery measured at 11.5 volts. Charging three (3) destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of 14 volts at 12:50 PM.

The destination batteries are then discharged to 10 volts under working load to prepare for Test #3.

Test #3 starts at 1:00 PM utilizing primary battery measured at 10.5 volts. Charging three (3) destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of 14 volts at 1:40 PM.

The destination batteries are then discharged to 10 volts under working load to prepare for Test #4.

Test #4 starts at 2:05 PM utilizing primary battery measured at 9.5 volts. Charging three (3) destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of 13 volts at 2:40 PM. The primary battery is now discharged to 9 volts under working load and unable to further run the

12 lead acid gel-cell batteries (12 volts, 450 milliamps each). This ratio is a 12 to 1 charging factor. The motor operation (work) being performed as this was done is not included as an additional factor in this test.

"The School Girl Radiant Energy Circuit and Motor is the most basic rendition of a patented circuit developed by John Bedini and researched by Dr. Peter A. Lindemann, based on the technology of Nikola Tesla, with follow-up work by Edwin Gray, Moray, and others. Bedini has done away with the need for a discharge gap. This "School Girl (Simplified)" design is the most basic presentation of the Bedini system. The circuit is run by an input battery, and charges an ouput battery, while turning a wheel, lined with magnets, that service to create a flux in the coils. There are some unusual characteristics observed in the process.

"Operation ~ The motor has to be started by an external push, after which it turns on its own from the firing of the coil electromagnet. It gradually increases in speeds until it reaches an optimum at around 300 rpm. Applying load to the wheel results in lower amperage going from the input battery because it is dependant on the rate of firing only.

"Features ~ Simple design. Inexpensive. Charger device whose oetput is friedly to batteries. Doesn't heat them, but actually refurbishes them. Charging takes less energy input by far than what is normally required, implicating Radiant (or whatever name is most suitable) energy infusion in the process. "

Assembly Notes ~

The Frame Stand needs to be non-magnetic, and mechanically stable front-to-back and left-to-right. The gap between the coil spool and wheel with magnets affixed (super-glue and tape) should be 1/8 inch. The gap should be variable for experimental purposes.

Determine the "North" end of the magnets with a compass, and label it. The "north" end of a compass needle will be attracted to the "south" pole of the magnet. All the magnets are mounted with the North pole facing out, toward the coil.

Equal-distance spacing of the magnets on the wheel's perimeter is not critical with one coil. There is a limiting minimum distance, but not a maximum. Spacing need not be uniform.  If you plan to add more coils --- with a separate circuit for each coil --- spacing must be symmetrical for proper firing. Do not space the magnets closer apart than 1.5 to 2 widths.

Coils are loosley wound with approximately 450 turns. The two wires on the coil are wound together. The number of turns is not critical, but an accurate count is necessary for proper scientific recording.

Miscellaneous Tips & Precautions

Spacing of the magnets on the wheel's perimeter is not critical with one coil. There is a imiting minimum distance, but not a maximum. Spacing need not be uniform.

Do not draw power from the battery while it is being charged. Charge one bank of batteries, and discharge another bank, switching between them.

This design can shock, though not dangerously.

If the neon bulb is not in place, The transistor will burn out if the neon bulb is not installed, and if the device is run without a receiver-load (battery) for the radiant energy. The neon bulb serves as a "shock absorber" for excess output energy.

Key

1 --- Solder junction (insulated base [same for 2,3,4]) joining (a) wire coming from (+) battery "in" and (b) #20 magnetic wire to coil and then to collector
2 --- Solder junction joining (a) wire coming from (-) battery "in" and (b) emitter and (c) Diode 1N4001 and (e) #23 magnetic wire going to coil then resistor then base.
3 --- Resistor 680 Ohms, between (a) Base/Diode1N4001 and (b) #23 magnet wire going to coil then collector.
4 --- Solder junction joining (a) diode {19} (1N4007) and (b) wire to battery receiving charge.
5 --- Insulated wire coming from (+) battery "in"
6 --- #20 magnetic wire from (+) battery "in" to coil and then to collector
7 --- Insulated wire coming from (-) battery "in"
8 --- #23 magnet wire coming from emitter to coil to resistor.
9 --- Wire connecting 1N4001 diode to junction {2}
10 --- Transistor emitter, connected to junction {2}
12 --- Wire connecting 1N4001 diode to (a) base and (b) resistor {3}.
13 --- Transistor base: connected to resistor and diode 1N4001
14 --- Resistor connected to #23 magnet wire going to coil then to emitter.
15 --- from resistor to #23 magnet wire to coil to emitter
16 --- #20 magnet wire (per Bedini SG specs) from transistor's "collector" lead
17 --- connection of transistor's "collector" lead to wire to Diode 19 and to #20 magnet wire 16 to coil to input battery's positive lead
18 --- wire from transistor's "collector" lead to Diode 19
19 --- 1N4007 Diode 1000V
20 --- Insulated wire to positive terminal of battery receiving charge
21 --- Transistor (Different one in this photo than is called in these plans)
22 --- Aluminum plate heat sink
23 --- Neon bulb, between collector and emitter. (not shown in picture, nor schematic, but that is where it goes, and that is where it is situated on the school girl simplified demonstrated in Bedini's shop).

---

https://www.energyscienceforum.com/forum/alternative-energy/john-bedini
John Bedini

The official John Bedini forum dedicated to his work in multiple areas of energy including the SG Energizers, Crystal Batteries, etc... Make sure to get a copy of Bedini SG - The Complete Beginner's Handbook at http://bedinisg.com

---

https://makingcircuits.com/blog/how-to-recharge-discarded-lead-acid/

Make this Bedini Charger Circuit to Recharge Dead Battery

---

https://everycircuit.com/circuit/6037806463057920/-solid-state-bedini-

Solid State Bedini Charger Circuit

---

https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/entities/publication/3b1aa6c2-571d-4bf4-a118-966ceaeef965

Study and investigating John Bedini energizer for over unity coefficient of performance and free radiant energy
Gay, Zheng Jie
s[ PDF ]

Abstract -- The aim for this project is to study and learn the working principle of John C. Bedini's Simple School Girl (SSG) Energizer. John C. Bedini had released the source of his systems to demonstrate the principle of "radiant" energy for charging of batteries. The most popular design was the Bedini SSG (Simplify School Girl) energizer as it was named before a nine years old girl that build one of Bedini motor and won a nodal science award.

Bedini process main objective is to receive free energy by creating the COP>1 during the charging and discharging of batteries in his systems. In other words, by using one powering battery, the Bedini process are able to charge one more batteries faster than discharging the batteries itself. On the other hand, he also prove that during the charging process. It can also produce rotating mechanism power from the rotating rotor.

This process give rise of new type of technology to achieve clean energy without consuming natural resources (conventional) or used harmful chemical (nuclear cells or etc) that bring harm to the environment

Therefore, the author will build a Bedini SSG for his FYP to test on the COP>1 that claimed by John Bedini and while doing so, the author will also achieved some basic knowledge and skills from this project.

---

https://www.instructables.com/Bedini-Monopole-Mechanical-Oscillator/

Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator
By petercd

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFB0AuXPmfA

Bedini SSG Battery Charger/Desulfator   //  electronicsNmore

This circuit uses a 12v battery to charge other 12v batteries to a higher voltage. According to John Bedini, you are getting more out of the circuit than you put into it(Which I have not proven). The high voltage that is created to charge the 12v battery is created by the back EMF from the coil.

---

https://rpmgt.org/JoinBediniList.htm

The Simplified School Girl (SSG) Project
Schematic | Parts Kit | Introduction | Instructions | Materials | Parts Sources |

---

https://hartito.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20-bedini-bearden-years-free-energy-generation-2007.pdf

Experiments with a Kromrey & a Brandt-Tesla Converter Built by John Bedini with Comments by Tom Bearden

[ PDF ]

---

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6814494

Performance comparison of 4-Pole Neodymium Magnet Bedini SSG free energy generator
Shahrel Fakhrurrazey, et al.

Abstract  -- This paper presents the performance comparison for 2 types of Bedini SSG free energy generator. The Bedini SSG is one types of magnetic motor generators based on zero point technology created and demonstrated by John Bedini. This device acts as a self-battery charger. The study involved the construction and performance of the original Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator SSG Energizer and 4-Pole Neodymium Magnet Bedini SSG. This type of free energy generator can be one of an alternative way to replace the non-renewable energy sources that will run out in future. In this paper, the Battery's Coefficient of Performance (COP) for both designs will be identified. Investigation and analysis were done for both types of Bedini SSG. It was found that the replication design can charge faster, had less power consumption and its COP improved by 8% compared to the original design.

---

---

---